1 PROVISIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY for a new edition of ARISTOTLE`S

1 PROVISIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY for a new edition of ARISTOTLE`S

1
PROVISIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY
for a new edition of
ARISTOTLE'S PROTREPTICUS
compiled by D. S. Hutchinson and Monte Ransome Johnson
version of 2013 February 25
A. Primary Sources
1. Aristotle
a. Collections of fragments of Aristotle's lost works, including his
Protrepticus
b. Editions and translations of fragments of Aristotle’s Protrepticus
c. Editions and translations of papyri attributable to Aristotle's Protrepticus
d. Editions and translations of the Aristotle Corpus
e. Editions and translations of other lost works of Aristotle
2. Isocrates
3. Plato
4. Archytas of Tarentum
5. Heraclides of Pontus
6. Anonymous Iamblichi
7. Cicero
8. Clement of Alexandria (AD II-III)
9. Lactantius (AD III-IV)
10. Iamblichus of Chalcis (AD III-IV)
a. Manuscripts of the Protrepticus
b. Printed editions and translations of the Protrepticus
c. Editions and translations of other works of Iamblichus
11. Ancient Commentators
a. Aristocles of Messene (AD I)
b. Alexander of Aphrodisias (AD II)
c. Ammonius (AD V)
d. Proclus (AD V)
e. Olympiodorus the younger (AD V-VI)
f. Philoponus (AD VI)
g. Asclepius of Tralles (AD VI)
h. Elias (AD VI-VII)
i. David the Invincible Philosopher (AD VI-VII)
j. Anonymous Scholion on Cod.Par.Gr.2064
12. Boethius (AD V-VI)
13. Stobaeus (AD VI)
B. Secondary Sources (arranged alphabetically)
2
A. Primary Sources
1. Aristotle
a. Collections of fragments of Aristotle's lost works, including his
Protrepticus
Flashar, H. Aristoteles: Fragmente zu Philosophie, Rhetorik, Poetik, Dictung. Darmstadt,
2006.
Gigon, O. Librorum deperditorum fragmenta = vol. iii of Aristoteles Opera. Berlin, 1987.
Gohlke, P. Aristoteles Fragmente. Paderborn, 1959.
Rose, V. Aristoteles pseudographus. Leipzig, 1863.
Rose V. Aristotelis qui ferebantur librorum fragmenta = 1463-1589 Opera Aristotelis, vol. v.
Berlin, 1870.
Rose V. Aristotelis qui ferebantur librorum fragmenta. Leipzig, 1886. Reprinted 1966.
Walzer, R. Aristotelis dialogorum fragmenta. Florence, 1934.
Ross, W. D. Select Fragments = vol. xii of The Works of Aristotle. Oxford, 1952.
Ross, W. D. Aristotelis fragmenta selecta. Oxford, 1955.
Zanatta, M. Aristotele I Dialoghi: testo greco a fronte. Milano 2008.
b. Editions and translations of fragments of Aristotle’s Protrepticus
Barnes, J. & G. Lawrence. “Fragments: Dialogues” pp. 2404-2416 of The Complete Works of
Aristotle vol. 2, ed. J. Barnes. Princeton, 1984.
Berti, E. Aristotele: Esortazione alla filosofia. Padua, 1969.
Berti, E. Aristotele: Protreptico: Esortazione alla filosofia. Turin, 2000.
Buela, A. El Protréptico de Aristóteles (Texto bilingüe griego-castellano traducción, notas y
comentarios), 1984. 2nd ed. 1993.
Casaglia, M. Aristotele: Protreptico: Esortazione alla filosofia. Florence, 2001.
Chroust, A. H. Aristotle’s Protrepticus. Notre Dame, 1964.
Düring, I. Aristotle’s Protrepticus: An Attempt at Reconstruction. Göteborg, 1961.
Düring, I. Der Protreptikos des Aristoteles. Frankfurt, 1969.
Follon, J. Aristote: Invitation à la philosophie. Paris, 2000.
Follon, J. (tr.) and P. Dulau (comm.), Aristote, Protreptique: invitation à la philosophie.
Paris, 2006.
Minca, B. & C. Partenie. Aristotel: Protrepticul. Bucharest, 2005.
Pelletier, Y. Aristote: Le Protreptique. Fragments ordonnés par Anton-Hermann Chroust
traduits par Yvan Pelletier d’après le texts grec colligé par W.D. Ross. 1999.
http://regislaurent.ifrance.com/textes/version%20imprimable.pdf.
Rodriguez, C. M. Aristóteles: Protreptico. Una Exhortacion a la Filosofia. Madrid, 2006.
Schneeweiss, G. Der Protreptikos des Aristoteles. Munich dissertation, 1966.
Schneeweiss, G. Aristoteles: Protreptikos. Hinführung zur Philosophie. Darmstadt, 2005.
Verhoeven, C. Aristoteles: Lof van de wijsbegeerte. Groningen, 1998.
van der Meeren, S. Exhortation à la Philosophie: Le dossier Grec Aristote. Paris, 2011.
von Fritz, K. and E. Kapp, Aristotle: Constitution of Athens and Related Texts. New York,
1950. Contains a translation of and commentary on Iamblichus, Protrepticus X in
Appendix 1.
3
c. Editions and translations of papyri attributable to Aristotle's
Protrepticus
Cockle, H. M. P.Oxy 3659. The Oxyrhynchus Papyri LII: 59-62. London, 1984.
Decleva Caizzi, F. & M. S. Funghi. P.Vindob G 26008 & 29329. Su alcuni frammenti
filosofici della Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Varia Papyrologica = Studi e
Testi per il Corpus dei papyri filosofici greci e latini, 5: 49-99. Firenze, 1991.
Haslam, M.W. P.Oxy 3699. The Oxyrhynchus Papyri LIII: 15-23. London, 1986.
Vendruscolo, F. P.Oxy 666. Corpus dei Papiri Filosofici I.1: 269-279. Florence, 1989.
d. Editions and translations and commentaries of the Aristotle Corpus
Barnes, J. (ed.) The Complete Works of Aristotle: the revised Oxford translation (2 vols.,
Princeton, 1984).
Bekker, I. Aristotelis Opera ex recensione Immanuelis Bekkeri edidit Academia Regia
Borussica accedunt fragmenta scholia index aristotelicus (5 volumes, Berlin, 18311987).
Burnet, J. The Ethics of Aristotle: edited with an introduction and notes. London, 1900.
Crisp, R. (tr.) Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge, 2000.
Gauthier, R. A. and J. Y. Jolif, L’Éthique a Nicomaque. Louvain and Paris, 1970. 3 vols.
