Tax Round Up - PinnacleHPC Pty Ltd, Accountants, Griffith, NSW
Transcrição
Tax Round Up - PinnacleHPC Pty Ltd, Accountants, Griffith, NSW
TAXROUNDUP KNOWLEDGE SHOP – MAY 2011 INSIDE MAY 2011 Knowledge Shop PD starts this month! ......................................... 1 FROM GOVERNMENT .............................. 2 Taxation of trust income - draft law released ....................................... 2 Professional privilege for tax advice – discussion paper ....................... 2 Simplification of the GST rules in relation to taxes, fees and charges2 FROM THE ATO ........................................ 3 Changes to the ATO Receivables Policy guidelines format .............. 3 RULINGS, DETERMINATIONS & INTERPRETATIVE DECISIONS .................... 3 Fringe benefits and cars destroyed in a natural disaster ..................... 3 Termination payments – unused long service leave payments and overseas employment ................. 3 CASES ....................................................... 4 Excess contributions tax levied on a future member of an SMSF.......... 4 Notice served by Commissioner ambiguous and not enforceable .. 4 LEGISLATION ............................................ 5 Hello, The Government has decided to defer the proposed re-write of the trust income definitions as a result of industry concern over the complexity of the changes and the relatively short time available for taxpayers to adjust to the new rules. Instead, the Government has opted to include some specific provisions aimed at clarifying the rules around streaming of franking credits and capital losses as well as addressing concerns around the operation of primary production businesses through trust structures following the Bamford decision. Another interesting development is the release of a discussion paper which considers the potential application of professional privilege for accountants and tax advisors who are not legal advisors. Professional privilege is currently only allowed to legal advisors and the paper considers its application to other advisors providing tax advice. If you have any questions about any of the information contained in the Tax Round Up, please contact the help desk online (you will need to log in first) or call us on 1800 800 232. Adnan Sibai Tax Adviser Knowledge Shop PD starts this month! 04/05/2011 Brisbane SMSF Training 2011 Online | Brochure 04/05/2011 Melbourne Cross border essentials Online | Brochure 19/05/2011 Newcastle Knowledge Shop PD Online 23/05/2011 Sydney Knowledge Shop PD Online 24/05/2011 Brisbane Knowledge Shop PD Online 25/05/2011 Brisbane Cross border essentials Online | Brochure 26/05/2011 Parramatta Knowledge Shop PD Online 30/05/2011 Melbourne Knowledge Shop PD Online 01/06/2011 Adelaide Knowledge Shop PD Online 08/06/2011 Perth Knowledge Shop PD Online 09/06/2011 Perth Cross border essentials Online | Brochure 17/06/2011 Brisbane Management shocks Online | Brochure 20/06/2011 Melbourne Future Proof Online | Brochure 22/06/2011 Brisbane Future proof Online | Brochure 24/06/2011 Sydney Future Proof Online | Brochure 30/06/2011 Melbourne Management Shocks Online 26/07/2011 Melbourne Advanced Tax & Business Services Online | Brochure TAXROUNDUP KNOWLEDGE SHOP – MAY 2011 FROM GOVERNMENT Taxation of trust income - draft law released Following on from last month’s discussion paper and subsequent submissions from interested stakeholders, the Government has deferred the re-write of the legislation relating to the taxation of trust income until a broader update of Division 6 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 can be undertaken. The proposed changes were aimed at aligning the concept of ‘income from the trust estate’ (i.e., distributable income) with ‘net income of the trust estate’ (i.e., taxable income) under the current rules. The changes were proposed in order to deal with the uncertainty that surrounds the taxation of trust income in light of the High Court decision in the Bamford case. The proposed changes have been deferred primarily due to concerns raised in relation to the costs associated with dealing with such a substantial change to the tax law in such a short period of time (the rules were intended to be effective for the 2011 income year). In the meantime, the Government has issued draft legislation to clarify the rules relating to the streaming of franking credits and capital gains to specific beneficiaries. The draft rules also deal with concerns that were raised in relation to primary production businesses that operate through trust structures. The aim of these changes is to ensure that beneficiaries of a primary production trust can still access the averaging rules and farm management deposit rules in a loss year. More information Press release No. 52 – Improving the taxation of trust income advice documents from the information gathering powers of the ATO. The paper considers the implications of providing accountants and tax advisors with the same type of privilege that is given to legal advisors for documents they prepare for the sole purpose of providing legal advice or in preparation for litigation. The Government is seeking submissions in relation to the discussion paper by 15 July 2011. More information Press release – Discussion paper released on privilege for tax advice Simplification of the GST rules in relation to taxes, fees and charges The Government has proposed simplified ‘principlesbased’ legislation in relation to the GST treatment of taxes, fees and charges. The proposed legislation aims to replace the prescriptive rules contained in a number of Rulings and Determinations that list the GST treatment of such amounts. In broad terms, regulatory charges that do not relate to particular goods and services are exempt from GST. However, supplies of goods and services by government related entities are generally intended to be subject to GST. The new regulations are intended to apply from 1 July 2011. More information Press release – Making it easier to exempt taxes, fees and charges from the GST – Exposure draft regulations Professional privilege for tax advice – discussion paper The Government is once again exploring the potential benefits and implications of applying a limited form of professional privilege to tax advice provided by tax practitioners and accountants to shield certain tax © Knowledge Shop Pty Ltd 2011 2 TAXROUNDUP KNOWLEDGE SHOP – MAY 2011 FROM THE ATO Changes to the ATO Receivables Policy guidelines format The ATO has transferred most of the “ATO Receivables Policy” document to a suite of Law Administration Practice Statements. There has been no change to the content of the policy or the intent of the policy statement. The key aim was to streamline the delivery and documentation of