Solid State Based Quantum Information Processing QIP 2006
Transcrição
Solid State Based Quantum Information Processing QIP 2006
International Workshop on Solid State Based Quantum Information Processing QIP 2006 May 24 – 26, 2006 Herrsching, Bavaria . c Walther-Meißner-Institut Impressum Herausgeber, Redaktion, Satz und Druck: Walther-Meißner-Institut Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften Walther-Meißner Straße 8 D-85748 Garching Tel.: Fax: web: +49 – 89 289 14201 +49 – 89 289 14206 http://www.wmi.badw.de International Workshop on Solid State Based Quantum Information Processing QIP 2006 Location Educational Center of the Bavarian Agricultural Association Rieder Straße 70 D-82211 Herrsching, Germany phone: +49 – 8152 938 000 fax: +49 – 8215 938 224 web: www.HdbL-Herrsching.de e-mail: [email protected] Organizing Committee Rudolf Gross, Bavarian Academy of Sciences, Munich, Germany Achim Marx, Bavarian Academy of Sciences, Munich, Germany Matthias Opel, Bavarian Academy of Sciences, Munich, Germany Martin Brandt, Technical University of Munich, Germany Sigmund Kohler, University of Augsburg, Germany Florian Marquardt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany Program Committee The Members of SFB 631 see www.wmi.badw-muenchen.de/SFB631 . This workshop is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through Sonderforschungsbereich 631 and the Bavarian Academy of Sciences. Contents Program 7 Oral Presentations 15 Abstracts: Invited Talks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Abstracts: Contributed Talks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Poster Presentations 47 Abstracts: Poster Presentations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 Notes 71 List of Participants 79 Author Index 89 Room Plans 91 5 Program 7 P ROGRAM QIP 2006 Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:00 – 13:30 Dining Hall Lunch 13:30 – 13:40 Hall 14 Workshop Opening Superconducting Systems I 13:40 – 14:20 Hall 14 14:20 – 15:00 Hall 14 15:00 – 15:20 Hall 14 15:20 – 15:40 Hall 14 15:40 – 16.20 Foyer Kees Harmans Kavli Institute of NanoScience, Delft University of Technology , The Netherlands Fux Qubits and Their Readout Evgeni Il’ichev Institute for Physical High Technology, Jena, Germany Concept of Adiabatic Computation with Superconducting Flux Qubits – First Experimental Results Paul Müller Physikalisches Institut III, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling in Intrinsic Josephson Junctions Frank Deppe Walther-Meißner-Institut, Garching, Germany Flux Qubit Readout via a Capacitive Bias Coffee Break Superconducting Systems II 16:20 – 17:00 Hall 14 17:00 – 17:30 Hall 14 Andreas Wallraff Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland Circuit QED: Superconducting Qubits and Cavities Matteo Mariantoni Walther-Meißner-Institut, Garching, Germany On-Chip Microwave Fock States and Quantum Homodyne Measurements 2006 9 QIP 2006 10 P ROGRAM 17:30 – 18:00 Hall 14 Florian Marquardt CeNS and Arnold-Sommerfeld-Center for Theoretical Physics, LMU Munich, Germany Efficient On-chip Source of Microwave Photon Pairs 18:00 Dining Hall Dinner 19:00 SR1, SR2 Poster Session SFB 631 P ROGRAM QIP 2006 Thursday, May 25, 2006 Theory I 08:30 – 09:10 Hall 14 09:10 – 09:50 Hall 14 09:50 – 10:20 Hall 14 10:20 – 10:50 Foyer Ignacio Cirac Max-Planck Institute for Quantum Optics, Garching,Germany Quantum Simulations with Trapped Ions Jonathan Baugh Institute for Quantum Computing, University of Waterloo, Canada Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance-Based Quantum Information Processing: What Can we Learn? Jens Siewert DMFCI, University of Catania, Italy Entanglement of Mixed States with GHZ and W State Components Coffee Break Quantum Optics meets Solid State I 10:50 – 11:30 Hall 14 11:30 – 12:10 Hall 14 12:10 – 14.00 Dining Hall Gerhard Rempe Max-Planck-Institute for Quantum Optics, Garching, Germany Atoms and Photons for Quantum Information Processing Immanuel Bloch Institut für Physik, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Germany Entangling Neutral Atoms in Optical Lattices Lunch Theory II 2006 11 QIP 2006 12 14:00 – 14:40 Hall 14 14:40 – 15:20 Hall 14 15:20 – 15:40 Hall 14 15:40 – 16:00 Hall 14 16:00 – 16.30 Foyer P ROGRAM Guido Burkard Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Basel, Switzerland Manipulating Electron Spin Qubits with Photons Martijn Wubs Institut für Physik, University of Augsburg, Germany Landau-Zener transitions in circuit QED Andrew D. Greentree Centre for Quantum Computer Technology, School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Australia Adiabatic Transport in Solid-State Qubit Systems Stefan Kehrein Dept. für Physik and CENS, LMU München, Germany Real Time Evolution of Dissipative Quantum Systems Coffee Break Semiconductor Systems I 16:30 – 17:10 Hall 14 Kohei M. Itoh Department of Applied Physics, Keio University and CREST-JST, Yokohama, Japan Recent Progress towards Silicon-Based Quantum Computing Dane R. McCamey Centre for Quantum Computer Technology, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia Spin and Charge Properties of Si:P Probed Using IonImplanted Nanostructures Dominique Bougeard Walter Schottky Institut, TU München, Germany Magnetic and Structural Properties of GeMn: on the Way to a DMS? 17:10 – 17:40 Hall 14 17:40 – 18:00 Hall 14 18:00 Dining Hall Dinner 19:00 SR1, SR2 Poster Session SFB 631 P ROGRAM QIP 2006 Friday, May 26, 2006 Quantum Optics meets Solid State II 08:30 – 09:10 Hall 14 09:10 – 09:50 Hall 14 09:50 – 10:10 Hall 14 10:10 – 10.40 Foyer Ad Lagendijk FOM-Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics (AMOLF), Amsterdam, The Netherlands Quantum Optics and Multiple Light Scattering Jozsef Fortagh Physikalisches Institut, University of Tübingen, Germany Bose-Einstein Chips and Micro Atom Optics Michael Kaniber Walter Schottky Institut, TU München, Germany Control of Single Quantum Dot and Collective Spontaneous Emission in 2D Photonic Crystal Nanostructures Coffee Break Theory III – Optimum Control 10:40 – 11:30 Hall 14 Frank Wilhelm IQC and Physics Department, University of Waterloom, Canada Optimum Control of Superconducting Qubits Thomas Schulte-Herbrueggen Department of Chemistry, TU-München, Germany Quantum Compilation by Optimal Control 11.30 – 12:00 Hall 14 12:00 – 14.00 Dining Hall Lunch Semiconductor Systems II 14:00 – 14:40 Hall 14 Andy S. Sachrajda IMS, NRC, Ottawa, Canada 2006 13 QIP 2006 14 14:40 – 15:10 Hall 14 15:10 – 15:40 Hall 14 15:40 – 16.10 Foyer P ROGRAM Triple Few Electron Quantum Dots - The Stability Diagram and Electron Transport Stefan Ludwig CeNS and Department für Physik, LMU München, Germany A Double Dot Quantum Ratchet Driven by an Independently Biased Quantum Point Contact Alexander Hohlleitner Center for NanoScience, LMU München, Germany Suppression of Spin Relaxation in n-InGaAs-Wires Coffee Break Semiconductor Systems III 16:10 – 16:30 Hall 14 16:30 – 17:00 Hall 14 17:00 – 17:15 Hall 14 Julien Gabelli Laboratoire Pierre Aigrain, E.N.S., Paris, France Relaxation Time of a Coherent RC Circuit Emily C. Clark Walter Schottky Institut, TU München, Germany Optically Probing Spin and Charge Interactions in a Tunable Artificial Molecule Rudolf Gross Workshop Closing SFB 631 Oral Presentations WMI 2µm SC-Qubit 2µm 15 O RAL P RESENTATIONS QIP 2006 Abstracts: Invited Talks Fux qubits and their readout C. Harmans Kavli Institute of NanoScience, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands Small superconducting flux-based circuits may act as interesting quantum mechanical entities. They show strong potential for quantum information processing as quantum bits or qubits, as well as being of fundamental interest to study coherent quantum dynamics in a condensed matter environment with many degrees of freedom. Crucial is the role of the interaction with this environment, in respect to the critical balance between qubit control and readout versus the requirement for an unperturbed dynamical system evolution. In recent experiments it has been shown that flux-based circuits show large dephasing (and relaxation) times with extensive tunability and in situ optimization. In addition qubit state readout has shown considerable improvement. Here we concentrate on single and multiple qubit systems, considering high visibility readout and qubit-qubit coupling. We discus our recently introduced fast, dispersive inductive qubit state readout method, which shows a strongly improved 87% readout visibility. Experimental results of (conditional) spectroscopy of directly coupled qubits will be shown. Earlier results on coupling a qubit to a harmonic oscillator will be discussed. This indicates the viability of dynamic qubit-qubit coupling schemes using (red/blue) sideband excitation. All these ingredients make us believe that a scalable few-fluxqubit system is viable. 2006 17 18 QIP 2006 A BSTRACTS : I NVITED TALKS Concept of adiabatic computation with superconducting flux qubits — first experimental results. E. Il’ichev (1), S.H.W. van der Ploeg(1,2), M. Grajcar(1,3), A. Izmalkov(1), U. Huebner(1), H.-G. Meyer(1). (1)Institute for Physical High Technology, P.O.Box 100239, D-07702 Jena, Germany, (2)MESA+ Research Institute and Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente,P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands, (3)Department of Solid State Physics, Comenius University, SK-84248 Bratislava, Slovakia Controllable adiabatic evolution of a multi-qubit system can be used for adiabatic quantum computation (AQC). This evolution ends at a configuration at which the Hamiltonian of the system encodes the solution of the problem to be solved. As first steps towards a realization of AQC we have investigated two, three and four flux qubit systems. These systems were characterized by making use of a radio-frequency method. We designed two-qubit systems with coupling energy up to several kelvins. For three-flux-qubit systems we determined the complete ground-state flux diagram in the three dimensional flux space around qubits common degeneracy point. For four-qubits samples we experimentally realized ferromagnetic as well as antiferromagnetic coupling. We also showed that the system’s Hamiltonian could be completely reconstructed from our measurements. Problems of implementation of AQC by making use of flux qubits are discussed. SFB 631 O RAL P RESENTATIONS QIP 2006 Circuit QED: Superconducting Qubits and Cavities D. I. Schuster, A. Blais, J. Gambetta, A. Houck, J. Schreier, B. Johnsson, J. Chow, L. Frunzio, J. Majer, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, J. Fink, M. Goeppl, R. Bianchetti Yale University and ETH Zurich In recent experiments we have demonstrated the resonant coherent coupling of individual photons to a single qubit implemented as a Cooper pair box in a high quality superconducting cavity [1]. In the non-resonant case, the dispersive coupling between the qubit and the cavity field is used to perform quantum non-demolition (QND) measurements of the qubit state [2]. Using this read-out technique we have performed high visibility measurements of Rabi oscillations and Ramsey fringes [3]. We analyze the single shot fidelity of the measurement and discuss approaches to realize two-qubit gates in the circuit QED architecture [4] using the cavity as a non-local coupling bus. Realizing photon-qubit coupling strengths in excess of 100 MHz we have recently been able to directly probe coherent and thermal photon distributions in the cavity in the dispersive limit [5]. [1] A. Wallraff et al. Nature (London) 431, 162 (2004) [2] D. I. Schuster et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 123602 (2005) [3] A. Wallraff et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 060501 (2005) [4] A. Blais et al. Phys. Rev. A 69, 062320 (2004) [5] J. Gambetta et al. cond-mat/0602322 (2006) 2006 19 QIP 2006 20 A BSTRACTS : I NVITED TALKS Quantum Simulations with Trapped Ions D. Porras, I. Cirac Max-Planck Institute for Quantum Optics, Garching, Germany Trapped ions at very low temperatures have been recognized