THE GLOBALISATION OF RESEARCH - EU Grants Access

Transcrição

THE GLOBALISATION OF RESEARCH
Horizon 2020: The EU Framework Programme for
Research and Innovation
Universität Zürich | 23. Oktober 2013
Finding funding made easy.
David Bohmert
SwissCore Head of Office
Contact Office for European Research Innovation and Education
Grüezi Züri!
www.swisscore.org
Rue du Trône 98, B-1050 Bruxelles
Tel +32-2-549 09 80
Fax +32-2-549 09 89
[email protected]
THIS EXPLAINS EVERYTHING
Framework Programme for Research and Innovation
Horizon 2020
PREVIEW EVENT GLOBALISATION OF RESEARCH
Zurich, 23 October 2013
David Bohmert (Head of Office)
www.swisscore.org
Tel +32-2-549 09 80
Fax +32-2-549 09 89
[email protected]
opportunities for knowledge region Zurich
architecture
Societal Challenges
Priority 3
Industrial Leadership
Priority 2
Excellent Science
Priority 1
European Institute for
Innovation and Technology
Crosscutting Interventions
Complementarities and Synergies with other programmes
Excellent Science
Programmes
Objectives
European Research Council (ERC)
•
•
Promote scientific excellence
Support ‘curiosity driven’
research
•
•
•
•
•
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
(MSCA)
•
• Action 1 Innovative Training Networks
€5.6 billion
•
Promote mobility and
exchange of researchers &
staff
Improve human resources
€11.93 billion
Research Infrastructure (RI)
€2.27 billion
•
Strengthen the development
and access to RI
Instruments
Starting grants
Consolidator grants
Advanced grants
Synergy grants
Proof of concept
• Action 2 Individual Fellowships
• Action 3 Exchange of Staff
• Action 4 COFUND
• Optimise use and development of RI in
Europe
• foster RI innovation potential and human
capital
• reinforce consistency and efficiency of MS and
EU RI policies
• FET-Open
Future and Emerging Technologies
(FET)
€2.45 billion
• FET-Proactive
•
Strengthen research in FET
• FET-Flagships
Leadership in enabling and
industrial technologies (LEIT)
(ICT, nanotechnologies, materials,
biotechnology, manufacturing, space)
€12.36 billion
Access to risk finance
Leveraging private finance and venture
capital for research and innovation
€2.59 billion
Innovation in SMEs
Fostering all forms of innovation in all
types of SMEs
€0.561 billion complemented by
€6.829 billion (expected 15% of
societal challenges + LEIT) and
'Access to risk finance' with strong
SME focus
Societal Challenges
• tackle global and societal challenges
• address political priorities of EU
• inter-sectoral and multidisciplinary collaborative research
Challenge
1. health, demographic change and wellbeing
2. food security, sustainable agriculture and forestry, marine and
maritime and inland water research and bioeconomy
3. secure, clean and efficient energy
€ billion
6.8
3.51
5.4
4. smart, green and integrated transport
5.78
5. climate action, resource efficiency and raw materials
2.81
6. Europe in a changing world – inclusive, innovative and reflective
societies
1.19
7. secure societies – protecting freedom and security of Europe and
its citizen
1.54
Crosscutting interventions
Crosscutting interventions:
• Spreading excellence and Widening Participation (€0.74 bn)
• Science with and for Society (€0.74 bn)
