Planning, Design and Development Minutes of

May 1, 2006
Members Present:
The following were present at 7:00 p.m.:
City Councillor G. Gibson – Wards 1 and 5 (Chair)
Regional Councillor P. Palleschi - Wards 2 and 6 (Vice-Chair)
Regional Councillor E. Moore – Wards 1 and 5
Regional Councillor G. Miles – Wards 7 and 8
Regional Councillor J. Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10
City Councillor S. Hames – Wards 7 and 8
The following arrived subsequently at the times noted:
Regional Councillor S. DiMarco – Wards 3 and 4 (7:05 p.m.)
City Councillor J. Hutton – Wards 2 and 6 (7:07 p.m.)
City Councillor B. Callahan – Wards 3 and 4(7:05 p.m., left at 7:34 p.m.,
returned at 7:40 p.m.)
City Councillor G. Manning – Wards 9 and 10 (7:09 p.m., returned at
9:13 p.m. after recess)
Staff Present:
Planning, Design and Development Department
J. Corbett, Commissioner of Planning, Design and Development
A. Smith, Director of Planning and Land Development Services
K. Walsh, Director of Community Design, Park Planning and
Development
B. Hale, Manager, Transportation Planning
P. Snape, Manager of Development Services
D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services
J. Hogan, Development Planner
N. Grady, Development Planner
M. Gervais, Development Planner
A. Parsons, Development Planner
A. Todd, Development Planner
Legal Services Department
T. Yao, Legal Counsel
Management and Administrative Services Department
J. LeFeuvre, Deputy City Clerk
C. Urquhart, Legislative Coordinator
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
The meeting was called to order at 7:06 p.m., recessed at 8:48 p.m. reconvened at 8:58 p.m.
and adjourned at 9:20 p.m.
After due consideration of the matters placed before this Committee, the members beg leave to
present its report as follows:
Item
A.
Recommendation
PDD119-2006
Approval of Agenda
B.
Conflicts of Interest
C.
Consent
D1.
PDD120-2006
Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Kerbel Group Inc.
and Greyrose Corporation – South side of Kintyre Street, East of
Dumfries Ave – Ward 2 (File C1E11.20).
D2.
PDD121-2006
Proposed Draft Plan of Vacant Land Condominium and
Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Sandringham Place
Inc. (Metrus Development Inc.) – East side of Dixie Road, North
and east of the existing Rosedale Village Private Clubhouse –
Ward 9 (File C3E14.7)
D3.
PDD122-2006
Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Rise-N-Shine Kids
Child Care Centre Inc. – 80 Bramalea Road - Southwest corner of
Bramalea Road and Avondale Boulevard – Ward 8 (File C4E2.6)
D4.
PDD123-2006
Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Application to Amend the
Zoning By-Law – Destona Homes (2003) Inc. (Glen Schnarr and
Associates Inc.) – West side of Mississauga Road, South of the
intersection of Mississauga Road and the future Williams Parkway
Extension - Ward 6 (File C4W7.8)
D5.
PDD124-2006
Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law –
Vince J. Cavallo – South-west corner of Regional Road 107
(Queen Street East) and Beaumaris Drive - Ward 10 (File
C9E4.13)
D6.
PDD125-2006
Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Application to Amend the
Zoning By-Law – Partacc Developments Inc. – GLB Urban
Planners Ltd. - South of Father Tobin Road, on the west side of
Torbram Road - Ward 9 (File C5E15.3)
2006 05 01
Page 2 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
D7.
PDD126-2006
City Initiated Amendment to the Zoning By-law - Driveways on
Detached, Semi-Detached and Townhouse Dwelling Lots (File P42
CO).
D8.
PDD127-2006
City Initiated Amendment to the Zoning By-law – Parking of
Oversized Vehicles and Recreational Vehicles on Residential
Properties (File P42 CO)
E1.
PDD128-2006
Request to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA)
for Greater Pedestrian Access to Heart Lake Conservation Area.
F1.
PDD129-2006
Block Plan –Sub-Area 2 (Springbrook Executive Community) –
Credit Valley Secondary Plan Area 45 - Ward 6 (File P26S 45).
F2.
PDD130-2006
Appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board – Application to Amend
the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law - Monterey Park Inc. – PMG
Planning Consultants – Southwest corner of Queen Street East
and Gateway Boulevard – Ward 8 (File C6E5.9).
F3.
PDD131-2006
Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Application to Amend the
Zoning By-Law – EMC Group Limited – Ridgecore Developers
Inc. – West side of Goreway Drive – South of Tortoise Court Ward 10 (File C7E14.8)
G1.
PDD132-2006
Proposed Parkway Belt West Plan Amendment Application (File
P04)
H.
I1.
Committee of Adjustment Reports
PDD133-2006
Application for a Permit to Demolish a Residential Properties –
9269 and 9283 Mississauga Road – Ward 6 (File G33 LA).)
J.
