Planning, Design and Development Minutes of
Transcrição
May 1, 2006 Members Present: The following were present at 7:00 p.m.: City Councillor G. Gibson – Wards 1 and 5 (Chair) Regional Councillor P. Palleschi - Wards 2 and 6 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E. Moore – Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor G. Miles – Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J. Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City Councillor S. Hames – Wards 7 and 8 The following arrived subsequently at the times noted: Regional Councillor S. DiMarco – Wards 3 and 4 (7:05 p.m.) City Councillor J. Hutton – Wards 2 and 6 (7:07 p.m.) City Councillor B. Callahan – Wards 3 and 4(7:05 p.m., left at 7:34 p.m., returned at 7:40 p.m.) City Councillor G. Manning – Wards 9 and 10 (7:09 p.m., returned at 9:13 p.m. after recess) Staff Present: Planning, Design and Development Department J. Corbett, Commissioner of Planning, Design and Development A. Smith, Director of Planning and Land Development Services K. Walsh, Director of Community Design, Park Planning and Development B. Hale, Manager, Transportation Planning P. Snape, Manager of Development Services D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services J. Hogan, Development Planner N. Grady, Development Planner M. Gervais, Development Planner A. Parsons, Development Planner A. Todd, Development Planner Legal Services Department T. Yao, Legal Counsel Management and Administrative Services Department J. LeFeuvre, Deputy City Clerk C. Urquhart, Legislative Coordinator MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee The meeting was called to order at 7:06 p.m., recessed at 8:48 p.m. reconvened at 8:58 p.m. and adjourned at 9:20 p.m. After due consideration of the matters placed before this Committee, the members beg leave to present its report as follows: Item A. Recommendation PDD119-2006 Approval of Agenda B. Conflicts of Interest C. Consent D1. PDD120-2006 Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Kerbel Group Inc. and Greyrose Corporation – South side of Kintyre Street, East of Dumfries Ave – Ward 2 (File C1E11.20). D2. PDD121-2006 Proposed Draft Plan of Vacant Land Condominium and Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Sandringham Place Inc. (Metrus Development Inc.) – East side of Dixie Road, North and east of the existing Rosedale Village Private Clubhouse – Ward 9 (File C3E14.7) D3. PDD122-2006 Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Rise-N-Shine Kids Child Care Centre Inc. – 80 Bramalea Road - Southwest corner of Bramalea Road and Avondale Boulevard – Ward 8 (File C4E2.6) D4. PDD123-2006 Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Destona Homes (2003) Inc. (Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc.) – West side of Mississauga Road, South of the intersection of Mississauga Road and the future Williams Parkway Extension - Ward 6 (File C4W7.8) D5. PDD124-2006 Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law – Vince J. Cavallo – South-west corner of Regional Road 107 (Queen Street East) and Beaumaris Drive - Ward 10 (File C9E4.13) D6. PDD125-2006 Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Partacc Developments Inc. – GLB Urban Planners Ltd. - South of Father Tobin Road, on the west side of Torbram Road - Ward 9 (File C5E15.3) 2006 05 01 Page 2 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee D7. PDD126-2006 City Initiated Amendment to the Zoning By-law - Driveways on Detached, Semi-Detached and Townhouse Dwelling Lots (File P42 CO). D8. PDD127-2006 City Initiated Amendment to the Zoning By-law – Parking of Oversized Vehicles and Recreational Vehicles on Residential Properties (File P42 CO) E1. PDD128-2006 Request to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) for Greater Pedestrian Access to Heart Lake Conservation Area. F1. PDD129-2006 Block Plan –Sub-Area 2 (Springbrook Executive Community) – Credit Valley Secondary Plan Area 45 - Ward 6 (File P26S 45). F2. PDD130-2006 Appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board – Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law - Monterey Park Inc. – PMG Planning Consultants – Southwest corner of Queen Street East and Gateway Boulevard – Ward 8 (File C6E5.9). F3. PDD131-2006 Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – EMC Group Limited – Ridgecore Developers Inc. – West side of Goreway Drive – South of Tortoise Court Ward 10 (File C7E14.8) G1. PDD132-2006 Proposed Parkway Belt West Plan Amendment Application (File P04) H. I1. Committee of Adjustment Reports PDD133-2006 Application for a Permit to Demolish a Residential Properties – 9269 and 9283 Mississauga Road – Ward 6 (File G33 LA).) J. Community Design - Parks Planning and Development Reports K. Engineering and Development Services Reports L1. PDD134-2006 Minutes- Brampton Heritage Board – March 14, 2006 M1. PDD135-2006 Minor Administrative Changes to Certain Procedures Associated with the Exemption from Part Lot Control Process (File P83) N1. PDD136-2006 List of Referred Matters - Planning, Design and Development Committee 2006 05 01 Page 3 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee N2. PDD119-2006 Heart Lake Road Re-alignment (File T00) (See Item Q1 and Approval of Agenda) O. Deferred Matters P. Notice of Motion Q1. PDD119-2006 Heart Lake Road Re-alignment (File T00) (See Item N2 and Approval of Agenda) R. Question Period S. Public Question Period T. Closed Session U. PDD137-2006 Adjournment _________________________ City Councillor Gibson, Chair 2006 05 01 Page 4 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee A. Approval of the Agenda PDD119-2006 That the agenda for the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, be approved as amended as follows: To Refer Items N2 and Q1: Items N2 and Q1 re: Heart Lake Road Realignment be referred to the Council meeting scheduled for May 8, 2006 Carried B. Conflicts of Interest - nil C. Consent The following items listed with an asterisk (*) were considered to be routine and noncontroversial by the Committee and were approved at one time. (F1, F2, F3, I1, L1, M1) D. Public Meeting Reports D 1. Report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and S. Todd, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated March 15, 2006, re: Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Kerbel Group Inc. and Greyrose Corporation – South side of Kintyre Street, East of Dumfries Ave – Ward 2 (File C1E11.20). No members of the public indicated that they wished to address Committee regarding this item. PDD120-2006 1. 