Smith J. A. and W. D. Ross (eds.) The Works of Aristotle Translated into English (12 vols.,
Oxford, 1908-1952).
e. Editions and translations of other lost works of Aristotle
Janko, R. Aristotle on Comedy: towards a reconstruction of Poetics II. (London 1984).
Janko, R. Aristotle: Poetics, with the Tractatus Coislinianus, reconstruction of Poetics II,
and the fragments of the On Poets (Indianapolis, 1987)
Janko, R. Philodemus: the Aesthetic Works. Vol. I/3: Philodemus, On Poems Books 3–4, with
the Fragments of Aristotle, On Poets (Oxford, 2011)
Moraux, P. A la recherché de l’Aristote perdu: La dialogue Sur la Justice. (Louvain 1957).
Searby, D. M. Aristotle in the Greek Gnomological Tradition. (Uppsala, 1998).
Schuhl, P.-M. et al. Aristote: De la richesse – De la prière – De la noblesse – Du plaisir – De
L’Éducation (fragments et témoignages). (Paris 1968).
2. Editions and translations of Isocrates
Mandilaras, B. G. (ed.) Isocrates: Opera Omnia. 3 vols. Leipzig, 2003.
Mirhady, D. C. & Y. L. Too. Isocrates I. Austin, 2000.
Norlin, G. Isocrates. Loeb Classical Library. 3 vols. Cambridge, MA and London, 1928.
Papillon, T. L. Isocrates II. (Austin, 2004).
3. Editions and translations of Plato
Cooper, J. and D. S. Hutchinson (ed.), Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis and Cambridge,
1997.
4
Slings, S. R. Plato: Clitophon. Cambridge, 1999.
Thompson, W. H. The Phaedrus of Plato. London, 1868.
4. Editions and translations of Archytas of Tarentum
Huffman, C. Archytas of Tarentum: Pythagorean, Philosopher, and Mathematician-King.
Cambridge, 2005.
Thesleff, H. The Pythagorean Texts of the Hellenistic Period Collected and Edited (Åbo,
1965), 2-48.
5. Editions and translations of Heraclides of Pontus
Heraclides of Pontus: Texts and Translation. Edited by E. Schütrumpf. Translators: P. Stork,
J. van Ophuijsen, and S. Prince. New Brunswick and London, 2008.
6. Editions and translations of the Anonymous Iamblichi
Mari, M. (ed. and trans.) Anonimo di Giamblico: La pace e il benessere (with a preface by D.
Musti, Milan, 2003).
7. Editions and translations of works of Cicero
Grilli, A. M. Tulli Ciceronis Hortensius: edited with a commentary. Milan, 1962.
Ruch, M. L’Hortensius de Ciceron—histoire et reconstruction. Paris, 1958.
Straume-Zimmermann, L. Ciceros Hortensius. Bern, 1976.
Shackleton-Bailey, D. R. Cicero: Letters to Atticus. N vols. Cambridge, MA and London,
1999.
Woolf, R. (tr.) and J. Annas (ed.), Cicero: On Moral Ends. Cambridge, 2001.
8. Editions and translations of works of Clement of Alexandria (AD II-III)
Stählin, O., ed. Clemens Alexandrinus. Erster Band: Protrepticus und Paedagogus. Berlin,
1972.
Stählin, O., ed. Clemens Alexandrinus. Zweiter Band: Stromata Buch I-VI. Berlin, 1960.
9. Editions and translations of Lactantius (AD III-IV)
McDonald, M. F., tr. Lactantius: The Divine Institutes. Washington, D. C., 1964.
10. Manuscripts, Editions and translations of works of Iamblichus of Chalcis
(AD III-IV)
a. Manuscripts of the Protrepticus:
B = Besançon, Bibl. Municipale 405, gr. 10 Omont, 7 Gollob, f. 60-106v.
C = Zeitz Stiftsbibliothek, 61 (32), 58-99v.
5
D = Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, cod.Monac.gr.102, f. 64-112v
E = Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, cod.Monac.gr.392, f. 104-145
F = Florence, Bibl. Laurenziana, cod.Laur.86,3, f. 46v-82v.
G = Rome, Biblioteca Angelica 77 (olim A-2-16), p. 109-198.
H = Vatican City, Bibl. Apostolica Vaticana, cod.Palatinus.gr.94, f. 74v-130v
I = Vatican City, Bibl. Apostolica Vaticana, cod.Vaticanus.gr.322, f.1-27
J = Vatican City, Bibl. Apostolica Vaticana, cod.Vaticanus.gr.324, p. 62-111
L = Florence, Bibl. Laurenziana, cod.Laur.86,29, f. 89-154.
M = Venice, Bibl. Marciana, cod.Marc.gr.243, f. 45v-82.
N = Naples, Bibl. Nazionale, cod. Neap.Borbon.III-B-30, p. 74-132.
O = Oxford, Bodleian Library, cod.Bodl.Auct.T.1.20 (misc.198), f. 55v-101.
P = Paris, Bibl. Nationale, cod.Par.gr.2093, f. 48v-83v.
Q = Madrid, Bibl. Nacional, cod.O46 , f. 59-106.
R = Ravenna, Bibl. Classense, cod.381 (olim 139,6,G), f. 1-54.
S = Escorial, Realbiblioteca , cod.Υ-I-11, f. 51-93v.
T = Paris, Bibl. Nationale, cod.Par.gr.1981, f. 54v-94.
U = Escorial, Realbiblioteca (Bibl. du Monastère), cod.Υ-I-.1.
V = Vatican City, Bibl. Apostolica Vaticana, cod.Vaticanus.gr.1028.
W = Vienna, Staatsbibliothek, cod.Vindob.philos.gr.11, f. 112v-156v.
X = Torino, Bibl. Civica, cod.Taurinensis gr.146 Pasini (337 Cosentini), f. 39-68.
Z = Escorial, Realbiblioteca, cod.Φ-II-4.
b. Printed Editions and translations of the Protrepticus:
Arcerius, Ioh. Arcerius Theodoretus, ed. Iamblichi Chalcidensis De vita pythagorica et
Protrepticae orations ad philosophiam. Frankfurt, 1598.
Des Places, E. Jamblique: Protreptique. Paris, 1989.
Johnson, T. M. Iamblichus: The Exhortation to Philosophy. Orig. pub. 1920. Repr. Grand
Rapids, 1988.
Kiessling, T., Iamblichi Chalcidensis ex Coele-Syria Adhotatio ad philosophiam (Leipzig,
1813).
Pistelli, H. Iamblichi Protrepticus, Leipzig, 1888.
Romano, F. Giamblico: Summa pitagorica. Milan, 2006.
