Geological features indicative of processes related to the hematite
Transcrição
Geological features indicative of processes related to the hematite
Icarus 171 (2004) 295–316 www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Geological features indicative of processes related to the hematite formation in Meridiani Planum and Aram Chaos, Mars: a comparison with diagenetic hematite deposits in southern Utah, USA Jens Ormö a,∗ , Goro Komatsu b , Marjorie A. Chan c , Brenda Beitler c , William T. Parry c a Centro de Astrobiología, Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial, Ctra de Torrejón a Ajalvir, km 4, 28850 Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain b International Research School of Planetary Sciences, Universita d’Annunzio, Viale Pindaro 42, 65127 Pescara, Italy c Department of Geology & Geophysics, University of Utah, 719 WBB, 135 S. 1460 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0111, USA Received 4 December 2003; revised 9 June 2004 Available online 28 July 2004 Abstract In order to understand the formation of the few but large, hematite deposits on Mars, comparisons are often made with terrestrial hematite occurrences. In southern Utah, hematite concretions have formed within continental sandstones and are exposed as extensive weatheredout beds. The hematite deposits are linked to geological and geomorphological features such as knobs, buttes, bleached beds, fractures and rings. These terrestrial features are visible in aerial and satellite images, which enables a comparison with similar features occurring extensively in the martian hematite-rich areas. The combination of processes involved in the movement and precipitation of iron in southern Utah can provide new insights in the context of the hematite formation on Mars. Here we present a mapping of the analogue geological and geomorphological features in parts of Meridiani Planum and Aram Chaos. Based on mapping comparisons with the Utah occurrences, we present models for the formation of the martian analogues, as well as a model for iron transport and precipitation on Mars. Following the Utah model, high albedo layers and rings in the mapped area on Mars are due to removal or lack of iron, and precipitation of secondary diagenetic minerals as fluids moved up along fractures and permeable materials. Hematite was precipitated intraformationally where the fluid transporting the reduced iron met oxidizing conditions. Our study shows that certain geological/geomorphological features can be linked to the hematite formation on Mars and that pH differences could suffice for the transport of the iron from an orthopyroxene volcanoclastic source rock. The presence of organic compounds can enhance the iron mobilization and precipitation processes. Continued studies will focus on possible influence of biological activity and/or methane in the formation of the hematite concretions in Utah and on Mars. 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Mars; Mineralogy; Geochemistry; Geological processes; Mars surface 1. Introduction 1.1. Aim of study The existence of large hematite deposits on Mars is now established, yet enigmatic (e.g., Christensen et al., 2001; Hynek et al., 2002). In order to understand the processes behind their formation, comparisons are often made with * Corresponding author. Fax: +34-91-5201621. E-mail address: [email protected] (J. Ormö). 0019-1035/$ – see front matter 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2004.06.001 terrestrial hematite occurrences (e.g., Banded Iron Formations; Christensen et al., 2001). In this study we compare surface features of an area with extensive hematite deposits in southern Utah, USA (Fig. 1), with conspicuous features visible in high-resolution Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC) images from the Meridiani Planum and Aram Chaos hematite regions on Mars (Fig. 2). Here the focus is on regional mapping distributions and similarities (versus detailed hematite mineralogies that have yet to be more thoroughly examined in both the terrestrial and Mars examples). In Utah, a large variety of diagenetic iron oxide (e.g., hematite and goethite) concretions occur within Jurassic 296 J. Ormö et al. / Icarus 171 (2004) 295–316 Fig. 1. Utah map overlain with multispectral data from five overlapping Landsat 7 ETM + scenes acquired between 8 September 1999 and 3 October 3 1999. Bands 7 (mid infrared, reflected), 4 (near infrared, reflected), and 2 (visible green, reflected) displayed in grayscale. Original spatial resolution 30 m. Outline of Glen Canyon Group outcrop locations are modified from Hintze et al. (2002). Photo localities are indicated by numbers 1 through 8. 1. Snow Canyon (Figs. 3B, 5B); 2. Kaibab Uplift (Fig. 11A); 3. Mollies Nipple (Fig. 12B); 4. Paria River (Figs. 3A, 7B, 6A, 6B); 5. Lake Powell (Figs. 7A, 6C, 6D, 8A); 6. Escalante (Fig. 4E, 5D); 7. Dubinky Well and Moab area (Figs. 3C, 11B, 11C, 12A, 8B, 4A–4D, 5A); 8. San Rafael Swell. Diagenetic hematite deposits in Utah and on Mars 297 Fig. 2. The location of geological and geomorphological features in the mapped sectors of Meridiani Planum and Aram Chaos analogous to features in southern Utah hematite-rich regions. Images include all released images from the mission phases dating from August 2001 to January 2002 and February 2002 to July 2002 and image 0301633 from an earlier phase. Each symbol represents the most dominant feature in each MOC image, and is located at the geographic center of the image. Simplified outlines of the hematite-rich plains unit (P2) and the etched unit (E) mapped by Hynek et al. (2002) are indicated (P2 and hematite-rich area in Aram Chaos = dark gray, E = light gray). The outline of the hematite-rich area in Aram Chaos is adopted from Christensen et al. (2001) and Catling and Moore (2003). Image numbers for images discussed in the text are indicated. continental sandstones and are exposed on the surface as resistant, weathered-out beds or accumulations. These iron oxide-cemented zones in the sandstone commonly generate spheres, pods, beds, and cylindrical pipes and columns that cut across the surrounding, primary bedding. Some deposits are associated with large pipe-like bodies of fluidized sand that intruded through the sedimentary bedding. The pipes have acted as aquifer conduits for the fluids that transported the iron. These bodies are in general cylindrical and can be several tens of meters in both width and vertical extent. In certain areas, weathered-out pipes generate clusters of towers a few meters high, and some even cap and protect hundred meter high butte-like mountains. The iron from the sediment may be carried by brines which can cause extensive alteration of strata along permeable layers, pipes, and fractures that are visible as albedo differences between the host and altered rock. Landforms and other geological features strongly resembling those of southern Utah, such as high-albedo rings and layers, knobs, domes, and cemented ridges along vertical joints and faults, also dominate the landscape features in the hematite-rich regions on Mars. In this study we seek an explanation for these geological features in Meridiani Planum and Aram Chaos by comparing with the mode of formation of the Utah examples. The hematite occurrences in southern Utah are not nearly as extensive as the hematite deposits on Mars, and may be smaller by a magnitude or more in size. However, the process behind their formation is of interest as it provides a model for iron transportation and precipitation in a low-temperature hydrologic groundwater system (Ormö and Komatsu, 2003). The strength of the model is that it is supported by the large variety of geological and geomorphological features. The model does not require a geologically and paleoclimatologically complicated environment (e.g., hydrothermal systems, long-lived large bodies of standing water etc.), however the presence of such an environment does not exclude the plausibility of our model. 