p - I. Physikalisches Institut B RWTH Aachen
Transcrição
p - I. Physikalisches Institut B RWTH Aachen
First steps towards a Balloonborne electronpositronspectrometer Henning Gast I. Physikalisches Institut B Bad Honnef, 29 August 2006 Overview ● Motivation ● High-altitude balloons ● Design and projected performance – Tracker – Electromagnetic calorimeter (Ecal) – Time of Flight system (TOF) – Transition Radiation Detector (TRD) ● Scintillating fibres ● Introduction to software Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 2/31 Motivation Previous measurements of cosmic-ray positron fraction: deviations from expected shape, but large errors. No primary source for positrons known: probe for new physics. Dark Matter Candidate: SUSY-Neutralino χ Annihilations can occur, e.g. in the galactic halo: χχ → bb, W+W-,... → ... → e+e- ... (stable) Primary source of positrons in cosmic rays! Secondary background arises from hadronic interactions of cosmic ray protons and subsequent decays. W. de Boer et al. Atmosphere inhibits ground-based measurement: 20X0, 8I , therefore use high altitude balloon as carrier. Advantages: Reproducibility, post-flight calibration possible. Background by atmospheric secondaries must be considered. Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 3/31 Cosmic ray fluxes Proton suppression of O(10000) needed for measurement of the positron fraction. Spectra steeply declining with energy: Φ~E-(2.7-3.0) Composition: 90% protons 8% helium 1% electrons positrons, antiprotons, heavy nuclei Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 Systematic effects widely cancel out when measuring positron fraction. • p 4/31 Having fun with balloons Artist's impression of a ULDB in flight (NASA) CREAM trajectory (NASA) Henning Gast Ultra-long duration balloons (ULDB) under development by NASA: Payload 3,630 kg Scientific Payload 1,500 kg Altitude 138,000 ft (42 km) Duration up to 100 days Record-breaking CREAM flight lasted 41d 22h. Launch pads in Palestine, TX, Fort Sumner, NM (test flights), McMurdo Station, Antarctica, ... After the CREAM flight: “Payload recovery operations are in progress.” (NASA website) CREAM at launch (NASA) • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 5/31 Detector layout Time of Flight (TOF) trigger system velocity measurement Tracker momentum measurement disks Transition Radiation Detector (TRD) proton rejection 101-102 Electromagnetic calorimeter (ECAL) proton rejection 103-104 0.2 T Rasnik system stabilty control 100 x 6 mm 1mm Pb, 6x1 mm Scintillator Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 6/31 Momentum measurement Trajectory of a charged particle in a uniform magnetic field is a helix: p cos=0.3 GeV /c z BR Tm curvature (κ=1/R) error arises from two effects: ● finite measurement resolution k res= 720 N 4 L'2 ● multiple scattering k ms ≈ improve position measurement increase detector length (bad for acceptance) 0.016GeV /c z L p cos 2 L X0 minimize material budget addition in quadrature leads to p 2 = a 2ms b res p2 p maximize magnetic field equidistant spacing: k res= L' 2 720 N 4 concentrate layers at centre and sides “sagitta” geometry: k res= L' 2 256 N s= x 1 −x 3 −x2 2 Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 7/31 Designing the tracker purpose: momentum measurement inside magnetic field principal choices: silicon semiconductor detectors delicate and expensive time projection chamber gas-filled detector problematic in near-space environment scintillating fibres cheap and effective uniform tracker/ECAL R+D low material budget Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 8/31 Scintillating fibres: principle Saint-Gobain Crystals standard size 0.25 mm to 5 mm square or round cross section emission peak 430 ~ 530 nm decay times ~3 ns 1/e length 2~4 m photons per MeV ~8000 radiation length 42 cm operating temperature -20°C to +50°C Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 9/31 Scintillating fibres: Simulation physics of optical photons implememented in Geant4 scintillation ● reflection, refraction, transmission at optical boundaries ● absorption and scattering in matter ● free parameters of the simulation fibre geometry ● surface quality ● number of photons: dE ⋅G ⋅ ⋅d Mirror scint dx core n =0.2⋅0.073⋅1.6⋅8000 MeV −1⋅40 keV =7.5 n =SiPM⋅trap⋅f fibre with core and cladding see talk by G. Roper Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 10/31 Scintillating fibres: Picture Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 11/31 Tracker layout tracker: 62 cm 2x8 layers of staggered modules, mounted on 7cm wide, 250µm thick CF skin rings, 1cm Rohacell 12 layers measuring bending-plane 4 layers rotated to measure slope ~10% X0 (Tracker) + ~2.5% X0 (TRD) tracker module: 2x4x128 250µm scintillating fibres 2x 100µm CF skin 1x 5 mm Rohacell 32 mm single tracker module tracker + TRD (upside down) Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 12/31 Tracker readout scheme A x = ∑ x i Ai ∑ Ai x 4x1 readout scheme (column-wise) with weighted cluster mean p resolution depends on width, not height lower number of channels Henning Gast 16x1 silicon photomultiplier, strip width 380 µm need 32x1, 250µm strip width • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 13/31 