• European Institute for Innovation and Technology (€2.47 billion)
Joint actions with:
• Public-Public-Partnerships like EDCTP 2 and Eurostars 2
• Public-Private-Partnerships (like Joint Technology Initiatives)
• Joint Programming Initiatives
Crosscutting issues like:
• Social and economic sciences and humanities
• International cooperation with ‘third countries’
Complementarities and Synergies
Complementarities with:
• Erasmus + for education, youth and sport
• EURATOM
Complementarities and Synergies with:
• European Structural Investment Funds (ESI)
• Instrument for Pre-Accession (IPA)
• European Neighbourhood Policy Instrument (ENPI)
European Institute for Innovation and Technology
five KIC will be launched in 3 waves:
1. 'Healthy living and active ageing' and 'Raw materials' (2014)
2. 'Food4future' and ‘Added value manufacturing' (2016)
3. 'Urban mobility' (2018)
no KIC on 'Smart secure societies'
Thank you for your attention!
Interested in getting our free monthly newsletter from Brussels?
Go to www.swisscore.org!
David Bohmert
+32 2 549 09 80
[email protected]
www.swisscore.org
Tel +32-2-549 09 80
Fax +32-2-549 09 89
[email protected]
Philipp Langer
Ressortleiter EU-Rahmenprogramme
Staatsekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation
Eidgenössisches Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF
Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation SBFI
EU Rahmenprogramme
Progress Report
Die Schweiz in Horizon 2020
Stand der Verhandlungen
Philipp LANGER, SBFI
Informationsevent ZH
23. Oktober 2013
Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation SBFI – Philipp LANGER
1
CH: Öffentliche Drittmittel für F&E
Frontier
Research
Applied Research
Demo, Exp. Development
Produc‐
tion
Com‐
mercia‐
lisation
SNSF
CTI
2
Frontier
Research
Applied Research
Produc‐
tion
Com‐
mercia‐
lisation
SNSF
CTI
COST
EUREKA
3
Frontier
Research
Applied Research
Produc‐
tion
Com‐
mercia‐
lisation
SNSF
CTI
EU Framework Programmes
COST
EUREKA
4
CH: Drittmittel des Bundes für F&E
(SBFI 2013)
5
CH: Bundesmittel für Internationale BFI
(SBFI 2013: 856 mio CHF; F&I = 95%)
6
CH: Mittel für F&E (alle Quellen)
(BfS 2008)
7
CH und EU‐Forschungsrahmenprogramme (FRPs)
 Euratom‐Rahmenprogramm: Offizielle Teilnahme CH seit 1978
 FRP: Projektteilnahmen seit 1987
 Projektweise Finanzierung Bund seit 1992
 Seit 2004 CH = assoziierter Staat
8
CH und EU‐Forschungsrahmenprogramme (FRPs)
 CH: Einziger assoziierter Staat an FRP und Euratom‐Programm
 CH: Grösster Beitragszahler unter allen Assoziierten Staaten
9
Prozesse zur Assoziierung an das Horizon 2020‐Paket
 Finanzierung sichern:
 Botschaft an das Parlament (BBl 2013 1987)
 Mittel von 4.4 Mia CHF
(knapp 4 Mia EUR)
 Nationalrat:
 146:20 Stimmen  Ständerat: 
44:0 Stimmen Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation SBFI – Philipp LANGER
10
Prozesse zur Assoziierung an das Horizon 2020‐Paket
 Assoziierung verhandeln:
 Verhandlungsmandat CH verabschieden (Bundesrat > Parl. > BR)
 Verhandlungsmandat EU verabschieden
 Exploratorische Gespräche
 Verhandlungen
11
Zeitplan der Schweizer Assoziierung Horizon 2020‐Paket
2011
2014
2013
2012
EU
FP7 (2007‐2013)
Redaktion Botschaft
Beschluss
12.2013?
Behandlung
Parlament