Community Design - Parks Planning and Development Reports
K.
Engineering and Development Services Reports
L1.
PDD134-2006
Minutes- Brampton Heritage Board – March 14, 2006
M1.
PDD135-2006
Minor Administrative Changes to Certain Procedures Associated
with the Exemption from Part Lot Control Process (File P83)
N1.
PDD136-2006
List of Referred Matters - Planning, Design and Development
Committee
2006 05 01
Page 3 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
N2.
PDD119-2006
Heart Lake Road Re-alignment (File T00) (See Item Q1 and
Approval of Agenda)
O.
Deferred Matters
P.
Notice of Motion
Q1.
PDD119-2006
Heart Lake Road Re-alignment (File T00) (See Item N2 and
Approval of Agenda)
R.
Question Period
S.
Public Question Period
T.
Closed Session
U.
PDD137-2006
Adjournment
_________________________
City Councillor Gibson, Chair
2006 05 01
Page 4 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
A.
Approval of the Agenda
PDD119-2006
That the agenda for the Planning, Design and Development Committee
Meeting of May 1, 2006, be approved as amended as follows:
To Refer Items N2 and Q1:
Items N2 and Q1 re: Heart Lake Road Realignment be referred to
the Council meeting scheduled for May 8, 2006
Carried
B.
Conflicts of Interest - nil
C.
Consent
The following items listed with an asterisk (*) were considered to be routine and noncontroversial by the Committee and were approved at one time.
(F1, F2, F3, I1, L1, M1)
D.
Public Meeting Reports
D 1.
Report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and S. Todd,
Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated March 15, 2006,
re: Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Kerbel Group Inc. and
Greyrose Corporation – South side of Kintyre Street, East of Dumfries Ave –
Ward 2 (File C1E11.20).
No members of the public indicated that they wished to address Committee
regarding this item.
PDD120-2006
1.
2.
That the report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development
Services, and S. Todd, Development Planner, Planning, Design and
Development, dated March 15, 2006, to the Planning, Design and
Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Application
to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Kerbel Group Inc. and
Greyrose Corporation – South side of Kintyre Street, East of
Dumfries Ave – Ward 2 (File C1E11.20) be received; and,
That staff be directed to report back to Planning, Design and
Development Committee with the results of the Public Meeting and a
staff recommendation subsequent to the completion of the circulation of
the application and a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal.
Carried
2006 05 01
Page 5 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
D 2.
Report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and N. Grady,
Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 10, 2006,
re: Proposed Draft Plan of Vacant Land Condominium and Application to
Amend the Zoning By-Law – Sandringham Place Inc. (Metrus Development
Inc.) – East side of Dixie Road, North and east of the existing Rosedale
Village Private Clubhouse – Ward 9 (File C3E14.7).
No members of the public indicated that they wished to address Committee
regarding this item.
PDD121-2006
1.
That the report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development
Services, and N. Grady, Development Planner, Planning, Design and
Development, dated April 10, 2006, to the Planning, Design and
Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Proposed
Draft Plan of Vacant Land Condominium and Application to
Amend the Zoning By-Law – Sandringham Place Inc. (Metrus
Development Inc.) – East side of Dixie Road, North and east of
the existing Rosedale Village Private Clubhouse – Ward 9 (File
C3E14.7) be received; and,
2.
That staff be directed to report back to Planning, Design and
Development Committee with the results of the Public Meeting and a
staff recommendation subsequent to the completion of the circulation of
the application and a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal.
Carried
D 3.
Report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and J. Hogan,
Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 10, 2006,
re: Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Rise-N-Shine Kids Child
Care Centre Inc. – 80 Bramalea Road - Southwest corner of Bramalea Road
and Avondale Boulevard – Ward 8 (File C4E2.6).
Members of the public present did not wish to see a presentation on this item.
The following residents spoke in support of the subject proposal:
Peter MacLean
Tammy Perry
Sheila Smith
Sylvia Giminez
Deborah Bodnar
Angela Meyer
2006 05 01
24 Valleyside Trail
25 Algonquin Boulevard
103 Dorset Drive
2 Dona Court
78 Majestic Crescent
8759 Heritage Road (correspondence submitted)
Page 6 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
Their comments were as follows:
o the families who presently take their children to the existing daycare facility
are pleased with the services provided and support the continued operation of
the daycare
o no other facility provides services such as before and after school care for the
children, and transportation to and from the daycare facility to elementary
schools
o the subject site located at southwest corner of Bramalea Road and Avondale
Boulevard, if approved will meet the needs of the day care facility
o parents find it difficult to find quality daycare and Rise-N-Shine comes highly
recommended
The following residents indicated that they do not support the subject proposal:
Brad Greene
Ernesto Romero
61 Darras Court
117 Avondale Boulevard (submitted petition)
Their comments and concerns were as follows:
o proposed daycare facility will add to the existing traffic congestion at the
subject site during morning and afternoon rush hours when parents must drop
off and pick-up their children
o potential vehicle accidents due to traffic congestion which would result in
higher automobile insurance rates
o safety of the parents and children who may have to cross Avondale Boulevard
to get to the daycare facility
o the subject site does not provide sufficient parking which would encourage
parents to park on the streets
Staff confirmed that all the comments provided and the concerns raised by the
residents will be considered in the recommendation report which will be
presented to Committee at a future date.