2. That the report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and S. Todd, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated March 15, 2006, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Kerbel Group Inc. and Greyrose Corporation – South side of Kintyre Street, East of Dumfries Ave – Ward 2 (File C1E11.20) be received; and, That staff be directed to report back to Planning, Design and Development Committee with the results of the Public Meeting and a staff recommendation subsequent to the completion of the circulation of the application and a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal. Carried 2006 05 01 Page 5 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee D 2. Report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and N. Grady, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 10, 2006, re: Proposed Draft Plan of Vacant Land Condominium and Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Sandringham Place Inc. (Metrus Development Inc.) – East side of Dixie Road, North and east of the existing Rosedale Village Private Clubhouse – Ward 9 (File C3E14.7). No members of the public indicated that they wished to address Committee regarding this item. PDD121-2006 1. That the report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and N. Grady, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 10, 2006, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Proposed Draft Plan of Vacant Land Condominium and Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Sandringham Place Inc. (Metrus Development Inc.) – East side of Dixie Road, North and east of the existing Rosedale Village Private Clubhouse – Ward 9 (File C3E14.7) be received; and, 2. That staff be directed to report back to Planning, Design and Development Committee with the results of the Public Meeting and a staff recommendation subsequent to the completion of the circulation of the application and a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal. Carried D 3. Report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and J. Hogan, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 10, 2006, re: Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Rise-N-Shine Kids Child Care Centre Inc. – 80 Bramalea Road - Southwest corner of Bramalea Road and Avondale Boulevard – Ward 8 (File C4E2.6). Members of the public present did not wish to see a presentation on this item. The following residents spoke in support of the subject proposal: Peter MacLean Tammy Perry Sheila Smith Sylvia Giminez Deborah Bodnar Angela Meyer 2006 05 01 24 Valleyside Trail 25 Algonquin Boulevard 103 Dorset Drive 2 Dona Court 78 Majestic Crescent 8759 Heritage Road (correspondence submitted) Page 6 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee Their comments were as follows: o the families who presently take their children to the existing daycare facility are pleased with the services provided and support the continued operation of the daycare o no other facility provides services such as before and after school care for the children, and transportation to and from the daycare facility to elementary schools o the subject site located at southwest corner of Bramalea Road and Avondale Boulevard, if approved will meet the needs of the day care facility o parents find it difficult to find quality daycare and Rise-N-Shine comes highly recommended The following residents indicated that they do not support the subject proposal: Brad Greene Ernesto Romero 61 Darras Court 117 Avondale Boulevard (submitted petition) Their comments and concerns were as follows: o proposed daycare facility will add to the existing traffic congestion at the subject site during morning and afternoon rush hours when parents must drop off and pick-up their children o potential vehicle accidents due to traffic congestion which would result in higher automobile insurance rates o safety of the parents and children who may have to cross Avondale Boulevard to get to the daycare facility o the subject site does not provide sufficient parking which would encourage parents to park on the streets Staff confirmed that all the comments provided and the concerns raised by the residents will be considered in the recommendation report which will be presented to Committee at a future date. PDD122-2006 2006 05 01 1. That the report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and J. Hogan, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 10, 2006, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Rise-N-Shine Kids Child Care Centre Inc. – 80 Bramalea Road - Southwest corner of Bramalea Road and Avondale Boulevard – Ward 8 (File C4E2.6) be received; and Page 7 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee 2. That staff be directed to report back to Planning, Design and Development Committee with the results of the Public Meeting and a staff recommendation subsequent to the completion of the circulation of the application and a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal. Carried