as one of the most promising approach to scalable quantum computing. In this talk I will show that with the same system one should be able to perform quantum simulations in a simple and efficient way. In particular, one could implement many-body models for spin systems, or Hubbard models. One of the most important features is the presence of relatively long interactions in those systems, which give rise to new physical phenomena. Apart from that, I will show that one quantum computation is possible with large number of ions trapped in magnetic traps. SFB 631 O RAL P RESENTATIONS QIP 2006 Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance-based quantum information processing: what can we learn? J. Baugh (1), O. Moussa (1), C. A. Ryan (1), R. Laflamme (1), C. Ramanathan (2), D. G. Cory (2) (1) Institute for Quantum Computing, Waterloo, Canada, (2) Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, MIT, USA This talk will focus on motivations for pursuing solid-state NMR qubits, what we can learn from this endeavour, and steps along the way (both recent accomplishments and future goals). In brief, we are motivated by (a) the prospect of long nuclear spin-1/2 coherence times in spindilute solids, limited mainly by control capabilities; and (b) the prospect of reaching nuclear polarizations near unity through dynamic nuclear polarization techniques. Recent experimental results in a three-qubit ensemble system demonstrate high-fidelity, universal control pertinent to the control/coherence problem. Moreover, we show controlled selective qubit interactions with a surrounding spin bath allowing for entropy-reducing operations such as algorithmic cooling [1] and ultimately quantum error correction. These experiments are meant to explore and push the boundaries of experimentally achievable control in the NMR context, with the expectation that similar hurdles will be faced in other solid-state QIP implementations. [1] J. Baugh, O. Moussa, C. A. Ryan, A. Nayak and R. Laflamme. Nature 438, 470-473 (2005). 2006 21 QIP 2006 22 A BSTRACTS : I NVITED TALKS Atoms and Photons for Quantum Information Processing Gerhard Rempe Institut für Quantenoptik, Hans-Kopfermann-Str. 1, Garching bei München, Germany to be submitted SFB 631 O RAL P RESENTATIONS QIP 2006 Entangling Neutral Atoms in Optical Lattices I. Bloch Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz Neutral atoms in optical lattice offer powerful possibilities for the simulation of many-body Hamiltonians, the generation of highly number squeezed states and the production of highly entangled many-particle states for quantum information purposes. In my talk I will review recent efforts to create such highly entangled many particle states with neutral atoms in optical lattices. A novel detection techniques based on Hanbury Brown & Twiss type quantum noise correlations in expanding ultracold atom clouds will be furthermore presented and applications for the read-out of novel quantum many body phases of a neutral atom based quantum simulator will be discussed. 2006 23 QIP 2006 24 A BSTRACTS : I NVITED TALKS Manipulating electron spin qubits with photons Guido Burkard University of Basel, Switzerland Single electron spins in semiconductor quantum dots are being initialized, manipulated, coherently coupled to other spins, and read out, all with on-chip electrical control, and are thus promising candidates for the implementation of solid-state quantum information processing. In this theoretical talk, we argue that further advantages in quantum coherence and control can be gained by coupling the electron spins to photons, either via inter-band transitions in the semiconductor material using optical light or via intra-band transitions in a microwave cavity. In the former case, excitation with a pair of applied laser fields at a two-photon resonance between the two electron spin states and a charged exciton state can act as a weak quantum measurement on the nuclear spin ensemble surrounding the electron. This optical process can be used to bring the nuclear ensemble close to an eigenstate of the nuclear field operator that couples to the electron spin, and thus to prolong the electron spin coherence time which is limited by nuclear-spin induced dephasing. In the second case (intra-band transitions), we show that deterministic quantum gates between two encoded spin qubits separated by up to a centimeter can be implemented by embedding the host quantum dots into a superconducting microstrip cavity. The coherent interaction between the two distant qubits is mediated by virtual photons in the common cavity mode. SFB 631 O RAL P RESENTATIONS QIP 2006 Landau-Zener transitions in circuit QED M. Wubs(1), K. Saito(2), S. Kohler(1), Y. Kayanuma(3), and P. Hänggi(1) (1) Institut für Physik, Universität Augsburg, Universitätsstrasse 1, D-86135 Augsburg, Germany, (2) Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan, (3) Department of Mathematical Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka Prefecture University, Sakai 599-8531, Japan. Recent experiments showed that superconducting circuits can behave as the electronic analogue of cavity quantum electrodynamics: A qubit interacts with a quantum harmonic oscillator. A decisive advantage of circuit QED is that parameters are highly tunable. Topic of this talk is the manipulation of a qubit via Landau-Zener transitions, in particular by transitions that are caused by the coupling to a circuit-QED oscillator. By summing up an infinite-order perturbation series, we determine the exact nonadiabatic transition probability, which turns out to be independent of the oscillator frequency. After the Landau-Zener sweep, qubit and oscillator are entangled in an intriguing manner. Novel single-photon generation emerges in the strong-coupling limit. When generalizing the circuit QED model to the coupling to many oscillators, we find that the transition probability depends on the total coupling strength. This in turn allows a robust measurement of the quantum dissipation strength. 2006 25 QIP 2006 26 A BSTRACTS : I NVITED TALKS Recent progress towards silicon-based quantum computing K. M. Itoh Keio University and CREST-JST Our progress towards realization of the silicon solid-state quantum computer [PRL, 89, 017901 (2002) and modified version of it] is reported. We show first experimental realization of a linear single array of 29 Si stable isotopes which is a basic building block of our quantum computer [PRL, 95, 106101 (2005)]. We also show experimentally that the phase decoherence time T2 of 29 Si nuclear spins in single crystal Si at room temperature can be extended up to 25 sec (and possibly more) using RF decoupling techniques [PRB, 71, 014401 (2005)]. In parallel, electron spins bound 31 P donors are found to have T2 up to msec and can be entangled efficiently to 31 P nuclear spins as well as to nearby 29 Si nuclear spins [PRB, 70, 033204 (2004)]. We show that detection of these electron spins bound to 31 P donors is possible not only with electron spin resonance but also with photoluminescence and photocurrent measurements, through which quantum measurement of 31 P nuclear spins is also possible. Such new techniques will be useful for the initialization and detection of electron and nuclear spin qubits in silicon. SFB 631 O RAL P RESENTATIONS QIP 2006 Spin and charge properties of Si:P probed using ion-implanted nanostructures D.R. McCamey (1,2) , H. Huebl (3), M. S. Brandt (3), V.C. Chan (1,2), T.M. Buehler (1,2∧ ), A.J. Ferguson (1,2), D.J. Reilly (1,2), W. D. Hutchison (1,4), J. C. McCallum (1,5), A. R. Hamilton (2), A.S. Dzurak (1,2), C. Yang (1,5), D.N. Jamieson (1,5) and R. G. Clark (1,2) (1)Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Quantum Computer Technology (2)School of Physics, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia (3)Walter Schottky Institut, Technische Universität München, Am Coulombwall 3, D-85748 Garching, Germany (4)School of Physical, Environmental and Mathematical Sciences, University College, The University of New South Wales ADFA, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia and (5)School of Physics, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia (*) Now at ABB Switzerland, Corporate Research. (∧ ) Now at Dept. Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, 02138, USA. The fabrication of nanoscale devices in silicon via ion-implantation is a useful tool for the study of both charge and spin properties. This talk focuses on two types of devices; an ionimplanted single electron transistor (SET), useful for the study of charge states in silicon, and ion-implanted Si:P electrically detected magnetic resonance (EDMR) devices. For both types of device, fabrication involves selective ion implantation into regions previously defined by EBL of a PMMA mask layer. For the SET, a small (500nm x 70nm) metallic island with two leads is fabricated. A nearby Al-AlOx-Al SET is used to probe the charge state of the Si-SET. We observe single electron charging of the device, as well as the effect of disorder on the tunnel coupling. To probe the spin properties of the Si:P system, we have fabricated nanoscale source-drain contacts via ion-implantation to restrict current through the device to a very small sample region (∼100nm x 100nm x 15nm). Phosphorus is implanted into this region at a dose below the metalinsulator transition. By using electrically-detected magnetic resonance (EDMR), which probes the spin properties of the donors via spin dependent recombination processes in the current, we are able to spectroscopically investigated systems with as few as 100 donors. The ability to study the spin states of few donors in the solid state has numerous applications in areas ranging from classical memory storage to quantum computation. 2006 27 QIP 2006 28 A BSTRACTS : I NVITED TALKS Quantum optics and multiple light scattering Ad Lagendijk FOM-Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics (AMOLF), Amsterdam, The Netherlands Multiple light scattering in random media is often assumed to wipe out many, if not all, quantum correlations. We will show (theory and experiment) however that a number of correlations survive multiple light scattering in linear media. We also explored the effect of multiple scattering in the regime where saturation of the scatterers plays a role. We investigate the lasing threshold of a system consisting of a few scatterers, of which one has gain. SFB 631 O RAL P RESENTATIONS QIP 2006 Bose-Einstein Chips and Micro Atom Optics Jozsef Fortagh Physikalisches Institut, Universität Tübingen, Germany Bose-Einstein condensates can be trapped, moved, and coherently manipulated with the magnetic fields generated by microfabricated current conductors at the surface of a chip. Recently we have observed Bragg diffraction of a condensate from an integrated purely magnetic lattice. Furthermore a matter wave interferometer has been realized by observing the interference pattern of overlapping diffraction orders. The interferometer demonstrates the feasibility of the construction of integrated precision sensors for forces, acceleration and rotation. The BoseEinstein-chip may also serve as the starting point for single atom matter wave physics on a chip. Efficient single atom detection as a crucial prerequisite for such a scenario should be possible by optical ionisation and subsequent ion detection with an suitable channeltron detector. If single atom detection and manipulation will turn out to be successful, the recently discussed schemes for quantum information processing on such chips may be pursued also experimentally. 