3ª série

ROTEIRO DE RECUPERAÇÃO DE INGLÊS INTERMEDIÁRIO - 3a Série - 2o
SEMESTRE - 2015
Nome: _________________________Nº_____ 3a. Série __
Data:
/
/2015
Professores: Priscila / Cláudio
Nota: _____ (valor: 1,0/2,0)
2º semestre
A - Introdução
Neste semestre, você não assimilou os conteúdos mínimos necessários. Agora,
você terá a oportunidade de recuperar esses conteúdos por meio de um roteiro de estudo.
Leia, atentamente, este roteiro, pois ele resgata conteúdos essenciais para o
prosseguimento de seus estudos no segundo bimestre.
B - Conteúdos essenciais do TERCEIRO BIMESTRE:
No 3º bimestre deste ano, os conteúdos essenciais de nossa disciplina foram:








CONDITIONAL SENTENCES
DEGREES OF COMPARISON
GENITIVE CASE/ FALSE COGNATES
QUESTION TAGS/ AGREEMENT AND DISAGREEMENT
RELATIVE PRONOUNS
ALSO/TOO/EITHER AND EACH/EVERY/ALL
ADJECTIVES
WH-WORDS
C - Conteúdos essenciais do QUARTO BIMESTRE:
No 4º bimestre deste ano, os conteúdos essenciais de nossa disciplina foram:







EASILY CONFUSED WORDS
ADVERBS
PASSIVE VOICE
REPORTED SPEECH
PHRASAL VERBS
PREPOSITIONS
PLURAL/EXPRESSIONS OF QUANTITY
D - Objetivos de aprendizagem (conceituais e procedimentais/habilidades):
1
Além dos conteúdos essenciais, citados anteriormente, no decorrer do 1º semestre
tínhamos como objetivos de aprendizagem:
o Interpretação de textos variados com perguntas dissertativas e de múltipla escolha.
o Utilizar apropriadamente o vocabulário estudado nas unidades 1 a 15;
E - Orientações de estudo (atividades que têm como objetivo diagnosticar os erros
dos alunos para que eles possam superá-los e, consequentemente, consigam
atingir uma aprendizagem satisfatória):
Agora, leia com bastante atenção as propostas de trabalho apresentadas a seguir,
pois elas propõem uma retomada da trajetória de seus estudos semestrais e, assim,
possibilitarão que você recupere sua aprendizagem e, consequentemente, sua média.
É importante ressaltar que você precisará de muito empenho e dedicação na
elaboração destas atividades, mas não estará sozinho nessa jornada porque terá o
constante apoio de seu professor e também do monitor da área.
Não se esqueça de que a meta geral de todos os seus professores neste ano é o
fortalecimento da postura de estudante.
E. Etapas e atividades
Veja quais são as atividades que fazem parte do processo de recuperação:
a) refazer as provas mensais e bimestrais para identificar as dificuldades encontradas e
aproveitar os momentos propostos para esclarecer as dúvidas com o professor ou monitor
da disciplina.
b) refazer os exercícios do livro ou caderno.
c) revisar as atividades realizadas em aula, bem como as anotações que você fez no
caderno.
d) fazer os exercícios do roteiro de recuperação.
2
F. Postura de estudante – Organização do material
Reveja suas anotações de aula. Você conseguiu garantir os registros mínimos de
cada conteúdo? Reflita sobre isso e, se necessário, complete suas anotações e anexe-as
ao final deste roteiro.
Reflexões sobre os estudos
Quais as principais dificuldades que você percebe em seus estudos?
Nunca
Às vezes
Muitas vezes
Sempre
Distraio-me
com facilidade
Esqueço-me
rapidamente do
que li
Desisto de
continuar a
estudar quando
não
compreendo o
que leio ou faço
0
1
Quando tenho que
estudar um texto,
primeiramente faço
uma
leitura
do
começo ao fim
Depois de fazer uma
primeira leitura do
texto, tento identificar
as ideias principais
de cada parágrafo
Sublinho as partes
3
2
3
4
mais importantes dos
textos que leio
Anoto as dúvidas
para pedir ajuda
Faço
resumos,
esquemas ou mapas
conceituais do texto
que li
Como vou estudar?