Schönberger, O. Iamblichos: Aufruf zur philosophie. Erste deutsche Gesamtübersetzung mit
zweisprachiger Ausgabe von Ciceros “Hortensius”. Würzburg, 1984.
c. Editions and Translations of other works of Iamblichus
Brisson, L. & A. Ph. Segonds. Jamblique: Vie de Pythagore. Paris, 1996.
Clark, E., J. M. Dillon & J. P. Hershbell (trans., comm.), Iamblichus: De mysteriis. Leiden,
2004.
Dueber, L. Iamblichi de vita pythagorica. Stuttgart, 1937. Revised by U. Klein, 1975.
Dillon, J. M. & J. Hershbell, Iamblichus: On the Pythagorean way of life. Atlanta, 1991.
Dillon, J. M. & W. Polleichtrer (ed., trans., comm..), Iamblichus of Chalcis: the letters.
Atlanta, 2009.
6
Festa, N. De communi mathmatica scienta. Leipzig, 1891. Revised by U. Klein, Stuttgart,
1975.
Finamore, J. F. and J. M. Dillon (ed., trans., comm.), Iamblichus: De anima. Leiden, 2002.
Pistelli, H. Iamblichi in nicomachi arithmeticam introductionem. Leipzig, 1894. Revised by
U. Klein, 1975.
Urmson, J. O. Concerning the General Science of Mathematics by Iamblichus. Unpublished
manuscript, London: Institute for Classical Studies, text deposited 2000.
11. Editions and Translations of Ancient Commentators
a. Aristocles of Messene (AD I)
Chiesara, M. L. Aristocles of Messene: testimonia and fragments (Oxford 2001).
b. Alexander of Aphrodisias (AD II)
Barnes, J. et al., Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Aristotle’s Prior Analytics 1.1-7. Ithaca, NY,
1991.
Wallies, M. Alexandri Aphrodisiiensis in aristotelis analyticorum priorum librum I
commentarium (CIAG II 1). Berlin, 1883.
Wallies, M. Alexandri Aphrodisiiensis in aristotelis topicorum libros octo commentaria
(CIAG 2.2). Berlin, 1891.
c. Ammonius (AD V)
Wallies, M. Amonii in Aristotelis analyticorum priorum librum I commentarium (CIAG IV
pars VI). Berlin, 1901.
d. Proclus (AD V)
Friedlein, G. Procli Diadochi in primum euclidis elementorum librum commentarii. Leipzig,
1873.
Morrow, G. Proclus: a Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Forward by I.
Mueller. Princeton, 1970.
e. Olympiodorus the younger (AD V-VI)
Westerink, L. G. Olympiodorus: Commentary on the First Alcibiades of Plato. Amsterdam,
1956.
f. Philoponus (AD VI)
Giardina, G. R. Giovanni Filopono Matematico tra neopithagorismo e neoplatonismo:
Commentario alla Introduzione Aritmetica di Nicomaco di Gerasa: introduzione,
testo, traduzione e note (Catania 1999).
7
g. Asclepius of Tralles (AD VI)
Taràn, L. Asclepius of Tralles: in Nicomachi Isagogen Arithm. Scholia I, Transactions of the
American Philological Society, NS 59.4 (Philadelphia 1969).
h. Elias (wrote circa AD VI-VII)
Busse, A. Eliae in prophyrii isagogen et Aristotelis categorias commentaria (CIAG supp.
vol.?). Berlin, 1900.
i. David the Invincible Philosopher (AD VI-VII)
Busse, A. Davidis prolegomena et in porphyrii isagogen (CIAG 18.2). Berlin, 1904.
Kendell, B. and R. W. Thomson, Definitions and Divisions of Philosophy by David the
Invincible Philosopher. Chico, CA, 1983.
j. Anonymous Scholion on Cod.Par.Gr.2064
Wallies, M. Ammonii in aristotelis analyticorum priorum librum I commentarium (CIAG
4.6), pp. ix-xii.
12. Boethius (AD V-VI)
Stump, E. Boethius's In Ciceronis topica. Ithaca, NY, 1988.
13. Editions of Stobaeus (AD VI)
Wachsmuth, C. and O. Hense (eds.), Ioannis stobaei anthologium (5 v. Berlin, 1958).
B. Secondary Sources (arranged alphabetically)
Acosta, E. En torno al Protréptico de la Carta de Epicuro a Meneceo. Helmantica 31 (1980),
89-114.
Allan, D. J. The Philosophy of Aristotle (London 1952, 2nd ed. Oxford 1970).
Allan, D. J. Fragmenta Aristotelica. The Philosophical Quarterly 3 (1953), 248-252.
Allan, D. J. The Fragments of Aristotle. Review of W. D. Ross, Aristotelis Fragmenta
Selecta. The Classical Review n.s. 6 (1956), 224-225.
Allan, D. J. Review of Rabinowitz. Classical Review, N.S. 9 (1959), 124-127
Allan, D. J. A passage from Iamblichus in praise of the contemplative life. Archiv für
Geschichte der Philosophie, 57 (1975), 246-68.
Allan, D. J. Critical and explanatory notes on some passages assigned to Aristotle’s
Protrepticus. Phronesis 21 (1976), 219-41.
Barwick, K. Die Rhetorik ad Alexandrum und Anaximenes, Alkidamas, Isokrates,
Aristoteles, und die Theodekteia. Philologus, 111 (1967); 47-55.
Bechtle, G. Iamblichus: Aspekte seiner Philosophie und Wissenschaftskonzeption. Sankt
Augustin, 2006.
8
Balla, C. Isocrates, Plato, and Aristotle on Rhetoric. Rhizai I (2004), 45-71.
Benoit, W. ‘Isocrates and Aristotle on Rhetoric’ Rhetoric Society Quarterly XX (1990): 251260.
Bernays, J. Die Dialoge des Aristoteles in ihrem Verhältnis an seinen übrigen Werken (at
116-22). Berlin, 1863.
Berti, E. Le nuove ricerche sui frammenti di Aristotele. Bollettino filosofico 22 (1988), 3340.
Berti, E. Les écoles philosophiques d’Athènes et les princes de Chypre. Actes du Colloque
“Chypre et les origines du Stoïcisme”, Publications du Centre Culturel Hellénique,
Paris, 1996, pp. 15-20.
Betegh, G. 'The Next Principle' Metaphysics A 3-4, 984b8-985b22. Aristotle's Metaphysics
Alpha - Symposium Aristotelicum (ed. C. Steel), 105-140 at 117 (Oxford 2012).
Bignone, E. L’Aristotele perduto e la formazione filosofica di Epicuro, 2 vols. Firenze, 1936.
Bignone, E. Nuove testimonianze e frammenti del Protrettico di Aristotele. RFIC # (1936),
225-37.
