(2852i-12 Relatório_JBS_Bioma_v18 TX1)

Transcrição

JBS S.A.
System for monitoring and tracking the
origin of raw material in the Amazon
Biome
Independent
auditors’
assurance report
limited
For the period from December 1, 2011
to May 31, 2012
MAA/VAB /JMK/NLM/SC
2852i/12
Tel.: +55 11 3848 5880
Fax: + 55 11 3045 7363
www.bdobrazilrcs.com.br
Rua Major Quedinho 90
Consolação – São Paulo, SP - Brasil
01050-030
0
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ LIMITED ASSURANCE REPORT
To
JBS S.A.
Attn: Mr. Márcio Nappo
São Paulo - SP
Introduction
We were engaged for the purpose of applying limited assurance procedures on the
criteria and processes of implementation and maintenance that JBS S.A. (JBS) has
adopted to guarantee the origin of its raw material (cattle purchase),
purchase exclusively in
the Amazon Biome,, for the period from December 1, 2011 to May 31 2012.
Management’s Responsibility
JBS’s management is responsible for the fair preparation and presentation of the
information referring to the criteria and processes established to guarantee the
origin of its raw material and for the internal controls considered necessary to
allow the preparation of this information free of material misstatement, whether
due to fraud or error.
Independent auditors’ responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an
an opinion on such information, based on the
limited assurance engagement performed for its publishing and disclosure to
external public.
The limited assurance procedures were followed according to the Standard NBC TO
3000 - Assurance Engagement Different from
from Audit and Review, issued by the
Federal Association of Accountants (CFC), which is equivalent to the international
standard ISAE 3000 - International Standard on Assurance Engagements, issued by
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IASB),
(IASB), both for assurance
engagements different from audit or review of historic financial information. These
auditing standards require that we comply with relevant ethical requirements,
including independence requirements, and that the engagement be performed
perform
to
obtain limited assurance as to whether the information on the criteria and
processes to guarantee the origin of the raw material is free from material
misstatements.
2
A limited assurance engagement performed in accordance with NBC TO 3000 (ISAE
3000) mainly consists of making enquiries to Management and to other
professionals of the Company responsible for the preparation of the information,
and of applying analytical procedures to obtain evidence, which allow us to
conclude on the limited assurance information taken as a whole. A limited
assurance engagement also requires the adoption of additional procedures, if we
become aware of issues that lead us to believe that the information provided
provid may
show material misstatements.
The procedures selected were based on our understanding of the aspects related to
the gathering and presentation of the information and of other circumstances of
the work, and on our consideration about areas where relevant
relevant misstatements may
exist. The limited assurance procedures comprise:
(a) Planning of the work, considering the relevance, coherence, and volume of
quantitative and qualitative information, and the operating and internal
control systems used as basis for the preparation of JBS information;
(b) Understanding the specific procedures adopted by the Company for the
acquisition of cattle in the Amazon Biome by means of the document “Cattle
Purchase Program” and of interviews with the people in charge of meeting
meetin the
criteria established;
(c) Crosschecking, based on sampling, the quantitative and qualitative information
against supporting documentation; and
(d) Checking the procedures followed for the monitoring of the properties suppliers
of raw material.
We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to
provide a basis for our limited opinion.
Scope and limitations
The purpose of our work was applying limited assurance procedures on the criteria
and processes adopted by JBS for the
the acquisition of cattle in the Amazon Biome,
including the evaluation of its sustainability policies, practices and performance in
the supply chain.
The procedures applied do not represent an exam of financial statements according
to audit standards. Qualitative
Qualitative interpretations on the materiality, relevance and
accuracy of data are subject to individual assumptions and judgments.
Additionally, our report does not provide any assurance on the scope of future
information (such as targets, expectations, strategies
strategies and projections) and
descriptive information which is liable to subjective evaluation.
3
Conclusion
Based on the procedures followed and herein described, and except for the indirect
suppliers chain and adhesion to the traceability system of the cattle production
chain, from the animals’ birth to slaughter,, whose comments are detailed further
in the present report, we are not aware of any fact that lead us to believe that the
procedures adopted by JBS, from December 1, 2011 to May 31, 2012, in regard
reg
to
the processes of purchase of raw material in the Amazon Biome, are not in
compliance with the social and environmental criteria applied by the Company in
regard to what is demanded from its direct suppliers of cattle.
São Paulo, November 14, 2012.