Respostas que ajudam pouco
Respostas que ajudam muito
Ler o livro e as anotações de aula de - fazer resumos;
Inglês
- pedir ajuda ao professor;
- pedir ajuda ao monitor;
- rever as correções de exercícios;
- reorganizar minhas anotações;
- copiar a matéria que perdi quando faltei;
- estudar com meus colegas após as
aulas.
Dificuldades na avaliação (percepção do aluno)
Interpretação Compreensão
Produção
Erros
ortográficos
dos
das
de textos
documentos
perguntas
e
Conteúdo
Não houve
dificuldade
relevante
respostas
Dificuldades na avaliação (percepção do professor)
4
Interpretação Compreensão
Produção
Erros
ortográficos
dos
das
de textos
documentos
perguntas
e
Conteúdo
Não houve
dificuldade
relevante
respostas
Trabalho de Recuperação
Laughter is the Best Medicine
Humor is infectious. The sound of roaring laughter is far more contagious than any cough,
sigh, or sneeze. When laughter is shared, it binds people together and increases
happiness and intimacy. In addition to the domino effect of joy and amusement, laughter
also triggers healthy physical changes in the body. Humor and laughter strengthen your
immune system, boost your energy, diminish pain, and protect you from the damaging
effects of stress. Best of all, this priceless medicine is fun, free, and easy to use.
(Adaptado de http://www.helpguide.org/life/humor_laughter_health.htm. Acesso em 21/08/2010.)
1.(UNICAMP-2011) O texto considera o riso mais contagioso do que outras
manifestações físicas. Indique duas dessas outras manifestações.
2.(UNICAMP-2011)Explicite os efeitos positivos do bom humor e do riso para a saúde
física das pessoas.
5
Did Charles Darwin Delay in Publishing Origins of Species?
Charles Robert Darwin (1809-1882) began working on his theories of the Origins of
Species in 1837; however his works were published more than twenty years after that.
There is much speculation as to why it took so long to publish the groundbreaking book;
some suggest that he was afraid to challenge the scientific community and upset the
Church.
After first positing his ideas regarding how species underwent a ―natural selection‖ and
could possibly adapt over time, the text provoked adverted reactions from his intellectual
mentors, Charles Lyell and Sir John Herschel.
Still, Darwin continued working on his theory; if he really was affected by the potential of a
negative response to his ideas, some believe that it seems more plausible that he would
have abandoned research completely. Throughout the period during which he was working
on the Origins of Species, he published essays revealing his work in progress. Many now
believe that Darwin did not delay publishing, but rather, took over two decades to complete
his work.
(Adaptado de http://www.suite101.com/greatthinkers/4. Acesso em 21/09/2010.)
3.(UNICAMP-2011) Que hipótese é levantada por algumas pessoas para justificar o fato
de Darwin ter demorado mais de duas décadas para publicar Origins of Species?
4.(UNICAMP-2011) Indique duas evidências que contrariam essa hipótese.
SPY VS. SPY
Last month, Attorney General Eric Holder announced that the United States was
charging members of the Chinese military with economic espionage. Stealing trade
secrets from American companies, he said, enabled China to ―illegally sabotage‖ foreign
6
competitors and propel its own companies to ―success in the international marketplace.‖
The United States certainly understands China’s behavior, because that’s pretty much how
we got our start as a manufacturing power, too.
For example, throughout the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, American
industrial spies searched the British Isles, looking not only for new machines but also for
skilled workers who could run and maintain those machines. One of these workers was
Samuel Slater, often called ―the father of the American industrial revolution.‖ He emigrated
to the U.S. in 1789, bringing with him an intimate knowledge of the Arkwright spinning
frames that had transformed textile production in England, and he set up the first waterpowered textile mill in the U.S. Two decades later, the American businessman Francis
Cabot Lowell talked his way into a number of British mills, and memorized the plans to the
Cartwright power loom. When he returned home, he built his own improved version of the
loom. Then, by making it part of the first integrated textile factory in America, he became
the most successful industrialist of his time.