Budget inkl. Euratom: 92 Mia €
CH: Assoziiert prov. 1.1.2014
Unterzeichnung
Zweitrat: SR
Mandat CH
Erstrat: NR
Bundesrat
Grundsatz‐
Entscheide
Verh. 6 Mt.
Horizon 2020 (2014‐2020)
6 Mte
Paraphierung
Horizon 2020
Diskussion und Adoption durch Rat und Parlament
Mandat EU
Vorber.
COM
Präsentation
30.11.2011
Budget: 54 Mia €
CH: Assoziiert seit 1.1.2007 (rückwirkend)
Ra‐
tif.
CH
12
Eidgenössisches Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF
Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation SBFI
EU Rahmenprogramme
Herzlichen Dank!
Dr. Philipp Langer
Leiter EU‐Rahmenprogramme Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation SBFI
Tel. +41 31 322 96 93, [email protected]
13
Lotte Jaspers
Senior & Founding Partner Yellow Research Amsterdam
The Rolling Agenda
3-year strategic programme and 2-year work
programme, what about it?
Opportunities and obstacles
Lotte Jaspers
[email protected]
+31-(0)20-422 1115
1
Our metaphor
EU Policies:
Public and
Industrial
Roadmaps
Part III:
Societal Challenges
Part I:
Excellent Science
Implementation
through Horizon
2020
Part II:
EUROPE 2020
EU Roadmaps,
Strategy &
Action Plans,
etc
Partnering
End-users; citizens; civil society organisations
2
2
Main Structure Horizon 2020
HORIZON 2020: FP FOR RESEARCH AND INNOVATION
Art. 173 AND 182 TFEU
PART (priority) I
PART (priority) II
PART (priority) III
EXCELLENT SCIENCE
SOCIETAL CHALLENGES
FOCUS AREAS
European Research Council Leadership in Enabling and 1. Health, demographic change and
(ERC):
Industrial Technologies
wellbeing
1. Starting Grant
(LEIT)
2. Food security, sustainable
2. Consolidator Grant
1. ICT
agriculture and forestry, marine
3. Advanced Grant
2. Nanotechnologies
and maritime and inland water
4. Proof of Concept
3. advanced materials
research and bio-economy
5. Synergy Grants
4. Biotechnology
3. Secure, clean and efficient
5. Advanced manufacturing
energy
Future Emerging
and processing
4. Smart, green and integrated
Technologies (FET):
6. Space
transport
1. FET Open
5. Climate action, environment,
2. FET Proactive
resource efficiency and raw
3. FET Flagships
materials
Marie Curie Actions:
Access to Risk Finance:
6. Europe in a changing world –
1. ITN
1. Debt Facility
inclusive, innovative and
2. Ind. Fellowships
2. Equity Facility
reflective societies
3. RISE
3. Capacity-Building in
7. Secure societies – protecting
4. COFUND
Technology Transfer
freedom and security of Europe
Research Infrastructures:
and its citizens
1. Developing EU RI for
2020
SME INSTRUMENT
2. Fostering innovation
potential of RI & HR
3. Reinforcing European RI
policy and int. cooperation
3
Topics are designed and calls issued by
Commission designs and
issues
Art 185 Joint Programming
Initiatives: design and issue
Contractual PPPs design but
Commission issues
H2020
and subsidiarity
 AAL;  Bonus;  EDCTP2  EMRP; 
Eurostars2;  EERA;  SET Plan;  JPND;
 FACCE;  Cultural Heritage;  Urban
Europe;  CliK'EU;  More Years,  Better
Lives;  Antimicrobial Resistance;  Water;
 Oceans
 Factories of the Future;  Energy-efficient
Buildings;  Green Vehicles;  Future
Internet;  Sustainable Process Industry; 
Robotics;  Photonics;  High Performance
Computing
Art 187 Joint Undertakings:
design and issue