1.2. Martian hematite occurrences Hematite is one of few minerals found on Mars, which can be linked directly to processes involving water. The first concentration of crystalline hematite mineral was identified in West Candor Chasma of Valles Marineris using Viking color and Phobos II data (Komatsu et al., 1993; Geissler et al., 1993). Examination of this site by the Mars Global Surveyor Thermal Emission Spectrometer (TES) has not yet confirmed this finding, and an alternative explanation is tentatively given as poorly crystalline FeOOH polymorphs including goethite (Christensen et al., 2001). However, the TES instrument has identified relatively high discrete concentrations of martian hematite deposits at 298 J. Ormö et al. / Icarus 171 (2004) 295–316 Meridiani Planum, Aram Chaos, and small areas within Valles Marineris (Christensen et al., 2001). Christensen et al. (2001) identified the mineral as crystalline, coarse-grained (> 5–10 µm), gray hematite, which may have axis-oriented crystals (Lane et al., 2002). Hematite coatings and finegrained consolidated hematite have also been suggested based on spectral studies matching the TES signatures (Kirkland et al., 2003, 2004). The Mars Exploration Rover (MER), Opportunity, is currently investigating an area in the western part of the hematite-rich unit in Meridiani Planum (Golombek et al., 2002; Squyres and the Athena Science Team, 2004a, 2004b). These studies have confirmed the existence of hematite concretions in a sedimentary host rock and apparent high concentrations of sulfur-rich minerals (i.e., sulfates) at the Opportunity landing site crater (“Eagle Crater”) although calibrated results have not yet been published. The friable layered unit in Meridiani Planum where hematite is concentrated (∼ 10–15%) was interpreted to be sedimentary (Christensen et al., 2001) or pyroclastics (Chapman and Tanaka, 2002; Hynek et al., 2002). The hematite-rich unit appears to be confined within a single stratigraphic horizon concentrated as a thin surface layer (Christensen et al., 2001), which now appears to be confirmed by the observations by Opportunity (Christensen et al., 2004). Thermal inertia data indicate that the unit is made of, or covered by, sand-sized or larger materials (e.g., Ramsey and Christensen, 1998). The hematite-rich unit is superimposed on Middle to Late Noachian cratered terrain (Hynek et al., 2002, and this study). In Meridiani Planum, a Geographic Information System (GIS) study of Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) topography and hematite concentrations indicate that the highest abundance levels of hematite are concentrated along the southern half of a 200 km long, 70 km wide, NE-trending, ancient ridge and a small area just to the east of the ridge (Chapman and Hare, 2002). Christensen et al. (2001) assessed five different mechanisms of hematite deposit formation as (1) chemical precipitation (a)low-temperature precipitation in Fe-rich water, (b) laterite style weathering, (c) direct precipitation from circulating hydrothermal fluid, (d) coating formation by weathering and (2) thermal oxidation of magnetite-rich lavas. Mechanisms (1)(a) and (1)(b) require diagenetic processes to convert Fe-oxide/oxide assemblages to coarse-grained, gray hematite. They preferred chemical precipitation [(1)(a) or (1)(c)] based on the geological settings assuming that the hematite-bearing unit is sedimentary. Hynek et al. (2002), on the contrary, considered that the hematite-bearing unit is pyroclastic in origin and advocated thermal oxidation of volcanic ash or precipitation from circulating fluids. In the case of the latter hypothesis, the flow may have been under hydrothermal or ambient conditions (Christensen et al., 2001). Catling and Moore (2003), argue for a hydrothermal origin of the hematite-rich unit in Aram Chaos. The Aram Chaos hematite deposits are concentrated inside a heavily degraded crater that shows a complex geological history and the deposits are observed within plateaus dotted with mesas (Glotch and Christensen, 2003). From the abundance map by Christensen et al. (2001) it is clear that hematite is confined in the northeastern part of the crater. Although this part of the crater basin has a widespread hematite distribution, there is a wide variety of geological units within the hematite concentrations. Glotch and Christensen (2003) suggest the hematite to have formed when iron in water ponding in the crater became saturated. 1.3. The southern Utah hematite deposits: geological setting, distribution, and related landforms The most prominent large-scale (km-scale visible in satellite images) features in southern Utah related to the hematite formation are the strong contrasts between red strata and white (bleached) strata. It is the iron oxides (e.g., hematite, goethite) that account for the vivid coloration in the permeable Jurassic Navajo, Page, and Entrada sandstones. Sandstone coloration is an index to both the character of the subsurface fluids which caused precipitation (oxidation) and bleaching (reduction), fluid flow pathways, and the overall paleohydrologic setting (Chan et al., 2000; Beitler et al., 2003). Most of the Utah sandstones were likely originally red from small amounts of early, disseminated iron oxides and clays that create thin grain coatings during deposition or early burial (e.g., Walker, 1975). The original iron source for the red coloration is the breakdown of ferromagnesium silicates with iron in the ferrous state. This iron is released from the minerals and oxidized to form the red coloration of the “redbeds.” This oxidized ferric iron is highly immobile. The iron needs to be reduced to Fe2+ (by donations of electrons) in order to be put into solution and transported. Bleaching by reducing solutions later removes iron on nearly microscopic scales such as those along individual eolian laminae, deformation bands, and lithologic contacts, to regional scales extending through a formation over tens of kilometers. Bleaching is dependent on the mobility of iron, fluid composition and flow paths. Flow paths are a function of permeability, lithology, sedimentology, stratigraphy, and structure. Field, laboratory, and numerical modeling studies on iron mineralization in southern Utah suggest that iron is mobilized and removed by reducing water that moved along conduits (e.g., faults or fractures) and then outward into adjacent permeable rocks (Chan et al., 2000; Beitler et al., 2003; Parry et al., 2004). The fluids in the Utah example were reducing possibly due to the presence of hydrocarbons, methane, organic acids, or hydrogen sulfide. Iron mobilizing fluids (sometimes brines) need only to contain small quantities of the reductant. When reduced waters carrying the iron meet and mix with shallow, oxygenated ground water, iron oxides are precipitated to form a variety of iron-oxide concretionary cements in the porous sandstones. Multiple iron-oxide mineralization events and concretionary geometries are evident and can be Diagenetic hematite deposits in Utah and on Mars 299 Fig. 3. Examples of large-scale bleaching in southern Utah. (A) Color aerial photo of Paria River area (supplied by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management). Right enlargement shows the colorful redox reaction front in the Jurassic Navajo Sandstone, with bleached sandstone at right. (B) Bleached white (distant) and red-colored (foreground) Navajo Sandstone in Snow Canyon State Park, Utah (GPS coordinates 37◦ 13 N, 113◦ 39 W). (C) Dark gray tar sand (center) with bleached (yellow) selvages on top and bottom, within red-colored Jurassic Entrada Sandstone, Dubinky Well area, Utah (GPS coordinates 38◦ 41 N, 109◦ 55 W). explained as the result of permeability heterogeneities in the host rock, a self-organization process, and/or the influence of microbes (Chan et al., 2000; Chan and Parry, 2002). In many Utah concretions, hematite is the primary iron oxide identified by XRD (Chan et al., 2000) although other iron oxides (e.g., goethite) are also important components in the broad, regional spectrum of Navajo concretions. Quartz grains are typically coated with hematite, precipitated into pore space or voids, with radial crystal growth perpendicular to the grain boundaries (Fig. 5D). Some hematite is very pervasive and may form as euhedral, hexagonal plates (Chan et al., 2000). The arid climate and lack of vegetation and differential ground cover in southern Utah creates unique conditions where lithology can often be distinguished with multispectral data (Beitler et al., 2003). Paleo-reservoir characteristics and diagenetic bleaching in the Jurassic Navajo Sandstone of southern Utah can be evaluated using Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) satellite imagery, aerial photos (Fig. 3) and detailed field mapping (Beitler et al., 2003). Analyses indicate that diagenetic removal of iron oxides in the Jurassic Navajo Sandstone occurs on regional formational scales to localized laminae scales. The most extensive bleaching is commonly associated with zones of higher permeabil- 300 J. Ormö et al. / Icarus 171 (2004) 295–316 ity associated with large-scale structures and anticlinal uplifts such as the Navajo Sandstone around the San Rafael Swell, the East Kaibab Uplift, and the Escalante Monocline (Fig. 1). Regional bleaching patterns indicate that Laramide structures likely served as conduits for hydrocarbons (Beitler et al., 2003). Field relationships also indicate small-scale bleaching that is controlled by primary sedimentary structures. Fluid