D 4. Report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and N. Grady, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 4, 2006, re: Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Destona Homes (2003) Inc. (Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc.) – West side of Mississauga Road, South of the intersection of Mississauga Road and the future Williams Parkway Extension - Ward 6 (File C4W7.8). Members of the public present requested a presentation of the proposal. Mr. Neal Grady, Development Planner, gave a presentation and provided details of a proposed development of single detached, semi-detached and street townhouse dwellings, a park and a portion of the Huttonville Creek valleylands at the subject site. Mr. Tony Mason, 6 Huttonville Drive, advised that he was in attendance on behalf of Huttonville residents. He is aware that the subject application is one of nine applications within the Sub-Area 2 block plan and requested that all the applications be in a unified plan. He suggested that appropriate buffering and a gradual density transition be considered where there is existing development. He urged Committee to ensure that the required services and infrastructure are in place before occupancy by new home owners. Staff confirmed that all the comments provided and the concerns raised by Mr. Mason will be considered in the recommendation report which will be presented to Committee at a future date. PDD123-2006 2006 05 01 1. That the report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and N. Grady, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 4, 2006, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Destona Homes (2003) Inc. (Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc.) – West side of Mississauga Road, South of the intersection of Mississauga Road and the future Williams Parkway Extension - Ward 6 (File C4W7.8) be received; and, Page 8 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee That staff be directed to report back to Planning, Design and Development Committee with the results of the Public Meeting and a staff recommendation subsequent to the completion of the circulation of the application and a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal. Carried D 5. Report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and N. Grady, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 6, 2006, re: Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law – Vince J. Cavallo – South-west corner of Regional Road 107 (Queen Street East) and Beaumaris Drive - Ward 10 (File C9E4.13). No members of the public indicated that they wished to address Committee regarding this item. PDD124-2006 1. That the report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and N. Grady, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 6, 2006, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law – Vince J. Cavallo – South-west corner of Regional Road 107 (Queen Street East) and Beaumaris Drive - Ward 10 (File C9E4.13) be received; and 2. That staff be directed to report back to Planning, Design and Development Committee with the results of the Public Meeting and a staff recommendation subsequent to the completion of the circulation of the application and a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal. Carried D 6. Report from K. Ash, Manager of Development Services, and A. Parsons, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 12, 2006, re: Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Partacc Developments Inc. – GLB Urban Planners Ltd. - South of Father Tobin Road, on the west side of Torbram Road - Ward 9 (File C5E15.3). No members of the public indicated that they wished to address Committee regarding this item. 2006 05 01 Page 9 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee PDD125-2006 1. That the report from K. Ash, Manager of Development Services, and A. Parsons, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 12, 2006, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – Partacc Developments Inc. – GLB Urban Planners Ltd. - South of Father Tobin Road, on the west side of Torbram Road - Ward 9 (File C5E15.3) be received; and 2. That staff be directed to report back to Planning, Design and Development Committee with the results of the Public Meeting and a staff recommendation subsequent to the completion of the circulation of the application and a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal. Carried D 7. Report from P. Snape, Manager of Development Services, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 10, 2006, re: City Initiated Amendment to the Zoning By-law - Driveways on Detached, Semi-Detached and Townhouse Dwelling Lots (File P42 CO). Members of the public present requested a presentation of the proposal. Mr. Paul Snape, Manager, Development Services, gave a presentation that included the current by-law standards for driveways in residential zones and highlighted the proposed changes to the zoning by-law. He showed photos of homes with widened driveways that were considered excessive and driveways that have been widened that are considered reasonable and may be allowed if the proposed changes to the current by-law are approved. Mr. Kelton Brooks, 30 Leacrest Street, advised that he is the owner of a home renovation business and he has constructed basement apartments in Brampton. It is his opinion that residents are constructing basement apartments because they need the additional income to pay the mortgage. He believes that widened driveways are needed to accommodate the residents who live in basement apartments and to control and prevent excessively wide driveways, basement apartments should be eliminated. Mr. Glenn Bible, 26 Unsworth Street, Brampton, advised that he was cited for excessive driveway width and subsequently fined $50.00. His driveway is now in compliance. He stated that he supports the staff recommendations. 