2006 29 QIP 2006 30 A BSTRACTS : I NVITED TALKS Triple Few Electron Quantum Dots - The Stability Diagram and Electron Transport A.S. Sachrajda, L. Gaudreau, S. Studenikin, J. Lapointe, A. Kam, M. Korkusinski and P. Hawrylak IMS, NRC, Ottawa, Canada Over the last few years the combination of few electron quantum dots and charge detection has led to dramatic developments in the area of single spin and charge qubits. These experiments have involved single and coupled few electron quantum dots. There has recently been growing theoretical interest in the next level of complexity triple few electron dots, the artifical triatom. In this talk I will describe experiments on a triple few electron quantum dot potential. The stability diagram of the triple dot potential is mapped out in the few electron regime, creating a new playground for future quantum information applications. Important regimes are identified e.g. (1,1,1) - the starting configuration for GHz states. Quadruple points are demonstrated where four different configurations become degenerate. In the vicinity of the quadruple points we observe a novel phenomenon as charge transfer lines are duplicated due to charge and spin reconfigurations. These effects are also reminiscent of quantum cellular automata. Preliminary transport experiments have also been performed through the triple dot and will be described. Low magnetic field experiments in the vicinity of quadruple points reveal magnetoconductance fluctuations that have many properties reminiscent of phase rigitiy effects first observed in transport experiments through quantum rings. SFB 631 O RAL P RESENTATIONS QIP 2006 Abstracts: Contributed Talks Macroscopic quantum tunneling in intrinsic Josephson junctions X.Y. Jin, J. Lisenfeld, Y. Koval, A. Lukashenko, A.V. Ustinov, and P. Müller Physikalisches Institut III, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erwin-Rommel-Strasse 1, D91058 Erlangen, Germany We have investigated macroscopic quantum tunneling in Bi2 Sr2 CaCu2 O8+δ intrinsic Josephson junctions at millikelvin temperatures using microwave irradiation. Measurements show that the escape rate for uniformly switching stacks of N junctions is about N 2 times higher than that of a single junction having the same plasma frequency. We argue that this gigantic enhancement of macroscopic quantum tunneling rate in stacks is boosted by current fluctuations which occur in the series array of junctions loaded by the impedance of the environment. 2006 31 32 QIP 2006 A BSTRACTS : C ONTRIBUTED TALKS Flux Qubit Readout via a Capacitive Bias F. Deppe(1,2,3), S. Saito(2,3), K. Kakuyanagi (2,3), T. Meno(4), K. Semba(2,3), H. Takayanagi(2,3), and R. Gross(1) (1)Walther-Meissner-Institut, Garching, Germany, (2)NTT BRL, NTT Corp., Atsugi, Japan, (3)CREST JST, Saitama, Japan, (4)NTT AT, NTT Corp., Atsugi, Japan Measuring a solid state based quantum two level system allows a better understanding of the interaction of these systems with their environment. As a particular example we present the results of measurements on an aluminum based superconducting three Josephson juntion flux qubit. The qubit state, which corresponds to circulating currents of opposite polarity, is read out via the switching signal of a dc superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) mutually coupled to the qubit. In contrast to many other experiments we use a capacitor and not a resistor to create the SQUID bias current, thereby creating a different electromagnetic environment which e.g. allows for faster readout pulses at similar filtering conditions. For one and the same qubit we show microwave spectroscopy results, Rabi oscillations, Ramsey fringes, and spin echo decay for both capacitive and resistive SQUID bias. Careful analysis reveals that the capacitive method improves visibility but shortens T1 and T2 in our experimental configration. Finally we discuss shortcomings of the present experiments and prospects for future experiments. This work was partly supported by the Sonderforschungsbereich 631 of the Deustche Forschungsgemeinschaft. SFB 631 O RAL P RESENTATIONS QIP 2006 On-Chip Microwave Fock States and Quantum Homodyne Measurements M. Mariantoni(1), M.J. Storcz(2), F.K. Wilhelm(2), W.D. Oliver(3), A. Emmert(1), A. Marx(1), R. Gross(1) H. Christ(4), and E. Solano(4,5) (1)Walther-Meissner-Institut, Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Walther-MeissnerStrasse 8, D-85748 Garching, Germany (2)Department Physik, CeNS and ASC, LMU, Theresienstrasse 37, D-80333 Muenchen, Germany (3)MIT Lincoln Laboratory, 244 Wood Street, Lexington, Massachussets 02420, USA (4)Max-Planck Institute for Quantum Optics, Hans-Kopfermann-Strasse 1, D-85748 Garching, Germany (5)Seccion Fýsica, Departamento de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Apartado 1761, Lima, Peru We propose a method to couple metastable flux-based qubits to superconductive resonators based on a quantum-optical Raman excitation scheme that allows for the deterministic generation of stationary and propagating microwave Fock states and other weak quantum fields. Moreover, we introduce a suitable microwave quantum homodyne technique, with no optical counterpart, that enables the measurement of relevant field observables, even in the presence of noisy amplification devices. 2006 33 QIP 2006 34 A BSTRACTS : C ONTRIBUTED TALKS Efficient on-chip source of microwave photon pairs F. Marquardt Sektion Physik der LMU München, Center for NanoScience and Arnold-Sommerfeld-Center for Theoretical Physics, Munich, Germany We describe a scheme for the efficient generation of microwave photon pairs by parametric downconversion in a superconducting transmission line resonator coupled to a Cooper pair box serving as artificial atom. By properly tuning the first three levels with respect to the cavity modes, the downconversion probability may become higher than in the most efficient schemes for optical photons. We show this by numerically simulating the dissipative quantum dynamics of the coupled cavity-box system and discuss the effects of dephasing and relaxation. The setup analyzed here might form the basis for a future on-chip source of entangled microwave photons. SFB 631 O RAL P RESENTATIONS QIP 2006 Entanglement of mixed states with GHZ and W state components Robert Lohmeyer (1), Andreas Osterloh (2), Jens Siewert (1,3), Armin Uhlmann (4) (1) Institut fuer Theoretische Physik, University of Regensburg, 93040 Regensburg, Germany, (2) Institut fuer Theoretische Physik, University of Hannover, 30167 Hannover, Germany, (3) DMFCI, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy, (4) Institut fuer Theoretische Physik, University of Leipzig, 04109 Leipzig, Germany Characterizing entanglement of multipartite mixed states is a fundamental issue in quantum information theory for which there is no general theory. We have investigated the entanglement properties of mixed three-qubit states composed of a GHZ state and a W state orthogonal to the former. In particular we have found the optimal decompositions and the convex roofs for the three-tangle, and we have analyzed the Coffman-Kundu-Wootters inequality for this family of mixed states. The results reveal intriguing differences compared to the properties of two-qubit mixed states. In particular we find that, the well-known monogamy of entanglement can be lifted for mixed states. 2006 35 36 QIP 2006 A BSTRACTS : C ONTRIBUTED TALKS Adiabatic transport in solid-state qubit systems A. D. Greentree(1), L. C. L. Hollenberg(1), C. J. Wellard(1), A. G. Fowler(1,2), and S. J. Devitt(1) (1) Centre for Quantum Computer Technology, School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia (2) Institute for Quantum Computing, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada Solid state quantum computer architectures are often touted as inherently scalable on the basis of the historical scaling of classical architectures – i.e. through sheer ease of component replication. However, this weak scaling argument misses the vast complexity of the implementation of fault-tolerant quantum protocols required to protect quantum information processing against errors. In the design of truly scalable quantum computer architectures, highly nontrivial requirements such as qubit transport, logic gates between physically separated qubits, fast read-out and resources for classical feed-forward processing in error correction must be taken into account. We present a new adiabatic scheme: CTAP, Coherent Tunneling Adiabatic Passage, for physical qubit transport particularly suited to solid-state systems. Several applications immediately follow, including a 2D donor electron spin architecture and a protocol for generating entangled states across non-local qubits. SFB 631 O RAL P RESENTATIONS QIP 2006 Real time evolution of dissipative quantum systems S. Kehrein (1) and A. Hackl (2) (1) Department für Physik and CENS, LMU München, Germany, (2) Theoretische Physik III, Elektronische Korrelationen und Magnetismus, Universität Augsburg, Germany The out-of-equilibrium time evolution of interacting quantum many-body systems is a difficult theoretical problem, which is of key importance for the theoretical modeling of quantum information processing with decohering environments. Recently, dramatic progress has been made with new numerical methods like the time-dependent density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) or numerical renormalization group (NRG). I will show that the flow equation method allows a novel analytical approach to this problem, and permits to study the real time evolution from short to long time scales. As an example I present results for the real time spin evolution of the spin-boson model prepared in some entangled or non-entangled initial state, which is a ubiquitous problem in quantum information processing. 2006 37 38 QIP 2006 A BSTRACTS : C ONTRIBUTED TALKS Magnetic Properties of GeMn: on the way to a group IV DMS? Dominique Bougeard(1), Stefan Ahlers(1), Achim Trampert(2), Narayan Sircar(1), and Gerhard Abstreiter(1) (1) Walter Schottky Institut, TU München, Garching, Germany (2) Paul-Drude-Institut für Festkörperelektronik, Berlin, Germany Diluted magnetic semiconductors (DMS) open new perspectives for the realisation of devices combining band-engineering and magnetic non-volatility. The Si-Ge system has attracted special interest because of its compatibility with the mature and widespread Si technology. A promising publication on GeMn claiming ferromagnetism up to 116 K [1] has recently been questioned by a comprehensive work reporting ferromagnetism only below 12 K [2] for comparable samples. We present the first detailed study of the relationship between nanostructure and magnetic properties of precipitate-free, MBE grown GeMn. The material is DMS-like from the structural point of view but shows no global spontaneous magnetisation. Our study shows hints for carrier induced ferromagnetism within coherent clusters, indicating a way to the realisation of a group IV DMS. [1] Y.D. Park et al., Science, 295, 651 (2002) [2] A.P. Li et al., Phys. Rev. B, 72, 195205 (2005) SFB 631 O RAL P RESENTATIONS QIP 2006 Control of single quantum dot and collective spontaneous emission in 2D photonic crystal nanostructures M. Kaniber(1), F. Hofbauer(1), S. Grimminger(1), M. Bichler(1), G. Abstreiter(1), and J.J. Finley(1) (1)Walter Schottky Institut, Am Coulomball 3, 85748 Garching, Deutschland We present investigations of the coupling of InGaAs quantum dots (QD) to both extended and strongly localised optical modes in 2D photonic crystal nanostructures. By measuring the local QD spontaneous emission rate (Rspon ) we probe the photonic DOS at frequencies throughout the photonic bandgap (PBG) and close to localised modes at single missing hole defects (Q∼10000, Vmode < 0.5(λ /n)3 ). For QD emitting into the PBG but detuned from the cavity mode, we observe a strong suppression of Rspon compared to its value in a homogenous photonic environment (R0 /Rspon =30±6) due to the reduced photon DOS. In contrast, for QD coupled to the cavity modes we measure 1/Rspon ∼50ps, corresponding to a large (Rcavity /R0 =18x) Purcell enhancement of Rspon over the intrinsic value (R0 ). Single dot measurements reveal clear photon anti-bunching for individual QD spectrally detuned from the cavity mode. Most surprisingly, for the same sample anti-bunching is not observed for single QD that are spectrally and spatially coupled to the cavity, which may be a signature for the occurrence of superradiant emission from the few QD coupled to a common cavity mode or a transition to low threshold lasing. 