PDD122-2006
2006 05 01
1.
That the report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development
Services, and J. Hogan, Development Planner, Planning, Design
and Development, dated April 10, 2006, to the Planning, Design
and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re:
Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Rise-N-Shine Kids
Child Care Centre Inc. – 80 Bramalea Road - Southwest
corner of Bramalea Road and Avondale Boulevard – Ward 8
(File C4E2.6) be received; and
Page 7 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
2.
That staff be directed to report back to Planning, Design and
Development Committee with the results of the Public Meeting
and a staff recommendation subsequent to the completion of the
circulation of the application and a comprehensive evaluation of
the proposal.
Carried
D 4.
Report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and N. Grady,
Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 4, 2006,
re: Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Application to Amend the Zoning
By-Law – Destona Homes (2003) Inc. (Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc.) –
West side of Mississauga Road, South of the intersection of Mississauga Road
and the future Williams Parkway Extension - Ward 6 (File C4W7.8).
Members of the public present requested a presentation of the proposal.
Mr. Neal Grady, Development Planner, gave a presentation and provided details
of a proposed development of single detached, semi-detached and street
townhouse dwellings, a park and a portion of the Huttonville Creek valleylands at
the subject site.
Mr. Tony Mason, 6 Huttonville Drive, advised that he was in attendance on behalf
of Huttonville residents. He is aware that the subject application is one of nine
applications within the Sub-Area 2 block plan and requested that all the
applications be in a unified plan. He suggested that appropriate buffering and a
gradual density transition be considered where there is existing development. He
urged Committee to ensure that the required services and infrastructure are in
place before occupancy by new home owners.
Staff confirmed that all the comments provided and the concerns raised by Mr.
Mason will be considered in the recommendation report which will be presented
to Committee at a future date.
PDD123-2006
2006 05 01
1.
That the report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development
Services, and N. Grady, Development Planner, Planning, Design
and Development, dated April 4, 2006, to the Planning, Design and
Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Proposed
Draft Plan of Subdivision and Application to Amend the
Zoning By-Law – Destona Homes (2003) Inc. (Glen Schnarr
and Associates Inc.) – West side of Mississauga Road, South of
the intersection of Mississauga Road and the future Williams
Parkway Extension - Ward 6 (File C4W7.8) be received; and,
Page 8 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
That staff be directed to report back to Planning, Design and
Development Committee with the results of the Public Meeting and a
staff recommendation subsequent to the completion of the circulation of
the application and a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal.
Carried
D 5.
Report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and N. Grady,
Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 6, 2006,
re: Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law – Vince J.
Cavallo – South-west corner of Regional Road 107 (Queen Street East) and
Beaumaris Drive - Ward 10 (File C9E4.13).
No members of the public indicated that they wished to address Committee
regarding this item.
PDD124-2006
1.
That the report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development
Services, and N. Grady, Development Planner, Planning, Design
and Development, dated April 6, 2006, to the Planning, Design and
Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Application
to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law – Vince J.
Cavallo – South-west corner of Regional Road 107 (Queen
Street East) and Beaumaris Drive - Ward 10 (File C9E4.13) be
received; and
2.
That staff be directed to report back to Planning, Design and
Development Committee with the results of the Public Meeting and a
staff recommendation subsequent to the completion of the circulation of
the application and a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal.
Carried
D 6.
Report from K. Ash, Manager of Development Services, and A. Parsons,
Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 12, 2006,
re: Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Application to Amend the Zoning
By-Law – Partacc Developments Inc. – GLB Urban Planners Ltd. - South of
Father Tobin Road, on the west side of Torbram Road - Ward 9 (File
C5E15.3).
No members of the public indicated that they wished to address Committee
regarding this item.
2006 05 01
Page 9 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
PDD125-2006
1.
That the report from K. Ash, Manager of Development Services,
and A. Parsons, Development Planner, Planning, Design and
Development, dated April 12, 2006, to the Planning, Design and
Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Proposed
Draft Plan of Subdivision and Application to Amend the
Zoning By-Law – Partacc Developments Inc. – GLB Urban
Planners Ltd. - South of Father Tobin Road, on the west side
of Torbram Road - Ward 9 (File C5E15.3) be received; and
2.
That staff be directed to report back to Planning, Design and
Development Committee with the results of the Public Meeting and a
staff recommendation subsequent to the completion of the circulation of
the application and a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal.
Carried
D 7.
Report from P. Snape, Manager of Development Services, Planning, Design and
Development, dated April 10, 2006, re: City Initiated Amendment to the
Zoning By-law - Driveways on Detached, Semi-Detached and Townhouse
Dwelling Lots (File P42 CO).