2006 05 01 Page 10 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee Staff confirmed that all the comments provided and the concerns raised by the residents will be considered in the recommendation report which will be presented to Committee at a future date. PDD126-2006 1. That the report from P. Snape, Manager of Development Services, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 10, 2006, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: City Initiated Amendment to the Zoning By-law Driveways on Detached, Semi-Detached and Townhouse Dwelling Lots (File P42 CO) be received; and 2. That staff be directed to report back to Planning, Design and Development Committee with the results of the Public Meeting and a recommendation with respect to proposed changes to the Zoning By-law for residential driveways. Carried D 8. Report from P. Snape, Manager of Development Services, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 10, 2006, re: City Initiated Amendment to the Zoning By-law – Parking of Oversized Vehicles and Recreational Vehicles on Residential Properties (File P42 CO). Members of the public present requested a presentation of the proposal. Mr. Paul Snape, Manager, Development Services, gave a presentation that included the current Zoning By-law standards for oversized motor vehicles parking on residential properties, the current definition of oversized vehicles and the proposed changes that are being recommended to amend the By-law to allow oversized and recreational vehicles to be parked on residential properties. The following residents indicated that they own or operate vehicles that are considered oversized and they support the proposed amendments to the Zoning By-law: Karla Riley Jodie Young Lewis Stevens Timo Tenhunen Cindy Allen Paul Nelson Valerie Liddell Alexandra Rajnak 2006 05 01 94 Earthstar Trail 1145 Welwyn Drive, Mississauga 52 Cutters Crescent 42 Kincaid Court 57 Gatesgill Street 5 Jill Crescent Brampton Brampton Page 11 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee S. Henderson D. Simpson-Ouellet Cheryl Summers Jim Riso A. Atkinson Diane Voce Dora Isagias Andy Caringi Rimon Colman Paul Agular Donald Cormier 2 Marchbank Crescent 9 Ural Circle 11 Dowling Crescent 53 Rusthall Way Brampton 46 Greenleaf Crescent 17 Butterchurn Road 6 Fallstar Crescent 5 Glenforest Road 18 Cherly Court 87 Townley Crescent Their concerns and comments were as follows: o most people who drive school buses/transhelp vehicles are parents or grandparents some of whom have pre-school and school age children who are allowed to travel in the bus with them and they require the convenience of parking the bus (20 passenger) at home o current by-law needs to be amended to address the needs of residents who use vehicles to earn an income, such as landscapers, electricians o the large buses should be allowed to park on the street between runs when they cannot be accommodated in the driveway with alternative parking on garbage days and snow days o approximately 65,000 students are transported safely to and from school each day by buses o income received for driving buses is not enough for them to buy a vehicle to go back and forth to a location where the buses would be parked o some schools allow the buses to be parked at the school site but they must be removed from very early in the morning o safety of buses is an issue when they are parked on school property because they are often vandalized o health and safety of children who need the transhelp vehicles should be considered o weight of a vehicle should not be an issue when it is on a private driveway o vehicles should be ticketed for idling o parents work more than one job to take care of handicapped children and if they are not allowed to park buses on their driveways, they may have to quit driving the bus o City should follow City of Mississauga practice and consider allowing buses to park on the street for three hours o tow trucks are considered to be oversized vehicles but because of the service they provide it requires the owner to have the vehicle parked on his driveway at all times o many of the people who drive school buses and transhelp vehicles are well educated and they have given up full time jobs to look after their children; this 2006 05 01 Page 12 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee industry has provided the opportunity for them to be with their children and contribute to the community at the same time o why are oversized City vehicles allowed to park on residential driveways? o residents who are concerned about pollution from oversized school buses should focus their attention on cars with modified engines o drivers of oversized vehicles pay taxes and should be allowed to park vehicles on their driveways. Ms. S. Evans, 52 Nickel Crescent, Brampton, advised that she does not support the parking of oversized vehicles in residential areas because of safety reasons and their often unsightly appearance. She urged that a by-law be passed that would prevent the idling of vehicles, especially large commercial trucks in family oriented residential areas because of the noise and fumes they generate. She submitted correspondence in support of her request. Staff confirmed that all the comments provided and the concerns raised by the residents will be considered in the recommendation report that will be presented to Committee at a future date. PDD127-2006 1. That the report from P. Snape, Manager of Development Services, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 10, 2006, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: City Initiated Amendment to the Zoning By-law – Parking of Oversized Vehicles and Recreational Vehicles on Residential Properties (File P42 CO) be received; and 2. That staff be directed to report back to Planning, Design and Development Committee with the results of the Public Meeting and a recommendation with respect to proposed changes to the Zoning By-law for residential driveways. Carried E. Delegations E 1. Mr. Leo O’Brien, 72 Rawling Crescent, Brampton, on behalf of Friends of Heart Lake Committee, re: Request to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) for Greater Pedestrian Access to Heart Lake Conservation Area. Mr. Leo O’Brien, 72 Rawling Crescent, Brampton, on behalf of Friends of Heart Lake Committee, provided an overview of his submission that was circulated to Committee regarding his request for greater pedestrian access for Brampton residents to the Heart Lake Conservation Area. He informed Committee that the 2006 05 01 Page 13 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee TRCA is nearing completion of the Master Plan for the Heart Lake Conservation Area and requested that the City ensure Brampton’s access proposal to the park is included in the Master Plan. He explained that the present front gate access on Heart Lake Road may be difficult and unsafe for residents. He pointed out that this gate is closed at times when residents may wish to visit the conservation area. Mr. O’Brien advised that he will be submitting a petition from area residents supporting his request. Staff and the delegation responded to questions from Committee on the issues raised by the delegation. Staff indicated that a report on the Master Plan is being prepared and Mr. O’Brien’s concern will be addressed. The following motion was considered: PDD128-2006 That the delegation of Mr. Leo O’Brien, 72 Rawling Crescent, Brampton, on behalf of Friends of Heart Lake Committee, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Request to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) for Greater Pedestrian Access to Heart Lake Conservation Area be received; and That the matter of Greater Pedestrian Access to Heart Lake Conservation Area, be referred to Planning, Design and Development staff for a report. Carried F. Development Team Reports * F 1. PDD129-2006 Report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and N. Grady, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 21, 2006, re: Block Plan –Sub-Area 2 (Springbrook Executive Community) – Credit Valley Secondary Plan Area 45 - Ward 6 (File P26S 45). That the report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and N. Grady, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 21, 2006, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Block Plan –Sub-Area 2 (Springbrook Executive Community) – Credit Valley Secondary Plan Area 45 - Ward 6 (File P26S 45) be received. Carried 2006 05 01 Page 14 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee * F 2. PDD130-2006 2006 05 01 Report from P. Snape, Manager of Development Services, and C. Gervais, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 18, 2006, re: Appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board – Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law - Monterey Park Inc. – PMG Planning Consultants – Southwest corner of Queen Street East and Gateway Boulevard – Ward 8 (File C6E5.9). 1. That the report from P. Snape, Manager of Development Services, and C. Gervais, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 18, 2006, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board – Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law - Monterey Park Inc. – PMG Planning Consultants – Southwest corner of Queen Street East and Gateway Boulevard – Ward 8 (File C6E5.9) be received; and, 2. That staff be directed to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing on May 15, 2006 and present to the Board the City’s position regarding the development application approved in principle by the Planning, Design and Development Committee and Council at the meetings held October 4, 2004 and October 13, 2004, respectively. The attached recommended Official Plan and the Zoning By-law amendments (Appendices 2 & 3) and conditions for the rezoning agreement (Appendix 1) to be executed prior to the issuance of the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) order, including the following additional conditions: 1. prior to site plan approval, a cash contribution of $10,000.00 shall be paid to the Region of Peel for the design and installation of the northbound advance left turn phase at the intersection of Queen Street East and Gateway Boulevard; 2. the owner agrees to provide improvements on Gateway Boulevard to support access to the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Transportation Planning Division at the time of formal site plan review; 3. the owner agrees that the existing access to Gateway Boulevard may be required to be relocated further south along Gateway Boulevard or may be restricted to right turns in and rights turns out only. Arrangements in this Page 15 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee regard will be determined by the City Transportation Planning Division at the time of formal site plan review; and, 4. a full turns access to Summerlea Road will be permitted at a location to be determined by the City Transportation Planning Division during site plan processing. Carried * F 3. PDD131-2006 2006 05 01 Report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and J. Hogan, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 10, 2006, Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – EMC Group Limited –Ridgecore Developers Inc. – West side of Goreway Drive – South of Tortoise Court - Ward 10 (File C7E14.8). 