The American government often encouraged such piracy. Alexander Hamilton, in his
1791 ―Report on Manufactures,‖ called on the country to reward those who brought us
―improvements and secrets of extraordinary value‖ from elsewhere. State governments
financed the importation of smuggled machines. And although federal patents were
supposed to be granted only to people who came up with original inventions, in practice,
Americans were receiving patents for technology pirated from abroad.
Piracy was a big deal even in those days. Great Britain had strict laws against the export
of machines, and banned skilled workers from emigrating. Workers who violated the ban
could lose their property and be convicted of treason. The efforts of Thomas Digges,
America’s most effective industrial spy, got him repeatedly jailed by the Brits—and praised
by George Washington for his ―activity and zeal.‖
These days, of course, things have changed. The United States is the world’s biggest
advocate for enforcing strong intellectual-property rules, which it insists are necessary for
economic growth. Yet, as our own history suggests, the economic impact of technology
piracy isn’t straightforward. On the one hand, patents and trade secrets can provide an
incentive for people to innovate. If you realized that a new invention was going to be stolen
by China, you might not invest the time and money needed to come up with it in the first
place. On the other hand, patents and trade secrets limit the diffusion of new technology—
and sometimes slow down technological progress—while copying accelerates it.
7
Samsung, for instance, is known for being a ―fast follower‖ in its consumer business, which
really means that it’s adept at copying other companies’ good ideas. That’s not the same
as theft, but evidence from its recent patent trials with Apple shows that Samsung’s
response to the iPhone was, in large part, simply to do it ―like the iPhone.‖ This was bad
for Apple’s profits, but it meant that many more people ended up enjoying the benefits of
Apple’s concepts.
(–James Surowiecki Adapted from The New Yorker, June 9 & 16, 2014)
5.(FGV-2014) (to be answered in Portuguese)
(This question tests your understanding of the text, as well as your ability to identify and
paraphrase the relevant pieces of information. You should write approximately 120
words.)
The article begins by mentioning a recent U.S.-China economic-espionage incident. In
your own words, tell what happened and how the U.S. government reacted. What does the
author think about the U.S. government’s attitude in this specific case and what examples
does he give in the article to support his point of view? Regarding this U.S.-China matter,
in your opinion, is the author’s position sensible and well formulated or equivocal and
unconvincing? In answering, you may take into account legal, ethical, and practical
considerations.
6.(FGV-2014 -adapted) (to be answered in Portuguese)
(This question tests your ability to express yourself in a manner that is clear, precise, and
relevant. You should write approximately 120 words.)
In 1876, in what many Brazilians consider an act of ―bio-piracy,‖ the English adventurer
Sir Henry Alexander Wickham smuggled around 70,000 rubber-tree seeds out of the
Amazon region and delivered them to the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London. The
resultant seedlings [mudas] were then cultivated in Ceylon (Sri Lanka), Malaysia, Africa,
Batavia, and other tropical locations. Sir Henry’s economic espionage caused Brazil to
8
lose its monopoly on rubber production; the Amazon region – especially the city of Manaus
– fell into a decline from which it has never fully recovered.
Although the loss of its rubber monopoly was harmful to Brazil, in what ways may the
world have benefited from the dispersal of rubber production? Do such benefits justify Sir
Henry’s action? Did Brazil have the right to hold such a monopoly? In answering, you
should consider rubber’s global military and industrial importance. Moreover, even
knowing that espionage of any kind is illegal, would you encourage Brazil’s current
government to practice vigorous economic espionage? In other words, if important
advantages could be gained, should Brazil, in its condition as a developing country,
engage in such a practice against any other country, no matter how rich or poor, friendly or
unfriendly?
THE PEOPLE'S CHOICE
By Jeffrey Toobin
Before Harry Blackmun became a federal judge, and then a Supreme Court Justice, he
was the general counsel at the Mayo Clinic, the celebrated medical center in Minnesota.
There he developed a reverence for doctors, which was reflected in his judicial opinions,
especially in Roe v. Wade. In that decision, which was handed down forty years ago this
week, the Court ruled that states must allow a woman to obtain an abortion during the first
trimester of a pregnancy. According to Blackmun's majority opinion, the ruling fell under
the right to privacy that is implicit in the Constitution. In keeping with his predilection for his
former colleagues, he emphasized the rights not of women but of doctors: ―The attending
physician, in consultation with his patient, is free to determine, without regulation by the
State, that, in his medical judgment, the patient’s pregnancy should be terminated.‖ The
word ―physician‖ appears in Roe v. Wade forty-eight times, the word ―woman‖ forty-four
times.
