Amendment

Archilect/Consullonl Evoluolions for lhe SCVMC Bed Pool Reolignment Bockfill Projecls
CANDIDAIE IIRIAS
EVAI.UATION CRITERIA
ARCHIIECT
ARCHITECI
ARCHITTCI
ARCHITECI
ARCHIITCI
ARCHIIECT
ARCHITECI
ARCHIIECT
ARCHIIECI
ARCHITECI
ARCHIIECf
ARCHIIECT
GUTDEUNES/NOTES
ARCHIIECI
=
2
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
4
5
2
3
4
5
I
2
3
4
5
I
2
3
4
5
t
2
3
4
5
ì
2
3
4
5
I
2
3
4
5
I
2
3
I
5
2
3
I
5
2
3
4
5
2
3
I
5
3
0
0
0
4
0
5
FIRM'S PASI PERI-ORMANCE ON LARGE HOSPITAL
AND/OR EMERGENCY DEPARTMENI PROJECTS ÍMUST
BE OSHPD ¡)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
0
0
0
0
0
(.1
o
{J
0
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
o
0
0
o
0
& EXPERIENCE OF
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 Do the Arch¡lecls quol¡ficolions exhibil stondords ond procl¡ces in lheir orgon¡zol¡ons for quol¡ly conlrol
ond effect¡vê coôrd¡nolion? Do they cleody reflecl lhe fim's professionol slondords ond eihics? Does lhe
Arch¡lecl demonslrole effeclive monogemenl of key pþjecl mìleslones ond schedules? Does lhe
Arch¡lecl recognize ond/or idenlify problêm oreos ond demonstrole oñ obility lo effect¡vely mit¡gote
QUALIFICATIONS
THE PROJECT
IEAM IINCLUDING ENGINEERING CONSUTIANTS)
the Architects perfomonce lo lhe Clienls solisfocl¡on? Does lhe Arch¡lecl hove experience
nlerocl¡ng ond negotioling wilh lhe OJHPD office sloff ìñ Socromento os we'l os lhê tORs ond ACOs in
he field?
/Vos
lhêñ?
QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE OF THE FIRM'S
PROJECT MANAGER
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TECHNICAT APPROACH
3
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 Does lhe Arch¡tecl demonslrolè lheir knowledge, experlise ond obil¡t lo perform oll technicol elemenls
of the work specif¡c lo medìcol focility prcjecfs? Do lhe Archilecls' slolements exhibil on underslond¡ng
of lhe key issues, ìñterdêpendencies belween med¡col dêporlmenls ond knowledge of problem
csolulion melhods? ls there meril lo ony proposed dèsign solutions?
ORGANIZATIONAL SIRUCTURE
l
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
lhe A.chitecl slruclured lo prov¡de effeciive monogêment of in-house resources ond oulsjde
consullonls for lhìs projecl? Does lhe Archilect demoñskole underslond¡ng of differenl elemenìs of
commun¡colions nêeded forsuccessful complelion of lhe p@ject? Does the Arch¡lecl demonslrole lhe
expert¡se in dêoling with OSHPD ond olher regulolory ogencies? Does lhe Archilect demonslrote l¡mely,
effeclive, ond cons¡slenl meons of communicolìng w¡lh lhe Owneis tocilil¡es Depodment Sfoff,
egulolory ogencies, ond olher govemmenl enlil¡es?
LOCAL
5.6.5.2
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Does lhe Archilecl hovê ô phys¡col office w¡lhin Ìhe Coúnly of Sonto Cloro where signiliconl produclion
copobility ond oulpul is moinlo¡ned? lA jo¡nt venture wilh o locol f¡rm ¡s nol coñsidered o "loco¡
cusiness.") Score Roling - 0 for non-locol ond 5 for lôcol.
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Wos
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
los ihe Architecl provided verif¡oble References for sìmilor projecls? Do lhe References hove o
'ovoroble ossessment of lhe Archilecl? Will lhe References consider retoinìng the Archilect qgoin for
BUSINESS PRETERENCE PER COUNTY POI.¡CY
FIRM's PASI PERTORMANCE
ON
PRO.JECTS FOR THE
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
REFERENCES
Does lhe Archilecl's Pþjecl Monoger exhibit relevonl experience ond sufficienl experlise wìlh similor
kinds of projecls ond demonstrole succêssful complel¡on of such proÌecls?
the Architecl's perfomonce lo lhe County's soJisfoction? Did lhe Archilecl reosonobly interocl ond
3ffeclively coordinole wilh consullonls, inspectoß, Counly Project Stoff ond olher Counly Deportmênls?
'ulure projects?
tNDtvtouat
sconI
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0.0
CONSOTIDATED SCORE*
RAfING GUIDEI.INES
SCORE
REVIEWER
NOIES:
-
UNACCIPIABIE
0.0
/
0
NOI ADDRESSED
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
POOR
AVERAGE
GOOD
EXCEI,TENI
l-3
4-6
7-B
9-t 0
0.0
0.0
0.0
¡ANl(lNG (8ASED ON CONSOUDATED SCORES) pRtOR tO
r
lreo
z
lreo
s
lroo
l
s
lrao
lroo
o lrao
z
lrao
a lrao
r
ro
lrao
lno
r
r lrao
r
z lrao
r
r
'
'-
lrao
lo be compleied by PM
see cuideÌiôe/Noies for scoring of Locol Busines Preference cíterio.
tNTERV|EWS
¡