1. That the report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and J. Hogan, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 10, 2006, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law – EMC Group Limited – Ridgecore Developers Inc. – West side of Goreway Drive – South of Tortoise Court - Ward 10 (File C7E14.8) be received; and 2. That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, outstanding final comments and/or conditions of draft plan approval from external circulated agencies and internal City departments shall be received and any appropriate “prior to conditions of draft plan approval” and conditions of approval, including revisions to the plan and physical layout resulting from these comments, shall be accommodated; 3. That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, the applicant shall sign the Landowner’s Cost Share Agreement, and provide the City with a written acknowledgement from the Trustee appointed pursuant to the agreement that the applicant has signed the agreement and has delivered the deeds or made the payments required by the agreement, and that the plan may be released for draft approval; Page 16 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee 2006 05 01 4. That prior to draft plan approval, a Noise Feasibility Study must be prepared by an acoustical engineer and submitted for the City’s review and approval. The report must assess the potential noise impact on the proposed development and recommend necessary noise attenuation measures to ensure compliance with the applicable noise criteria; 5. That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, a detailed Functional Servicing Study shall be prepared, to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering and Development Services; 6. That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, the design of the vehicular access to Jacksonville Road from Goreway Drive shall be in place. This will require TRCA’s permission to alter the watercourse and shall confirm the required lands to accommodate the vehicular access; 7. That the design of the stream crossing be consistent in design with the required gateway feature to be erected at the intersection of Goreway Drive and Jacksonville Road, as outlined in the Upscale Executive Housing Design Guidelines; 8. That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, any necessary revisions identified by the City and/or the Toronto and Region Conservation to be undertaken to the site-specific Functional Servicing Report submitted in support of the proposal shall be completed by the proponent, to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering and Development Services and Toronto and Region Conservation; 9. That the following street names be approved for this proposed draft plan of subdivision: Bloomsbury Avenue (extension of existing road), Latania Boulevard (extension of existing road) and Jacksonville Road (east-west road); 10. That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, the applicant shall prepare a preliminary community information map of the subdivision to be posted in a prominent location in each sales office where homes in the subdivision are being sold. The map shall contain the applicable information prescribed within the City of Brampton List of Standard Conditions of Draft Approval for Residential Plans of Subdivision as it pertains to Sales Office Community Information Maps, including City approved street names and the possible temporary location of Canada Post mailboxes, including the number and duration; Page 17 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee 11. 12. 2006 05 01 That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, the applicant shall execute a preliminary subdivision agreement to the satisfaction of the City. The preliminary subdivision agreement shall include a schedule identifying all of the notice provisions for all of the lots and blocks within the plan, including the provision of a 2.5 metre buffer block along the rear of lots abutting open space; That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, a detailed Environmental Impact Study is required in order for the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to consider the proposed watercourse alteration; 13. That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, the final location and configuration of the park be determined in conjunction with the finalization of the draft plan of subdivision to the north (Intracorp Properties) to the satisfaction of City Council; 14 That should it be determined that the park located entirely on the draft plan of subdivision to the north (Intracorp Properties) an entry feature shall be incorporated by the applicant at the intersection of Bloomsbury Avenue and Jacksonville Road (the right-of-way for this intersection shall be increased in width by 5 metres to accommodate this feature). An updated Design Brief will be required in this instance; 15. That the subject application be approved and staff be directed to prepare the appropriate amendments to the zoning by-law; 16. That prior to the issuance of draft plan approval, the applicant shall agree in writing to the form and content of an implementing zoning by-law; and, 17. That staff be authorized to issue the notice of draft plan approval at such time as all items recommended by Planning Design and Development Committee to be addressed prior to draft plan approval have been addressed to the satisfaction of the City, subject to the following: 1. any necessary red-line revisions to the draft plan identified by staff; and, 2. all conditions contained in the City of Brampton List of Standard Conditions of Draft Approval for Residential Plan of Subdivision, or derivatives or special applications of said conditions, as determined by the Commissioner of Planning, Design and Development. Page 18 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee 18. That this decision be considered null and void and a new development application be required, unless a zoning by-law is passed within 36 months of the Council approval of this decision; and, 19. That development allocation to this EMC Group LimitedRidgecore Developers Inc. plan of subdivision for up to 56 units in the 2006 Development Cap Allocation be granted. Carried G. Policy Planning Reports * G 1. PDD132-2006 2006 05 01 Report from D. Waters, Manager, Land Use Policy, and M. Majeed, Policy Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 24, 2006, re: Proposed Parkway Belt West Plan Amendment Application (File P04). 