2006 39 40 QIP 2006 A BSTRACTS : C ONTRIBUTED TALKS Optimum control of superconducting qubit systems F.K. Wilhelm (1,2), A. Spoerl (3), T. Schulte-Herbrueggen (3), S.J. Glaser (3), M.J. Storcz (2), J. Ferber (2), and P. Rebentrost (1,2) (1) IQC and Physics Department, University of Waterloom, Canada (2) Physics Department, CeNS, and ASC, University of Munich, Germany (3) Chemistry department, Technical University of Munich, Germany We apply the optimum control theory invented for NMR to superconducting qubit systems. i) For coupled Cooper-pair boxes, we show how to implement a high-fidelity CNOT in short time using shaped pulses. We discuss techniques to shape these pulses in purely dissipative networks. ii) For phase qubits, there is a crucial trade-off between speed and loss of fidelity due to leakage to higher states. We wil discuss how to improve the fidelity of single-qubit rotations in this system using shaped pulses. SFB 631 O RAL P RESENTATIONS QIP 2006 Quantum Compilation by Optimal Control T. Schulte-Herbrueggen (1), A.K. Spoerl (1), N. Khaneja (2), and S.J. Glaser (1), (1) TU-Munich (2) Harvard University Decomposing a quantum gate or module into a sequence of universal gates often looses the race against decoherence. Optimal-control-based direct compilation is far more advantageous as exemplified in spin [1] and pseudo-spin systems. In Josephson charge qubits, for example, timeoptimal control gains two orders of magnitude [2] towards the error-correction threshold as compared to pioneereing controls. Here we extend our optimal control toolbox [3] by a quantum compiler under explicit relaxation. The new approach proves to be the method of choice in the generic case, whenever the drift Hamiltonian would take the system outside decoherence-poor subspaces. Otherwise timeoptimal controls already give highest fidelities. Finally, we show how algorithmic modules (like the Quantum Fourier Transform, the indirect SWAP etc) optimised for medium-sized quantum systems can be recursively used in larger quantum systems thus giving significantly higher fidelities than standard decompositions into universal one- and two-qubit modules. References: [1] Phys. Rev. A 72 (2005), 042331; and ”The Quantum Gate Design Metric”, submitted [2] ”Optimal Control of Josephson Qubits”, quant-ph/0504202 [3] J. Magn. Reson. 172 (2005), 296; and NATO Proceedings, Crete 2005, in press 2006 41 42 QIP 2006 A BSTRACTS : C ONTRIBUTED TALKS A double dot quantum ratchet driven by an independently biased quantum point contact V. Khrapay (1), S. Ludwig (1), J.P. Kotthaus (1), W. Wegscheider (2) (1) Center for NanoScience and Department für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 München, Germany (2) Institut für Experimentelle und Angewandte Physik, Universität Regensburg, D-93040 Regensburg, Germany In this experiment we investigate the dynamic interaction between a double quantum dot (DQD) and a nearby quantum point contact (QPC). An unbiased DQD acts as a current source, if electrons are excited resonantly between the last filled state of one of the dots and the first empty state of the other dot. The energy difference between these two states, called the asymmetry energy of the DQD, defines the resonance condition, while the sign of the asymmetry energy specifies the direction of current. In this sense the DQD represents a special case of a non-adiabatic energy selective tunable ratchet. In our experiment a biased QPC impeding an electrically separate current circuit acts as the energy source driving the ratchet. We measure current through the DQD in dependence of the DQD asymmetry and the QPC bias voltage. As expected, the current direction through the DQD is only determined by the sign of the DQD asymmetry and independent of the current direction through the QPC. We observe a strong dependence of the amplitude of the current through the DQD on the QPC bias voltage. By tuning the asymmetry energy of the DQD the spectrum of the energy source defined by the QPC can be probed. We find a wide band energy spectrum. Stricingly, our observations are inconsistent with a standard model of voltage fluctuations related to shot noise in a QPC. Possible ratchet mechanisms will be discussed. SFB 631 O RAL P RESENTATIONS QIP 2006 Suppression of Spin Relaxation in n-InGaAs-Wires A.W. Holleitner Center for NanoScience (CeNS), Munich For an efficient information processing scheme based upon the electron spin, it is important to explore carrier spin relaxation mechanisms in nanostructures as a function of dimensionality. In two and three dimensions, elementary rotations do not commute, with significant impact on the spin dynamics if the spin precession is induced by spin-orbit coupling. Spin-orbit coupling creates a randomizing momentum-dependent effective magnetic field; the corresponding relaxation process is known as the D’yakonov-Perel’ mechanism. In an ideal one-dimensional system, however, all spin rotations are limited to a single axis, and the spin rotation operators commute. In the regime approaching the one-dimensional limit, a progressive slowing and finally a suppression of the D’yakonov-Perel’ spin relaxation have been predicted. We report on spin dynamics of electrons in narrow two-dimensional n-InGaAs channels as a function of the wire width [1]. We find that electron-spin relaxation times increase with decreasing channel width, in accordance with recent theoretical predictions. Surprisingly, the suppression of the spin relaxation rate can be detected for widths that are an order of magnitude larger than the electron mean free path. We find the spin diffusion length and the wire width to be the relevant length scales for explaining these effects. We acknowledge financial support by AFOSR and ONR. [1] A.W. Holleitner, V. Sih, R.C. Myers, A.C. Gossard, and D.D. Awschalom, cond-mat/0602155. 2006 43 QIP 2006 44 A BSTRACTS : C ONTRIBUTED TALKS Relaxation time of a coherent RC circuit J. Gabelli(1)(4), G. Fève(1), J.-M. Berroir(1), B. Plaçais(1), Y. Jin(2), U. Gennser(2), B. Etienne(2), D.C. Glattli(1)(3) (1)Laboratoire Pierre Aigrain, E.N.S., 24 rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France, (2)Laboratoire de Photonique et Nanostructure, CNRS , route de Nozay, 91 Marcoussis, France, (3)Service de Physique de l’Etat Condensé, C.E.A. Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France, (4)Department für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Geschwister-SchollPlatz 1, 80539 Müunchen, Germany Solid-state based nanoscale systems open up the perspective of fabricating large integrated networks that would be required for realistic applications of quantum information processing. Examples involving a two dimensional electron system (2DES) are flying qubits on quantum edge states [1] or spin qubits in double quantum dots [2,3]. However, coherent manipulation of such a qubit requires detailed knowledge of its high frequency dynamics. We have performed radio frequency transport measurements through a microscale RC-circuit at temperatures in the range of T 100 mK. The RC-circuit is defined by a large electron droplet coupled capacitively to a top gate and via a quantum point contact (QPC) to the 2DES. In the quantum hall regime with filling factor ν = 2, we observe strong oscillations of the imaginary part of the circuit impedance in dependence of a gate voltage, which are related to Coulomb oscillations of the electron droplet. In contrast, the real part of the impedance stays constant at the value of Re( Z ) = h/2e2 , which is half of the value expected for an isolated QPC. This signature is only possible for a fully coherent quantum circuit. Our results are in accordance with a fully coherent scattering theory developed by A. Prêtre, H. Thomas and M. Büttiker [4]. [1] PRA 63,050101(R)(2001) [2] PRA 57,120-126 (1998) [3] PRL 91,226804(2003), Science 309,2180(2005),Science 309,1346-1350(2005) [4] PRA 180,364(1993),PRL 70,4114 (1993) SFB 631 O RAL P RESENTATIONS QIP 2006 Controlled Hybridization of Neutral and Charged Excitons in Self-Assembled Quantum Dot Molecules E. C. Clark(1), H. J. Krenner(1), C. Scheurer(2), T. Nakaoka(1), M. Sabathil(1), M. Bichler(1), Y. Arakawa(2), G. Abstreiter(1) and J. J. Finley(1) (1)Walter Schottky Institut and Physik Department, Technische Universität München, Am Coulombwall 3, D-85748 Garching, Germany, email:[email protected] (2)Lehrstuhl für Theoretische Chemie, Technische Universität München Lichtenbergstraße 4, D-85748 Garching, Germany Qubits formed from interband charge excitations (excitons) in semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) represent a particularly attractive system since they can be coherently manipulated using picosecond laser pulses. An important step is to achieve coherent coupling of quantum states in spatially sepa-rated QDs to realize a system with conditional coherent dynamics that can be electrically and opti-cally manipulated.[1] We report recent experiments in which we electrically manipulate coupled excitonic states (neutral and negatively charged single excitons) in individual QD-molecules using static electric fields. The samples investigated consist of a single pair of vertically stacked, self assembled InGaAs QD-molecules embedded in an n-type GaAs Schottky photodiode. This device geometry enables us to control the coherent coupling between excitonic states in the upper and lower dots by tuning the electric field oriented along the axis of the QD-molecule. At low excitation power densities, field dependent luminescence reveals a clear anticrossing of spatially direct (e,h in the same dot) and indirect (e,h in different dots) neutral excitons. The spectrum and controlled hybridization of nega-tively charged excitons is shown to be much richer due to the complex spectrum of three particle states (X-=2e+1h) that can exist in a QD-molecule. Supported by the DFG via SFB631, Projects B1 and B5. [1] H. J. Krenner et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 057402 (2005) 2006 45 Poster Presentation CeNS 47 P OSTER P RESENTATION QIP 2006 Abstracts: Poster Presentations How fat is Schroedinger’s cat? B. Abel(1,2,3), Florian Marquardt(1,2,3), Jan von Delft(1,2,3) (1)Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Department for Physics, (2)Arnold Sommerfeld Center for Theoretical Physics, (3)Center for Nanoscience Recent experiments have tried to produce superpositions of ”macroscopically distinct” quantum states, e.g. in small superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) or in microwave cavities. These superpositions are commonly referred to as ”Schrödinger cat states” (1). In this work, we provide an answer to the following important question: ”How ’macroscopic’ is such a superposition?”. We present a general measure of the distance between two arbitrary many-body states forming such a superposition, going beyond previous works that only considered a special class of possible states (2). After illustrating its general features, we apply our measure to experiments employing three-junction SQUIDs (Mooij), where the ground state at half a flux quantum is a superposition of clockwise and counterclockwise flow√ ing supercurrents: |Ψi = (|lefti + |righti)/ 2. [1] E. Schrödinger, ”Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik”, Naturwissenschaften, 48, 807, 49, 823, 50,844 (1935). [2] W. Dürr, C. Simon, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 210402 (2002). [3] xs J. E. Mooij, et al., Science 285, 1036 (1999). 