 Clean Sky;  Fuel Cells and Hydrogen; 
Innovative Medicines;  Electronic
Components and Systems;  Bio-based
Industries
4
Treaty
EU2020 Policies: Flagships: Health Strategy, Health Security initiative,
eHealth Action Plan, Biodiversity Strategy, Roadmaps etc…………..
FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME
3 Priorities:
•
Excellent Science
•
LEIT
•
Societal Challenges
1 - SPECIFIC
PROGRAMME
3 YEAR STRATEGIC PROGRAMME 2014-2016
Focus areas
2 Y – WORK PROGRAMME 2014-2015
5
H2020 work programme
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Strategic Programme
Work Programme 1
Lobby
H2020?
Calls
published
on basis of
WP ‘14
Ad hoc
financing
decision
‘15
Strategic Programme
Work Programme 2
Calls
published
on basis
of WP ‘16
6
Ad hoc
financing
decision
‘17
Strategic Programme
Work Programme 3
Calls
published
on basis
of WP ‘18
Ad hoc
financing
decision
‘19
Work
Program
me 4
Calls
published
on basis
of WP ‘20
Adoption H2020 2-year WPs
Internal:
Relevant DGs
European
Commission
H2020
Consultation
Strategic Programme
is fine-tuned on yearly
basis wrt the WPs
Draft
Ad-hoc financing
decision Y2
Adoption
Call for
proposals
Stakeholder
Consultation
Partnerships:
• 185 JPI
• 187 JU
• Contractual PPPs
• EIP
• ETP
7
•
•
•
Advisory groups
Programme Comitees
Other Commitees
Adding a topic to a Focus Area
Focus Area: Sustainable food security
Focus:
Development of competitive and resource-efficient aquatic
and terrestrial food production systems covering
• :Eco-intensification of production;
• Sustainable management of natural resources;
• Technologies for a sustainable food chain;
• Safe foods and healthy diets for all;
• A global food security system
Impact supports
•
•
•
•
the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe,
the European Innovation Partnership,
the European Consumer Agenda and
the integrated EU approach to contribute to reducing ill
health due to poor nutrition, overweight and obesity.
8
Example WP Societal challenge 2
FOOD SECURITY, SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, MARINE AND
MARITIME RESEARCH AND THE BIO-ECONOMY
Table of Content:
Introduction (emphasis on focus areas + indication that in LEIT other relevant
calls can be found)
I.
Focus Area “Sustainable Food Security”
II. Focus Area “Blue Growth”
III. Societal Challenge 2 - General Call
IV. Contributions to other Focus Areas
•
•
V.
Focus Area “Waste”
Focus Area “Personalising Health and Care”
Other actions not implemented through calls for proposals
Topics to review with JRC
9
Adding a topic to main call of a WP
Main call
Under which WP and pillar
2 year Agenda
Expected
Impact
Funding
Instrument
10
Researc & Innovation Action
Innovation Action
SME Instrument
Coordination & Support Action
Roles - 1
Issues
Role for research
Role of support staff
What activities: Training,
What is the need
Translate to EU funded
activities
Align need to TRL
Explain TRLs per field if
necessary
Networking, Future, Large
equipment, Emerging trend?
Applicable TRL?
Which pillar
Expected Impact:
Research + support
Impact from the research Translate into EU impact
perspective
and contribution
Funding Instrument
Aligning funding
instrument to the TRLs
11
Influencing the Rolling Agenda