Members of the public present requested a presentation of the proposal.
Mr. Paul Snape, Manager, Development Services, gave a presentation that
included the current by-law standards for driveways in residential zones and
highlighted the proposed changes to the zoning by-law. He showed photos of
homes with widened driveways that were considered excessive and driveways
that have been widened that are considered reasonable and may be allowed if the
proposed changes to the current by-law are approved.
Mr. Kelton Brooks, 30 Leacrest Street, advised that he is the owner of a home
renovation business and he has constructed basement apartments in Brampton. It
is his opinion that residents are constructing basement apartments because they
need the additional income to pay the mortgage. He believes that widened
driveways are needed to accommodate the residents who live in basement
apartments and to control and prevent excessively wide driveways, basement
apartments should be eliminated.
Mr. Glenn Bible, 26 Unsworth Street, Brampton, advised that he was cited for
excessive driveway width and subsequently fined $50.00. His driveway is now in
compliance. He stated that he supports the staff recommendations.
2006 05 01
Page 10 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
Staff confirmed that all the comments provided and the concerns raised by the
residents will be considered in the recommendation report which will be
presented to Committee at a future date.
PDD126-2006
1.
That the report from P. Snape, Manager of Development Services,
Planning, Design and Development, dated April 10, 2006, to the
Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1,
2006, re: City Initiated Amendment to the Zoning By-law Driveways on Detached, Semi-Detached and Townhouse
Dwelling Lots (File P42 CO) be received; and
2.
That staff be directed to report back to Planning, Design and
Development Committee with the results of the Public Meeting
and a recommendation with respect to proposed changes to the
Zoning By-law for residential driveways.
Carried
D 8.
Report from P. Snape, Manager of Development Services, Planning, Design and
Development, dated April 10, 2006, re: City Initiated Amendment to the
Zoning By-law – Parking of Oversized Vehicles and Recreational Vehicles on
Residential Properties (File P42 CO).
Members of the public present requested a presentation of the proposal.
Mr. Paul Snape, Manager, Development Services, gave a presentation that
included the current Zoning By-law standards for oversized motor vehicles
parking on residential properties, the current definition of oversized vehicles and
the proposed changes that are being recommended to amend the By-law to allow
oversized and recreational vehicles to be parked on residential properties.
The following residents indicated that they own or operate vehicles that are
considered oversized and they support the proposed amendments to the Zoning
By-law:
Karla Riley
Jodie Young
Lewis Stevens
Timo Tenhunen
Cindy Allen
Paul Nelson
Valerie Liddell
Alexandra Rajnak
2006 05 01
94 Earthstar Trail
1145 Welwyn Drive, Mississauga
52 Cutters Crescent
42 Kincaid Court
57 Gatesgill Street
5 Jill Crescent
Brampton
Brampton
Page 11 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
S. Henderson
D. Simpson-Ouellet
Cheryl Summers
Jim Riso
A. Atkinson
Diane Voce
Dora Isagias
Andy Caringi
Rimon Colman
Paul Agular
Donald Cormier
2 Marchbank Crescent
9 Ural Circle
11 Dowling Crescent
53 Rusthall Way
Brampton
46 Greenleaf Crescent
17 Butterchurn Road
6 Fallstar Crescent
5 Glenforest Road
18 Cherly Court
87 Townley Crescent
Their concerns and comments were as follows:
o most people who drive school buses/transhelp vehicles are parents or
grandparents some of whom have pre-school and school age children who are
allowed to travel in the bus with them and they require the convenience of
parking the bus (20 passenger) at home
o current by-law needs to be amended to address the needs of residents who use
vehicles to earn an income, such as landscapers, electricians
o the large buses should be allowed to park on the street between runs when they
cannot be accommodated in the driveway with alternative parking on garbage
days and snow days
o approximately 65,000 students are transported safely to and from school each
day by buses
o income received for driving buses is not enough for them to buy a vehicle to
go back and forth to a location where the buses would be parked
o some schools allow the buses to be parked at the school site but they must be
removed from very early in the morning
o safety of buses is an issue when they are parked on school property because
they are often vandalized
o health and safety of children who need the transhelp vehicles should be
considered
o weight of a vehicle should not be an issue when it is on a private driveway
o vehicles should be ticketed for idling
o parents work more than one job to take care of handicapped children and if
they are not allowed to park buses on their driveways, they may have to quit
driving the bus
o City should follow City of Mississauga practice and consider allowing buses
to park on the street for three hours
o tow trucks are considered to be oversized vehicles but because of the service
they provide it requires the owner to have the vehicle parked on his driveway
at all times
o many of the people who drive school buses and transhelp vehicles are well
educated and they have given up full time jobs to look after their children; this
2006 05 01
Page 12 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
industry has provided the opportunity for them to be with their children and
contribute to the community at the same time
o why are oversized City vehicles allowed to park on residential driveways?
o residents who are concerned about pollution from oversized school buses
should focus their attention on cars with modified engines
o drivers of oversized vehicles pay taxes and should be allowed to park vehicles
on their driveways.