2006 49 QIP 2006 50 A BSTRACTS : P OSTER P RESENTATIONS Magnetic Ge(Mn) nanostructures Stefan Ahlers(1), Dominique Bougeard(1), Achim Trampert(2), Narayan Sircar(1), and Gerhard Abstreiter(1) (1) Walter Schottky Institut, TU München, Garching, Germany (2) Paul-Drude-Institut für Festkörperelektronik, Berlin, Germany We report on the first comprehensive study relating the nanostructure of MBE-grown GeMn alloys to their magnetic properties. The formation of ferromagnetic intermetallic Mn5Ge3 precipitates in a Ge matrix is observed down to substrate temperatures TS of 70◦ C. The size and quantity of the precipitates can be tuned by the variation of the substrate temperature. Although the thermomagnetic behaviour is very similar to reported GeMn diluted magnetic semiconductors, the magnetic properties of our material are clearly dominated by the influence of the precipitates below the ferromagnetic ordering temperature of Mn5Ge3. We have investigated the nanostructure of nominal Ge0.95Mn0.05 alloys grown in low temperature MBE at TS ranging from 120◦ C to 70◦ C. The epitaxy on (001)Ge is defect-free, but transmission electron microscopy (TEM) shows the formation of precipitates which are incoherent with the surrounding matrix and have a hexagonal crystal structure. The precipitates can be identified as Mn5Ge3. The precipitates are round and exhibit a preferred orientation. Their size and quantity decreases with decreasing substrate temperature. Zero field cooled, field cooled, time-dependent as well as magnetisation versus field measurements converge in a picture where the magnetic properties of the alloy between the ferromagnetic ordering temperature of Mn5Ge3 and a lower characteristic blocking temperature TB are dominated by superparamagnetism of Mn5Ge3 precipitates. Below TB the magnetic signature of ferromagnetic precipitates with a preferred orientation in a non-ferromagnetic matrix is observed. The volume of the precipitates, and thus also the magnetic moment and TB are decreased by decreasing the substrate temperature in MBE. SFB 631 P OSTER P RESENTATION QIP 2006 Manipulation of Nuclear Spins with Electrons Spins (and vice versa) in Quantum Dots H. Christ, G. Giedke, and J.I. Cirac Max Planck Institut fuer Quantenoptik, Garching, Germany The spin of an excess electron in a quantum dot is a promising candiate for a qubit. We study the hyperfine interaction with the lattice of nuclei, which is in many situations of interest the strongest coupling to the environment. It is shown how the nuclear spin system can be prepared efficiently via this interaction. The resulting polarized states will in turn leave pronounced effects on the electron spin evolution. For highly polarized states a systematic expansion of the nuclear spin operators in terms of bosonic mode operators is derived. The resulting Jaynes-Cummings-like dynamics of the electron-nuclear system provides a versatile tool for quantum information processing tasks. 2006 51 52 QIP 2006 A BSTRACTS : P OSTER P RESENTATIONS Circuit Modeling of Nanosystems Interacting with Superconducting Resonators G. Csaba, Z. Fahem, F. Peretti, P. Lugli Institute for Nanoelectronics, Technical University of Munich On-chip microwave spectroscopy is emerging as a powerful method to probe dynamic properties of quantum systems in the GHz frequency range. The design of such experimental setup requires different levels of modeling: quantum-mechanical simulations, classical and quantum electrodynamics and extensive microwave simulations of the read-out apparatus. Equivalent circuit construction is a promising approach to simulate these different physical phenomena in a unified environment. Our work will present circuit simulation of flux qubits and nanoscale magnets, which are interacting with a superconducting coplanar resonator. The resonator is modeled by a three-port equivalent circuit, extracted from three-dimensional finite-element simulations. This three-port is connected to the equivalent circuit of the qubit, which - in the simplest case - is based on the Bloch equations. As an example, we will simulate dispersive readout of various quantum systems with our circuit models. SFB 631 P OSTER P RESENTATION QIP 2006 Charge carrier confinement in quantum dots and wires fabricated by cleaved edge overgrowth J. Ehehalt(1), R. Schuster(1), C. Gerl(1), M. Reinwald(1), D. Schuh(1), W. Wegscheider(1), M. Bichler(2), G. Abstreiter(2) (1)Universität Regensburg, Germany, (2)Walter-Schottky-Institut, TU München, Germany The Cleaved Edge Overgrowth technique has been used to fabricate single and coupled quantum dots with precisely controlled sizes and positions. Conventionally three intersecting GaAs quantum wells lead to the formation of a quantum dot at the junction due to quantum mechanical bound states with confinement energies of up to 10 meV. In this work we focus on enhancing the charge carrier confinement in these QD structures by introducing tensile strain between materials with different lattice constants. In order to optimize the growth parameters we studied the effects of strain in quantum wires. Microphotoluminescence spectroscopy of purely strain-induced quantum wires shows confinement energies of up to 52 meV. By combining conventional T-shaped wires with strain-induced confinement, much larger confinement energies are possible. Simulations predict confinement energies of up to 108 meV. These results are now to be applied to fabricate improved quantum dot stuctures. We also present a technique to improve the interface smoothness of the overgrown layers, which leads to sharper PL spectrum lines and better quantum dot conformity. 2006 53 54 QIP 2006 A BSTRACTS : P OSTER P RESENTATIONS Implementation of two-cell flux qubits A.K. Feofanov, A.A. Abdumalikov, A.V. Ustinov Physikalisches Institut III, Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg, Erlangen, Germany The standard flux qubit implemented at Delft [1] consists of a superconducting loop with three Josephson junctions and features a double well potential at half frustration. Its limitation is that the barrier height cannot be changed without breaking the symmetry of the potential. An alternative device proposed by Yukon [2] is a two-cell flux qubit containing four junctions. One of the useful properties of Yukon’s qubit is that the barrier height can be controlled without violating the potential symmetry, which in turn permits implementation of geometric quantum computation using a Cirac-Zoller [3] type of bus. We have established a technological process for fabricating two-cell qubits based on sub-micron Al-AlOx-Al Josephson tunnel junctions with a critical current density around 500 A/cm2. We have also developed read out circuits for such qubits using inductive coupling. Results reflecting actual progress in this experiment will be presented. [1] I. Chiorescu et al., Science 299, 1869 (2003) [2] S.P. Yukon, Physica C 368, 320 (2002) [3] J.I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995) SFB 631 P OSTER P RESENTATION QIP 2006 Transmission through a two-level quantum dot T. Hecht(1), C. Karrasch(2), V. Meden(2), Y. Oreg(3), J.v. Delft(1) (1)Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, ASC and CeNS, Germany, (2)Universität Göttingen, Germany, (3)Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel The recent measurements of Schuster et al. [1] of the transmission phase through a quantum dot embedded in one arm of an Aharonov Bohm interferometer contradict the simple models that were used to describe the phase evolution so far, see e.g. [2]. Inspired by this experiment, we study the transmission phase of a quantum dot embedded in one arm of a two path electron interferometer by solving a two-level Anderson model by means of Wilson’s numerical renormalization group method and the functional renormalization group method. Relating the scattering phase and the occupation of the levels at T = 0 using the Friedel sum rule, we show that for a level spacing ∆ much bigger than the coupling to the leads Γ , the transmission always experiences a phase lapse of π as a function of gate voltage. This behaviour is independent of the exact parameters of the quantum dot or the parity of the successive levels. [1] R. Schuster, E. Buks, M. Heiblum, D. Mahalu, V. Umansky, H. Shtrikman, Nature 385, 417 (1997). [2] U. Gerland et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3710 (2000). 2006 55 56 QIP 2006 A BSTRACTS : P OSTER P RESENTATIONS Fabrication and characterisation of Al/AlOx based superconducting T. Heimbeck, K. Madek, M. Göppl, S. Dandl, A. Marx, R. Gross Walther-Meissner-Institut, Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, D-85748 Garching Superconducting quantum bits (qubits) based on superconducting loops containing an odd number of Josephson junctions with a coupling energy larger than the charging energy are called flux qubits. The qubit states are given by a symmetric superposition of currents flowing clockwise and counter-clockwise when being frustrated by applying a magnetic field corresponding to half a flux quantum in the loop. The system can be read out by a dc SQUID comprising the qubit. We are fabricating flux qubits based on Al/AlOx /Al tunnel junctions, using electron beam lithography and shadow evaporation technique. A crucial point was to establish and optimise the oxidation process for the lower electrode in order to fabricate Josephson junctions with well defined critical currents. Furthermore, the design of the electromagnetic environment is an important issue, which is required to isolate the qubit from environmental sources of decoherence. Measurements on various test structures (Josephson junctions, SQUIDs, qubits) were used to analyse and further optimise the fabrication parameters. This work was supported by the Sonderforschungsbereich 631 of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 631 P OSTER P RESENTATION QIP 2006 Hole Spin Relaxation in Self-Assembled InGaAs Quantum Dots D. Heiss, S. Schaeck, M. Kroutvar, M. Bichler, G. Abstreiter, and J.J. Finley Walter Schottky Institut, Garching, Germany We present investigations of the spin dynamics of optically stimulated holes in self-assembled quantum dots (QD). In the context of quantum information processing, fully localised holes may be advantageous due to the p-like character of their Bloch wavefunction that strongly suppresses coupling to the nuclear spin system. For these experiments we use spin memory devices based on n-type Schottky diodes that enable selective optical generation, storage and readout of single hole spins in InGaAs-GaAs self assembled quantum dots. Our measurements show a significant polarization memory effect for holes with up to 12% degree of polarization. Furthermore, investigations of the time dynamics of the hole spin relaxation reveal surprisingly long lifetimes T1 in the microsecond range, with a lower limit of ∼100µs (B=3T, T=8K). For increasing magnetic field or temperature a reduction of the hole spin lifetimes is observed. 2006 57 58 QIP 2006 A BSTRACTS : P OSTER P RESENTATIONS On-chip single microwave photon detector in superconducting circuit QED F. Helmer (1), M. Mariantoni (2), E. Solano (3), and F. Marquardt (1) (1) Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet (Sektion Physik), CeNS and ASC, Munich, Germany, (2) Walther-Meissner Institut, Garching, Germany, (3) Max-Planck Institute for Quantum Optics, Garching, Germany Superconducting circuit QED combines concepts from quantum and atom optics with those from solid state physics. Microwave photons guided along superconducting transmission lines on a chip interact with superconducting qubits. So far, a crucial element is missing in the circuit QED toolbox: a single photon detector. Here, we propose and analyze a scheme that implements single-photon detection on a chip. Using both numerical and analytical results, we point out how the quantum Zeno effect may impose fundamental limits on the detection probability. We discuss possible experimental schemes to realize our proposal. SFB 631 P OSTER P RESENTATION QIP 2006 Towards Electrical Driven Single Photon Sources Based on Quantum Dots in Photonic Crystal Nanostructures F. Hofbauer(1), M. Kaniber(1), S. Grimminger(1), G. Böhm(1), S. Dachs(1), M. Bichler(1), G. Abstreiter(1) and J. J. Finley(1) (1)Walter Schottky Institut, Am Coulombwall 3, 85748 Garching, Germany We present investigations of electrically tunable InGaAs quantum dots (QDs) coupled to localised optical modes in 2D photonic crystal (PC) nanostructures. The samples consist of a 180 nm thick GaAs p-i-n membrane waveguide into which PCs are formed by etching a triangular lattice of air holes. Ultra low mode volume nanocavities are formed by introducing reduced symmetry missing hole defects into the photonic crystal. The active PC nanocavities were studied using spatially resolved luminescence and photocurrent absorption spectroscopy. Quenching of the PL is observed for fields ¿50 kV/cm due to carrier tunneling escape from the dots that occurs over timescales faster than the radiative lifetime. By measuring the PL quenching as a function of position on the PC and nanocavity we electrically probe the local density of photonic states via a shift of the threshold voltage. These devices have the potential to study cavity-single QD coupling in an electrically tunable system. 