BDO RCS Auditores Independentes
CRC 2 SP 013846/O-1
Mauro de Almeida Ambrósio
Accountant CRC 1 SP 199692/O-5
199692/O
4
Introduction
System for monitoring and tracking the origin of raw material in the Amazon
Biome (*)
(*) Text provided by JBS
In order to guarantee that the origin of its raw material is not associated to
deforestation, degrading work conditions or unlawful occupation of Conservation
Unit or Indigenous Lands, JBS has developed since 2010 a monitoring system in the
Amazon Biome that uses satellite images, georeferenced data of the suppliers’
supplier
holdings,, and information from official public bodies to analyze each farm,
farm supplier
of the Company, located in that area.
In the implementation of JBS' monitoring system, in view of the lack of a public
registry with georeferenced maps of the rural properties, JBS started to gather at
least a pair of geographical coordinates of the animals’
animals shipment point (shipment
loading pen) in each farm of its suppliers and started
started to monitor, within a 10 km
radius of the collected point, possible deforestation and/or encroachment of
Indigenous Lands and/or Conservation Unit.
Also in order to improve the information of its monitoring system, all suppliers of
JBS in the Amazon Biome
me are required to send their official documentation with
the geographical boundaries of each suppliers’
supplier
holding,, such as the CCIR
(Certificate
Certificate of Registration of Rural Property),
Property LAR (Rural Environmental License),
License)
CAR (Rural Environmental Register),
Register) georeferenced map, Title deed
d
or the
Descriptive Memorandum.
Memorandum
Using this information the monitoring system of JBS analyzes whether the maps of
the suppliers’ holdings (georeferenced maps or “pair of geographical coordinates of
the animals’ shipment point + 10 km radius of the collected point”) show them
included in environmental restriction areas (deforestation, Indigenous Lands or
Conservation Unit).
If there are restrictions
rictions to any of the criteria referred to above, the suppliers’
supplier
holdings are classified in JBS Monitoring System as IRREGULAR.
Suppliers’ holdings whose perimeter (georeferenced map) show them included in
areas undergoing degradation, Indigenous Land or Conservation Unit, or whose pair
of geographical coordinates of the shipment point (shipment loading pen) + a 10 km
radius are within any of these restriction areas,
areas are classified as IRREGULAR. In
these cases, the farm is immediately excluded from the information
information system (ERP)
of JBS (excluded for new cattle purchase).
5
Holdings
oldings without georeferenced maps and whose pair of geographical coordinates
of the shipment point (shipment loading pen) + a 10 km radius are out of
deforestation areas, Indigenous Land or Conservation Units are classified as on
ALERT. Therefore, if no environmental restriction is confirmed, the properties
classified as on ALERT will be eligible to sell its cattle to JBS and the supplier will
be required to provide documents with the official
official geographical boundaries of the
holdings, so that the perimeters of the properties can be checked.
checked
Finally, holdings monitored through georeferenced maps with no environmental
restriction of any kind are considered ELIGIBLE.
In addition to the analyses
analys of geographical information obtained from the maps of
the suppliers' holdings and of the environmental restrictions areas, JBS Monitoring
System also checks, automatically, the lists of restrictions from government bodies
(list
list of properties embargoed by
by the Brazilian Environment and Natural Resources
Institute - IBAMA, the Black List of Slave-Like
Slave Like Work from the Ministry of Labor and
Employment – MTE, and of the Federal Public Prosecution Office - MPF), to check
whether JBS suppliers have undergone embargoes
goes or notification by any of those
bodies.
If any supplier or suppliers’ holdings are found in those lists, the name is excluded
from the information system (ERP) of JBS for cattle purchase. This verification of
the official lists is also made in three different moments: By the cattle purchaser
before the purchase agreement is entered into, before shipment and transportation
of the animals from the farm to slaughter, and before the slaughter of the animals
at the meat-packing
packing plant.
Also, in order to reinforce
nforce its commitment to sustainability, JBS delivers to its
suppliers, in the first purchase made to a meat-packing
packing plant,
plant a document
presenting the socio-environmental
environmental criteria adopted by the JBS for the purchase of
cattle.
Additionally, JBS has participated
pated in the most important discussion groups
searching solutions and sustainable production models, such as the Working Group
on Sustainable Beef (GTPS), the Global Roundtable for Sustainable Beef (GRSB) e
Leather Working Group (LWG) formed by representatives
representatives of different sectors that
make up the value chain of cattle production in Brazil and in the world.