this policy going forward in line with other administrative position taken by the ATO whereby the administrative position of the ATO is detailed in Practice Statements. More information Changes to the ATO Receivables Policy RULINGS, DETERMINATIONS & INTERPRETATIVE DECISIONS Fringe benefits and cars destroyed in a natural disaster ATO ID 2011/28: Fringe benefits tax: Car fringe benefits: car destroyed in natural disaster Facts A car is provided by an employer to an employee for their exclusive use as a private vehicle During the year, the car is burnt out in a bushfire when it was parked at the employee’s residence Due to the natural disaster, the insurance assessors cannot determine any claims for a considerable time after the bushfire and hence the car remains parked at the employee’s premises for some time A car fringe benefit only arises where the car is available for private use by the employee. Given the car no longer satisfies the definition of a road vehicle, the destroyed car is no longer capable of satisfying the car fringe benefit condition. Hence, the holding period of the car for the purposes of determining the taxable value of the fringe benefit ends at the time the car is destroyed. More information ATO ID 2011/28: Fringe benefits tax: Car fringe benefits: car destroyed in natural disaster Termination payments – unused long service leave payments and overseas employment ATO ID 2011/29: Income tax: Termination of employment: unused long service leave payments and periods of overseas employment Facts The taxpayer is an individual who worked overseas for a continuous period of at least 91 days The taxpayer remained a tax resident during this time The taxpayer’s employment was terminated after the taxpayer returned to Australia Upon termination, the taxpayer received a lump sum payment for unused long service leave which related to the total period of employment Issue Is any part of a termination payment which is attributable to unused long service leave exempt from income tax where a part of the payment is attributable to a period of overseas employment? Issue Where a car is destroyed in a natural disaster, is it still considered a car which is available for private use to the employee? Decision Yes, the portion of the lump sum amount attributable to overseas service is exempt under the foreign employment earning rules in s23AG(1) of ITAA 1936. Decision No, due to the destruction of the car, it cannot be available for private use because it is no longer a car capable of operating as a road vehicle. Provided the general conditions in s23AG(1) are satisfied, the amount in respect of the long service leave is also exempt foreign earnings. This is because the long service leave accrues daily and the portion accrued for the foreign service tenure would also be exempt along with foreign earnings. Hence, the © Knowledge Shop Pty Ltd 2011 3 TAXROUNDUP KNOWLEDGE SHOP – MAY 2011 taxpayer would only be assessed on the payment attributable to the Australian service. This is irrespective of whether the taxpayer’s employment is terminated during the period of foreign service or Australian service. Notice served by Commissioner ambiguous and not enforceable Commissioner of Taxation v De Martin and Gasparini Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 286 More information ATO ID 2011/29: Income tax: Termination of employment: unused long service leave payments and periods of overseas employment CASES Excess contributions tax levied on a future member of an SMSF The Federal Court dismissed the Commissioner’s application to the court to enforce a notice served on the taxpayer on the grounds that it was deemed ambiguous. By way of background, the respondent (DMG) owed money to a third party (Arndell). Arndell owed money to the ATO. The Commissioner served a notice on DMG under section 260-5 of Schedule 1 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 requiring DMG to pay money it owed to Arndell directly to the ATO. The Taxpayer v Commissioner of Taxation [2011] AATA 168 The Commissioner applied excess non-contributions tax to a $1 million payment made to a SMSF in 2007. The taxpayer argued that this payment was actually paid in part towards the $450,000 personal contributions cap. The balance was paid in respect of other members of the fund which had not joined at the time the contribution was received. The taxpayer contended that the instructions provided to their former accountant to have those members join the fund had not been carried out by the accountant. The Court found that the notice issued by the Commissioner left DMG in doubt as to its obligations with respect to the specified time for payment. The key issue was that page 1 of the notice specified that payments were to be made every 4 weeks while page 2 of the notice specified that payments were due every 2 weeks. The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner’s decision that despite the evidence provided that the member joined the fund prior to this date, the Commissioner was unable to make this decision at the time of issuing the assessment and hence the taxpayer was still liable for the excess contributions tax. The legislation required that the contributions received be allocated to a member of the fund at that time and there is no provision to allow the Commissioner to modify this position given subsequent information in relation to membership of the fund. More information The Court held that the notice issued by the Commissioner to DMG was ambiguous and was therefore invalid. As a result, DMG was not required to comply with the notice. Commissioner of Taxation v De Martin and Gasparini Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 286 More information The Taxpayer v Commissioner of Taxation [2011] AATA 168 © Knowledge Shop Pty Ltd 2011 4 TAXROUNDUP KNOWLEDGE SHOP – MAY 2011 LEGISLATION Bills that have received Royal Assent: Tax Laws Amendment (Temporary Flood Reconstruction Levy) Bill 2011; and Income Tax Rates Amendment (Temporary Flood Reconstruction Levy) Bill 2011 Royal Assent date is 12 April 2011. These bills give effect to the progressive one-off ‘flood reconstruction levy’ that will apply for the year ending 30 June 2011 and will apply to both residents and nonresidents of Australia for income tax purposes. As noted in previous Tax Roundups, the aim of this oneoff levy is to increase capacity to assist in rebuilding the disaster affected regions of Australia. © Knowledge Shop Pty Ltd 2011 5
Documentos relacionados
Taxpayer Information Assistance Services and Tax
true interpretation. Thus, complexity in the tax regime can lead to lower compliance as the individual seeks to gamble more not less, and this effect may be exacerbated if taxpayers become frustrat...
Leia mais