Ms. S. Evans, 52 Nickel Crescent, Brampton, advised that she does not support
the parking of oversized vehicles in residential areas because of safety reasons
and their often unsightly appearance. She urged that a by-law be passed that
would prevent the idling of vehicles, especially large commercial trucks in family
oriented residential areas because of the noise and fumes they generate. She
submitted correspondence in support of her request.
Staff confirmed that all the comments provided and the concerns raised by the
residents will be considered in the recommendation report that will be presented
to Committee at a future date.
PDD127-2006
1.
That the report from P. Snape, Manager of Development Services,
Planning, Design and Development, dated April 10, 2006, to the
Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1,
2006, re: City Initiated Amendment to the Zoning By-law –
Parking of Oversized Vehicles and Recreational Vehicles on
Residential Properties (File P42 CO) be received; and
2.
That staff be directed to report back to Planning, Design and
Development Committee with the results of the Public Meeting
and a recommendation with respect to proposed changes to the
Zoning By-law for residential driveways.
Carried
E.
Delegations
E 1.
Mr. Leo O’Brien, 72 Rawling Crescent, Brampton, on behalf of Friends of Heart
Lake Committee, re: Request to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
(TRCA) for Greater Pedestrian Access to Heart Lake Conservation Area.
Mr. Leo O’Brien, 72 Rawling Crescent, Brampton, on behalf of Friends of Heart
Lake Committee, provided an overview of his submission that was circulated to
Committee regarding his request for greater pedestrian access for Brampton
residents to the Heart Lake Conservation Area. He informed Committee that the
2006 05 01
Page 13 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
TRCA is nearing completion of the Master Plan for the Heart Lake Conservation
Area and requested that the City ensure Brampton’s access proposal to the park is
included in the Master Plan. He explained that the present front gate access on
Heart Lake Road may be difficult and unsafe for residents. He pointed out that
this gate is closed at times when residents may wish to visit the conservation area.
Mr. O’Brien advised that he will be submitting a petition from area residents
supporting his request.
Staff and the delegation responded to questions from Committee on the issues
raised by the delegation. Staff indicated that a report on the Master Plan is being
prepared and Mr. O’Brien’s concern will be addressed.
The following motion was considered:
PDD128-2006
That the delegation of Mr. Leo O’Brien, 72 Rawling Crescent, Brampton,
on behalf of Friends of Heart Lake Committee, to the Planning, Design
and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Request to
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) for Greater
Pedestrian Access to Heart Lake Conservation Area be received; and
That the matter of Greater Pedestrian Access to Heart Lake Conservation
Area, be referred to Planning, Design and Development staff for a report.
Carried
F.
Development Team Reports
*
F 1.
PDD129-2006
Report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and N. Grady,
Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 21, 2006,
re: Block Plan –Sub-Area 2 (Springbrook Executive Community) – Credit
Valley Secondary Plan Area 45 - Ward 6 (File P26S 45).
That the report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services,
and N. Grady, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development,
dated April 21, 2006, to the Planning, Design and Development
Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Block Plan –Sub-Area 2
(Springbrook Executive Community) – Credit Valley Secondary Plan
Area 45 - Ward 6 (File P26S 45) be received.
Carried
2006 05 01
Page 14 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
*
F 2.
PDD130-2006
2006 05 01
Report from P. Snape, Manager of Development Services, and C. Gervais,
Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 18, 2006,
re: Appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board – Application to Amend the
Official Plan and Zoning By-Law - Monterey Park Inc. – PMG Planning
Consultants – Southwest corner of Queen Street East and Gateway
Boulevard – Ward 8 (File C6E5.9).
1.
That the report from P. Snape, Manager of Development Services,
and C. Gervais, Development Planner, Planning, Design and
Development, dated April 18, 2006, to the Planning, Design and
Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Appeal to
the Ontario Municipal Board – Application to Amend the
Official Plan and Zoning By-Law - Monterey Park Inc. – PMG
Planning Consultants – Southwest corner of Queen Street East
and Gateway Boulevard – Ward 8 (File C6E5.9) be received;
and,
2.