6
Amazon Biome
Socio-environmental
environmental criteria adopted by JBS for the purchase of cattle in the
Amazon Biome
1. Zero Deforestation in the Supply Chain:
a. Providing evidence, in a way that can be monitored, checked and reported, that
no rural property, which is a direct supplier of cattle for slaughtering (feeder cattle
farm) and which has deforested the Amazon Biome, as from October 5, 2009, is
part of JBS’ss list of suppliers;
b. Providing evidence, in a way that can be monitored, checked and reported, that
none of its indirect suppliers (such as breeding and rearing farms involved in the
Company’s production chain) and which has deforested the Amazon Biome, as from
October 5, 2009, is part of JBS’s list of suppliers;
c. Properties where deforestation of the Amazon Biome has been proved will be
excluded from the list of suppliers, and will only be accepted again after proving
the reparation of environmental damage,
damage, entering into a Conduct Adjustment
Agreement (TAC), paying possible fines and indemnities applied to them, and
proving the compliance with the effective environmental laws, including land title
regulations.
2. Rejection of the invasion of protected areas and indigenous people’s territory:
the Company and its products shall be exempt from involvement in invasions of
indigenous people’s territory and areas protected by Federal, State or Municipal
laws.
a. Farms accused by the Federal Public Prosecution Office (MPF) or by the Brazilian
Indian Foundation (FUNAI) of invasion of indigenous people’s territory, farms
included in the list of properties embargoed by the IBAMA, and those notified and
assessed by state or federal bodies for invasion of protected areas will be excluded
from the Company’s list of suppliers, after unmistaken proof of the situation. These
farms will only be accepted again after proving the reparation of environmental
damage, entering into a TAC, paying the fines and indemnities applied
applie to them,
and proving the compliance with the effective legislation ruled
ruled by the MTE, MPF,
FUNAI, IBAMA and other involved bodies.
3. Rejection of slave-like
like work:
a. Farms notified and assessed for degrading or slave-like
slave like work, after unmistaken
proof of the situation by the Company, will be excluded from the list of suppliers
for a period of 2 (two) years and will only be accepted again after proving
compliance with the
he legislation
legi
in effect ruled by the MTE and the MPF, or after
entering into a TAC.
7
4. Rejection to land fraud and violence in the rural area:
a. The Company will exclude from its list of direct or indirect suppliers, after
unmistaken proof of the situation by the Company, those producers accused of land
fraud by the Public Prosecution Office or by Federal or State Land Institutes, or
provenly involved in provoking land conflicts based on accusations
accusation of the Public
Prosecution Office. The return of the supplier to JBS’ list shall happen after a TAC
is entered into or the accusation is dismissed.
5. Production traceability system verifiable, reportable and able to be monitored:
Cattle can only be supplied by farms or groups formally committed
comm
with the
adoption of a reliable traceability system which, in addition to the current
demands, include clear environmental requirements intended to eliminate
deforestation.
a. The Company shall obtain from its direct and indirect suppliers the GPS
coordinates of their rural properties in the proper scale, with a clear definition of
their boundaries and of the used and unused areas, in addition to recent satellite
images of the farm area.
b. The Company has to prove that its direct suppliers have a rural environmental
register within six months and/or an environmental license within 24 months,
granted by the state or federal government body, as long as there is no impediment
to do so from third parties.
c. Until 2014, the Company intends to accept as suppliers only rural producers
capable of proving the legality of their title deeds. All properties shall have
available satellite images and GPS coordinates showing the used areas,
conservation reserves and protected areas.
d. The Company shall prove, in a way that can be monitored, checked and
reported, the origin of all slaughtered cattle through a reliable and internationally
accepted traceability system, and that deforestation, slave-like
slave like work, invasion of
indigenous land and of protected areas are not part of its supply chain.
6. Implementation of commitments in the production chain:
a. The Company shall inform its suppliers of all requirements referred to above and
make clear that the ones that do not satisfy these criteria will no longer be
accepted as suppliers. A commission will be formed to monitor and follow the
protocol in order to analyze, study and correct the course of the industry in favor
of zero deforestation. To that end, the commission will have monthly meetings
with representatives of the industry, NGOs, clients, financial institutions and the
government.
8
Methodology, sampling and tests conducted
As aligned, data and information from 6 (six) meat-packing
meat packing units located in the
Amazon Biome already audited in a previous work (RFP JBS 0012SUS2011/Business
Proposal BDO No. 1592/11 – June/2012) were used, and 2 (two) more units (Vilhena
– RO and Pimenta Bueno – RO), as previously agreed, were selected for a more
comprehensive sampling of JBS' operations in the Amazon Biome. Accordingly, this
report includes analyses and procedures applied in 8 (eight) meat-packing
meat
units of
JBS, namely:
Alta Floresta – Mato Grosso;
Marabá – Pará;
Matupá – Mato Grosso;
Pimenta Bueno – Rondônia;
Redenção – Pará;
Rio Branco – Acre;
Tucumã – Pará;
Vilhena – Rondônia.