migration patterns are complex and can be both constrained and/or independent of internal stratification. Chan et al. (2000) suggest that in the Moab area, the fluid responsible for bleaching of the redbeds was a reduced, low pH, high salinity brine from the Pennsylvanian Paradox Formation that moved up along faults and percolated the permeable sandstones where it met oxidizing meteoric water with higher pH. The iron was transported in a reduced state until it precipitated as hematite when encountering the oxidizing water. This has caused concentric structures, and in some cases the flow direction of the redox fluid front is visible (Fig. 4B). Manganese concretions occur in less extensive deposits in the area. 40 Ar/39 Ar dating indicates that the manganese mineralization (probably coincident with the hematite mineralization) occurred about 25 Ma, possibly in connection to a period of regional uplift and increased volcanism in 30 km distant volcanoes (La Sal Mountains) (Chan et al., 2001a). The Utah hematite deposits occur at a variety of scales (mostly cm to m-scale), sometimes as individually small, but highly concentrated (up to ∼ 30 wt% Fe2 O3 ), concretions that form spheres, pipes and columns, to sheets and joint/fracture fills (Fig. 4). Many of the iron oxide occurrences are also affected by stratigraphy, sedimentology, and structure, for instance within the toes of some of the fossil dune sets. The concretions weather out and concentrate, although as thin deposits, in large sheets along flat surfaces. Accumulations (Chan et al., 2004) of weatheredout concretions can cover larger areas on the scale to tens of meters to hundreds of meters (Figs. 5A–5C). Another example (Fig. 4E) is from Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument and shows iron oxide cementation in bleached sandstone beds. The iron cementation follows laterally along stratigraphically controlled permeable surfaces. Both Figs. 4D and 4E demonstrate that hematite-cemented material can reach considerable thickness. There is a remarkable display of intraformational, syndepositional deformation structures, with a large concentration of sandstone pipes in the Jurassic Carmel and Entrada Sandstone intervals around Lake Powell, Utah (Netoff and Shroba, 2001; Netoff, 2002). Some pipes are clustered, and weather out of a finer-grained or less-cemented host rock creating a knob-like morphology (Figs. 6A and 6B), but pipes can also take the shape of sand-volcanoes after the host sediments have been eroded (Figs. 6C and 6D). These pipes are different from the hematite cemented columns shown in Figs. 4A–4C. It is important to note that the features seen in Figs. 6A and 6B are sand intrusions, and not petrified tree trunks, despite some initial similarities in appearance. There is no organic material associated with these features, and they are composed of laminated or homogeneous sand. Some apparent structure in the pipes could be the result of fluidized grain movement from liquids flowing up the pipes creating a fabric by rearrangement of the grains. Other cylindrical mega pipe features measure over 100 m in height and 70 m in diameter (Fig. 6D); the biggest recorded such sandstone pipes in the terrestrial continental stratigraphic record. Many of the megapipes currently weather out as massive positive features, surrounded by ring fractures and faults that may have resulted from downward relaxation after the initial upward injection (Figs. 7A and 7B). The massive pipes commonly have slightly different, stronger cementation than the surrounding stratified host rock, and can physically stand out as cylindrical pipes, or can be recognized even aerially by the different color, texture, and weathering pattern. The bleached appearance of some sandstone pipes and/or their contacts show that they have acted as pathways for the reducing fluids responsible for the mobilization of the iron. Some of the knobs and pipes have different textural characteristics (e.g., grain size or packing) and could act as preferential pathways for mineralizing fluids that could precipitate iron oxides (Figs. 12A and 12B). However, pipes can also contain other types of mineral cements (e.g., calcite or quartz) (Fig. 6). In many cases, some of the cement appears to have been dissolved in the bleaching process, creating some secondary porosity and small vugs along with the removal of the iron oxide grain coatings (e.g., Surdam et al., 1993). In other cases, the bleaching appears to have occurred before the current cement was formed. This bleaching could have increased the porosity and allowed for more cement to be emplaced, making the sediment stronger. In the case of the pipes, it may be that the “fluidization” process rearranges the grains in a way that makes them more cohesive. The bleaching and cementation of these observed syndeformational structures indicate that their formation occurred prior to the phase of reducing fluid flow. These structures can be attributed to several conditions within the Jurassic desert environments that likely include dune loading of water-saturated, poorly consolidated substrates, and some external triggers, such as mudflows, earthquakes, or bolide impact (Chapman, 1989; Alvarez et al., 1998; Netoff, 2002; Chan et al., 2002). These conditions could produce upward fluid injection into loose overlying dune sand. These mega sandstone pipe injections have proportions not yet recognized among recent analogues of earthquake induced liquefaction structures. Another unusual feature of southern Utah is large potholes and/or weathering pits that commonly occur on flat, exposed sandstone surfaces (Figs. 8A and 8B). The host rock is typically eolian sandstone that may range from Permian through Jurassic in age. Some potholes are small and shallow, yet others are tens of meters wide, steep sided, and several tens of meters in depth. The formation of the potholes is somewhat enigmatic. Some potholes appear to be related to accumulated water and may host a variety of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms (Chan et Diagenetic hematite deposits in Utah and on Mars 301 Fig. 4. Examples of iron oxide cementation in sediments in southern Utah. (A), (B), (C) show hematite-cemented, vertical cylindrical pipes in a paleotopographic high area of the Jurassic Navajo Sandstone, Dubinky Well area, Utah (GPS coordinates 38◦ 42 N, 109◦ 54 W. (A) Cross-section through a hematite cemented pipe cutting the bedding of the host sediment. US quarter dollar for scale. (B) Top view of hematite cemented pipe showing shadow effect of hematite stain that has shifted with fluid flow direction (towards the top and top right). (C) Clustered hematite cemented pipes weather out and concretions are accumulated on the ground surface. (D) Ferricrete layer of hematite-cemented coarse-grained sandstone (at an unconformity) at the top of the Jurassic Navajo Sandstone, Dubinky Well area, Utah (GPS coordinates 38◦ 44 N, 109◦ 56 W). (E) A zone of hematite-cemented sandstone in the bleached Jurassic Navajo Sandstone, Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument (GPS coordinates 37◦ 52 N, 111◦ 27 W). The hematite cementation follows laterally along stratigraphically controlled permeable surfaces. 302 J. Ormö et al. / Icarus 171 (2004) 295–316 Fig. 5. Examples of large accumulations of weathered out hematite-cemented concretions. (A) Arrow marked “a” points at bleached beds with tar sand. Arrow “b” indicate part of an accumulation of hematite-cemented erosional residue from vertical cylindrical pipes in a paleotopographic high area of the Jurassic Navajo Sandstone. This stratigraphic view covering several tens of meters, Dubinky Well area, Utah (GPS coordinates 38◦ 41 N, 109◦ 54 W). (B) Concentration (foreground) of spherical hematite-cemented concretions accumulated on a flat weathered surface, Snow Canyon, Utah (GPS coordinates 37◦ 13 N, 113◦ 39 W). The orange-colored Jurassic Navajo Sandstone comprises all the exposed rocks. (C) Close up of accumulation of weathered out hematite concretions from Navajo Sandstone, Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument. (D) Photomicrograph (under plane polarized light) of concretionary Navajo Sandstone, Escalante area, Utah. Image is about 1 mm across. Hematite cement crystals precipitate radially out from grains into pore space. al., 2001b). Others are giant weathering pits that appear to be a function of wind abrasion (Netoff et al., 1995; Netoff and Shroba, 1997). 