That staff be directed to attend the Ontario Municipal Board
(OMB) hearing on May 15, 2006 and present to the Board the
City’s position regarding the development application approved in
principle by the Planning, Design and Development Committee
and Council at the meetings held October 4, 2004 and October 13,
2004, respectively. The attached recommended Official Plan and
the Zoning By-law amendments (Appendices 2 & 3) and
conditions for the rezoning agreement (Appendix 1) to be executed
prior to the issuance of the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) order,
including the following additional conditions:
1.
prior to site plan approval, a cash contribution of
$10,000.00 shall be paid to the Region of Peel for the
design and installation of the northbound advance left
turn phase at the intersection of Queen Street East and
Gateway Boulevard;
2.
the owner agrees to provide improvements on
Gateway Boulevard to support access to the subject
lands to the satisfaction of the City Transportation
Planning Division at the time of formal site plan
review;
3.
the owner agrees that the existing access to Gateway
Boulevard may be required to be relocated further south
along Gateway Boulevard or may be restricted to right
turns in and rights turns out only. Arrangements in this
Page 15 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
regard will be determined by the City Transportation
Planning Division at the time of formal site plan
review; and,
4.
a full turns access to Summerlea Road will be
permitted at a location to be determined by the City
Transportation Planning Division during site plan
processing.
Carried
*
F 3.
PDD131-2006
2006 05 01
Report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and J. Hogan,
Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 10, 2006,
Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Application to Amend the Zoning
By-Law – EMC Group Limited –Ridgecore Developers Inc. – West side of
Goreway Drive – South of Tortoise Court - Ward 10 (File C7E14.8).
1.
That the report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development
Services, and J. Hogan, Development Planner, Planning, Design
and Development, dated April 10, 2006, to the Planning, Design
and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re:
Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Application to Amend
the Zoning By-Law – EMC Group Limited – Ridgecore
Developers Inc. – West side of Goreway Drive – South of
Tortoise Court - Ward 10 (File C7E14.8) be received; and
2.
That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, outstanding final
comments and/or conditions of draft plan approval from external
circulated agencies and internal City departments shall be received
and any appropriate “prior to conditions of draft plan approval”
and conditions of approval, including revisions to the plan and
physical layout resulting from these comments, shall be
accommodated;
3.
That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, the applicant shall
sign the Landowner’s Cost Share Agreement, and provide the City
with a written acknowledgement from the Trustee appointed
pursuant to the agreement that the applicant has signed the
agreement and has delivered the deeds or made the payments
required by the agreement, and that the plan may be released for
draft approval;
Page 16 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
2006 05 01
4.
That prior to draft plan approval, a Noise Feasibility Study must be
prepared by an acoustical engineer and submitted for the City’s
review and approval. The report must assess the potential noise
impact on the proposed development and recommend necessary
noise attenuation measures to ensure compliance with the
applicable noise criteria;
5.
That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, a detailed
Functional Servicing Study shall be prepared, to the satisfaction of
the Director of Engineering and Development Services;
6.
That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, the design of the
vehicular access to Jacksonville Road from Goreway Drive shall
be in place. This will require TRCA’s permission to alter the
watercourse and shall confirm the required lands to accommodate
the vehicular access;
7.
That the design of the stream crossing be consistent in design with
the required gateway feature to be erected at the intersection of
Goreway Drive and Jacksonville Road, as outlined in the Upscale
Executive Housing Design Guidelines;
8.
That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, any necessary
revisions identified by the City and/or the Toronto and Region
Conservation to be undertaken to the site-specific Functional
Servicing Report submitted in support of the proposal shall be
completed by the proponent, to the satisfaction of the Director of
Engineering and Development Services and Toronto and Region
Conservation;
9.
That the following street names be approved for this proposed draft
plan of subdivision: Bloomsbury Avenue (extension of existing
road), Latania Boulevard (extension of existing road) and
Jacksonville Road (east-west road);
10.
That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, the applicant shall
prepare a preliminary community information map of the
subdivision to be posted in a prominent location in each sales
office where homes in the subdivision are being sold. The map
shall contain the applicable information prescribed within the City
of Brampton List of Standard Conditions of Draft Approval for
Residential Plans of Subdivision as it pertains to Sales Office
Community Information Maps, including City approved street
names and the possible temporary location of Canada Post
mailboxes, including the number and duration;
Page 17 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
11.
12.
2006 05 01
That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, the applicant shall
execute a preliminary subdivision agreement to the satisfaction of
the City. The preliminary subdivision agreement shall include a
schedule identifying all of the notice provisions for all of the lots
and blocks within the plan, including the provision of a 2.5 metre
buffer block along the rear of lots abutting open space;
That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, a detailed
Environmental Impact Study is required in order for the Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority to consider the proposed
watercourse alteration;
13.
That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, the final location
and configuration of the park be determined in conjunction with
the finalization of the draft plan of subdivision to the north
(Intracorp Properties) to the satisfaction of City Council;
14
That should it be determined that the park located entirely on the
draft plan of subdivision to the north (Intracorp Properties) an
entry feature shall be incorporated by the applicant at the
intersection of Bloomsbury Avenue and Jacksonville Road (the
right-of-way for this intersection shall be increased in width by 5
metres to accommodate this feature). An updated Design Brief
will be required in this instance;
15.
That the subject application be approved and staff be directed to
prepare the appropriate amendments to the zoning by-law;
16.
That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, the applicant shall
agree in writing to the form and content of an implementing zoning
by-law; and,
17.