The stratified sampling was processed from the classification of 23 (twenty-three)
(twenty
meat-packing
packing units of JBS operating in the Amazon Biome, considering the location
and size of the slaughter facility (small, medium and large), which resulted in the
selection of 8 (eight) meat-packing
meat
plants.
During the period from August 20 to 21, 2012, a visit was made to the units of
Vilhena – RO and Pimenta Bueno – RO, to better understand JBS' operations in
regard to their routines of purchase of cattle and gathering of the documentation
required for the analyses. The same procedures were followed for
fo the remaining
meat-packing
packing units included in the scope of the previous audit.
In all units it was possible to check JBS’ internal controls in regard to the routine of
purchase of cattle and examine the documents that make possible meeting all the
socio-environmental
nvironmental criteria previously described. So, it is important to present the
meaning of the following acronyms:
Rural Environmental Record (CAR);
Rural Environmental License (LAR)/ Single Environmental License (LAU)/
Environmental License of Rural Property
Proper (LAPR);
Certificate of Registration of Rural Property (CCIR);
State Department of the Environment (SEMA);
Brazilian Environment and Natural Resources Institute (IBAMA);
Ministry of Labor and Employment
Employm
(MTE);
National Institute of Colonization and Agrarian Reform (INCRA);
Brazilian Indian Foundation (FUNAI);
(FUNAI)
Ministry of Environment (MMA);
Federal Public Prosecution Office (MPF);
Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio).
9
In order to conduct the tests, 25 (twenty-five)
(twenty
cattle purchase
rchase from each unit of
the sampling were randomly selected by means of the software IDEA - Interactive
Data Extraction and Analysis.
In the meat-packing
packing units visited in the prior audit, the tests were conducted by
means of a list of cattle purchases made
made from December 1, 2011 to May 17, 2012,
extracted from the ERP system by a JBS team. As for the 2 (two) plants visited in
August, it was possible to consider the whole period. Within the scope of this
sampling, it is possible to consider the result obtained
obtained for the period from
December 1, 2011 to May 31, 2012.
During the exam of this total 200 (two hundred) purchases,
purchases, the following issues
were checked:
Pair of geographical coordinates of the shipment point (shipment loading pen) +
10 km radius: existence
xistence of at least one pair of geographical coordinates in the
register of the supplier farm in which the purchase was made;
CCIR of the supplier farm: entry of the document number in the register of the
supplier farm in JBS’ ERP system. If found, a copy of the physical document is
required and a consultation made with the competent body, in this case,
through
INCRA’s
website:
(http://ccirweb.serpro.gov.br/ccirweb
http://ccirweb.serpro.gov.br/ccirweb
/emissao/formEmissaoCCIRWeb.asp
/formEmissaoCCIRWeb.asp);
LAR/LAU/LAPR/CAR of the supplier farm: entry of the document number in the
register of the supplier farm in JBS’ ERP system. If found, a copy of the physical
document is required and its validity checked through a search on SEMA’s
website of the respective state;
state
Cattle breeder’s Declaration
eclaration: Existence or not of the document signed by the
cattle supplier, according to the template included in Attachment V;
V
Date of the last monitoring of the supplier farm carried out by APOIO Consultoria
Consul
on a date previous to the cattle purchase analyzed: Date checked in the history
of the monitoring, prior and closer to the purchase date stated in the invoice
examined;
Monitoring result: Classification of the supplier farm as “ELIGIBLE”, “ALERT” or
“IRREGULAR” after analyzing the geographical information of the supplier farm
(digitized
d maps or at least a pair of geographical coordinates of the shipment
point (shipment loading pen) + 10 km radius)) and the satellite images available
in regard to deforestation, Conservation Units and Indigenous Lands;
Reason for the classification of the supplier farm: Register available in the
monitoring report prepared by APOIO Consultoria which justifies the result
determined by it;
Period between the monitoring of the supplier farm and the purchase made:
Number of days from the last monitoring carried out by APOIO Consultoria to the
cattle purchase made by JBS in the respective supplier farm.