1. That the report from D. Waters, Manager, Land Use Policy, and M. Majeed, Policy Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 24, 2006, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Proposed Parkway Belt West Plan Amendment Application (File P04) be received; and 2. That the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing be advised that the City has no objections to removing the lands located in Part Lot 1 Concession 9 N.D., more specifically described as Parts 1, 2, 5 and 6 on Reference Plan 43R-24780, from the jurisdiction of the Parkway Belt West Plan; 3. That City staff be directed to request the City of Vaughan to initiate, in conjunction with the City of Brampton, a minor restructuring proposal under section 173(16) of The Municipal Act, 2001 to annex the triangle of land deleted from the Parkway Belt West Plan and the remaining Brampton land east of Highway 50 that is affected by the realignment of Highway 50; 4. That staff be directed to undertake a comprehensive review of the City’s municipal boundaries and report back to Planning, Design & Development Committee should the review identify any other inconsistencies that need to be addressed through a minor restructuring proposal under Section 173(16) of The Municipal Act, 2001; and, Page 19 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee 5. That the City Clerk be directed to forward a copy of this report and Council Resolutions to the City of Vaughan, the Regional Municipality of Peel and the Regional Municipality of York. Carried H. Committee of Adjustment Reports - nil I. Building and Zoning Reports * I 1. Report from B. Campbell, Director of Building and Chief Building Official, and A. Magnone, Regulatory Coordinator, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 11, 2006, re: Application for a Permit to Demolish a Residential Properties – 9269 and 9283 Mississauga Road – Ward 6 (File G33 LA). PDD133-2006 That the report from B. Campbell, Director of Building and Chief Building Official, and A. Magnone, Regulatory Coordinator, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 11, 2006, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Application for a Permit to Demolish a Residential Properties – 9269 and 9283 Mississauga Road – Ward 6 (File G33 LA), be received. That the application for a permit to demolish the properties located at 9269 and 9283 Mississauga Road, be approved subject to standard permit conditions. Carried J. Community Design - Parks Planning and Development Reports - nil K. Engineering and Development Services Reports - nil L. Minutes * L 1. PDD134-2006 Minutes – Brampton Heritage Board – April 18, 2006 That the Minutes of the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of February 21, 2006, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, Recommendations HB048-2006 to HB57-2006, be approved as printed and circulated. Carried 2006 05 01 Page 20 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee The recommendations were approved as follows: HB048-2006 That the agenda for the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of April 18, 2006 be approved, as amended, as follows: To add: F 3-1. Minutes – Brampton Heritage Board Heritage Resources SubCommittee – April 4, 2006 (File G33). HB049-2006 That the Minutes of the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of March 14, 2006, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of April 18, 2006, be received. HB050-2006 That the following delegations from George Robb Architect, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of April 18, 2006, re: Downtown Heritage Conservation District Study (File G33) be received: 1. 2. Peter Stewart Paul Dilse HB051-2006 That the Minutes of the Brampton Heritage Board Heritage Resources SubCommittee Meeting of April 4, 2006 (File G33), to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of April 18, 2006, be received. HB052-2006 That, as considered at the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of April 18, 2006, the Board acknowledges that its Proposal for Recognition of the City’s Hamlets and Villages on the Friezes at Brampton City Hall (File G33) is not on the City’s current project list in light of timelines for other ongoing projects and agrees that this project should not be pursued further at this time. HB053-2006 That the verbal report from Mr. Bob Hulley, Interim Chair, listed on the agenda for the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of April 18, 2006, re: Brampton Heritage Board Volunteer Sub-Committee (File G33) be deferred to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of May 16, 2006. HB054-2006 That the correspondence from Mr. Glen McTavish, dated March 22, 2006, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of April 18, 2006, re: Resignation from Membership on the Brampton Heritage Board (File G33) be received; and, That Mr. McTavish’s resignation be accepted with regret; and, 2006 05 01 Page 21 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee That Mr. McTavish be thanked for his active participation and