Step 1: What activities require funding: outstanding researchers,
mobility, career development, infrastructure, technology development, large
infrastructures, large equipment, networking etc

Step 2: Strategy per research group

Step 3: Focus Areas applicaple, identify relevent WPs in Priorities 2
and 3 as well as any complementary funding possibilities. If no
topics available, what strategy can be applied to influence the topic
description

Step 4: No Focus Area: add topic to WP or add Focus Area?

Step 5: Link connected partnerships (185, 187 & contractuals)

Step 6: Define nature of the actions and plan per year
12
Roles – 2
Issues
Role for research
Role of support staff
Activities
Identify the scientific
European associations
Who is the NCP & get
Swisscore involved as
early as possible
Applicable TRL?
-
-
Which pillar
Mobilise your network
accross PPPs
Identify the Swiss
experts
Expected Impact:
Cross check with your
network
Identify the EU project
officers
Funding Instrument
-
-
Organise a meeting (face-to-face, workshop, round table discussion) and invite
the stakeholders to discuss the impact of this topic in Brussels
Bring support staff to pick up and translate the
opportunities suggested by Brussels
13
Adding a topic to the Focus Area
Focus Area is given for 3 years
Pillar
Activity
2
Expected
impact
3
Technical Roadmap
EC committees
14
Partners
Stijn Delauré
Head of International Research Funds KU Leuven
The Globalisation of Research: Horizon 2020
Zürich, 23/10/2013
THE HIDDEN DRIVER TO EXCELLENCE:
ERC and Marie Skłodowska Curie actions in H2020
„Successful models of individual career development“
Stijn Delauré, KU Leuven, Belgium
[email protected]
Introducing KU Leuven (Belgium)
Comprehensive university
2012-2013
number
% international
students
41,255
16
professors
1,022
9
research staff
5,657
37
PhD degrees
625
40
Research expenses 2012: 348 M€
KU Leuven Funds: 23% (bottom-up)
License income/year: top 0.1% univs
533 projects
~245 M€
www.kuleuven.be
129 actions
(56 ITNs)
62 grants
(43 StG)
Outline
• Career development? Independence? – ‘Excellent Science’
• Your career? Marie Skłodowska Curie Actions
• So you think you’re excellent? European Research Council
• + examples
The next Framework Programme
Period 2014-2020 - Budget ~70.2 B€
Excellent Science pillar: the
scientist or the scientific community
set the agenda (bottom-up calls)
I.
III.
Societal
Challenges
Excellent
Science
8%
17%
II.
Industrial
Leadership
Marie Skłodowska
Curie Actions (MSCA)
European Research
Council (ERC)
Outline
• Career development? Independence?
• Your career? High expectations…
• So you think you’re excellent?
• + examples
Career paths of
young researchers
18% Academic
career
Post34% doc
82%
PhD
66%
Nonacademic
career
Academic
Academic
professorship
9%
Permanent
of PhD
research
graduates
staff
Public sector
NGO
Enterprise
Teaching /
colleges
% situation in Flanders
Nonacademic
91%
of PhD
graduates
Career development?
“Strengthen your profile while being researcher”
Motives for researchers’ mobility (>3m)
MORE2 study on mobility patterns and career paths of researchers, 2013
Mobility? It’s about independenceility?
University perspective
•
•
•
•
Fresh blood
Fresh insights in sciences
Complementary expertises
International network
Researcher perspective
•
•
•
Independence
Exploring new research domains,
technologies and cultures
Enlarging your network
Horizon 2020 – Excellent Science pillar
Marie Skłodowska Curie Actions (MSCA)
ITN
~12%
Innovative networks
supporting early-stage researchers’ training
~ April 2014?
10%13%
405M€
IF
Individual fellowship
supporting experienced researchers’ mobility
~ August 2014?
25%36%
COFUND
Co-funding of