10
Specifically in regard to the socio-environmental
socio environmental criteria of the Company
Co
for the
purchase of cattle in the Amazon Biome, we highlight:
highlight
1.a) Providing evidence, in a way that can be monitored, checked and reported,
that the purchase of cattle was made only from properties which have not
deforested the Amazon Biome, as from October 5, 2009, that is, properties
classified as “ELIGIBLE” by APOIO Consultoria, and whose monitoring was carried
out before the purchase date. We point out that our analyses comprise cattle
purchases made during 6 (six) months, between December 1, 2011 to May 31,
2012;
1.b) Providing evidence, in a way that can be monitored, checked and reported,
that none of its indirect suppliers has deforested the Amazon Biome;
1.c) Proving the exclusion from JBS list of suppliers,
suppliers, of the supplier farms where
deforestation of the Amazon Biome has been proved and acceptance of those
farms only after proving the reparation of environmental damage, entering into
a Conduct Adjustment Agreement (TAC), paying possible fines and indemnities
indemnit
applied to them, and proving the compliance with the effective environmental
laws, including land title regulations;
2.a) Checking the lack of involvement of the supplier farms of JBS with the
invasion of Indigenous Land and Protected Areas, and in case
cas of accusation by
the MPF or FUNAI, checking the exclusion of the farm from the suppliers' list;
3.a) Checking the purchases made by JBS in the period under analysis, by
verifying if the CPF/CNPJ (Individual/Corporate Taxpayer Identification Number)
of the
e supplier is included in the registry of employers found exploiting workers
in slave-like work conditions. If that is the case, verifying the exclusion of the
involved farms from the JBS list of suppliers for a period of 2 (two) years and
acceptance of those
ose farms only after proving compliance with the legislation in
effect, ruled by MTE and MPF, or entering into a TAC.
4.a) Proving the exclusion from the Company’s list of suppliers, of farm owners
accused of land fraud by the Public Prosecution Office or by Federal or State
Land Institutes, or provenly involved in provoking land conflicts based on
accusations of the Public Prosecution Office;
Office
5.a) Checking the existence of digitized maps of the farms suppliers of JBS and
quantifying the total number of digitized
dig
maps;
5.b) Existence of CAR and/or LAR/LAU/LAPR granted by responsible state or
federal government bodies to the direct suppliers' holdings of JBS, according to
established terms;
5.c) According to the objective established by the Company, it was found
fo
that
JBS evaluates the legality of its suppliers’ title deeds by means of the CCIR.
Accordingly, the CCIR entry in the register of the supplier farm in JBS’ ERP
system was checked, and if found, a copy of the physical document was received
and a consultation
tation made with the competent body, in this case, through INCRA’s
website;
11
5.d) Checking the existence of a reliable and internationally accepted
traceability system that allow proving, in a way that can be monitored, checked
and reported, the origin of all slaughtered cattle, so to guarantee that
deforestation, slave-like
like work, invasion of indigenous land and of protected
areas are not part of JBS’ supply chain;
6.a) Proving the meeting of the monitoring committee.
The result of the tests conducted is
i Attachment I.
Along with the analyses of the 25 (twenty-five)
(twenty five) purchases of each audited unit, an
additional sample of 16 (sixteen) purchases randomly selected,
selected 2 (two) of each
selected unit, was determined to evaluate the whole monitoring process carried
out by APOIO Consultoria.
For this analysis, and in order to understand the whole monitoring process, a visit
was made to the company that carries out this monitoring, APOIO Consultoria (a
service provider engaged by JBS, located in Redenção - Pará, and specialized
s
in
satellite images processing, remote sensing and geoprocessing), and an interview
was conducted with the team responsible for the work. In that occasion it was
possible to follow all the methodology used in the monitoring process, from the
request
uest of the sustainability team of JBS until the answer of the consulting
company with the classification of the property and the reason for that result. The
details of this exam are included in Attachment II.
For the analyses of the official lists of embargoed areas (IBAMA), the whole list of
embargoed areas was downloaded from the website of IBAMA, except for the states
of Pará and Mato Grosso, due to an error of the website during our consultation,
which prevented us from gathering the data from these
these 2 (two) states, although
the analysis of the 25 (twenty-five)
(twenty five) purchases of the samplings of the units in those
states (Alta Floresta and Matupá – MT, and Marabá, Redenção and Tucumã – PA)
was sufficient for the audit procedures.