Bignone, E. Importante conferme all’ “Aristotele perduto”. Atene e Roma 3 ser.5 (1937),
217-234. Chiarimenti e aggiunte all’ “Aristotele perduto”, Atene e Roma 3 ser.5
(1937), 119-129.
Blank, D. Aristotle’s ‘Academic Course on Rhetoric” and the end of Philodemus, On
Rhetoric VIII’ Cronache Ercolanesi 37 (2007), 5-48.
Bloch, O. R. Protreptique d’Aristote: Fragment 17 de l’édition Ross. Revue philosophique de
la France et l’Étranger 154 (1964), 219-240.
Bluck, R. S. The origin of the Greater Alcibiades. The Classical Quarterly n.s. 3 (1953), 4652.
Bobonich, C. Aristotle’s ethical treatises. The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean
Ethics (ed. R. Kraut), 12-36. Oxford, 2006.
Bobonich, C. Why should philosophers rule? Plato’s Republic and Aristotle’s Protrepticus.
Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (2007), 153-175.
Bos, A. P. Aristotle’s Eudemus and Protrepticus: Are they really two different works?
Dionysius, 8 (1984), 19-51.
Bos, A. P. The divine monarchia and the system of world government in Aristotle’s De
Mundo. Polis and Cosmopolis: Problems of a global era (ed. K. Boudouris), 51-68.
Athens, 2003.
Bos, A. P. The Soul and its Instrumental Body: a reinterpretation of Aristotle’s philosophy of
living nature. Leiden, 2003.
Bos, A. P. Aristotle on the Etruscan robbers: A core text of “Aristotelian dualism”. Journal
of the History of Philosophy 41 (2003), 289-306.
Bos, A. P. Aristotle’s De Spiritu as a critique of the doctrine of pneuma in Plato and his
predecessors. Mnemosyne 60 (2007), 565-588.
Bos, A. P. Why is Aristotle treated so differently from other Greek philosophers? Elenchos
XXIX (2008), 145-165.
Brague, R. Aristote et la question du monde: Essai sur le contexte cosmologique et
anthropologique de l’ontologie. Paris, 1988.
Brink, C. O. Review of M. Ruch. The Journal of Roman Studies 51 (1961), 215-222.
Buela, A. A. El Protreptico de Aristoteles. Interpretacion, desarrollo y bibliografia. Sapientia
39 (1984), 231-234.
9
Burkert, W. Platon oder Pythagoras? Zum Ursprung des wortes “Philosophie”. Hermes 88
(1960), 159-177.
Bywater, I. On a lost dialogue of Aristotle. Journal of Philology, 2 (1869), 55-69.
Bywater, I. Aristotle’s dialogue On Philosophy. Journal of Philology 7 (1877), 64-87.
Cambiano, G. The desire to know: Metaphysics A 1. Aristotle's Metaphysics Alpha –
Symposium Aristotelicum (ed. C. Steel), 1-42 at 40 and n.77 (Oxford 2012).
Carlini, A. Due finali di rigo dimenticate nel papiro del Protrettico di Aristotele (P. Oxy.
666, 5253), SCO 33 (1983), 235.
Castagnoli, L. Ancient Self-Refutation: the logic and history of self-refutation from
Democritus to Augustine (Cambridge 2010).
Cherniss, H. Review of H. D. Saffrey, Le peri\ filosofi/aj d’Aristote et la théorie
platonicienne des idées et des nombres. Gnomon 31 (1939): 36-51.
Chroust, A. H. A brief account of the reconstruction of Aristotle’s Protrepticus. Classical
Philology 60 (1965), 229-239.
Chroust, A. H. What prompted Aristotle to address the Protrepticus to Themison? Hermes 94
(1966), 202-207.
Chroust, A. H. An emendation to fragment 13 (Walzer, Ross) of Aristotle’s Protrepticus.
Tijdschrift voor Philosophie 28 (1966), 366-377.
Chroust, A. H. The term philosopher and the panegyric analogy in Aristotle’s Protrepticus.
Apeiron I (1966), 14-17.
Chroust, A. H. Werner Jaeger and the reconstruction of Aristotle’s lost works. Symbolae
Osloenses 42 (1968), 7-43.
Chroust, A. H. Aristotle. New light on his life and on some of his lost works. 2 vols. London,
1973.
Chroust, A. H. Aristotle’s Protrepticus versus Aristotle’s On Philosophy: a controversy on
the nature of dreams. Theta Pi 3 (1974), 168-178.
Cole, T. The anonymous Iamblichi and his place in Greek political theory. Harvard Studies
in Classical Philology 65 (1961), 127-163.
Cole, T. Democritus and the Sources of Greek Anthropology. Cleveland, 1967.
Cooper, J. M. 'Plato, Isocrates and Cicero on the independence of oratory from Philosophy',
BACAP 1 (1986): 77-96.
Croissant, J. Aristote et les mystères (Paris 1932).
Crowley, T. J. Aristotle’s so-called elements. Phronesis 53 (2008), 223-242.
de Laix, R. A. Aristotle’s conception of the Spartan constitution. Journal of the History of
Philosophy 12 (1974), 21-30.
den Boeft, J. Review of Straume-Zimmermann’s 1976 edition of Cicero’s Hortensius.
Vigiliae Christianae 33 (1979), 412-414.
de Vogel, C. J. Did Aristotle ever accept Plato’s theory of transcendent ideas? Problems
around a new edition of the Protrepticus. AGPh 47 (1965), 261-298.
de Vries, G. J. Isocrates’ reaction to the Phaedrus. Mnemosyne 6 (1953), 39-45.
Diels, H. Über die exoterischen Reden des Aristoteles. Sitzungsberichte der Berliner
Akademie der Wissenschaften, 19 (1883), 447-94.
Diels, H. Zu Aristoteles’ Protreptikos und Cicero’s Hortensius. Archiv fur Geschichte der
Philosophie, 1 (1888), 447-97.
Dillon, J. Iamblichus of Chalcis (c. 240-325 A.D.). Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen
Welt, 36.2 (1987), 862-909. Larsen, B. D. Jamblique de Chalcis. Exégète et
10
Philosophe. Aarhus, 1972.
Dorandi, T. ‘La polemica fra Aristotele e Isocrate nella testimonianza Filodema’ in Etica,
Politica, Retorica: Studi su Aristotele e la sua presenza nell’eta’ moderna, ed. E.
Berti e L. M. Napolitano Valditara, Rome, 1989, 201-5.
Dümmler, F. ‘Platon und Isokrates (Hippias I). Antisthenes Protreptikos berücksichtigt von
Isokrates, Platon und Xenophon’ = ch. 4 of Akademika (Giessen, 1889), 52-68.