As the Court returned to the subject of abortion in subsequent decades, the rationale for
its decisions shifted. In the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the court
reaffirmed Roe in an opinion written jointly by Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony Kennedy,
and David Souter. That decision focussed on the provision of the Fourteenth Amendment
9
which says that no state shall ―deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due
process of law.‖ The Justices said that a woman's decision to terminate a pregnancy was
within the "realm of personal liberty which the government may not enter." More recently,
in a dissenting opinion, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, joined by three other Justices, offered still
another constitutional justification for a woman’s right to choose, under a different part of
the Fourteenth Amendment: the equal-protection clause. Undue restrictions on the right to
abortion, Ginsburg wrote, violate ―a woman’s autonomy to determine her life's course, and
thus to enjoy equal citizenship stature.‖
This sort of evolution is not unusual in the history of the Supreme Court. Some Justices
like to assert, or pretend, that the Constitution has a single meaning, and that each case
thus has only one correct resolution. This view is especially pronounced among
conservatives, who, in recent years, have claimed that they can identify the original intent
of the framers and use their eighteenthcentury wisdom to resolve any modern controversy.
But, of course, interpretations of the Constitution have changed over time: legal theories
pass in and out of fashion, and, most important, Presidents can and do change the
understanding of the Constitution by naming new Justices to the bench. (There have been
twelve since 1973.)
That is the real lesson of abortion rights in the Supreme Court. Politicians, especially
Presidents, lead. Judges, even Justices, follow.
It’s tempting to be outraged by the close correlation between the outcome of Presidential
elections and the outcome of cases before the Supreme Court. Aren’t Justices supposed
to be independent of politics – isn’t that one reason they have life tenure? Aren’t judges
different from politicians? Not really, and that’s nobody’s fault; when it comes to
interpreting the majestic generalities of the Constitution, there is no such thing as apolitical
decision-making. So, in a time of great polarization between the parties, Democratic and
Republican judicial appointees see the world, and the law, in very different ways.
(Adapted from The New Yorker, January 28, 2013)
7.(FGV-2013) (to be answered in Portuguese)
(This question tests your understanding of the text, as well as your ability to identify and
paraphrase the relevant pieces of information. You should write approximately 120 words.)
10
Though abortion has been legal in the United States for more than 40 years, it remains a
controversial issue. (Essentially, liberals, who tend to be members of the Democratic
Party, favor the continued legality of abortion, whereas conservatives, who tend to be
members of the Republican Party, would like to see abortion prohibited.)
So, in your own words, identify the three pro-abortion opinions presented in the passage
and discuss the logic on which they are based. Explain why you think these opinions are
fair and well formulated or weak and unconvincing. In answering, you may take into
account the factors that can influence a Supreme Court decision.
8.(FGV-2013-adapted) (to be answered in Portuguese)
A great Brazilian criminal-defense attorney once said: ―I’m not in favor of abortion,
because I don’t think any decent man would be in favor of such a thing. I'm just not against
it.‖
With that idea in mind, and considering the information in the passage, can you conceive
of a situation in which you would not be against allowing a woman to have an abortion? Is
abortion always wrong, or are there occasions when, in your opinion, it is admissible?
Keeping in mind Brazil’s constitutionally mandated separation of Church and State, can
you debate abortion without resorting to religious arguments? In other words, can the
prohibition or legalization of abortion be based on logic and ethics alone? Give reasons
and examples (from the passage and from your own knowledge and experience) to
support your point of view.
9.(Mackenzie) Indicate the alternative that best completes the following sentence.
―If you had taken my advice, you ___________________________________.‖
a. would learned the lesson.
b. would have learnt the lesson.
c. should learned the lesson.
d. would learn the lesson.
e. should understand the lesson.
11
10. Complete with the passive voice.
―When_____________?‖
―In 1928.‖
a. penicillin was discovered
b. did penicillin discovered
c. was penicillin discovered
d. did penicillin discover
e. discovered was penicillin.
12