regional, national,
international
programmes funding
PhD students and
postodoctoral
research fellos
~ end 2014?
240M€
RISE
International and inter-sector cooperation
through research & innovation staff exchange
~ early 2014?
70M€
80M€
2013 success rates for similar programmes – Source: DG EAC
Indicative budget breakdown of 2014 call – Source: draft WP
Source: draft work programme – not approved, may change
42%
Award criteria – MSCA
Excellence (50%)
Impact (30%)
Implementation (20%)
• Research programme
• Training programme
• Enhancement R&Irelated HR and skills
• Coherence work plan
• Management structures
(ITN) / objectives (IF)
• Supervision quality
• Interaction between
the partners
• Structuring PhD
training (ITN)
• Effectiveness of
dissemination
& procedures
• Operational capacity
• Competences,
institutional environment
(ITN), commitment (IF)
Triple “I” principle
• International
• Interdisciplinary
• Intersectoral
Source: draft work programme – not approved, may change
Examples – Innovative Training Network
In natural sciences & medicine…
…but also in humanities
MIDFREQUENCY: CAE
Methodologies for Mid-Frequency
Analysis in Vibration and Acoustics
Translation Research
Training: an Integrated and
Intersectoral Model for Europe
•
•
•
•
Spin-out of collaborative project
12 partners – 4 companies
Incl.
(services supplier)
o
KU Leuven spin-off, multinational
o
Most successful BE company, FP7
o
19 MCA projects
o
Embedded MCA in its HR policy
4 universities – 4 public bodies /
ngo’s – 4 companies
1. Translation technologies
2. Multimedia and multimodal translation
3. Linguistic diversity and integration in
Europe
4. Media representation of political
discourse in Europe
Looking for job opportunities? http://ec.europa.eu/euraxess
Example – incoming Individual Fellow
Career example ♀ 2002-2013
Obstacles
Master Industrial Engineering, Milano
Moving, housing, registration, insurance,…
• Initiative needed; dedicate the first
weeks to administrative stuff
Erasmus program, Aachen
PhD Materials Engineering, Roma
Postdoc fellow, Leuven
• Marie Curie IEF
• applied research project
Assistant professor, KU Leuven
Faculty of Engineering Technology
Family, friends,…
• Travel as much as possible
• Eventually, they can move with you
Salary, conditions,…
• Really???
Tips from the fellow
•
get in touch with the host institution at least 1 year in advance – visit if possible
•
do not focus on one possibility – compare, look for ‘a match’, it’s your career!
•
when to go abroad? – It’s never a good time … or … anytime is fine
Outline
• Career development? Independence?
• Your career?
• So you think you’re excellent? Having a ‘eureka’ moment?
• + examples
European Research Council (ERC)
• Funds ground-breaking, blue-sky, high-risk/high-gain research on the
sole basis of excellence
o
50% track record
o
50% project / idea
• For any nationality, with a host institution in Europe
• Portable grant – Highly flexible – Creates independence – Highly visible
• But: high interest, low success rate
http://ec.europa.eu/erc
European Research Council grants (ERC)
12%
Starting Grant
~ end of March 2014
?
485M€
Consolidator Grant
Consolidator, 7-12y post PhD
Up to 2.75 M€
~ early June 2014
12%
Proof-ofConcept
Starters, 2-7y post PhD
Up to 2.0 M€
713M€
Advanced Grant
Bridging gap
between research &
earliest stage of
marketable
innovation (for ERC
grantees only)
2 deadlines/year
Track record of significant research
achievements in the last 10y – Up to 3.5 M€
~ end of Oct. 2014
450M€
2013 success rates for similar programmes – Source: ERCEA
Indicative budget allocation for 2014 calls – Source: draft WP
http://ec.europa.eu/erc
15M€
The ERC grantee and his/her team