Düring, I. Problems in Aristotle’s Protrepticus. Eranos, 52 (1954), 139-71.
Düring, I. Aristotle in the Protrepticus. Autour d’Aristote, 81-97. Louvain, 1955.
Düring, I. Aristotle in the Ancient Biographical Tradition. Göteborg, 1957.
Düring, I. Aristotle on ultimate principles from ‘nature and reality’ . In. Aristotle and Plato
in the Mid-Fourth Century. Papers of the Symposium Aristotelicum held at Oxford in
August, 1957, ed. I. Düring and G.E.L. Owen (Göteborg, 1960), 35-55.
Düring, I. and G.E.L. Owen. Aristotle and Plato in the Mid-Fourth Century. Papers of the
Symposium Aristotelicum held at Oxford in August, 1957. Göteborg, 1960.
Dumoulin, B. Recherches sur le Premier Aristote (Eudeme, de la Philosophie, Protreptique).
Paris, 1981.
Einarson, B. Aristotle’s Protrepticus and the structure of the Epinomis. Transactions and
Proceedings of the American Philological Association 67 (1936), 261-85.
Eucken, C. Isokrates: seine Positionen in der Auseinandersetzung mit den zeitgenössischen
Philosophen. Berlin, 1983.
Feke, J. Ptolemy’s Defense of Theoretical Philosophy. Apeiron 45 (2012), 61-90.
Festugière, A. J. La Révélation d’Hermes Trismégiste II: Le Dieu cosmique. Paris, 1949.
Festugière, A. J. Un fragment nouveau du “Protreptique” d’Aristote. Revue philosophique de
la France et l’Étranger 146 (1956), 117-127.
Festugière, A. J. Les Trois Protreptiques de Platon: Euthydeme, Phaedon, Epinomis. Paris,
1973.
Flacelière, R. ‘L’éloge d’ Isocrate a la fin du ‘Phèdre’, RÉG xlvi (1933): 224-232.
Flashar, H. Platon und Aristoteles im Protreptikos des Jamblichos. Archiv fur Geschichte der
Philosophie, 47 (1965), 53-79. Reprinted in: P. Moraux, ed., Frühschriften des
Aristoteles, Darmstadt, 1975 (“Wege der Forschung” CCXXIV, 247-69); and Eidola.
Ausgewählte Kleine Schriften, Amsterdam, 1989, 297-323.
Fujisawa, N. Aristotle’s conception of philosophy in the Protrepticus: comparison with
Isocrates, Plato, and Aristotle himself in his later treatises. Journal of Classical
Studies 21 (1973), 1-19 + 133-134.
Furley, D. Review of Rabinowitz. JHS 89 (1959), 178.
Furley, D.J. “Protrepticus” s.v. The Oxford Classical Dictionary. Oxford, 1996.
Gadamer, H. Der Aristotelische Protreptikos und die Entwicklungsgeschichtliche
Betrachtung der Aristotelischen Ethik. Hermes, 63 (1928), 138-65.
Gaiser, K. Protreptik und Paranese bei Platon. 1959.
Gaiser, K. Zwei Protreptikos-Zitate in der Eudemischen Ethik des Aristoteles. Rheinisches
Museum für Philologie 110 (1967), 314-345.
Gaiser, K. ‘Ein Gespräch mit König Philipp: zum Eudemos des Aristoteles’ in Aristoteles
Werk und Wirkung: Paul Moraux Gewidmet 1. Band: Aristoteles und seine Schule,
ed. J. Wiesner, Berlin, 1985, 457-84.
Gallagher, R. L. “Protreptic Aims of Plato's Republic.” Ancient Philosophy 24 (2004), 293–
319.
11
Gerhäusser, W. Der Protreptikos des Poseidonios. Doctoral dissertation, Univ. of Heidelberg,
1912.
Gigon, O. Cicero und Aristoteles. Hermes, 87 (1959), 143-62.
Gill, C. Protreptic and dialectic in Plato’s Euthydemus. In Plato: Euthydemus, Lysis,
Charmides: Proceedings of the V Symposium Platonicum, 133-143, ed. M. Robinson
and L. Brisson. Sankt Augustin, 2000.
Gottschalk, H. Heraclides of Pontus. Oxford, 1980.
Griffo, S. Problemi di riconstruzione del Protreptico di Aristotele. Annali della Scuola
Normale Superiore di Pisa: Classe di Lettere e Filosofia 2 (1978), 375-392.
Guthrie, W. G. The philosophy of Aristotle’s Protrepticus. Proceedings of the Cambridge
Philological Society # (1932), 3-4.
Haase, W. Ein vermeintliches Aristotelisches Fragment bei Johannes Philoponus. Sunusia:
Festgabe für W. Schadwaldt, 323-354. Pfullingen, 1965.
Hagen von, Benno von [sic], 'Isokrates und Alexander', Philologus lxvii 1908, 113-33.
Halliwell, S. Philosophical Rhetoric or Rhetorical Philosophy? The strange case of Isocrates.
In The Rhetoric Canon (ed. B. D. Schildgen) (Detroit 1997), 107-125.
Hankinson, J. Aristotle on Kind-Crossing. In R. W. Sharples, ed., Philoosphy and the
Sciences in Antiquity. Burlington, 2005, 23-54.
Hartlich, P. De exhortationum a Grecis Romanisque scriptorum historia. Leipziger Studien
zur Klassischen Philologie, 11 (1889), 209-72.
Harvey, S. The Hebrew translation of Averroes’ Prooemium to his Long Commentary on
Aristotle’s Physics. American Academy for Jewish Research Proceedings LII (1985),
55-84.
Hare, J. God and Morality: a philosophical history. Maldan, MA and Oxford, 2007.
Haskins, E. V. Logos and Power in Isocrates and Aristotle. South Carolina, 2004.
Heath, T. A History of Greek Mathematics, Volume I: Thales to Euclid (Oxford 1921).
Heitz, E. Die verlornen Schriften des Aristoteles Leipzig, 1865.
Hirzel, R. Über den Protreptikos des Aristoteles. Hermes, 10 (1876), 61-100.
Hutchinson, D. S. “Doctrines of the Mean and the Debate concerning Skills in FourthCentury Medicine, Rhetoric, and Ethics”, in Method, Medicine, and Metaphysics:
Studies in the philosophy of ancient science, ed. R. J. Hankinson = Apeiron 21
(1988), 17-52.
Hutchinson, D. S. and M. R. Johnson. ‘Authenticating Aristotle’s Protrepticus’ in Oxford
Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29 (2005), 193-294.
Huxley, G. Crete in Aristotle’s Politics. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 12 (1971),
505-515.
Jaeger, W. Paideia: the ideals of Greek culture. 3 vols. (originally published 1933);
translated by G. Highet. Oxford, 1944.