2. Method Hynek et al. (2002) performed a detailed mapping of the part of Meridiani Planum where the hematite deposits are lo- cated. They sorted out the stratigraphic relationship between different units and gave examples of surface features typical of each unit. In this study we focus on surface features in the martian hematite regions of Meridiani Planum, and Aram Chaos, which appear to be analogous to the geological and geomorphological features in the area of the Utah hematite deposits. As Aram Chaos was not included in the study by Hynek et al. (2002) we used the map by Christensen et al. (2001) for the location of the hematite-rich unit in that area. Diagenetic hematite deposits in Utah and on Mars 303 Fig. 6. Comparison between knob-formation in Utah and in Meridiani Planum, Mars. (A) and (B) Bleached, fluidized, cylindrical sandstone pipes in the Jurassic Carmel Formation, near Paria and Lake Powell, Utah (GPS coordinates 37◦ 02 N, 111◦ 49 W). These cylindrical pipes with massive interiors are more resistant to weathering than the surrounding eolian sandstone host rock. There is also common bleaching in the host rock surrounding the pipe (B). (C) A large cluster of positively weathered-out mega sandstone pipes in the Jurassic Entrada Sandstone of Lake Powell, Utah. The conical weathered form just left of center (GPS coordinates approximately 37◦ 11 N, 111◦ 13 W) is about 30 m high. The horizontal panning distance of the photograph is about 300 m. Aerial photograph courtesy of Dennis Netoff. (D) One large mega sandstone pipe in the Jurassic Entrada Sandstone, close to the location of (C). This positively weathered-out plug/neck has local relief of about 70 m (GPS coordinates 37◦ 11 N, 111◦ 3 W). Photograph courtesy of Dennis Netoff. (E) Image from layered deposit at Meridiani Planum showing knobs revealed by removal of surrounding host material. Original image resolution 3.07 m/pixel. Arrow “a” points at knob just released from the layered material. Arrow “b” show cylindrical topographic dome interpreted to be knob not yet exposed. Arrow “c” show how the knobs maintain their distinct appearance long after the host material is removed. This apparent resistance to erosion is visible also in the evenly distributed knobs in (F) (original image resolution 6.11 m/pixel). 304 J. Ormö et al. / Icarus 171 (2004) 295–316 Fig. 7. Examples of high-albedo ring features in Utah ((A) and (B)) and Meridiani Planum, Mars (C). (A) Fluidized mega sandstone pipes and associated ring faults and ring edge bleaching in the Jurassic Entrada Sandstone, Lake Powell, Utah (near GPS coordinates 37◦ 05 N, 111◦ 18 W). Horizontal field of view (slightly oblique) across is approximately 30 m. Center cylindrical plug ∼ 12 m across, with outermost cylindrical ring ∼ 22 m across. (B) Ring fault (associated with sandstone pipe) in Jurassic Carmel Formation with edge bleaching, near Paria and Lake Powell, Utah (GPS coordinates 37◦ 02 N, 111◦ 49 W). (C) Distinct high-albedo ring surrounding a depression (crater and/or vent?) in Meridiani Planum (original image resolution 3.00 m/pixel). Iron can be a very sensitive indicator of fluid flow that can produce coloration patterns (reflecting mineral composition and abundance) on mm scales up to km scales. Hematite ce- mentation of strata can cause structures on the same scales that may be further enhanced by later erosion of weaker, non-cemented, confining material. These patterns and struc- Diagenetic hematite deposits in Utah and on Mars 305 Fig. 8. Bleached layers and erosional pits in southern Utah and Meridiani Planum, Mars. (A) Arrow point at top of a fluidized mega sandstone pipe (approximately stretching between the arrow and the large pit to the lower right of the arrow) measuring over 50 m across in exposures of the Middle Jurassic Entrada Sandstone, Lake Powell, Utah (GPS coordinates 37◦ 05 N and 111◦ 18 W). Superimposed large weathering pits are several meters across and up to 15 m deep. Field view in this oblique photo covers ∼ 580 × 800 m. Aerial photograph courtesy of Dennis Netoff. (B) Deeply carved, steep-sided, cylindrical weathering pits (some filled with collected rainwater at the bottom) in the Jurassic Navajo Sandstone, Moab, Utah (GPS coordinates 38◦ 35 N, 109◦ 32 W). (C) Eroded domes of high-albedo (from mineral precipitation or bleaching?) layered deposits in Meridiani Planum. Original image resolution 1.52 m/pixel. Arrow “a” points at a row of pits that appear to be strata bound (wind erosion pits?). Arrow “b” points at an example of pit with what seems to be low-albedo ejecta (impact crater?). tures can be seen visually in the field as well as with remote sensing, as applied in this study. We have studied all 156 MOC images from mission phases dating from August 2001 to January 2002 and February 2002 to July 2002 within the sectors 18◦ W–24◦ W/5◦ N–0◦ N (Aram Chaos) and 5◦ E–10◦ W/5◦ N–10◦ S (Meridiani Planum). One selected 306 J. Ormö et al. / Icarus 171 (2004) 295–316 image from an older phase was also used. The studied sectors and location of MOC images presented in this work are outlined in Fig. 2. The study of the MOC images focused on conspicuous geological and geomorphological features, and the relations between the units (based on Hynek et al., 2002) in which the landforms occur. The features included knobs, high-albedo rings, bright (high-albedo) rim craters, bright (high-albedo) layers, and possible mega vents (suggested by Hynek et al., 2002 to be vestiges of hydrothermal systems). These features occurred in almost all the mapped images (see Fig. 2). In the rare case that several different features occur in the same image, the most common feature was mapped. The MOC image interpretation has been combined with fieldwork by team members at the sites in southern Utah (Fig. 1). The mineral products and geochemical conditions necessary to mobilize iron from a hypothetical Martian basaltic shergottite volcanoclastic sediment were investigated using the Geochemist Workbench (Bethke, 1998). We present a model for the formation of the hematite deposits on Mars based on Mars’ geological and environmental constraints, and the apparent link between the geological and geomorphological features, the hydrological system, and the hematite accumulations in Utah. Our study emphasizes the landforms and fluid flow pathways connected to the mechanisms for the formation of hematite concretions in any sedimentary setting (e.g., Utah and Mars), where fluids can move through permeable sediments with adequate chemistry for iron mobilization. 3. Comparison between surface features in southern Utah and in the Meridiani Planum and Aram Chaos 3.1. Bright rim craters and high albedo rings The mapping of Meridiani Planum and Aram Chaos sectors shows that knobs, “mega vents,” and bright rim craters may occur in the same image, although rarely. Bright rim craters and rings occur more frequently within the same image. Only bright rim craters occur in both the etched unit and the hematite-rich plains unit mapped by Hynek et al. (2002), however with a certain preference to the hematite-rich unit and the cratered unit to the immediate south (Fig. 2). High albedo wind-streaks from the bright parts of the crater rims indicate that the bright appearance of the rims is not a consequence of illumination. This bright appearance of the crater rims can be the consequence of fluid flow causing either bleaching or mineral precipitation along zones of increased porosity, possibly due to impact related fractures (Fig. 9). The bright rims can also be due to uplift and exposure of high albedo material. In particular, this appears to be the case for the Eagle Crater, studied by the Opportunity rover. Ground truth from more craters in Meridiani Planum is needed before it can be established whether the bright rims have only one or several causes. High albedo rings commonly occur in connection to the bright rim craters. However, the ring features, in contrast to bright rim craters, are only present within the hematiterich unit where they dominate the surface features visible in MOC images. The hematite-rich unit in Meridiani Planum and Aram Chaos appears as a flat, smooth plain with small mesas and underlying brighter terrain that may indicate that the surface is exhumed (Hynek et al., 2002). Hynek et al. (2002) date the hematite rich unit to Late Noachian to Early Hesperian. Kelsey et al. (2000) and Hartmann et al. (2001) suggested many of the depressions linked to bright (sometimes dark) ring pattern to be vestiges of old “fossil” craters, which gives a much higher age to the unit. However, Hynek et al. (2002) show that the supposed fossil craters have both a non-random spatial, as well as, size distribution inconsistent with the occurrence of impact craters. They also point out that a higher age (high crater density) of the unit does not comply with the stratigraphic relationship with surrounding units. Based on this they conclude that it is unlikely that the high albedo rings are individual fossil craters. The connection between high albedo rings and fossil craters