Readout electronics top view fibres to be read out by silicon photomultipliers ~8x2x17x256=69632 channels ~1.5 mW per channel → 100W power consumption side view front view Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 14/31 Tracker performance momentum resolution for 4x1 readout from full detector simulation protons dominated by multiple scattering for low energies curvature resolution for high energies Henning Gast p = 0.1162 0.004⋅p/GeV 2 p • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 15/31 Designing the Ecal 6 Limitations: Weight Readout channels ~250 kg <10000 Choice of absorber material: lead X0/λI ρX0 X0 in 250kg 0.0328 6.37 g/cm2 15.3 3D sampling calorimeter: 80 layers 1mm absorber 6x1mm scintillating fibres (light guides to be included in simulation soon) Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 16/31 Ecal shower e+ p dE b 1 −bt =E 0 t e dt 1 t=x/X0 1 GeV e+ ECAL shower simulated by Geant4 simulation Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 17/31 Ecal digitization dE/dx 3 mm before digitization after digitization amplitude layer number 3x3 mm array: 8100 pixel SiPM digitization: photons at fibre end Henning Gast 8100 pixels photons pixel array • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 18/31 Ecal energy resolution preliminary E = E Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 2 a b 2 E • p 19/31 Shower shape analysis simulation of Ecal showers positrons Henning Gast protons • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 20/31 Cuts on shower parameters e+ p bremsstrahlung fraction shower shape fits for parameters E0, tmax=(a-1)/b from full simulation ratio of Ecal energy within one Moliere radius from shower axis angle between reconstructed track and shower axis pMC/pmeas Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 21/31 Ecal performance: Proton rejection Ecal proton rejection of O(10000) at ~55% electron efficiency Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 22/31 Misreconstructed showers “good” positron missed positron “good” proton misidentified proton TRD design based on AMS02 TRD 2x4 layers of TRD modules each module consists of 2cm radiator fleece (PE/PP mixture, ρ = 0.06 g/cm3) 72 µm kapton-based straw tube wall (16x) 6mm straw tube diameter, filled with Xe/CO2 (80:20) Carbon fiber stiffeners TRD module physics: Geant4 offers several TR models, here: irregular fibre radiator with gamma-distributed fibre diameter Photo-absorption ionization model for energy loss in thin material (gas tube) Bug found in Geant4 Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 24/31 TRD performance: electrons vs protons from reconstructed TRD track proton MPV at 1.35 keV AMS02 testbeam: 1.3 keV electrons protons 30-40 GeV AMS02 testbeam results: higher electron energy depositions from TR photons apparent rejection analysis to be done Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 25/31 TRD performance: charge separation p/Q > 5 GeV within arrows: 80% of 11B 3% of 10Be 10% of 12C Be 10 B 11 C 12 Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 26/31 TOF design and principle 2x2 layers in x/y direction each made of 8 modules: 10cm wide, 5mm high polystyrene scintillator geometrical optimization due digitization: at the moment, time of passage of first particle used upper TOF upper TOF t1 = L lower TOF t2 Henning Gast • L = t 2 −t 1 1 m2 1 2 p Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 p from rigidity measurement and charge determination → m → particle ID • p 27/31 TOF performance with ideal electronics resolution electrons protons C-12 Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 28/31 Introduction to software ● ● A software package for simulation, reconstruction, event display and analysis has been developed. Written in C++, uses GEANT4, ROOT, Qt, and some external libraries. parallelized by condor simulation reconstruction event display analysis I GEANT4 core: geometry, tracking, physics, interaction, digitization track finding, cleaning, fitting event mode ECAL mode shower mode fill histograms calculate analysis variables documentation analysis II automatically generated with doxygen fast access draw plots calculate efficiencies ROOT files for persistency shower axis and fit TRD tracks extended ROOT files CVS Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 29/31 Software: Event display Fast event display exists for browsing simulation and reconstruction result files. event mode: subdetector digis reconstructed tracks reconstructed shower digis used in tracks ECAL mode: ECAL shower histogram Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 30/31 Summary ● ● ● ● Indirect dark matter search relies on precise measurement of the cosmic-ray positron fraction, not yet done. Dedicated balloon-borne detector proposed, based on scintillating fibre tracker, sampling e.m. calorimeter and transition radiation detector for proton suppression, scintillator trigger and time-offlight system. Software framework for simulation, reconstruction, display and analysis exists. Atmospheric background under study. (see talk by Philip von Doetinchem) ● ● First measurements of fibre properties have begun. A lot of work ahead... Henning Gast • Bad Honnef 29 August 2006 • p 31/31