Jaeger, W. Aristoteles: Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung (1st ed. Berlin
1923; 2nd ed. 1955); English translation: Aristotle: Fundamentals of the history of his
development by R. Robinson. Oxford, 1948, 2nd ed., 1961.
Jaeger, W. Ueber Ursprung und Kreislauf des philosophischen Lebensideals. In
Sitzungsberichte d. pruess. Akad. D. Wissensch. Phil. –Hist. Klasse 1928, p. 390++.
Translated as appendix 2 in the above.
Johnson, M. Aristotle on Teleology. Oxford, 2005.
Johnson, M. The Aristotelian explanation of the halo. Apeiron 42 (2009), 325-357.
12
Joly, R. Le Thème de genres de vie dans l’Antiquitè Classique. Brussels, 1956.
Jordan, M. D. ‘Ancient philosophic protreptic and the problem of persuasive genres’.
Rhetorica 4 (1986), 309-33.
Kerferd, G. B. Platonism and Neoplatonism [review of Merlan, From Platonism to
Neoplatonism]. The Classical Review n.s. 5 (1955), 58-60.
Kurz, D. AKPIBEIA: Das Ideal der Exaktheit bei den Griechen bis Aristoteles. Göppingen,
1970.
Landolfi, L. Per l’analisi di un protreptikos logos: Manil. 4, 1-22. Orpheus (1994), 448-458.
Langerbeck, H. Review of D. J. Allan, The philosophy of Aristotle. Gnomon 26 (1954), 1-8.
Larsen, B. D. Jamblique de Chalcis: Exégète et Philosophy. Vol. I: Thèse. Vol. II.
Appendice. Testimonia et Fragmenta Exegetica (Aarhus, 1972).
Laskaris, J. The Art is Long: on the sacred disease and the scientific tradition. Leiden, 2002.
Chapter Three: “On the Sacred Disease—A Sophistic Protreptic Speech”
Leeman, A. D. De Aristotelis Protreptico Somnii Scripionis exemplo. Mnemosyne, 11
(1958), 139-51.
Leszl, W. L’Aristotele di Düring. Revista di Storia della Filosofia 2 (1984), 3-34 and 211242.
Livingstone, N. 'Voice of Isocrates and the dissimination of cultural power', in Y. L. Too and
N. Livingstone (edd.) Pedagogy and Power: Rhetorics of classical learning
(Cambridge, 1998).
Long, A. A. Aristotle on eudaimonia, nous, and divinity. In J. Miller (ed.),
Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: a critical guide. (Cambridge 2011).
Macleod, C. W. The poetry of ethics: Horace, Epistles I. The Journal of Roman Studies 69
(1979), 16-27.
Mansion, S. Review of Rabinowitz. Revue Philosophique de Louvain 56 (1958), 316-9.
Mansion, S. Contemplation and action in Aristotle’s Protrepticus. In Aristotle and Plato in
the Mid-Fourth Century, ed. I. Düring and G.E.L. Owen, 56-75. 1960.
Mansion, S. Les critères du meilleur dans le Protreptique d’Aristote. Zetesis, 164-176.
Antwerp and Utrecht, 1973. Reprinted in Suzanne Mansion: Études
Aristotéliciennes, ed. J. Follon, 433-445, Louvain, 1984.
Massaracchia, A. Isocrate e le scienze. Saggi di storia del pensiero scientific dedicati a
Valerio Tonini, 23-46. Rome, 1983.
Masters, R. D. The case of Aristotle’s missing dialogues: who wrote the Sophist, the
Statesman, and the Politics? Political Theory 5 (1977), 31-60.
McBryde, D. I. The Foundations of Aristotle’s Ethics. Newcastle, Australia, Ph.D. Diss.
2010.
McKirahan Jr., R. Aristotle on subordinate sciences. British Journal for the History of
Science 11 (1970), 197-220.
Menn, S., ‘The origins of Aristotle’s concept of e)ne/rgeia: e)ne/rgeia and du/namij’, Ancient
Philosophy, 14 (1994), 73-114.
Menn, S. Collecting the letters. Phronesis XLIII (1998), 291-305.
Menn, S. Aristotle's Theology. The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle (ed. C. Shields), 422-464
at 453n8 (Oxford 2012).
Merlan, P. Isocrates, Aristotle and Alexander the Great. Historia 3 (1954): 60-81 = Kleine
philosophische Schriften, 167-188, ed. F. Merlan. Hildesheim and New York, 1976.
Merlan, P. From Platonism to Neoplatonism (1st ed. 1953, 2nd ed., The Hague 1960).
13
Merlan, P. Das Problem der Erasten. Horizons of a Philosopher. Festschrift für David
Baumgardt (Leiden, 1963), 297-314 = Kleine philosophische Schriften, 109-126, ed.
F. Merlan. Hildesheim and New York, 1976.
Molina, J. Tradición y novedad en el Protréptico a la filosofia de Jámblico. Noua tellus 17
(1999), 65-107.
Monan, D. La connaissance morale dans le “Protreptique” d’Aristote. Revue philosophique
de Louvain 58 (1960), 185-219.
Monan, D. Moral Knowledge and its Methodology in Aristotle. Oxford, 1968.
Moraux, P. Une nouvelle trace de l’Aristote perdu. Les Ètudes classiques 16 (1948), 89-91.
Moraux, P. Les listes anciennes des ouvrages d’Aristote. Preface by A. Mansion. Louvain,
1951.
Moraux, P. ‘Notes sur la tradition indirecte du ‘De Caelo’ d’Aristote’ Hermes 82 (1954),
145-182.
Moraux, P. Review of Rabinowitz. AntCl 27 (1958), 460-464.
Moraux, P. From the Protrepticus to the dialogue On Justice. In Aristotle and Plato in the
Mid-Fourth Century, ed. I. Düring and G.E.L. Owen (Göteborg, 1960), 113-32.
Most, G. Some new fragments of Aristotle’s Protrepticus? Studi su Codici e Papiri
Filosofici. ed. L. Olschki, 189-216. Firenze, 1992.
Muehlenberg, E. Review of Schneeweiss 1966. The Journal of the History of Philosophy 10
(1972), 86-88.
Mueller, I. Iamblichus and Proclus’ Euclid commentary. Hermes 115 (1987): 334-348.
Natali, C. Rhetorical and scientific aspects of the Nicomachean Ethics. Phronesis 52 (2007),
364-381.
Needler, M. The Aristotelian Protrepticus and the developmental treatment of the
Aristotelian Ethics. Classical Philology, 23 (1928), 280-4.
Nehemas, A. ‘Eristic, antilogic, sophistic, dialectic: Plato’s demarcation of philosophy from
sophistry’ in Virtues of Authenticity: essays on Plato and Socrates (Princeton, 1999).