is evoked by the occurrence in some of the most apparent rings by smooth, sub-circular depressions. Indeed, some of the most distinct rings occur as bright rims around bowl-shaped, crater-like depressions (Fig. 7C). However, with the transition into more frequent rings, the link to crater-like depressions becomes less obvious (Fig. 9). It appears that the rings remain, but the “craters” disappear. The rings also lose their circular outline and begin to overlap each other in a percolative pattern typical for mineral precipitation and/or mobilization from seeping fluids [cf. percolation theory, which considers the connectedness of a phase or multiple phases across a microstructure (Stauffer and Aharony, 1992). This theory is commonly used to simulate the percolation of substances (e.g., calcium hydroxide) in a hydrating cement paste system (e.g., Bentz et al., 1998)]. It is doubtful that crater rims of different sizes would remain as distinct albedo features on a level surface, while the crater depressions have been completely subdued. This is in support of the notion by Hynek et al. (2002) that the rings may not be directly related to impact craters, but instead related to subsurface fluids. However, the transition from bright crater rims into diffuse ring patterns may suggest a link between the high-albedo rings and impact craters, although not a morphological one. If the depressions are buried impact craters, the localized increase in fracturing could provide conduits for later groundwater flow. On Mars, the most common cause for fracturing of the upper crust is cosmic impacts. Instead of the linear fracture patterns most common on Earth, zones of intense fracturing on Mars has a more patchy or ring-shaped appearance. In our model for the high-albedo ring formation on Mars, we continue on the suggestion by Hynek et al. (2002) that the depressions represent vents for fluids, and we suggest the rings to be zones of possible alteration, such as bleaching and/or precipitation of, most often, high albedo minerals (e.g., carbonates, sul- Diagenetic hematite deposits in Utah and on Mars 307 Fig. 9. Model for the formation of high-albedo rings in the hematite rich plains unit on Mars based on the process forming the Utah analogues in Fig. 7, and the apparent transition from bright rim craters to rings (1)–(3). As rings may overlap, alteration may “bleed” out and cause some blending and coalescing of altered areas (bleaching and/or mineral precipitation). Original image resolution of image E1001273: 3.04 m/pixel, image E1203255: 3.00 m/pixel, and image E1103488: 3.04 m/pixel. 308 J. Ormö et al. / Icarus 171 (2004) 295–316 Fig. 10. Example of concentric structure similar to structures mapped as possible vestiges of hydrothermal systems by Hynek et al. (2002). In this study mapped as “mega vents.” Original image resolution 3.05 m/pixel. fates) (Figs. 7 and 9). It may be that the rings are surface expressions of pipes still buried within the sediments, as an alternative, or maybe companion to the buried-crater-model presented in Fig. 9. As a consequence, the etched zone may have had rings before, but after erosion the rings remain as knobs, “mega vents,” and pitted bright layers. Large concentric structures, suggested by Hynek et al. (2002) to be vestiges of large hydrothermal systems, occur at some locations in the etched unit (“mega vents” Fig. 10). Bright rim craters do not occur in the Utah sandstone examples so it is difficult to make a direct comparison in this case. However, structurally controlled, ring-shaped fault or fracture bleaching occurs in connection to the sand intrusions, although on much smaller scales than on Mars (Fig. 7). Of interest is the strong connection between the altered rings and ring-shaped fractures around the intrusions acting as pathways for fluids through less permeable layers. Sometimes more strongly resistant altered material such as pipes and rings in Utah stand out in positive relief. This is also noticed at some of the martian ring features (Fig. 7C) and high albedo layers (Fig. 8C). It is clear, however, that at the Utah site, bright material exists both as a consequence of bleaching and as mineral precipitation (e.g., carbonate cements, or evaporitic sabkha deposits). The same can be valid for Mars. 3.2. Bright layers and ridges More extensive high-albedo features are confined within the areas mapped as etched unit by Hynek et al. (2002), which they defined to be in a stratigraphically lower position than the hematite rich unit. These high-albedo features commonly appear as layers, with sharp scarps, as well as concentric rings possibly due to erosion of layered domes (Fig. 8C). The bright layers are typically pierced by numerous, similar-sized, dark, pits. However, not all of these dark pits are circular and randomly distributed, criteria to support an impact origin. Several appear in clusters, adopt very Diagenetic hematite deposits in Utah and on Mars elongated shapes, and most importantly, seem to be strata bound (“a” in Fig. 8C). If impact craters, the high density would suggest a high age of these bright layers. However, the rather uniform size distribution, the apparent distinct appearance, and most of all that they follow certain layers, entirely exclude an impact origin. Whereas low albedo ejecta patterns are visible around a few such pits (“b” in Fig. 8C), most of the other similar sized pits completely lack visible ejecta. These pits show a most striking resemblance to the wind-erosion pits in southern Utah (Figs. 8A and 8B). The observation that the bright layers in Meridiani Planum often appear to stand out in relief at the same time as they seem subject to localized wind erosion is an indication for a different response to erosion than the adjacent material. Figures 11A–11C show examples of bleaching linked to faults and fractures in southern Utah. Bleaching of the Kaibab Uplift (Fig. 11A) occurs along the eastern fault, as well as in a large adjacent area extending over 30 km, whereas along smaller faults, fractures, and joints the bleached zone may be limited to a few meters or less (Figs. 11B and 11C). High-albedo material also occurs around faults in Meridiani Planum (Fig. 11D), in this particular case along ring faults and radial faults related to a large impact crater. When the bleached fractures are viewed from a birds-eye view in the Utah examples, the albedo difference to the surrounding unbleached material can be striking (Fig. 11C). In some cases, deformed zones can stand out in positive relief, which is also observed in some locations in the martian etched terrain (Fig. 11E). Hynek et al. (2002) suggested some ridges in the Meridiani Planum to be areas where groundwater caused cementations along vertical joints. Most often, such ridges have a high albedo and can occur with transition into material resembling the bright layers, possibly as erosional remnants of wider bleached or cemented zones around joints (Fig. 11E). 3.3. Knobs, domes, and circular mesas Knobs of sizes ranging from the limit of the resolution of the MOC images to a couple of hundred meters are common in the etched unit and within large craters in the cratered units of the studied areas on Mars (Fig. 2). There are similarities in both the circular form (compare Figs. 6 and 12), as well as the distribution and spacing, although the Mars features may be an order of magnitude larger than the majority of the Utah knobs. It is clear from the relationship between the knobs and the layered deposits in Figs. 6E and 12C that the knobs have formed within the layered material before becoming exposed. This is an analogue with the formation of the knobby topography in Utah (Figs. 6 and 12). It is also clear that the knobs remain as distinct morphological features for long periods of time after exposure, sometimes occurring in lines, but most often in a random distribution (Fig. 6F). On Mars, however, no knobs have so far been observed within the hematite-rich plains unit. Figure 13 possibly 309 shows the hematite-rich plains unit onlapping on the knobby etched unit, which also has been suggested by Hynek et al. (2002). Some knobs are protruding through the thinning plains unit. Alternatively, scattered mounds and buttes exposed in bright outcrops underlying hematite deposits are similar to fumarolic mounds formed by vapor escape and differential cementation in terrestrial ignimbrite deposits (Chapman and Tanaka, 2002). Fumarolic pipes form above the welded zone in the unwelded overlying ash; the loose ash is often eroded away by wind, exposing the fumarolic knobs. 