trabalho completo - 52ª Reunião Anual da Sociedade Brasileira de
Transcrição
trabalho completo - 52ª Reunião Anual da Sociedade Brasileira de
52a Reunião Anual da Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia Zootecnia: Otimizando Recursos e Potencialidades Belo Horizonte – MG, 19 a 23 de Julho de 2015 Comportamento diurno de tourinhos nelorados em pastejo recebendo suplementação nutricional com aditivos1 Edneia Pereira Rosa2, Henrique Jorge Fernandes3, Yasmin dos Santos Falcão6, Vinicius Mota de Deus Souza5, Luísa Melville Paiva4, Fabrício Ricardo Martinho6, Thiago Garcia Carvalho6 1 Parte da dissertação de mestrado do primeiro autor, financiada pela FUNDECT/Capes Mestranda do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia – UEMS, Aquidauana, MS, Brasil, [email protected] 3 Professor do curso de Zootecnia – UEMS, Aquidauana, MS, Brasil: [email protected] 4 Professor do curso de Zootecnia – UEMS, Aquidauana, MS 5 Mestrando do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia – UEMS, Aquidauana, MS, Brasil 6 Acadêmico do curso de Zootecnia – UEMS, Aquidauana, MS, Brasil 2 Bolsista da FUNDECT/Capes. e-mail: Resumo: O objetivo com este estudo foi avaliar o efeito de aditivos em suplementos concentrado e mineral sobre o comportamento de bovinos de corte em pastejo. Foram utilizados trinta e dois tourinhos Nelore, com peso médio inicial de 332.9 ± 34.3, divididos em quatro grupos. O primeiro grupo recebeu suplemento concentrado LIPOMAX©, contendo Virginiamicina© e aditivos homeopáticos: Convert H©, SODO 100© e Figotonus©. O segundo grupo recebeu o mesmo suplemento sem aditivos. O terceiro grupo recebeu suplemento mineral contendo Virginiamicina® e aditivos homeopáticos: Convert H®, SODO 100®, Figotonus® e Entero 100®. O último grupo recebeu o mesmo suplemento mineral sem aditivos. Os animais foram identificados individualmente e seu comportamento foi observado das 0600 às 1800 h, a cada 5 min, durante nove dias. O comportamento animal foi classificado como em pé em ócio, em pé ruminando, deitado em ócio, deitado ruminando, caminhando, pastejando, consumindo suplemento ou bebendo água. O tempo total ruminando foi a soma dos tempos em pé e deitado ruminando. O tempo total em ócio foi a soma do tempo em pé e deitado em ócio. O tempo despendido em cada comportamento foi analisado considerando o efeito dos aditivos em cada tipo de suplemento e as medidas repetidas. Um nível de significância de 5% foi adotado. A inclusão de aditivos no suplemento concentrado ou mineral fez os animais mais lenientes, reduzindo o tempo dispendido em atividades produtivas e aumentando o tempo em atividades de ócio. Palavras–chave: bovinos de corte, forragem, suplementos Diurnal behavior of grazing Nellore bulls receiving nutritional supplementation with additives Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of additives in concentrated and mineral supplements on the behavior of grazing beef cattle. Thirty-two Nellore bulls with average initial BW of 332.9 ± 34.3 kg were used, divided into four groups. The first group received Lipomax© concentrated supplement containing virginiamicina© and homeopathic additives: Convert H©, SODO 100© and Figotonus©. The second one received the same supplement without additives. Third group received mineral supplement containing Virginiamicina® and homeopathic additives: Convert H®, SODO 100®, Figotonus® and Entero 100®. The last group received the same mineral supplement without additives. Animals were individually identified and their behavior was observed from 0600 to 1800 h, every 5 min, during nine days. The animals' behavior was classified as standing in leisure, standing ruminating, lying in leisure, lying ruminating, walking, grazing, consuming supplement, or drinking water. Total time ruminating was the sum of time standing and lying while ruminating. The total time of leisure was the sum of time standing and lying in leisure. The daily time spent in each behavior was analyzed considering the effect of the additives in each type of supplement, and the repeated measurements. A significance level of 5% was adopted. Include additives in the concentrate supplement made the animals more lenient, reducing time expended in productive activities, and increasing time in lying activities. Keywords: beef cattle, forage, supplements Introduction Knowledge of the nutritional behavior patterns of the animals is essential to successfully develop livestock management techniques (Fraser, 1985). According to Fisher et al. (1997), eating, ruminating and leisure are the basic behaviors that characterize the daily activities of the ruminants. Diet, management, weather conditions and animal activities could affect their distribution. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Página - 1 - de 3 52a Reunião Anual da Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia Zootecnia: Otimizando Recursos e Potencialidades Belo Horizonte – MG, 19 a 23 de Julho de 2015 The interaction of the factors that characterize the grazing cattle production system can affect feeding behavior of animals, interfering directly with the animal response (Pardo et al., 2003). According to Silva et al. (2010), there are just few and controversial results in the literature about the effect of nutritional supplementation on the behavior of grazing ruminants. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of additives in concentrated and minerals supplements on the behavior of grazing beef cattle. Material e Methods Thirty-two Nellore bulls with average initial body weight of 332.9 ± 34.3 kg were divided into four groups and grazed Piatã grass (B. brizantha cv. BRS Piatã) pastures in the Beef Cattle Center of the State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Aquidauana, Brazil, at the rainy season. The first group of animals, received concentrate supplement Lipomax® (Real H, Campo Grande, Brazil) (18.9% CP, 2.35% EE, 12.0% NDF, 50.9% NFC, and 76.2% TDN), containing Virginiamicina© (1.3 g kg-1) and homeopathic additives: Convert H© (20 g kg-1), SODO 100© (20 g kg-1) and Figotonus© (20 g kg-1). The second group received the same concentrate supplement without additives. Third group received mineral supplement Real H 650® (Real H, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil), containing Virginiamicina® (20 g kg-1) and homeopathic additives: Convert H ® (40 g kg-1), SODO 100® (15 g kg-1), Figotonus® (30 g kg-1) e Entero 100® (15 g kg-1). The last (fourth) group received the same mineral supplement without additives. After 56 d of adaptation, animals were individually identified in both sides of the body using a black hair paint, and their behavior was observed using binoculars from 0600 to 1800 h, every 5 min, during nine non-consecutive days in April and May, 2014. At each observation, the animals' behavior was classified as standing in leisure, standing ruminating, lying in leisure, lying ruminating, walking, grazing, consuming supplement, or drinking water. Total time ruminating was calculated as the sum of time standing and lying while ruminating. The total time of leisure was calculated as the sum of time standing and lying in leisure. As an interaction between the presence of additives and the type of supplement was observed, the daily time spent in each behavior was analyzed considering: the effect of the additives in each type of supplement separately, and the repeated measurements in each animal. The PROC MIXED of SAS v.9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) was used in all analysis, and a significance level of 5% was adopted. Results and Discussion Diurnal time standing in leisure, grazing and consuming supplement were greater in animals consuming concentrate supplement without additives (Table 1). The diurnal time lying in leisure, lying ruminating, drinking water and the total time ruminating was greater for animals that received concentrate supplement with additives. Include additives in the concentrate supplement reduced the time in productive activities, and increased time in lying activities. This can be an effect of the better use of the feed by animals. The total diurnal time ruminating in animals receiving mineral supplement without additives was greater than those receiving mineral supplement with additives. The diurnal time lying in leisure, consuming supplement and drinking water was greater for animals that received mineral supplement with additives. It was also possible to see a tendency (P<0.10) to increase total time of leisure when additives were added to the mineral supplement. Despite the differences in the observed results, the general effect of the use of the additives in mineral supplement was also to make the animals more lenient. Other observed behaviors were not affected by the use of additives in the concentrate or mineral supplement. Table 1 Means of diurnal behavior (min d-1) of cattle during the rainy season. Concentrate Mineral supplement supplement Behavior SE additives additives Without With Without With Standing in leisure 54.8 40.8 38.9 40.6 2.18 Standing ruminating 30.7 34.8 37.5 32.6 2.16 Lying in leisure 34.3 45.9 33.6 41.1 2.36 Lying ruminating 110 125 119 110 3.73 Total time ruminating 141 161 156 143 3.99 Total time of leisure 89.1 86.6 72.5 81.7 3.87 Walking 27.2 26.2 18.9 21.8 1.17 Grazing 435 419 471 467 5.23 P-value Effect of additives in supplement Concentrate Mineral <0.001 0587 0.190 0.118 0.002 0.033 0.007 0.131 0.001 0.023 0.595 0.057 0.557 0.100 0.026 0.587 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Página - 2 - de 3 52a Reunião Anual da Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia Zootecnia: Otimizando Recursos e Potencialidades Belo Horizonte – MG, 19 a 23 de Julho de 2015 Consuming supplement Drinking water 30.1 2.30 26.4 5.28 5.43 1.19 9.00 2.92 0.96 0.46 0.010 0.001 0.014 0.014 Conclusions Include additives in the concentrate supplement made the animals more lenient, reducing time expended in productive activities, and increasing time in lying activities. Acknowledgements Thanks to FUNDECT, UEMS, Capes and CNPq for the financial support for this project. References FRASER, A.F. Ethology of farm animals: A comprehensive study of the behavior al features of the common farm animals. A Basic Information, n.5. Elsevier Science Publishers: Netherlands, p. 500, 1985. FISHER, V.; DESWYSEN, A.G.; DESPRES, L. et al. Comportamento ingestivo de ovinos recebendo dieta à base de feno durante um período de seis meses. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 5: 1032-1038, 1997. PARDO, R.M.P.; FISCHER, V.; BALBINOTTI, M. et al. Comportamento ingestivo diurno de novilhos em pastejo a níveis crescentes de suplementação energética. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v.32, p.1408-1418, 2003. SILVA, R.R.; PRADO, I.N.; SILVA, F.F. et al. Comportamento ingestivo diurno de novilhos Nelore recebendo níveis crescentes de suplementação em pastejo de capim-braquiária. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v.39, n.9, p.2073-2080, 2010. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Página - 3 - de 3