2006 59 60 QIP 2006 A BSTRACTS : P OSTER P RESENTATIONS ESR studies of low energy ion implanted P donors in Silicon W.D. Hutchison(1), N. Suwuntanasarn(1), P.G. Spizzirri(2), N. Stavrias(2), S. Prawer(2), J.C. McCallum(2) and E. Gauja(3). (1) Centre for Quantum Computer Technology, School of PEMS, University of New South Wales @ ADFA, ACT, 2600 Australia. (2) Centre for Quantum Computer Technology, School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010 Australia. (3) Centre for Quantum Computer Technology, School of Physics, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052 Australia One method for fabricating silicon based quantum devices (QD) employs low energy ion implantation techniques along with electron beam lithography to accurately position dopant atoms which, following activation, become the QD qubits. It is common practice to perform implantation into silicon wafers with a controlled oxide grown on their surface. High quality oxides exhibit low trap densities in contrast to their native oxide counterparts making them more suitable for electronic devices. Unfortunately, surface oxides can also be incompatible with very low energy implantation processes (¡ 10 keV) since they result in reduced dopant activation due to losses in the surface oxide layer. In this work, we have studied low energy single and molecular ion implantation, (the latter as a means of locating donor pairs in close proximity to obtain greater donor wavefunction overlap). Using the electron spin resonance (ESR) technique, we have monitored the activation of donors implanted through high quality, thermally grown (5 nm) and native oxides. In addition to donor signals, ESR is also sensitive to the creation of electronic trap states including Pb centres which arise from silicon dangling bonds at the silicon / silicon oxide interface. The observation of low dopant activation and large Pb signals for this fabrication strategy suggested that an alternative surface termination may be needed. SFB 631 P OSTER P RESENTATION QIP 2006 Quantum Phase Transitions in the Bosonic Single-Impurity Anderson Model H.-J. Lee and R. Bulla Theoretische Physik III, Elektronische Korrelationen und Magnetismus, Institut fuer Physik, Universitaet Augsburg Recently, we generalized the numerical renormalization group method for quantum impurities coupled to a bosonic bath (1). This method has been shown to give very accurate results for the spin-boson model. As another application of the bosonic numerical renormalization group, we investigate the bosonic single-impurity Anderson model, which is obtained from the standard (fermionic) single-impurity Anderson model by substituting all fermionic operators with bosonic ones. Experimentally, one can realize such type of model with an atomic quantum dot in a tight optical trap which is coupled to a superfluid reservoir via laser transitions (2). Furthermore, comprehensive knowledge on the impurity model can be extended to the corresponding lattice system (Bose-Hubbard model) via dynamical mean-field theory. We found clear evidence of zero-temperature phase transitions for the bosonic single-impurity Anderson model with sweeping the chemical potential (µ) and the coupling between the dot and the reservoir (α). For a finite Coulomb interaction U, the two dimensional phase space (µα-plane) is divided into the Bose-Einstein condensate phase and the Mott phases with nimp = 0, 1, 2, ... and each phase boundary shows quantum critical behavior. [1] R. Bulla, H. J. Lee, N.-H. Tong, M. Vojta, PRB 71, 045122 (2005) [2] A. Recati, P. O. Fedichev, W. Zwerger, J. von Delft and P. Zoller, PRL 94, 040404 (2005) 2006 61 62 QIP 2006 A BSTRACTS : P OSTER P RESENTATIONS Decoherence and single electron charging in electronic Mach-Zehnder interferometer L.V. Litvin, P. Tranitz, W. Wegscheider, and C. Strunk Institute for experimental and applied physics, University of Regensburg, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany We study the temperature and voltage dependence of the quantum interference of single edge channels in the QHE-regime in an electronic Mach-Zehnder interferometer. The amplitude of the interference fringes is about 50 times smaller than expected from theory; nevertheless the decay of the visibility with temperature and applied voltage agrees very well with theoretical prediction. Superimposed on the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) oscillations, a conductance oscillation with six times smaller period is observed. The latter depends only on gate voltage and not on the AB-phase, and can be consistently interpreted as single electron charging of the edge channels. SFB 631 P OSTER P RESENTATION QIP 2006 Microwave spectroscopy on Josephson junctions with ferromagnetic barriers K. Madek(1), M. Weides(2), S. Beutner(1), C. Probst(1), A. Marx(1), and R. Gross(1) (1)Walther-Meißner-Institut für Tieftemperaturforschung, D-85748 Garching (2)Institut für Festkörperforschung, Forschungszentrum Jülich Superconducting qubits are very promising candidates for quantum information processing, since they are highly decoupled from quasiparticle excitations (superconducting energy gap) thus allowing for long enough decoherence times. Phase qubits containing a Josephson πjunction have the additional advantage of an intrinsic π-phase shift which leads to a degeneracy point of the qubit at zero applied magnetic flux. Moreover, Josephson π-junctions are of special interest because until now it is unclear whether they exhibit macroscopic quantum behavior. We have performed continuous wave spectroscopy on single Josephson junctions with ferromagnetic barriers of various thickness which hence are either ”0” or ”π”-coupled. Microwave induced transitions of the phase particle from the ground state to the first excited state by either one or more microwave photons have been observed proving the existence of quantized energy levels in the potential wells of the junction’s tilted washboard potential and hence the macroscopic quantum properties of Josephson π-junctions. 2006 63 64 QIP 2006 A BSTRACTS : P OSTER P RESENTATIONS NRG Matrix Product States and Quantum Information Processing H. Saberi(1), A. Weichselbaum(1), J. von Delft(1), F. Verstraete(2), and I. Cirac(3) (1)Arnold Sommerfeld Center for Theoretical Physics and Center for NanoScience, LudwigMaximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany, (2)Institute for Quantum Information, Caltech, Pasadena, US (3)Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik, Garching, Germany We use newly developed ”Matrix Product” techniques to compare the Numerical Renormalization Group approach for the Single Impurity Anderson model to the Density Matrix Renormalization Group approach. We would also discuss the prespectives for applying Matrix Product techniques to time-dependent models relevant for the field of quantum information theory, such as a qubit coupled to a bath of decohering excitations. SFB 631 P OSTER P RESENTATION QIP 2006 Kondo conductance in a one electron double quantum dot D. Schröer(1), A.K. Hüttel(1), K. Eberl(2), S. Ludwig(1), M. Kiselev(3), and B. Altshuler(4) (1)Center for NanoScience and Sektion Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 München, Germany. (2)Max-Planck-Institut für Festkörperforschung, Heisenbergstraße 1, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany. (3)Institut für Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany. (4)Physics Department, Columbia University, 538 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027. We have investigated the Kondo effect in a double quantum dot (DQD) in the few electron limit. For a charge of just one electron in the DQD, we observe a surprising non-monotonic dependence of the Kondo current on a perpendicular magnetic field below 50mT. We assign this behaviour to a magnetic field dependence of the single dot eigen-energies. The alignment of these states determines the interdot tunnel coupling and, as a consequence, the Kondo current through the serial DQD. Contrariwise, in the two-electron case, transport is determined by symmetric and anti-symmetric combinations of the wave functions (i.e. singlet and triplet). Therefore, the two-electron Kondo conductance has little to do with the interdot tunnel coupling and a monotonic magnetic field dependence is oberserved. The described magnetic field dependent coupling provides an extremely sensitive tool to detect and control the level alignment in a single electron DQD. We consider this an important step towards the controllable engineering of semiconductor DQD devices, which are promising candidates for qubits in quantum information processing. 2006 65 QIP 2006 66 A BSTRACTS : P OSTER P RESENTATIONS Phase-space theory for dispersive detectors of superconducting qubits I. Serban(1), F.K. Wilhelm(1,2) (1)Ludwig Maximilians Universitaet, Munich, Germany, (2)University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada Superconducting circuits are envisioned as quantum bits and demonstrate quantum-coherent features i.e. Rabi oscillations and Ramsey fringes. The detector (e.g. a superconducting quantum interference device, SQUID) can itself be described by a Hamiltonian and treated quantum-mechanically.This allows more insights into the measurement process. Several experimental groups have recently realized good detectors with strong coupling to the measured system, where nonlinear dynamics plays a significant role. Motivated by the recent experiment [1], we study a nonlinear detector where the qubit couples to the square amplitude of a driven oscillator, which can be used for dispersive detection. We use a complex-environment approach treating the qubit and the oscillator exactly, expressing their full Floquet-state master equations in phase space. We investigate the backaction of the environment on the measured qubit and explore the resolution of measurement. [1] A. Lupaşcu et al. PRL 93 177006 (2004) SFB 631 P OSTER P RESENTATION QIP 2006 Self-consistent calculation of the electron distribution near a QPC in the presence of a strong perpendicular magnetic field. A. Siddiki(1), F. Marquardt(1) (1) Physics Department, Arnold Sommerfeld center for Theoretical Physics, and CeNS, LudwigMaximillians-Universitaet Muenchen, Germany The experimental success of developing a ”Quantum Hall” based interferometer, like an optical Mach-Zender interfrometer, has revealed a novel technique to exploit the properties of the so called ’edge states’ (ES) in the extreme quantum limit [1]. A key element of these experiments are the quantum point contacts (QPCs) and the electrostatic potential (ESP) profile near these QPCs, that plays an important role in the rearrangement of the ES. The interaction of the electrons was proposed [1] to be a possible origin of the dephasing and a better understanding requires a self-consistent (SC) calculation of the ESP. Here we present an implementation of the SC-Thomas-Fermi-Poisson approach [2] to an homogeneous two dimensional electron system in order to obtain the ESP and electron distribution near the QPC. First the ESP produced inside the semiconductor structure by a QPC placed at the surface is calculated based on a semi-analytical solution of the Laplace equation [3]. Second, we represent the calculated ESP distribution