Elucidating the transition period in linguistic change
Transcrição
Elucidating the transition period in linguistic change
November 12, 04 WECOL04 Elucidating the transition period in linguistic change Shana Poplack University of Ottawa www.sociolinguistics.uottawa.ca 1. a. Esopo, desavergonhado, tu me foste enganar? Pois em ti vingarei (SF) minha raiva. (Euripedes; Silva 1734:106)1 ‘Aesop, you shameless man, did you deceive me? Well, I will avenge myself of my fury’. b Não vo-lo hei de negar (HP): fazei-me uma petição. (Fidalgo: Vicente 1526:176) I won’t deny it to you – make your request’. c Sao nove horas e o oficio de Ramos principia (P) às dez e meia. (Ambrósio; Pena 1853: 12) 3. Hypotheses & Factors Meanings and functions: • Grammatical person and number • Animacy • Type of sentence (declarative, interrogative, negative) • Temporal distance between speech time and predication (distal, proximal) • Contingency of the future eventuality (contingent, assumed) ‘It’s nine o’clock and the Palm procession begins at ten-thirty.’ d Aí eu, “que festa?” “Ah, na nossa sala vai ter (IR) uma festa.” (Tiago/A2/1992) ‘So I’m, “what party?” “Oh, there’s going to be a party in our classroom.’” 2. 1 “Variable context”: Any and all unambiguous reference to states or events occurring posterior to speech time. Codes in parentheses locate the utterance in play or speech corpus. Prescribed contexts of use: • Number of syllables in stem (monosyllabic vs. other) • Verb type (motion vs. other) • Type of clause (main, subordinate, relative) • Clitic pronoun (infixed (in SF) or not) • Presence and type of disambiguating adverbial specification (specific, non-specific, no adverbial) Extralinguistic: • Medium (written vs. spoken) • Century • Educational level (primary, secondary, university) POPLACK 2 4. Distribution of future temporal reference variants by century SF Century 16th 18th 19th 20th Plays Speech Total N 198 169 276 46 4 693 HP % 66 57 53 9 1 30 N 91 103 104 5 -303 P % 30 35 20 1 -13 N 10 19 66 93 104 292 IR % 3 6 13 18 14 12 N 3 5 72 384 613 1077 Total N Corrected Mean Contingency Contingent .68 Assumed .48 Sentence Type Declarative .55 Interrogative .33 Negative .37 Verb Type Motion .36 Non-motion .54 Temporal Distance Proximal Distal Grammatical Person/Animacy 1st Animate 3nd Inanimate 3rd Animate 2rd Animate HP 194 .33 Variable rule analyses of the probability that SF, HP, P & IR will be selected: 19th century Total % 1 302 2 296 14 518 73 528 85 721 45 2365 5. Variable rule analyses of the probability that SF, HP & P will be selected: 16th & 18th centuries SF 367 .62 6. P 29 .05 .31 .52 .44 .70 .63 .87 .38 .72 .35 .68 .62 .41 .20 SF 268 .55 HP 104 .21 Proximal .37 Distal .56 Sentence Type Declarative Interrogative Negative Adverbial Specification No adverbial .47 Specific .41 Non-specific .69 Verb Type Motion .31 Non-motion .52 Contingency Contingent Assumed .40 .55 Total N Corrected Mean P 48 .10 IR 72 .15 Temporal Distance .79 .35 .59 .29 .09 .45 .88 .45 .89 .44 .27 .52 .83 .47 .62 .27 .15 POPLACK 3 7. Variable rule analyses of the probability that P & IR will be selected: 20th century speech Present Ir - periphrasis Total N 47 611 Corrected Mean .07 .93 Specific .79 .21 Non-Specific .60 .40 No adverbial .42 .58 Contingent .87 .13 Assumed .45 .55 Adverbial Specification Contingency 8. Variable rule analyses of the probability that P & IR will be selected: 20th century speech vs. plays Total N: Corrected Mean Contingency Contingent Assumed Verb Type Motion Non-motion Grammatical Person 1st Animate 3rd Inanimate 3rd Animate 2nd Animate Adverbial Specification Specific Non-Specific No adverbial Present Plays Speech 72 47 .14 .05 Ir - periphrasis Plays Speech 384 611 .77 .93 .78 .47 .87 .45 .30 .52 .13 .55 .78 .47 [.62] [.48] .28 .52 [.38] [.52] .66 .50 .47 .13 [.44] [.69] [.46] [.55] .39 .43 .55 .81 [.56] [.31] [.54] [.45] .76 .61 .45 .79 .60 .42 .31 .34 .56 .21 .40 .58