That staff be authorized to issue the notice of draft plan approval at
such time as all items recommended by Planning Design and
Development Committee to be addressed prior to draft plan
approval have been addressed to the satisfaction of the City,
subject to the following:
1.
any necessary red-line revisions to the draft plan identified
by staff; and,
2.
all conditions contained in the City of Brampton List of
Standard Conditions of Draft Approval for Residential
Plan of Subdivision, or derivatives or special applications
of said conditions, as determined by the Commissioner of
Planning, Design and Development.
Page 18 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
18.
That this decision be considered null and void and a new
development application be required, unless a zoning by-law is
passed within 36 months of the Council approval of this decision;
and,
19.
That development allocation to this EMC Group LimitedRidgecore Developers Inc. plan of subdivision for up to 56 units in
the 2006 Development Cap Allocation be granted.
Carried
G.
Policy Planning Reports
*
G 1.
PDD132-2006
2006 05 01
Report from D. Waters, Manager, Land Use Policy, and M. Majeed, Policy
Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 24, 2006, re: Proposed
Parkway Belt West Plan Amendment Application (File P04).
1.
That the report from D. Waters, Manager, Land Use Policy, and M.
Majeed, Policy Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated
April 24, 2006, to the Planning, Design and Development
Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Proposed Parkway Belt
West Plan Amendment Application (File P04) be received; and
2.
That the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing be advised
that the City has no objections to removing the lands located in
Part Lot 1 Concession 9 N.D., more specifically described as Parts
1, 2, 5 and 6 on Reference Plan 43R-24780, from the jurisdiction
of the Parkway Belt West Plan;
3.
That City staff be directed to request the City of Vaughan to
initiate, in conjunction with the City of Brampton, a minor
restructuring proposal under section 173(16) of The Municipal Act,
2001 to annex the triangle of land deleted from the Parkway Belt
West Plan and the remaining Brampton land east of Highway 50
that is affected by the realignment of Highway 50;
4.
That staff be directed to undertake a comprehensive review of the
City’s municipal boundaries and report back to Planning, Design &
Development Committee should the review identify any other
inconsistencies that need to be addressed through a minor
restructuring proposal under Section 173(16) of The Municipal
Act, 2001; and,
Page 19 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
5.
That the City Clerk be directed to forward a copy of this report and
Council Resolutions to the City of Vaughan, the Regional
Municipality of Peel and the Regional Municipality of York.
Carried
H.
Committee of Adjustment Reports - nil
I.
Building and Zoning Reports
*
I 1.
Report from B. Campbell, Director of Building and Chief Building Official, and
A. Magnone, Regulatory Coordinator, Planning, Design and Development, dated
April 11, 2006, re: Application for a Permit to Demolish a Residential
Properties – 9269 and 9283 Mississauga Road – Ward 6 (File G33 LA).
PDD133-2006
That the report from B. Campbell, Director of Building and Chief
Building Official, and A. Magnone, Regulatory Coordinator, Planning,
Design and Development, dated April 11, 2006, to the Planning, Design
and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Application
for a Permit to Demolish a Residential Properties – 9269 and 9283
Mississauga Road – Ward 6 (File G33 LA), be received.
That the application for a permit to demolish the properties located at 9269
and 9283 Mississauga Road, be approved subject to standard permit
conditions.
Carried
J.
Community Design - Parks Planning and Development Reports - nil
K.
Engineering and Development Services Reports - nil
L.
Minutes
*
L 1.
PDD134-2006
Minutes – Brampton Heritage Board – April 18, 2006
That the Minutes of the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of February
21, 2006, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting
of May 1, 2006, Recommendations HB048-2006 to HB57-2006, be
approved as printed and circulated.
Carried
2006 05 01
Page 20 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
The recommendations were approved as follows:
HB048-2006 That the agenda for the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of April 18, 2006 be
approved, as amended, as follows:
To add:
F 3-1. Minutes – Brampton Heritage Board Heritage Resources SubCommittee – April 4, 2006 (File G33).
HB049-2006 That the Minutes of the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of March 14, 2006, to
the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of April 18, 2006, be received.
HB050-2006 That the following delegations from George Robb Architect, to the Brampton
Heritage Board Meeting of April 18, 2006, re: Downtown Heritage
Conservation District Study (File G33) be received:
1.
2.
Peter Stewart
Paul Dilse
HB051-2006 That the Minutes of the Brampton Heritage Board Heritage Resources SubCommittee Meeting of April 4, 2006 (File G33), to the Brampton Heritage
Board Meeting of April 18, 2006, be received.
HB052-2006 That, as considered at the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of April 18, 2006,
the Board acknowledges that its Proposal for Recognition of the City’s Hamlets
and Villages on the Friezes at Brampton City Hall (File G33) is not on the
City’s current project list in light of timelines for other ongoing projects and
agrees that this project should not be pursued further at this time.