4. Discussion 4.1. Geological and geomorphological features Diagenetic concretionary iron-oxide precipitation is common in the terrestrial sedimentary record (e.g., Liesegang banding). What makes southern Utah a useful analog for comparison with the martian hematite-rich areas is the that it is applicable to different geological settings. The extent of the hematite accumulations and the link between the deposits and certain geological features (bright layers, knobs, rings, etc.) seem to be characteristics shared with the hematite-rich areas on Mars. However, on Mars, the direct link between the geological features and the hematite deposits is more difficult to establish than in Utah. For instance, there is very little hematite (weak or no TES anomaly) within the etched unit. Whereas in Utah, the hematite accumulates in close proximity to the rocks that they weathered out from. In contrast, the areas that have been “etched” on Mars do not have a high concentration of hematite. Instead the hematite is located in the overlying smooth and flat plains unit characterized by the high albedo rings. If the Utah model would be directly applicable to Mars, we would expect hematite to have accumulated near the bleached layers, knobs and possible mega vents. However, in our model the hematite accumulations in the plains unit is erosional after the plains unit was “etched” as well (Fig. 14). Therefore, we seek a model that can explain why there is no hematite accumulation as erosional remnants within the etched unit. One explanation can be that there was a difference in composition between the plains unit with the rings and the layered deposits in which the knobs of the etched unit have formed. In Fig. 14 we have applied a strict Utah model (including knob and ring-forming intrusions) to Mars. The fluids are driven by differences in confining pressure between permeable near-surface layers, where precipitation occurs, and a deeper located fluid reservoir. Assuming that fluid-flow related alteration is responsible for the formation of bright layers in the etched unit, still the amount of iron in the material must have been too low to generate MGS-TES detectable accumulations of hematite. However, if the fluid flow continues, or is reinitiated after a de- 310 J. Ormö et al. / Icarus 171 (2004) 295–316 Fig. 11. Examples of bleaching along faults and fractures in southern Utah and possible analogues in Meridiani Planum, Mars. (A) Landsat 7 ETM + bands 7, 4, 2 image of Kaibab fault and bleached Navajo Sandstone cliffs. Original image resolution 30 m/pixel, image is 18 km across (B) Bleaching (shown at arrow) of the “Roberts Rift” fracture near Moab, Utah (GPS coordinates 38◦ 35 N, 109◦ 42 (W). (C) Bleached fault trace in the Jurassic Salt Wash Formation. Salt Wash fault system southeast of Green River near Moab, Utah (GPS coordinates 38◦ 49 N, 110◦ 01 W). (D) Bright material (from mineral precipitation and/or bleaching?) along ring faults (“a”) and radial faults (“b”) at large impact crater in Meridiani Planum, Mars. Original image resolution 4.56 m/pixel. (E) Bright ridges and adjacent material in etched unit Meridiani Planum. Similar features were suggested by Hynek et al. (2002) to be possible cemented fractures. The high albedo may be due to alteration such as bleaching in analogue to the Utah examples. Original image resolution 6.10 m/pixel. Diagenetic hematite deposits in Utah and on Mars 311 Fig. 12. Examples of large knobs and knob formation in southern Utah and Meridiani Planum, Mars. (A) Preferentially hematite-cemented sandstone pipes (towers) encased in fine-grained, mudstone-dominated host rock in the Jurassic Carmel Formation (also known as the Dewey Bridge Member of the Jurassic Entrada Formation). This cluster of resistant weathered towers, with individual heights up to 10+ m tall, Dubinky Well area, Utah (GPS coordinates 38◦ 43 N, 109◦ 55 W). (B) A topographic high called Mollies Nipple is a circular outcrop of dense, concentrated iron-cemented Jurassic Navajo Sandstone. The iron-cemented center top is resistant to weathering, and much of the surrounding area of the knob is paved with weathered pieces of the iron-cemented sandstone that help cap and protect the softer surrounding bleached white Navajo Sandstone. The photograph width is approximately 1 km. Location in Grand Staircase National Monument (GPS coordinates 37◦ 27 N, 112◦ 05 W). ((C) and (C )) Exposure of large knobs from layered deposits in the etched unit, Meridiani Planum. Arrow “a” shows knob (cemented pipe?) still embedded in host material, “b,” “c,” and “d” show close up of exposed knobs similar to Mollies Nipple, Utah. Original image resolution 3.06 m/pixel. ((D) and (D )) Circular knobs, some with depression on top, exposed by erosion in Meridiani Planum etched unit. Original image resolution 3.06 m/pixel. 312 J. Ormö et al. / Icarus 171 (2004) 295–316 position of a unit with much higher iron content (Fig. 14C), then iron can be part of the process and hematite be precipitated in contact with oxidizing fluids. Fluids capable of transporting iron in a reduced state can pass up through less permeable layers in places where impacts or intrusions have generated fractures. Alteration rings (mostly high albedo) form at the surface or in permeable layers at the same time as hematite is precipitated at oxidizing fronts. There is evidence that the hematite-rich plains unit covered larger areas, but has been extensively eroded (Hynek et al., 2002). This erosion may have caused accumulation of the precipitated hematite in the same fashion as what has been suggested for the hematite deposits in Aram Chaos (Catling and Moore, 2003). This is supported by the recent results from the Opportunity landing site where hematite concretions seem to weather out from a sedimentary host rock to form extensive beds (Squyres and the Athena Science Team, 2004a; Christensen et al., 2004). 4.2. Iron geochemistry There are other factors that are important to the model: the source for the iron, the fluid acting as transporting agent, and the nature and form of the precipitated hematite. A strict Utah model involves first destabilization of detrital ferrous minerals, then oxidation of ferrous iron in detrital ferrous minerals to form the initial red coloration. The oxidized iron is then mobilized by chemical reduction bleaching the red sandstones, transported in reduced form and fixed by chemical oxidation. The martian example may include some or all of these steps. Critical steps in this process are: (1) destabilization of source iron, (2) mobilization of the iron, and (3) oxidation to fix the iron in hematite concretions. 4.3. Geochemical simulation Fig. 13. Image illustrating the stratigraphic relation between the knobby etched unit (E) and the plains unit (P2). P2 is overlapping unit E indicating a younger age. Original image resolution 5.78 m/pixel. On Mars, the composition of the layered deposits that may provide the source of the iron for the hematite deposits appears to be basaltic ( 80%) (Christensen et al., 2001) or possibly with a more andesitic composition (Bandfield et al., 2000). The preliminary results from the Opportunity landing site crater (Eagle Crater) support a basaltic composition at this location (Squyres and the Athena Science Team, 2004a; Christensen et al., 2004). No evidence has been detected for coarse grained carbonates or crystalline silica (Christensen et al., 2004). In fact, an apparent andesitic composition may be due to a silica-rich weathering rind (Wyatt and McSween, 2002). If the iron source is an ferric oxide, such as a oxidized glassy basalt (Minitti et al., 2004), reduction of the iron would be required for transport. However, if the iron source is already reduced (ferrous), then acidic fluids would be sufficient for transport (Fernández-Remolar et al., 2004). Basaltic shergottite has been suggested to be similar to the crustal composition of Mars based on spectroscopy of martian meteorites and the surface mineralogy detected by remote sensing (e.g., Singer aud McSween, 1993). Therefore, Diagenetic hematite deposits in Utah and on Mars 313 Fig. 14. Model based on the Utah analogue for the formation of the conspicuous geological and geomorphological features and hematite deposits in Meridiani Planum and Aram Chaos, Mars. Gray shades represent different content of iron and levels of bleaching and/or precipitation of high albedo minerals (e.g., carbonates, sulfates). 