efforts on behalf of the Brampton Heritage Board, with particular mention of his role as Chair of the Brampton Heritage Board Ad Hoc Committee to Explore Options for the Re-use of the former CP Railway Station; and, That it is hoped that Mr. McTavish will be in a position to reapply in future for membership on the Brampton Heritage Board; and, That, in light of the time remaining on the current Board term, it is the position of the Brampton Heritage Board that the vacancy created by Mr. McTavish’s resignation not be filled. HB055-2006 That the correspondence from Mr. Robert Payne, dated March 28, 2006, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of April 18, 2006, re: Resignation from Membership on the Brampton Heritage Board (File G33) be received; and, That Mr. Payne’s resignation be accepted with regret; and, That Mr. Payne be thanked for his active participation and efforts on behalf of the Brampton Heritage Board, with particular mention of his many years in the role of Co-Chair; and, That, in light of the time remaining on the current Board term, it is the position of the Brampton Heritage Board that the vacancy created by Mr. Payne’s resignation not be filled. HB056-2006 That the correspondence from Mr. Mike Marcolongo, Municipal Heritage Committee Advisor, Ministry of Culture, dated March 24, 2006, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of April 18, 2006, re: Letter of Authority from the Director of Real Property Registration Branch, Ministry of Government Services – Waiving of Fees at the Land Registry Offices for Municipal Heritage Committee Members (File G33) be received. HB057-2006 That the Brampton Heritage Board do now adjourn to meet again on Tuesday, May 16, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. or at the call of the Chair. Carried M. Other/New Business/Unfinished Business * M 1. 2006 05 01 Report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and N. Grady, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 4, 2006, Page 22 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee re: Minor Administrative Changes to Certain Procedures Associated with the Exemption from Part Lot Control Process (File P83) PDD135-2006 1. That the report from D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and N. Grady, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated April 4, 2006, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006, re: Minor Administrative Changes to Certain Procedures Associated with the Exemption from Part Lot Control Process (File P83) be received; and 2. That the following minor administrative changes to the application for part lot control procedures be approved: 3. i. an extension of the part lot by-law expiry period from one (1) year to three (3) years; and, ii existing land leases involving a single dwelling unit, and requiring an application for exemption from part lot control application in order for the individual leasing the land to purchase the land, shall be subject to a part lot application fee of $80.00, and That the Tariff of Planning Fees By-law 85-96, as amended, be amended. Carried N. Referred Matters N 1. List of Referred Matters – Planning, Design And Development Committee. N 1. In response to a question from Regional Councillor Palleschi regarding the status of Reference #2003-326 on the Referred Matters List, staff advised that they were directed to look at the technical feasibility of opening Highway 410 to traffic on Mayfield Road. This work is generally complete but has not progressed further since the overall agreement between the Region of Peel, Town of Caledon and MTO needs to be amended to reflect this staged opening if so directed by Council. The following motion was considered. 2006 05 01 Page 23 of 24 MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee PDD136-2006 That the List of Referred Matters – Planning, Design and Development Committee to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of May 1, 2006 (File P45GE) be received. Carried N 2. Report from P. Anderson, Manager of Engineering and Construction Division, Works and Transportation, dated March 27, 2006, re: Heart Lake Road Realignment (File T00). (See Item Q1). Dealt with under Approval of the Agenda, Recommendation PDD119-2006 O. Deferred Matters - nil P. Notice of Motion - nil Q. Correspondence Q 1. Correspondence from Mr. Mark Emery, Weston Consulting Group, dated April 12, 2005, re: Heart Lake Road Re-alignment (File T00) (See Item N2). Dealt with under Approval of the Agenda, Recommendation PDD119-2006 R. Question Period S. Public Question Period T. Closed Session - nil U. Adjournment PDD137-2006 That the Planning, Design and Development Committee do now adjourn to meet again on Monday, May 15, 2006 at 1:00 p.m. or at the call of the Chair. Carried 2006 05 01 Page 24 of 24
Documentos relacionados
Council Meeting Agenda
Possible delegations re: Proposed Sale of Land to Hamount Investments –Plan 43R-29821, Part 1- Castlemore Road / McVean Drive (File L 15) Ward 10 (See Committee of Council Recommendation CW312-2005...
Leia maisMinutes - Markham
Staff gave a presentation regarding the proposal, the location, surrounding uses and outstanding issues. The Committee discussed snow storage, the townhouse product, compensation for removal of tre...
Leia maisthe City of Vaughan
FOR CONSIDERATION BY COUNCIL, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 2001 Programming at the Woodbridge Pool and Memorial Pool recovers 79% of the costs. Programming at this centre is very limited in scope providin...
Leia maisMaster Plan for Recreation
were very well received by the public and user groups. The new shift presented in this update will be one of creating a more walkable city and a city that is more user friendly for both older adult...
Leia mais