Nestle, W. ‘Hippocratica’, Hermes 73 (1938): 1-38.
Nielsen, K. M. Ancient Ethics. International Encyclopedia of Ethics (ed. H. LaFollette),
245-257. (Oxford, Blackwell 2013).
Nightingale, A. W. Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge,
1995.
Nightingale, A. Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy. Cambridge, 2004.
Nix, G. E. Aristotle’s Protrepticus and Isocrates. University of Chicago Dissertation, 1969.
Nuyens, F. L'Évolution de la Psychologie d'Aristote. Louvain, The Hague, and Paris, 1948.
Ober J. I, Socrates…The Performative Audacity of Isocrates’ Antidosis, Isocrates and Civic
Education, ed. T. Poulakos and D. Depew (Austin, 2004), 21-43.
O’Meara, D. Pythagoras Revived: Mathematics and philosophy in late antiquity. Oxford,
1989.
O’Meara, D. Faut-il Philosopher? Le voyage d’une question dans le monde antique. In
Peregrina Curiositas ed. A. Kessler et al. (Freiburg (Schw.), 1995), 1-12.
O’Meara, D. Iamblichus. The Oxford Classical Dictionary. 3rd edition. Oxford, 1996.
O’Meara, D. Platonopolis: Platonic political philosophy in late antiquity. Oxford, 2003.
Orlandi, T. Il primo Aristotele nel de comuni mathematica scientia di Iamblico. Revista
critica di storia della filosofia 18 (1963), 592-598.
Ostwald, M. and J. P. Lynch ‘The Growth of Schools and the Advance of Knowledge’ = Ch.
14
12a of The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume 6, The Fourth Century BC. 2nd ed.
D. M. Lewis, J. Boardman, S. Hornblower, M. Ostwald, 592-633. Cambridge, 1994.
Owen, G. E. L. Logic and metaphysics in some earlier works of Aristotle. In Aristotle and
Plato in the Mid-Fourth Century, ed. I. Düring and G.E.L. Owen (Göteburg, 1960),
163-190.
Philippson, R. Cicero’s Hortensius. In RE VII A, coll. 1125-7.
Pistelli, E. Dei manoscritti di Giamblico di una nuova edizione del Protrpetico. Museo
Italiano di Antichita Classica 2 (1888), 457-480.
Pistelli, E. Iamblichea. Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 1 (1893), 25-40.
Pistelli, E. Per una nuova edizione del IV libro di Giamblico. Studi Italiani di Filologia
Classica 1 (1893), 233-238.
Plezia, M. De quodam Protreptici Aristotelii loco supplendo. Classica et Mediaevalia 28
(1967), 214-215.
Pohlenz, M. Review of Bignone, L’Aristotele perduto. Göttinginische Gelehrte Anzeigen 198
(1936), 514-31.
Poulakos, T. Speaking for the Polis: Isocrates’ rhetorical education. South Carolina, 1997.
Rabinowitz, W. G. Aristotle’s Protrepticus and the Sources of its Reconstruction. Berkeley,
1957.
Rashed, M. ‘Textes inédits transmis par l’Ambr. Q 74 sup. Alexandre d’Aphrodise et
Olympiodore d’Alexandrie’ in Rev. Sc. ph. th. 81 (1997), 219-38.
Rashed, M. ‘Alexandre d’Aphrodise, Lecteur du Protreptique’ in Les Prologues Mediévaux
(ed. J. Hamesse). Turnhout, 2002.
Ratte, C. La loi dans l'anonyme de Jamblique. Camenulae 2 (2008).
Rees, D. A. Bipartition of the soul in the early academy. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 77
(1957), 112-118.
Regenbogen, O. Review of Bignone. Gnomon 16 (1940), 103-4.
Renehan, R. An aristotelian mode of argumentation in Iamblichus’ Protrepticus. Hermes 92
(1964), 507-508.
Richter, L. Die Beziehung zwischen Theorie und Praxis der Musik im Aristotelischen
Protreptikos. Hermes 88 (1960), 177-188.
Rodriguez, C. M. Propuesta de atribución de dos fragmentos del papiro de Viena PVindob
26008. Emerita LXXVI (2008), 87-104.
Rohatyn, D. The protreptic argument. International Logic Review 16 (1977), 192-204.
Romeyer-Dherbey, G. Vie bienheureuse et philosophie Les traces du Protreptique dans le
livre X de l’Ethique de Nicomaque. Les Études philosophiques 4 (1975), 399-414.
Roscalla, F. Strategie letterarie a confronto: Isocrate e Platone. Athenaeeum lxxxvi (1998):
109-132.
Rowe, C. Review of Dumoulin. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 105 (1985), 188-189.
Rowe, C. ‘Aristotelian Constitutions’, The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political
Thought, ed. C. Rowe and M. Schofield (Cambridge, 2000), 366-389.
Saffrey, H. D. Le peri\ filosofi/aj d’Aristote et la théorie platonicienne des idées et des
nombres. Leiden, 1955.
Schmieja, H. Drei Prologe im Grossen Physikkommentar des Averroes? Aristotelisches Erbe
im arabisch lateinischen Mittelalter: Übersetzungen, Kommentare, Interpretationen,
ed. A. Zimmermann. Berlin and New York, 1986.
Schneeweiss, G. Die Überlieferungen von Themison und Sardanapall: zur Datierung des
15
aristotelischen Protreptikos. Gymnasium 117 (2010), 531-558.
Sedley, D., ‘Is Aristotle's Teleology Anthropocentric?’, Phronesis, 36 (1991), 179-96.
Sedley, D., ‘Becoming like God in the Timaeus and Aristotle’, in Interpreting the TimaeusCritias (Proceedings of the IV Symposium Platonicum), ed. Calvo, Tomás and
Brisson, Luc, (Sankt Augustin, 1997), 327-39.
Shields, C. Aristotle's Philosophical Life and Writings. The Oxford Handbook of
Aristotle (ed. C. Shields), 3-16 at 15n27 (Oxford 2012).
Sicherl, M. Die Handschriften, Ausgaben und Übersetzungen von Iamblichos de mysteriis.
Berlin, 1957.
Sicherl, M. Ein uebersehener Iamblichos-Codex (Matrit. O 46). Emerita 28 (1960), 87-93.
Sicherl, M. Der codex grimanianus graecus 11 und seine nachkommenschaft. Byzantische
Zeitschrift 67 (1974), 313-336.
Slings, S. R. Protreptic in ancient theories of philosophical literature. In Greek Literary
Theory after Aristotle: A collection of papers in honour of D. M. Schenkveld, ed. J.J.