314 J. Ormö et al. / Icarus 171 (2004) 295–316 we use shergottite as a model composition of the parent material from which iron was derived for the hematite precipitation. Shergottite contains iron in the ferrous state. Because the iron is already reduced (as ferrous iron = Fe2+ , vs. ferric = Fe3+ ) interaction with reducing fluids is not required to mobilize the iron. Rather, some chemical mechanism, such as acidity, that would destabilize the host minerals can put ferrous iron from these basaltic minerals into solution to effectively “bleach” the host rock. In the martian atmosphere, CO2 is the most common gas (Owen, 1992) and a possible source of acidity in liquid water on Mars. Acid from elevated CO2 (carbonic acid) pressure mobilizes iron and also increases the solubility of carbonates. Another potential iron mobilizing fluid is sulfuric acid, based on the possible jarosite identified at the Opportunity landing site (Squyres and the Athena Science Team, 2004b). Our modeling stresses the role of pH differences in the mobilization of the iron. We choose to use CO2 as it is a plausible source for acidic solutions on Mars, and as it has been previously used in modeling the release (mobilization) of iron from ferromagnesian minerals on Mars (Marion et al., 2003). The initial Marion et al. (2003) stage of a four-stage model is carbonic acid weathering of primary ferromagnesian minerals to form an initial magnesium-ironbicarbonate-rich solution. With subsequent oxidation of the iron, HFO (hydrous ferric oxide) concretions would precipitate. The minor amounts of martian carbonates is a result of surface acidification and/or sediment burial (Marion et al., 2003). Our geochemical modeling of basaltic shergottite reacting at 100 ◦ C with CO2 (gas) dissolved in water indicates that the reactions involved in the removal of the ferrous iron from these minerals results in the precipitation of minerals such as talc, siderite, magnesite, dolomite, and quartz. Thus, these minerals are related to iron mobilization and not the later iron oxide precipitation, and would therefore not necessarily be expected in the same outcrop as the hematite concretions, which can explain the apparent absence of carbonate precipitates at the Opportunity landing site. In addition, future alteration could lead to the absence of this mineral assemblage. The occurrence of high albedo material in areas where we suggest iron mobilization to have occurred (e.g., vents with high albedo rings, bright material adjacent to fracture zones) can be an indication for localized existence of such mineral precipitates. Hence, it would be most valuable with ground-based data from, for instance, the high albedo ring features. We choose to present a model for the system at 100 ◦ C because this is a normal upper end temperature for diagenetic burial conditions. In our model for Mars, we suggest the hematite precipitation to occur in buried sediments, and not at the surface. However, to allow different scenarios, we also studied the effect of temperature change in the interval 0–100 ◦ C. Increasing the temperature moves the transition for solubility from a pH of about 1.5 up to 3. Hence, slightly less acidic fluids are needed to mobilize iron at warmer tem- peratures. There is no sharp boundary between diagenesis and hydrothermal alteration. If the Fe2+ saturated fluid reached an oxidizing environment, hematite would precipitate. Therefore, the chemical bleaching mechanisms for the Utah and Mars systems may be quite different (Mars = acidity, Utah = reducing). The mobilization of iron may occur in more than one stage of oxidation, dissolution, and reduction such as the terrestrial example. Ferrous silicates may be incorporated into a mafic material. Destabilization of the ferrous silicates with acidity would release the iron, which might be oxidized grain coatings, as in the Utah case. Chemical reduction or acidity could mobilize the iron in the ferrous state. Iron oxides (in the ferric state) are then concentrated similar to nodules observed in the terrestrial examples. Precipitates initially start as polynuclear amorphous HFO (hydrous ferric oxide), that upon maturation goes to metastable goethite, and then hematite. It is likely that hematite grows and becomes coarser-grained through Ostwald ripening (e.g., Ostwald, 1896; Giege et al., 1996). Ostwald ripening is the process by which larger particles grow at the expense of smaller ones due to the higher solubility of the smaller particles with more surface area, and due to molecular diffusion through the continuous phase. Given the right fluid chemical conditions, sufficient pore volumes, and the right host rock, gray hematite could be generated in layered deposits with some different erosional patterns (possibly cemented joints). These occurrences would be consistent with our study of geological and geomorphological features in Meridiani Planum and Aram Chaos, having less inconsistencies than previous primary and secondary hematite origins that have been proposed to date. Diagenetic precipitation of hematite through interactions of reducing (or acidic) and oxidizing fluids does not require hot/thermal temperatures. 4.4. Implications Our model is consistent with the geological setting of the Meridiani Planum area. Meridiani Planum lacks obvious geomorphologic features indicative of thermal events such as volcanic or tectonic sites. This area is characterized by layered deposits, with the hematite occurring in a single surface layer. Furthermore, there are other Earth analogs of the Utah type that are based on similar groundwater processes, showing that the Utah model for hematite deposition is common in the terrestrial stratigraphic record. Although acidic brines will likely suffice for the Utah model in a martian setting, organic influence, hydrocarbons (i.e., methane) or biomediation would help accelerate and facilitate chemical reactions. Gas-related (methane) structures, although highly speculative, have been proposed on Mars (Ori et al., 2000). Methane does not necessarily originate from biological processes. However, if methane was really involved in the formation of the hematite deposit on Mars, astrobiological implications of the hematite formation should be investigated in the future. Diagenetic hematite deposits in Utah and on Mars 5. Summary In the quest for understanding the recently discovered hematite on Mars, much of the past literature has focused on Earth analogs that were either hydrothermal in origin, a process of ground water leaching through soils, or layered lake or oceanic precipitates similar to banded iron formations. There is yet another important Earth analog that could be applicable to understanding large-scale and localized distribution of hematite on Mars. Excellent examples and superb exposures of chemical bleaching and iron oxide precipitation on a variety of scales occur in sedimentary strata of southern Utah. The distribution of iron oxides in these areas is controlled by the presence of preferential fluid flow pathways related to variations in porosity and permeability. The distribution can be strataform, or cross-cutting, and deposits can be further concentrated by erosion and preferential accumulation of these resistant mineralogies. There are several geological and geomorphological features in the Utah hematite areas that are linked to the process of iron accumulation. Similar features appear to occur at the hematite-rich areas in Meridiani Planum and Aram Chaos. The striking similarities call for further detailed study and it is expected that the new discoveries with the ongoing Mars mission will shed considerable light on refining our understanding of these important Earth and planetary processes. Acknowledgments The work by Jens Ormö was partially supported by the Spanish Ministry for Science and Technology (Reference AYA2003-01203) and the Spanish Ramón y Cajal program. The work by Goro Komatsu was supported by funding from the Italian Space Agency. The authors acknowledge the use of Mars Orbiter Camera images processed by Malin Space Science Systems that are available at http://www.msss.com/ moc_gallery/. Acknowledgment is made to the donors of the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund and Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument for partial support of this research (to Chan and Parry). We thank Dennis Netoff for use of his photographs and his input on Utah wind-erosion and weathering pits and mega sandstone pipe features. We are grateful to Mary Chapman and an anonymous reviewer whose thoughtful and constructive comments helped to improve the paper. References Alvarez, W., Staley, E., O’Connor, D., Chan, M.A., 1998. Synsedimentary deformation in the Jurassic of southeastern Utah—a case of impact shaking? Geology 26, 579–582. Bandfield, J.L., Hamilton, V.E., Christensen, P.R., 2000. A global view of martian surface compositions from MGS-TES. Science 287, 1626– 1630. 