by a relatively simple model and calculate the SC (screened) potential together with the electron densities for finite temperature, magnetic field and gate voltages. We see that there are three characteristic rearrangement of the incompressible [4] ES, which influences the current distribution [5]. [1] Nature, 422, 2003, 415 [2] Phys. Rev. B, 50, 1994, 7757 [3] J. Appl. Phys., 77, 1995, 4505 [4] Phys. Rev. B, 46, 1992, 4026 [5] Phys. Rev. B, 70, 2004, 195335 2006 67 QIP 2006 68 A BSTRACTS : P OSTER P RESENTATIONS Indistinguishable Single Photons of Alternating Polarization H. Specht, T. Wilk, S. Webster, A. Kuhn, G. Rempe Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik, Garching, Deutschland We realized a new scheme to generate single photons from an atom-cavity system. A Raman transition is driven between two Zeeman sublevels of a hyperfine ground state of a single 87 Rb atom. A magnetic field is applied to lift the degeneracy of those levels. A pump laser drives one branch of the Raman transition while the cavity stimulates the emission of a photon along the other branch. With every transition a single photon with well defined polarization is emitted into the cavity. Due to the magnetic splitting Raman resonance for the two possible directions of the transition is fulfilled for different pump laser frequencies. By alternating the laser frequency we can drive the process in both directions leading to orthogonal polarizations of subsequent photons. Their mutual coherence is characterized in a two photon interference experiment [2], where their suitability for applications in quantum information processing such as linear optical quantum computing [3] is verified. [1] Kuhn et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 67901 (2002) [2] Legero et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 070503 (2004) [3] Knill et al. Nature409, 46 (2001) SFB 631 P OSTER P RESENTATION QIP 2006 Coupled Josephson Phase Qubits T. Wirth(1), J. Lisenfeld(1), A. Lukashenko(1), S. Shitov(2), and A.V. Ustinov(1) (1)Physikalisches Institut III, Universität Erlangen, Germany, (2)Institute of Radio Engineering and Electronics, Moscow, Russia. Solid-state quantum bits based on current-biased Josephson junctions have recently been shown as very promising. They require appropriate isolation from the bias leads which can be achieved by the use of superconducting transformers. A junction enclosed into a superconducting loop has a double-well potential, where the discrete quantum levels in one well can be used as qubit states. State-dependent tunneling to the other well changes the magnetic flux in the qubit, which is measured by a SQUID (Superconducting QUantum Interference Device). We experimentally demonstrate the preparation of an arbitrary quantum state using nanosecond long microwave pulses and observe Rabi oscillations using samples fabricated by a standard foundry. Another crucial point is the coupling of qubits, which we currently study in a system of two capacitively coupled flux-biased phase qubits. Our ongoing experiments are focused on spectroscopic measurements of the coupling strength and the demonstration of coherent interaction in the time domain by observing antiphase oscillation of the two-qubit states at the degeneracy point. 2006 69 Notes 71 N OTES QIP 2006 2006 73 74 QIP 2006 SFB 631 N OTES N OTES QIP 2006 2006 75 76 QIP 2006 SFB 631 N OTES N OTES QIP 2006 2006 77 78 QIP 2006 SFB 631 N OTES List of Participants 79 L IST OF PARTICIPANTS QIP 2006 Mr. Benjamin Abel LMU München, ASC and CeNS Theresienstr. 37 80333 München, Germany Phone: +49 (0)174 1764218 [email protected] Prof. Gerhard Abstreiter Walter Schottky Institut Technische Universität München Am Coulombwall 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 2891 2770 [email protected] Mr. Stefan Ahlers Walter Schottky Institut Am Coulombwall 3 85748 Garching, Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12736 [email protected] Dr. Jonathan Baugh Institute for Quantum Computing University of Waterloo 200 University Ave W N2L 6P2 Waterloo, Canada Phone: +1 519 888 4567 x7491 [email protected] Mr. Christoph Bihler Walter Schottky Institut Technische Universität München Am Coulombwall 3 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12755 [email protected] Prof. Immanuel Bloch Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz Institut für Physik Staudingerweg 7 55128 Mainz, Germany Phone: +49 (0)6131 39 26234 [email protected] Dr. Dominique Bougeard Walter Schottky Institut Technische Universität München Am Coulombwall 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 89 289 12 777 [email protected] Dr. Brandt Martin Walter Schottky Institut Technische Universität München Am Coulombwall 3 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12758 [email protected] Prof. Guido Burkard Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Basel Klingerlbergstrasse 82 CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland Phone: +41 61 267 3694 [email protected] Mr. Henning Christ Max-Planck Institut für Quantenoptik Hans-Kopfermann-Str. 1 85748 Garching b. Muenchen, Germany Phone: 089-32905336 [email protected] Prof. Ignacio Cirac Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik Hans-Kopfermann-Str. 1 D-85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 32905 736 [email protected] Ms. Emily Clark Walter Schottky Institut Technische Universitaet Muenchen Am Coulombwall 3 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12784 [email protected] 2006 81 QIP 2006 82 L IST OF PARTICIPANTS Dr. Gyorgy Csaba Technical University of Munich Institute for Nanoelectronics Arcisstrasse 21 D-80333 München, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 25339 [email protected] Ms. Susanne Dachs Walter Schottky Institute Technical University of Munich Am Coulombwall 3 D-85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12759 [email protected] Ms. Sonia Dandl Walther Meissner Institut Walther-Meissner-Str. 8 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 3569939 [email protected] Mr. Frank Deppe Walther Meissner Institut Walther-Meissner-Str. 8 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 14230 [email protected] Mr. Roland Doll Institut für Physik Universität Augsburg Universitätsstr. 1 86135 Augsburg, Germany Phone: +49 (0)821 5983221 [email protected] Mr. Joerg Ehehalt Universität Regensburg Institut für Exp. und Angew. Physik Lst. Prof. Dr. W. Wegscheider Universitätsstraße 31 93053 Regensburg, Germany Phone: +49 (0)941 943 2067 [email protected] Mr. Olexiy Feofanov Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg Physikalisches Institut III Erwin-Rommel-Str. 1 91058 Erlangen, Germany Phone: +49 (0)9131 8527120 [email protected] Prof. Jonathan James Finley Walter Schottky Institut Technische Universität München Am Coulombwall 3 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12782 [email protected] Dr. Anna Fontcuberta i Morral Walter Schottky Institut Technische Universitaet Muenchen Am coulombwall 3 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +40 (0)89 289 12779 [email protected] Dr. Jozsef Fortagh Physikalisches Institut Universität Tübingen Auf der Morgenstelle 14 72076 Tübingen, Germany Phone: +49 (0)7071 29 73033 [email protected] Dr. Julien Gabelli Lehrstuhl Prof. Kotthaus Department für Physik der LMU München Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1 80539 München, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 2180 1457 [email protected] Mr. Thomas Geiger Physik Lst. Weiss AG Strunk Universität Regensburg Universitätsstr. 31 93040 Regensburg, Germany Phone: 0941 943 1617 [email protected] SFB 631 L IST OF PARTICIPANTS QIP 2006 Prof. Steffen Glaser TU Muenchen Chemistry Department Lichtenbergstrasse 4 85747 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 13759 [email protected] Dr. Sebastian T.B. Goennenwein Walther-Meissner-Institut Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften Walther-Meissner-Str. 8 D-85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 14226 [email protected] Mr. Benno Grolik Walter Schottky Institut Am Coulombwall 3 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12730 [email protected] Prof. Rudolf Gross Walther-Meissner-Institut Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften Walther-Meissner Str. 8 D-85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 14201 [email protected] Prof. Dirk Grundler Physik-Department E10 TU München James-Franck-Str. 1 85747 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12401 [email protected] Mr. Daniel Harbusch LMU München LS Kotthaus Phone: +49 (0)89 2180 5301 [email protected] Prof. Kees (C.) Harmans Kavli Institute of NanoScience Dept. Appl. Physics Delft Univ. of Technology POB 5046 2600AG Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31 (0)15 2785195 [email protected] Ms. Theresa Hecht LMU München Arnold Sommerfeld Center and CeNS Theresienstrasse 37 80333 München, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 2180 4526 [email protected] Mr. Tobias Heimbeck Walther Meissner Institut Walther Meissner Strasse 8 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 14224 [email protected] Mr. Dominik Heiss Walter Schottky Institut Am Coulombwall 3 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12784 [email protected] Mr. Ferdinand Helmer Arnold Sommerfeld Centre for Theoretical Physics and CENS LMU München Theresienstr. 37, 80333 Munich, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 2180 4113 [email protected] Mr. Felix Hofbauer Walter Schottky Institut Am Coulombwall 3 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12784 [email protected] 2006 83 QIP 2006 84 L IST OF PARTICIPANTS Ms. Susanne Hofmann Walther-Meissner-Institut Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften Walther-Meissner Str. 8 D-85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)8441 784630 [email protected] Mr. Hans Huebl Walter Schottky Institut Am Coulombwall 3 857488 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12768 [email protected] Dr. Wayne Hutchison UNSW@ADFA School of PEMS 2600 Canberra, Australia Phone: +61 2 6268 8804 [email protected] Dr. Evgeni Il’ichev Institute for Physical High Technology A. Einstein str. 9 07745 Jena, Germany Phone: +49 (0)3641 206121 [email protected] Prof. Kohei Itoh Dept. Applied Physics Keio University 3-14-1, Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku 223-8522 Yokohama, Japn Phone: +81 45 566 1594 [email protected] Mr. Xiaoyue Jin Physikalisches Institut III Uni Erlangen Erwin-Rommel-Str. 1 91058 Erlangen, Deutschland Phone: +49 (0)9131 8527082 [email protected] Mr. Michael Kaniber Walter Schottky Institut Technische Universität München Am Coulombwall 3 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12784 [email protected] Prof. Stefan Kehrein Department für Physik LMU München Theresienstr. 37 80333 München, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 2180 4539 [email protected] Dr. Sigmund Kohler Universität Augsburg Universitätsstr. 1 86135 Augsburg, Germany Phone: +49 821 598 3316 [email protected] Prof. Jörg P. Kotthaus Center for Nano Science and Department für Physik LMU München Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 München, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 2180 3737 [email protected] Mr. Dawid Kupidura LMU München Sektion Physik LS Kotthaus Geschwister - Scholl - Platz 1 80539 München, Deutschland Phone: +49 (0)89 2180 3586 [email protected] Prof. Dr. Ad Lagendijk FOM-Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics (AMOLF) Kruislaan 407 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands Phone: +31 (0)20 6081 302 [email protected] SFB 631 L IST OF PARTICIPANTS QIP 2006 Prof. Alfred Laubereau Fakultät für Physik James-Franck-Straße 85748 Garching bei München, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12841 [email protected] Ms. Hyun-Jung Lee Theoretische Physik III, EKM Institut für Physik Universität Augsburg 86135 Augsburg, Germany Phone: +49 (0)821 598 3711 [email protected] Dr. Leonid Litvin Institute for Experimental and Applied Physics Universitaetstrasse 31 D-93053 Regensburg, Germany Phone: +49 (0)941 943 1620 [email protected] Dr. Stefan Ludwig LMU München Center for Nano Science and Department für Physik Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1 80539 München, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 2180 3733 [email protected] Mr. Stefan Ludwig Walter Schottky Institut TU München Am Coulombwall 3 85748 Garching, Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12784 [email protected] Mr. Karl Madek Walther-Meissner-Institut Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften Walther-Meissner-Str. 8 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 14402 [email protected] Mr. Matteo Mariantoni Walther-Meissner-Institut (WMI) Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften Walther-Meissner-Strasse 8 D-85748 Garching b. München, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89-289-14224 [email protected] Dr. Florian Marquardt Sektion Physik LMU München (CeNS, ASC) Theresienstr. 