2/3 of staff are
people in the training
phase of their career
(job opportunities…)
Source: ERC
Evaluator’s advice to StG applicants
•
Track record: should be outstanding
o Key role in a top publication mandatory – going beyond own research field beneficial
o Independence (mobility?)
•
Project: carefully written, thought through
o
o
o
o
Evaluators are excellent scientists but not all are experts in your field
Clear & simple, correct, build up your hypothesis, write carefully how you’ll challenge it
Sufficient details, but keep focused on the essentials
Carefully analyze the risks and be specific about “plan-B”; include preliminary data
•
Overall: “write a thriller”
•
Select the right panel
•
Interview: be sparkling ambitious and enthusiastic
Examples – Starting Grants
ViralPhylogeography
AIDA
Evolutionary Reconstruction of
Viral Spread in Time and Space
Architectural design In Dialogue
with disAbility
•
•
Interdisciplinary research project
Aims to investigate whether and
how the spatial experience of
people living with a disability can
trigger innovation in architecture
RENT-A-SPECIALIST
•
Proof of Concept grant
•
Full characterization of pathogen
spread in space and time
•
Computationally tractable models
•
Mapping the origins and
expansion of the Indo-European
language family
Questions?
[email protected]
www.kuleuven.be/EU
Spyridon Arvanitis
Konjunkturforschungsstelle ETH Zürich
Wissens- und Technologietransfer zwischen
Hochschulen und Unternehmen in der Schweiz: Was
meinen die Betroffenen dazu?
Dr. Spyros Arvanitis
ETH Zürich, KOF Swiss Economic Institute
Section Innovation Economics
“The Globalisation of Research – Horizon 2010”
Zürich, 23. Oktober 2013
Übersicht
 Einleitung
 Wissens- und Technologietransfer in der Schweiz
 Standpunkt der Unternehmen
 Standpunkt der Hochschulen
 Schlussbemerkungen
2
Einleitung
= Definition:
Mit Wissens- und Technologietransfer (WTT) zwischen Unternehmen
und wissenschaftlichen Institutionen bezeichnen wir alle Aktivitäten,
die darauf abzielen, wissenschaftliches bzw. technologisches Wissen
– je nach Richtung des Austausches – den beteiligten Unternehmen
bzw. Hochschulen zu übertragen, das für ihre Tätigkeit nützlich sein
kann
= Formen:
Informelle Kontakte (z.B. Telefonkontakte, Besuch von
Konferenzen)
Technische Infrastruktur (z.B. gemeinsame Labors)
Ausbildungsaktivitäten (z.B. Rekrutierung von F&E- Mitarbeitenden,
Vergabe von Dissertationen, gemeinsame Lehrveranstaltungen)
 Forschungsaktivitäten
Beratung (z.B. Gutachten)
8.2.2012
3
= Quelle der Information:
repräsentative Umfragen bei Unternehmen und wissenschaftlichen
Instituten im Auftrag des ETH-Rates 2005 und 2011
Unternehmen: Industrie, Bauwirtschaft, ausgewählte
Dienstleistungsbranchen, mehr als 5 Beschäftigte (je ca. 2000 Firmen)
wissenschaftlichen Institute: sämtliche Schweizer Hochschulen +
Forschungsorganisationen des Bundes (je ca. 180 Institute aus den
technischen, Natur- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften)
= Ziel des Referats:
 Präsentation von Motiven und Hemmnissen bezüglich WTT bei
Unternehmen und Hochschulen!
4
Wissens- und Technologietransfer in der Schweiz
= Wer hat solche Aktivitäten?
2002-04
2008-10
Industrie
25
28
Bauwirtschaft
10
4
Dienstleistungen
27
25
Insgesamt
22
21
ETH-Bereich
81
92
Universitäten
80
79
Fachhochschulen
97
100
Insgesamt
84
88
%-Anteil aller Firmen
%-Anteil aller Institute
5
Motive der Unternehmen
Hauptkategorien von Motiven für WTT-Aktivitäten:
%-Anteil der WTT-aktiven Firmen, die eine bestimmte Kategorie von Motiven
melden (*)
Total 2011
Total 2005
Zugang zu
Humankapital
Zugang zu
Forschungs-
65
66
ergebnissen
29
29
Finanzielle InstitutionellMotive
organisatorische
33
41