HB053-2006 That the verbal report from Mr. Bob Hulley, Interim Chair, listed on the agenda
for the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of April 18, 2006, re: Brampton
Heritage Board Volunteer Sub-Committee (File G33) be deferred to the
Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of May 16, 2006.
HB054-2006 That the correspondence from Mr. Glen McTavish, dated March 22, 2006, to the
Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of April 18, 2006, re: Resignation from
Membership on the Brampton Heritage Board (File G33) be received; and,
That Mr. McTavish’s resignation be accepted with regret; and,
2006 05 01
Page 21 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
That Mr. McTavish be thanked for his active participation and efforts on behalf of
the Brampton Heritage Board, with particular mention of his role as Chair of the
Brampton Heritage Board Ad Hoc Committee to Explore Options for the Re-use
of the former CP Railway Station; and,
That it is hoped that Mr. McTavish will be in a position to reapply in future for
membership on the Brampton Heritage Board; and,
That, in light of the time remaining on the current Board term, it is the position of
the Brampton Heritage Board that the vacancy created by Mr. McTavish’s
resignation not be filled.
HB055-2006 That the correspondence from Mr. Robert Payne, dated March 28, 2006, to the
Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of April 18, 2006, re: Resignation from
Membership on the Brampton Heritage Board (File G33) be received; and,
That Mr. Payne’s resignation be accepted with regret; and,
That Mr. Payne be thanked for his active participation and efforts on behalf of the
Brampton Heritage Board, with particular mention of his many years in the role of
Co-Chair; and,
That, in light of the time remaining on the current Board term, it is the position of
the Brampton Heritage Board that the vacancy created by Mr. Payne’s resignation
not be filled.
HB056-2006 That the correspondence from Mr. Mike Marcolongo, Municipal Heritage
Committee Advisor, Ministry of Culture, dated March 24, 2006, to the Brampton
Heritage Board Meeting of April 18, 2006, re: Letter of Authority from the
Director of Real Property Registration Branch, Ministry of Government
Services – Waiving of Fees at the Land Registry Offices for Municipal
Heritage Committee Members (File G33) be received.
HB057-2006 That the Brampton Heritage Board do now adjourn to meet again on Tuesday,
May 16, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. or at the call of the Chair.
Carried
M.
Other/New Business/Unfinished Business
*
M 1.
2006 05 01
Report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and N. Grady,
Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 4, 2006,
Page 22 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
re: Minor Administrative Changes to Certain Procedures Associated with the
Exemption from Part Lot Control Process (File P83)
PDD135-2006
1.
That the report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development
Services, and N. Grady, Development Planner, Planning, Design
and Development, dated April 4, 2006, to the Planning, Design and
Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Minor
Administrative Changes to Certain Procedures Associated with
the Exemption from Part Lot Control Process (File P83) be
received; and
2.
That the following minor administrative changes to the application
for part lot control procedures be approved:
3.
i.
an extension of the part lot by-law expiry period from one
(1) year to three (3) years; and,
ii
existing land leases involving a single dwelling unit, and
requiring an application for exemption from part lot control
application in order for the individual leasing the land to
purchase the land, shall be subject to a part lot application
fee of $80.00, and
That the Tariff of Planning Fees By-law 85-96, as amended, be
amended.
Carried
N.
Referred Matters
N 1.
List of Referred Matters – Planning, Design And Development Committee.
N 1.
In response to a question from Regional Councillor Palleschi regarding the
status of Reference #2003-326 on the Referred Matters List, staff advised
that they were directed to look at the technical feasibility of opening
Highway 410 to traffic on Mayfield Road. This work is generally
complete but has not progressed further since the overall agreement
between the Region of Peel, Town of Caledon and MTO needs to be
amended to reflect this staged opening if so directed by Council.
The following motion was considered.
2006 05 01
Page 23 of 24
MINUTES
Planning, Design and Development Committee
PDD136-2006
That the List of Referred Matters – Planning, Design and Development
Committee to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting
of May 1, 2006 (File P45GE) be received.
Carried
N 2.
Report from P. Anderson, Manager of Engineering and Construction Division,
Works and Transportation, dated March 27, 2006, re: Heart Lake Road Realignment (File T00). (See Item Q1).
Dealt with under Approval of the Agenda, Recommendation PDD119-2006
O.
Deferred Matters - nil
P.
Notice of Motion - nil
Q.
Correspondence
Q 1.
Correspondence from Mr. Mark Emery, Weston Consulting Group, dated April
12, 2005, re: Heart Lake Road Re-alignment (File T00) (See Item N2).
Dealt with under Approval of the Agenda, Recommendation PDD119-2006
R.
Question Period
S.
Public Question Period
T.
Closed Session - nil
U.
Adjournment
PDD137-2006
That the Planning, Design and Development Committee do now adjourn
to meet again on Monday, May 15, 2006 at 1:00 p.m. or at the call of the
Chair.
Carried
2006 05 01
Page 24 of 24