37 80333 München, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 21804591 [email protected] Dr. Achim Marx Walther-Meissner-Institut Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften Walther-Meissner Str. 8 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 14211 [email protected] Mr. Dane Robert McCamey CQCT, School of Physics The University of New South Wales 2052 Kensington, Australia Phone: +61 2 9385 6566 [email protected] Mr. Edwin Menzel Walther-Meissner-Institut Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften Walther-Meissner-Str. 8 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 14519 [email protected] Mr. Joel Moser Ludwig Maximilians Universität Department für Physik der LMU München Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1 80539 Munich, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 2180 3349 [email protected] 2006 85 QIP 2006 86 L IST OF PARTICIPANTS Prof. Müller Paul Physikalisches Institut III Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Erwin-Rommel-Str. 1 91058 Erlangen, Deutschland Phone: +49 (0)9131 8527272 [email protected] Mr. Thomas Niemczyk Walther-Meissner-Institut Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften Walther-Meissner-Str. 8 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 14247 [email protected] Dr. Matthias Opel Walther-Meissner-Institut Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften Walther-Meissner-Str. 8 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 14237 [email protected] Mr. Federico Peretti TU München Arcistrasse 21 80333 München, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 25341 [email protected] Prof. Gerhard Rempe Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik Hans-Kopfermann-Str. 1 85741 Garching bei München, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 32905 701 [email protected] Dr. Stefan Rinner Lehrstuhl Prof. Dr. K. Richter Institut fuer Theoretische Physik Universität Regensburg 93040 Regensburg, Germany Phone: +49 (0)941 943 2020 [email protected] Mr. Hamed Saberi Arnold Sommerfeld Center for Theoretical Physics , LMU München Theresienstr. 37 80333 München, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 2180 4525 [email protected] Dr. Andrew Sachrajda Institute For Microstructural Sciences National Research Council M-23a, 1200 Montreal Road K1K 0H7 Ottawa, Canada Phone: +1 613-949-0545 [email protected] Mr. Jürgen Sailer TP C4 Walter Schottky Institute TU München Am Coulombwall 3, 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12736 [email protected] Mr. Dieter Michael Schlosser Walter Schottky Institut Am Coulombwall 3, 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12730 [email protected] Mr. Daniel Schröer Department für Physik LMU München Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1 80539 München, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 2180 3738 [email protected] Dr. Thomas Schulte-Herbrüggen TU-München Dept. Chemistry (Prof. Glaser’s group) Lichtenbergstr. 4 85747 Garching, D Phone: +49 (0)89 289 13312 [email protected] SFB 631 L IST OF PARTICIPANTS QIP 2006 Ms. Ioana Serban LMU München Arnold Sommerfeld Center Theresienstrasse 37 80333 Munich, Germany Phone: +1-519-888-4567-2825 [email protected] Dr. Afif Siddiki Physics Deparment LMU München Theresienstr. 37 D-80833 München, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 2180 4533 [email protected] Dr. Jens Siewert Dipartimento di Metodologie Fisiche e Chimiche per l’Ingegneria, Universita di Catania viale Andrea Doria, 6 95125 Catania, Italy Phone: +39 095 738 2803 [email protected] Ms. Johanna Simon Walter Schottky Institut, E24 TU München Am Coulombwall 3, 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12756 [email protected] Mr. Narayan Sircar Walter Schottky Institut, E24 TU München Am Coulombwall 3, 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12717 [email protected] Mr. Holger Specht Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik Hans Kopfermann Str. 1 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 32905333 [email protected] Prof. Christoph Strunk Institut für Experimentelle und Angewandte Physik Universität Regensburg Universitätsstr. 31, 93040 Regensburg, Germany Phone: +49 (0)941 943 3199 [email protected] Mr. Stephan Trumm Technische Universität München Physik-Department, E11 James-Franck-Str. 1 85748 Garching b. München, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12861 [email protected] Mr. Xaver Voegele LMU München LS Kotthaus Geschwister Scholl Platz 1, München, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 2180 5301 [email protected] Prof. Andreas Wallraff ETH Zurich Department of Physics HPF D 14, Schafmattstr. 16 CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland Phone: +41 44 633 7563 [email protected] Mr. Chunlang Wang Department für Physik, LMU München Schellingstr.4 / III 80799 München, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 2180 5804 [email protected] Mr. Bernhard Weber Max-Planck Institut für Quantenoptik Hans Kopfermann Str. 1 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 32905398 [email protected] 2006 87 QIP 2006 88 L IST OF PARTICIPANTS Prof. Werner Wegscheider Universität Regensburg Universitätsstr. 31 93040 Regensburg, Germany Phone: +49 (0)941 943 2081 [email protected] Mr. Markus Wesseli TU München Physik Department, Lehrstuhl E11 James-Franck-Straße 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12861 [email protected] Mr. Georg Wild Walther-Meißner-Institut Bayrische Akademie der Wissenschaften Walther-Meissner-Str. 8 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 14230 [email protected] Dr. Marc A. Wilde TU München Physik-Department E10 James-Franck-Straße 1 85747 Garching , Germany Phone: +49 (0)40 42838 2932 [email protected] Prof. Wilhelm Frank IQC and Physics Department University of Waterloo 200 University Avenue West N2L 3G1 Waterloo, ON, Canada Phone: +1 519 888 4567 X7305 [email protected] Mr. Tobias Wirth Physikalisches Institut III Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Erwin-Rommel-Str. 1 91058 Erlangen, Germany Phone: +49 (0)9131 8527208 [email protected] Dr. Martijn Wubs Institut für Physik Universität Augsburg Universitätsstraße 1 D-86135 Augsburg, Germany Phone: +49 (0)821 598 3316 [email protected] Mr. Tobias Zibold Walter-Schottky-Institut, T33 Technische Universität München Am Coulombwall 3 85748 Garching, Germany Phone: +49 (0)89 289 12740 [email protected] Prof. Claus Zimmermann Physikalisches Institut Universität Tübingen Auf der Morgenstelle 14 72076 Tübingen, Germany Phone: +49 (0)7071 29 76075 [email protected] SFB 631 Author Index 89 Index Abdumalikov, A. A., 54 Abel, B., 49 Abstreiter, G., 38, 39, 45, 50, 53, 57, 59 Ahlers, S., 38, 50 Altshuler, B., 65 Arakawa, Y., 45 Böhm, G., 59 Baugh, J., 21 Berroir, J.-M., 44 Beutner, S., 63 Bianchetti, R., 19 Bichler, M., 39, 45, 53, 57, 59 Blais, A., 19 Bloch, I., 23 Bougeard, D., 38, 50 Brandt, M. S., 27 Buehler, T. M., 27 Bulla, R., 61 Burkard, G., 24 Chan, V. C., 27 Chow, J., 19 Christ, H., 33, 51 Cirac, I., 20, 64 Cirac, J. I., 51 Clark, E. C., 45 Clark, R. G., 27 Cory, D. G., 21 Csaba, G., 52 Dachs, S., 59 Dandl, S., 56 Deppe, F., 32 Devitt, S. J., 36 Devoret, M. H., 19 Dzurak, A. S., 27 Eberl, K., 65 Ehehalt, J., 53 Emmert, A., 33 Etienne, B., 44 Fève, G., 44 Fahem, Z., 52 Feofanov, A. K., 54 Ferber, J., 40 Ferguson, A. J., 27 Fink, J., 19 Finley, J. J., 39, 45, 57, 59 Fortagh, J., 29 Fowler, A. G., 36 Frunzio, L., 19 Göppl, M., 56 Gabelli, J., 44 Gambetta, J., 19 Gaudreau, L., 30 Gauja, E., 60 Gennser, U., 44 Gerl, C., 53 Giedke, G., 51 Girvin, S. M., 19 Glaser, S. J., 40, 41 Glattli, D. C., 44 Goeppl, M., 19 Grajcar, M., 18 Greentree, A. D., 36 Grimminger, S., 39, 59 Gross, R., 32, 33, 56, 63 Hänggi, P., 25 Hüttel, A. K., 65 Hackl, A., 37 Hamilton, A. R., 27 Harmans, C., 17 Hawrylak, P., 30 Hecht, T., 55 Heimbeck, T., 56 Heiss, D., 57 Helmer, F., 58 Hofbauer, F., 39, 59 Holleitner, A. W., 43 Hollenberg, L. C. L., 36 Houck, A., 19 91 QIP 2004 92 Huebl, H., 27 Huebner, U., 18 Hutchison, W. D., 27, 60 Meno, T., 32 Meyer, H.-G., 18 Moussa, O., 21 Il’ichev, E., 18 Itoh, K. M., 26 Izmalkov, A., 18 Nakaoka, T., 45 Oliver, W.D., 33 Oreg, Y., 55 Osterloh, A., 35 Jamieson, D. N., 27 Jin, X. Y., 31 Jin, Y., 44 Johnsson, B., 19 Peretti, F., 52 Plaçais, B., 44 Porras, D., 20 Prawer, S., 60 Probst, C., 63 Kakuyanagi, K., 32 Kam, A., 30 Kaniber, M., 39, 59 Karrasch, C., 55 Kayanuma, Y., 25 Kehrein, S., 37 Khaneja, N., 41 Khrapay, V., 42 Kiselev, M., 65 Kohler, S., 25 Korkusinski, M., 30 Kotthaus, J. P., 42 Koval, Y., 31 Krenner, H. J., 45 Kroutvar, M., 57 Kuhn, A., 68 Ramanathan, C., 21 Rebentrost, P., 40 Reilly, D. J., 27 Reinwald, M., 53 Rempe, G., 22, 68 Ryan, C. A., 21 Sabathil, M., 45 Saberi, H., 64 Sachrajda, A. S., 30 Saito, K., 25 Saito, S., 32 Schaeck, S., 57 Scheurer, C., 45 Schoelkopf, R. J., 19 Schröer, D., 65 Schreier, J., 19 Schuh, D., 53 Schulte-Herbrueggen, T., 40, 41 Schuster, D. I., 19 Schuster, R., 53 Semba, K., 32 Serban, I., 66 Shitov, S., 69 Siddiki, A., 67 Siewert, J., 35 Sircar, N., 38, 50 Solano, E., 33, 58 Specht, H., 68 Spizzirri, P. G., 60 Spoerl, A., 40 Spoerl, A. K., 41 Stavrias, N., 60 Storcz, M. J., 40 Laflamme, R., 21 Lagendijk, A., 28 Lapointe, J., 30 Lee, H.-J., 61 Lisenfeld, J., 31, 69 Litvin, L.V., 62 Lohmeyer, R., 35 Ludwig, S., 42, 65 Lugli, P., 52 Lukashenko, A., 31, 69 Müller, P., 31 Madek, K., 56, 63 Majer, J., 19 Mariantoni, M., 33, 58 Marquardt, F., 34, 49, 58, 67 Marx, A., 33, 56, 63 McCallum, J. C., 27, 60 McCamey, D. R., 27 Meden, V., 55 SFB 631 INDEX INDEX QIP 2004 Storcz, M.J., 33 Strunk, C., 62 Studenikin, S., 30 Suwuntanasarn, N., 60 Takayanagi, H., 32 Trampert, A., 38, 50 Tranitz, P., 62 Uhlmann, A., 35 Ustinov, A. V., 31, 54, 69 van der Ploeg, S. H. W., 18 Verstraete, F., 64 von Delft, J., 49, 55, 64 Webster, S., 68 Wegscheider, W., 42, 53, 62 Weichselbaum, A., 64 Weides, M., 63 Wellard, C. J., 36 Wilhelm, F. K., 40, 66 Wilhelm, F.K., 33 Wilk, T., 68 Wirth, T., 69 Wubs, M., 25 Yang, C., 27 2006 93 Room Plans 95 2. Floor: guest rooms 233 – 253 1. Floor: south wing: guest rooms 130 – 152 north wing: guest rooms 101 – 123 staircase to 2. floor south wing SR3: SR4: SR5: Bibliothek: seminar room 3 seminar room 4 seminar room 5 library guest rooms 101 - 123 north wing SFB 631 R OOM P LANS QIP 2004 96 10: large dining room (Garden Hall) 11: small dining room (Garden Room) 12: kitchen 13: Forest Hall 1-2: reception 3-8: offices north wing: guest rooms 1 – 23 Ground Floor: 2006 south wing entrance inner courtyard terrace 14 lecture hall terrace lecture hall seminar room 1 seminar room 2 conference office meeting room north wing guest rooms 1 – 23 14: SR1: SR2: TB: KR: R OOM P LANS QIP 2004 97 Bierstüberl bar TV room club room skittle alley leisure room swimming pool changing room sauna fitness room table tennis Basement: 5: 6: 7: 8: 9: 10: 11: 12: 13: 14: 15: south wing SR7: SR6: 2: EDV-SR: seminar room 7 seminar room 6 WEB room EDV teaching room north wing SFB 631 R OOM P LANS QIP 2004 98