315 Beitler, B., Parry, W.T., Chan, M.A., 2003. Bleaching of Jurassic Navajo Sandstone on Colorado Plateau Laramide Highs: evidence of exhumed hydrocarbon supergiants? Geology 31, 1041–1044. Bentz, D.P., Garboczi, E.J., Lagergren, E.S., 1998. Multi-scale microstructural modeling of concrete diffusivity: identification of significant variables. Cem. Concr. Aggregates 20 (1), 129–139. Bethke, C.M., 1998. The Geochemist’s Workbench. University of Illinois, Illinois, USA. 184 p. Catling, D.C., Moore, J.M., 2003. The nature of coarse-grained crystalline hematite and its implications for the early environment of Mars. Icarus 165, 277–300. Chan, M.A., Beitler, B., Parry, W.T., Ormö, J., Komatsu, G., 2004. A possible terrestrial analogue for haematite concretions on Mars. Nature 429, 731–734. Chan, M.A., Parry, W.T., 2002. Rainbow of rocks: mysteries of sandstone colors and concretions in Colorado Plateau Canyon Country. Utah Geol. Surv. Public Info. Ser. 77. 17 p. Chan, M.A., Parry, W.T., Bowman, J.R., 2000. Diagenetic hematite and manganese oxides and fault-related fluid flow in Jurassic sandstones, southeastern Utah. AAPG Bulletin 84, 1281–1310. Chan, M.A., Parry, W.T., Petersen, E.U., Hall, C.M., 2001a. 40 Ar–39 Ar age and chemistry of manganese mineralization in the Moab to Lisbon fault systems, southeastern Utah. Geology 29, 331–334. Chan, M.A., Southam, G., Moser, K., Davis, J.M., Graham, T., 2001b. Desert potholes; life in the fast pool. Abstracts with programs— Geological Society of America. GSA Annual Meeting 33 (6), 282. Abstract. Chan, M.A., Netoff, D., Blakey, R., Kocurek, G., Alvarez, W., Marrett, R., 2002. Analysis of syndepositional deformation structures in Permian– Jurassic dune fields of the Colorado Plateau. In: GSA Annual Meeting, Denver, CO. Abstract #222-7. Chapman, M.G., 1989. Implications of rhyolitic ignimbrite boulders in the Middle Jurassic Carmel Formation of southern Utah. Geology 17, 281– 284. Chapman, M.G., Hare, T., 2002. Sinus Meridiani hematite deposits, Mars: results of a GIS-based study of regional MGS and Viking data sets. In: Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 33rd. Abstract #1626. Chapman, M.G., Tanaka, K.L., 2002. Related magma–ice interactions: possible origins of chasmata, chaos, and surface materials in Xanthe, Margaritifer, and Meridiani Terrae, Mars. Icarus 155, 324–339. Christensen, P.R., Morris, R.V., Lane, M.D., Bandfield, J.L., Malin, M.C., 2001. Global mapping of martian hematite mineral deposits: remnants of water-driven processes on early Mars. J. Geophys. Res. 106 (E10), 23873–23885. Christensen, P.R., 27 colleagues, 2004. Mini-TES observations of the Gusev and Meridiani landing sites. In: Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 35th. Abstract #2186. Fernández-Remolar, D., Gómez-Elvira, J., Gómez, F., Sebastian, E., Martíin, J., Manfredi, J.A., Torres, J., González-Kessler, C., Amils, R., 2004. The Tinto river, an extreme acidic environment under control of iron, as an analog of the Terra Meridiani hematite site of Mars. Planet. Space Sci. 53, 239–248. Geissler, P.E., Singer, R.B., Komatsu, G., Murchie, S., Mustard, J., 1993. An unusual spectral unit in west Candor Chasma: evidence for aqueous or hydrothermal alteration in the martian canyons. Icarus 106, 39–380. Giege, R., Ng, J.D., Lorber, B., Theobald-Dietrich, A., Kern, D., Witz, J., 1996. The crystallization of biological macromolecules from precipitates: evidence for Ostwald ripening. J. Crystal Growth 168 (1–4), 50–62. Glotch, T.D., Christensen, P.R., 2003. The geology of Aram Chaos. In: Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 34th. Abstract #2046. Golombek, M., 16 colleagues, 2002. Downselection of landing sites for the Mars Exploration Rovers. In: Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 33rd. Abstract #1245. Hartmann, W.K., Anguita, J., de la Casa, M.A., Berman, D.C., Ryan, E.V., 2001. Martian cratering 7: the role of impact gardening. Icarus 149, 37– 53. 316 J. Ormö et al. / Icarus 171 (2004) 295–316 Hintze, L.F., Willis, G.C., Laes, D.Y.M., Sprinkel, D.A., Brown, K.D., 2002. Digital Geologic Map of Utah, Map 179DM, Utah Geological Survey, Utah, USA. Hynek, B.M., Arvidson, R.E., Phillips, R.J., 2002. Geological setting and origin of Terra Meridiani hematite deposit on Mars. J. Geophys. Res. 107 (E10), 5088. Kelsey, C., Hartmann, W.K., Grier, J.A., Berman, D.C., 2000. Observation of a hematite-rich region within Sinus Meridiani. In: Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 31st. Abstract #1524. Kirkland, L.E., Herr, K.C., Adams, P.M., Salisbury, J.W., 2003. Hematite coatings match TES spectra of Sinus Meridiani, Mars. In: Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 34th. Abstract #1944. Kirkland, L.E., Herr, K.C., Adams, P.M., 2004. A possible surprise for the Mars rover “Opportunity”: the inferred coarse hematite may instead be fine-grained, consolidated hematite. Geophys. Res. Lett. In press. Komatsu, G., Geissler, P.E., Strom, R.G., Singer, R.B., 1993. Stratigraphy and erosional landforms of layered deposits in Valles Marineris, Mars. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 11105–11121. Lane, M.D., Morris, R.V., Mertzman, S.A., Christensen, P.R., 2002. Evidence for platy hematite grains in Sinus Meridiani. J. Geophys. Res. 107 (E12), 5126. Marion, G.M., Catling, D.C., Kargel, J.S., 2003. Modeling aqueous ferrous iron chemistry at low temperatures with application to Mars. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67, 4266–4351. Minitti, M.E., Lane, M.D, Bishop, J.L., 2004. A new hematite formation mechanism for Mars. In: Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 35th. Abstract #1999. Netoff, D., 2002. Seismogenically induced fluidization of Jurassic erg sands, south-central Utah. Sedimentology 49. Netoff, D.I., Shroba, R.R., 1997. Evidence of deflational removal of sandy sediment from giant weathering pits in southern Utah. Abstracts with programs—Geological Society of America. GSA Annual Meeting 29 (6), 255. Abstract. Netoff, D., Shroba, R.R., 2001. Conical sandstone landforms cored with clastic pipes in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, southeastern Utah. Geomorphology 39, 99–110. Netoff, D., Cooper, B., Shroba, R.R., 1995. Giant sandstone weathering pits near Cookie Jar Butte, Southeastern Utah. In: van Riper III, C. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second Biennial Conference on Research in Colorado Plateau National Parks, 25–28 October 1993. In: National Park Transactions and Proceedings Series NPS/NRNAU/NRTP-95-11. Colorado Plateau Research Station, Flagstaff, AZ, pp. 25–53. Ori, G.G., Marinangeli, L., Komatsu, G., 2000. Gas (methane)—related features on the surface of Mars and subsurface reservoirs. In: Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 31st. Abstract #1550. Ormö, J., Komatsu, G., 2003. Hydrocarbon related bleaching of strata and hematite deposition in red beds at Moab, Utah: a possible analogous process that formed bright layers and hematite deposits on Mars. In: Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 34th. Abstract #1356. Ostwald, W., 1896. Lehrbuch der Allgemeinen Chemie, vol. 2, part 1. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany. In German. Owen, T., 1992. The composition and early history of the atmosphere of Mars. In: Kieffer, H.H., Jakosky, B.M., Snyder, C.W., Matthews, M.S. (Eds.), Mars. Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 818–834. Parry, W.T., Chan, M.A., Beitler, B., 2004. Chemical bleaching indicates fluid flow in sandstone deformation bands. AAPG Bulletin 88, 1–17. Ramsey, M.S., Christensen, P.R., 1998. Mineral abundance determination: quantitative deconvolution of thermal emission spectra. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 577–596. Singer, R.B., McSween Jr., H.Y., 1993. The igneous crust of Mars: compositional evidence from remote sensing and the SNC meteorites. In: Lewis, J.S., Matthews, M.S., Guerrieri, M.L. (Eds.), Resources of NearEarth Space. Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, London, pp. 709–736. Squyres, S.W., the Athena Science Team, 2004a. Initial results from the MER Athena science investigation at Gusev Crater and Meridiani Planum. In: Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 35th. Abstract #2187. Squyres, S.W., the Athena Science Team, 2004b. Results of the Mars Exploration Rover Athena science investigation. In: American Astronomical Society Meeting 204. Abstract #66.01. Stauffer, D., Aharony, A., 1992. Introduction to Percolation Theory, second ed. Taylor and Francis, London. Surdam, R.C., Jiao, Z.S., MacGowan, D.B., 1993. Redox reactions involving hydrocarbons and mineral oxidants: a mechanism for significant porosity enhancement in sandstones. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 77 (9), 1509–1518. Walker, T.T., 1975. Red beds in the western interior of the United States. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 853, 49–56. Wyatt, M.B., McSween Jr., H.Y., 2002. Spectral evidence for weathered basalt as an alternative to andesite in the northern lowlands of Mars. Nature 417, 263–266.