Abbenes, S.R. Slings, I. Sluiter, 173-92. Amsterdam, 1995.
Smith, T. W. The protreptic character of the Nicomachean Ethics. Polity XXVII (1994), 307330.
Spoerri, W. Review of Rabinowitz. Gnomon 32 (1960), 18-25.
Stark, R. Rev. of During, Attempt, GGA 217 (1965), 55-68.
Stark, R. Aristotelesstudien: Philologische untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der
Aristotelischen Ethik. München, 1972. Rev. by D. Russell, CR 1956, 70-71.
Stowers, S. K. Letter Writing in Greco-Roman Antiquity. Philadelphia, 1986.
Strycker , É. de. On the first section of fragment 5a of the Protrepticus: its logical structure
and the platonic character of the doctrine. In Aristotle and Plato in the Mid-Fourth
Century, ed. I. Düring and G.E.L. Owen (Göteborg, 1960), 76-104..
Strycker, É. de. Prédicats univoques et prédicats analogiques dans le Protreptique
d’Aristote. In Revue Philosophique de Louvain 66 (1968), 597-618.
Strycker, É. de. Review of Düring 1981. Gnomon 41, (1969), 233-55.
Strycker, É. de. Sur un emploi technique de ma=llon chez Aristote. Mnemosyne 22 (1969),
303-304.
Stylianou, P. J. The Age of Kingdoms: a political history of Cyprus in the Archaic and
Classical Periods. 1989.
Swancutt, D. M. Paraenesis in light of protrepsis: troubling the typical dichotomy. In J. Starr
and T. Engberg-Pederson, Early Christian Paranesis in Context (Berlin 2004), 113153.
Taran, L. Review of Larsen. The Classical World 68 (1975), 466-467.
Too, Y. L. The Rhetoric of Identity in Isocrates: Text, power, pedagogy. Cambridge, 1995.
Tuominen, M. The Ancient Commentators on Plato and Aristotle (California 2009).
Turkowska, D. Protreptyk Arystotelesa w Swietle Ostatnich Badan. Meander 17 (1962), 3439.
Turkowska, D. L’Hortensius de Ciceron et le Protreptique d’Aristote. Warsaw, 1965.
Usener, H. Vergessenes. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 28 (1873), 392-403.
Usener, H. Organisation der wissenschaftlichen Arbeit bilder aus der Geschichte der
Wissenschaft. Preussische Jahrbücher LIII (1884), 1-25. Reprinted in Vorträge und
Aufsätze, 69-102 (see esp. 101n1). Leipzig and Berlin, 1907.
Usener, S. Isokrates, Platon, und ihr Publikum: Hörer und Leser von Literatur im 4.
16
Jahrhundert v. Chr. (Tübingen, 1994).
Usher, S. ‘Isocrates: Kingship and the barbarian’, The Birth of the European Identity: The
Europe-Asia contrast in Greek thought 490-322 B.C., ed. H. A. Kahn (ed.), ???-???.
Vendruscolo, F. Gli Estratti Aristotelici nel Protrettico di Giamblico: Approfondimenti
criticotestuali (Pisa dissertation, 1985).
Vendruscolo, F. Due Frammenti Aristotelici (Protrepticus 6 e 15 Walzer-Ross): Note
Testuali e spunti per una ricostruzione. Studi Classici e Orientali 38 (1988), 293-330.
Verbeke, G. Plutarch and the development of Aristotle. In Aristotle and Plato in the MidFourth Century, ed. I. Düring and G.E.L. Owen (Göteburg, 1960), 236-247.
Verdenius, W. J. Aristotle Protrepticus B.84 (Düring). Mnemosyne 15 (1962), 395-396.
Villa, E. Il Protreptikos di Aristotele. Rendiconti dell’Istituto Lombardo, Classe di Lettere,
Scienze e Storiche, 53 (1920), 539-49. Von der Mühll, P. Isocrates und der
Protreptikos des Aristoteles. Philologus, 94 (1939-40), 259-65.
van der Meeren, S. Le protreptique en philosophie: essai de définition d’un genre. REG 115
(2002), 591-621.
von Hagen, B. Isokrates und Alexander. Philologus 67 (1908), 113-133.
von der Mühll, P. ‘Isocrates und der Protreptikos des Aristoteles’, Philologus 94 (1939-40):
259-65.
von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. ‘Platon und Isokrates’ = ch. 10 of Platon: Beilagen und
Textkritik 3, 106-125. Berlin, 1962.
Walker, M. Living by contemplation: Theoria, self-maintenance, and flourishing in
Aristotle's ethics. Yale Ph. D. diss., 2008.
Walker, M. The utility of contemplation in Aristotle’s Protrepticus. Ancient Philosophy 30
(2010), 135-153.
Waszink, J. H. Traces of Aristotle’s lost dialogues in Tertullian. Vigiliae Christianae 1
(1947), 137-149.
Wendland, P. Anaximenes von Lampsakos: Studien zur ältesten Geschichte der Rhetorik.
Berlin, 1905.
Weil, M. R. Isocrate et le Protreptique d’Aristote. Revue des Études grecques 91 (1978),
xviii.
Wersdörfer, H. Die φιλοσοφια des Isokrates im Spiegel in ihren Terminologie.
Untersuchungen zur frühattischen Rhetorik und Stillehre. (Klassisch philologischen
Studien xiii). Bonn dissertation, 1940.
Wieland, W. Die aristotelische Physik (Göttingen 1970).
Wildberg, C. Three Neoplatonic Introductions to Philosophy: Ammonious, David, and Elias.
Hermathena CXLIX (1990), 33-51.
Wieland, W. Aristoteles also Rhetoriker und die exoterischen Schriften. Hermes 86 (1958),
323-346.
Wilpert, P. Zwei aristotelische Frühschriften über die Ideenlehre. Regensburg, 1949.
Wilpert, P. Review of Rabinowitz. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 42 (1960), 101-6.
Wilpert, P. The fragments of Aristotle’s lost writings. In Aristotle and Plato in the MidFourth Century, ed. I. Düring and G.E.L. Owen, 257-264. Göteborg, 1960.
Wolfsdorf, D. Epicurus on Eu)frosu/nh )and Ene/rgeia (DL 10.136). Apeiron 42 (2009), 222257.
Zhmud, L. Pythagoras and the Early Pythagoreans. First published in Russian 1994.
Translated by K. Windle and R. Ireland (Oxford 2012).
17
Zhmud, L. Mathematics and Philosophy: an alleged fragment of Aristotle in Iamblichus.
Hyperboreus 13 (2007), 77-78.
Zuntz, G. In Aristotelis Protrepticum Coniecturae. Mnemosyne 11 (1958), 158-9.