Motive
28
25
(*): Firmen, welche die Werte 4 oder 5 auf einer fünfstufigen Likert-Skala für mindestens ein
Einzelmotiv in einer bestimmten Hauptkategorie von Motiven meldet.
 Zugang zu Humankapital ist das wichtigste Motiv!
 Zwischen den beiden Perioden unterscheiden sich signifikant nur die
Firmenanteile, die sich auf die finanziellen Motive beziehen.
8.2.2012
6
Motive der wissenschaftlichen Institute
Hauptkategorien von Motiven für WTT-Aktivitäten 2005:
%-Anteil der WTT-aktiven Firmen, die eine bestimmte Kategorie von Motiven
melden (*)
Zugang zu
Humankapital
ETH-Bereich
Universitäten
Fachhochschulen
Insgesamt
Zugang zu
Forschungs-
Finanzielle InstitutionellMotive
organisatorische
82
65
86
ergebnissen
43
33
65
91
84
98
Motive
82
63
88
75
45
90
75
 Finanzielle Motive am wichtigsten, Zugang zum Industriewissen am wenigsten
wichtig; beachtliche Unterschiede zwischen den Hochschulkategorien
8.2.2012
7
Hemmnisse der Unternehmen
Hauptkategorien von Hemmnissen von WTT-Aktivitäten:
%-Anteil der WTT-aktiven Firmen, die eine bestimmte Kategorie von
Hemmnissen melden (*)
Total 2011
Total 2005
Fehlende
Defizite
Information
d. Firmen
25
24
53
49
Defizite
Kosten/
d. Institute Risiken
41
42
43
42
Institutionellorganisatorische
Hemmnisse
31
25
 Selbstkritische Betrachtung der Unternehmen!
8.2.2012
8
Hemmnisse der wissenschaftlichen Institute 2005
Fehlende
Probleme bei
Defizite
Defizite
Kosten/
Institutionell-
Information
Lehre/Forschung
d. Firmen
organisator.
Hemmnisse
ETH-Bereich
Universitäten
Fachhochschulen
Insgesamt
25
29
31
22
24
13
27
16
14
18
22
16
41
21
43
13
10
10
28
21
18
19
32
11
(*): Firmen, welche die Werte 4 oder 5 auf einer fünfstufigen Likert-Skala für mindestens ein Einzelmotiv
in einer bestimmten Hauptkategorie von Motiven meldet.
 Beachtlicher Anteil der Institute mit Problemen bei Lehre/Forschung!
8.2.2012
9
Hemmnisse der wissenschaftlichen Institute 2011
Fehlende
Probleme bei
Defizite
Defizite
Kosten/
Institutionell-
Information
Lehre/Forschung
d. Firmen
organisator.
Hemmnisse
ETH-Bereich
Universitäten
Fachhochschulen
Insgesamt
14
21
21
23
30
29
19
19
19
17
20
14
19
16
43
4
13
14
19
27
19
18
24
11
(*): Firmen, welche die Werte 4 oder 5 auf einer fünfstufigen Likert-Skala für mindestens ein Einzelmotiv
in einer bestimmten Hauptkategorie von Motiven meldet.
 Beachtliche Reduktion der Hemmnisse gegenüber 2005 bei drei Hauptkategorien (fehlende Information, Probleme bei Lehre/Forschung,
Kosten/Risiken)
8.2.2012
10
Schlussbemerkungen
= Unterschiedliche Zielfunktionen von Unternehmen und Hochschulen
daher nicht erstaunlich, dass unterschiedliche Motiv/Hemmnis-Muster
bestehen
= Relativ stabile Muster 2005-2011
= Motive:
Unternehmen: Zugang zu Humankapital vs. finanzielle Motive
Hochschulen: Finanzielle Motive vs. Zugang zu Industriewissen
= Hemmnisse:
Unternehmen: Firmendefizite wichtiger als Hochschuldefizite!
Hochschulen: Probleme bei Lehre/Forschung
 Verbesserungsbedarf an der Schnittstelle zwischen Unternehmen und
Hochschulen (z.B. Errichten von Informationsplattformen, KontaktEvents)
11
Ich danke Ihnen für Ihre Aufmerksamkeit
12
Thank you
For more information, support or advice go to: http://grantsaccess.ethz.ch/en/
Call us on +41.44 634 53 50
Or keep updated via Twitter @grantsaccess

THE GLOBALISATION OF RESEARCH - EU Grants Access

Transcrição

Documentos relacionados

ERC Starting Grants 2016: Examples of projects

AGENDA

Sustainability and Climate Change: Interpretations and Claims by

50562 PRB React 17 inch Self Righting Deep V RTR Manual

mer zmedien + erziehung

AGENDA

Thailand

Financing Health Actions Through EU Funding

ERC Starting Grant 2016 - Physical Sciences and

Social Sciences and Humanities - ERC