With these data, it was possible
possible to compare the official list of IBAMA of embargoed
properties with the purchases from December 1, 2011 to May 17, 2012 (for the
units visited in the prior audit) or to May 31, 2012 (for Pimenta Bueno - RO and
Vilhena - RO). Following the same methodology,
methodology, the complete list of the Registry of
Employers found exploiting workers in slave-like
slave like work conditions, provided by the
MTE, was compared with the purchases from December 1, 2011 to May 17, 2012
(for the units visited in the prior audit) or to May 31,
31, 2012 (for Pimenta Bueno - RO
and Vilhena - RO). The results and specifications of this analysis are included in
Attachment III.
12
Conclusion
The conclusions on the procedures implemented by JBS to guarantee the origin of
the raw material for its operations in the Amazon Biome, and the results obtained
from the selected samples, are described below:
Based on data generated on 11/12/2012,
11/ 2/2012, we found that JBS has 22,549 (twenty(twenty
two thousand, five hundred forty-nine)
forty nine) supplier farms located in the Amazon
Biome included in its list of suppliers, when considering the active registers from
01/01/2011 to 31/08/2012. From this total, JBS has actually purchased from
approximately 15,062 (fifteen thousand, sixty-two)
sixty
farms in average, in the last
3 (three) years. In
n 2010,
2010 it has negotiated with 15,444 (fifteen thousand, four
hundred forty-four)
four) farms, in 2011 with 15,015 (fifteen thousand, fifteen) farms,
and from January to August 2012 with a total of 14,726 (fourteen thousand,
seven hundred twenty-six)
twenty
farms;
JBS has at least a pair of geographical coordinates of the shipment point of the
cattle (shipment loading pen) + a 10 km radius of 100% of its suppliers;
JBS has requested from its suppliers the digitized maps of the supplier cattle
farms, as well as the official
official documents describing the geographical boundaries
of the property or descriptive
d
memorandum
emorandum for digitalization of the property
map;
With the digitized maps of the supplier farms, JBS monitors its chain of
suppliers, through the company APOIO Consultoria,
Consultoria, by checking areas of
deforestation, invasion of Indigenous Land or Conservation Units;
Units
Based on data generated on 11/12/2012, we found that JBS has 9,920 (nine
(
thousand, nine hundred and twenty) digitized maps of the supplier farms located
in the Amazon
zon Biome in the data base of the Amazon Biome Monitoring System,
kept by APOIO Consultoria;
If the supplier does not have a digitized map of the farm and does not provide
the official documents of the property for the digitalization of the maps, JBS
monitors
ors the farm using the pair of geographical coordinates of the cattle
shipment point (shipment loading pen) and adding an area of 10 km radius of
that point, internally called as security buffer, checking deforestation areas,
invasion of Indigenous Land and
an Conservation Units;
Based on data generated by JBS on 11/12/2012, we found that the Company had
509 (five hundred and nine) supplier farms blocked for deforestation, 171 (one
hundred seventy-one)
one) suppliers farms blocked for irregular occupation of
indigenous land, and 82 (eighty-two)
(eighty two) supplier farms blocked for irregular
occupation of Conservation Units, which total 762 (seven hundred, sixty-two)
sixty
supplier farms blocked in the Amazon Biome;
Biome Additionally, on the same date,
2,810 (two thousand, eight hundred
hundred and ten) supplier farms were blocked due to
embargoed areas (IBAMA) and 83 (eighty-three)
(eighty three) due to slave-like
slave
work
involvement (MTE);
In total, 3,655 (three thousand, six hundred fifty-five)
fifty five) supplier farms were
blocked for purchase in the ERP system of JBS on 11/12/2012;
13
Daily, JBS imports the official lists of embargoed areas (IBAMA) and slave-like
slave
work involvement (MTE) to its ERP system, which automatically blocks the
suppliers included in those lists.
For the selected samples, it can be concluded that:
We did not identify purchase of cattle from supplier farms included in the list of
embargoed
argoed areas disclosed by IBAMA;
IBAMA
We did not identify purchase of cattle from individuals or legal entities
(CPF/CNPJ) included in the registry of employers found exploiting workers in
slave-like
like work conditions disclosed by the MTE.
In regard to the criteria of deforestation, invasion of Indigenous Land or Protected
Areas, the company APOIO Consultoria monitors satellite images,
images superimposing
official maps of IBGE - Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics,
Statistics INPE National Institute for Space Research (PRODES - Legal Amazon Deforestation
Monitoring Project and DETER - Real Time Deforestation Detection), perimeters of
Indigenous Lands (FUNAI), Conservation Units
Units (MMA and ICMBio) and adding
add
a
security buffer area of 10 km on those protected areas. In this process, other
aspects are also verified, such as the specificity of the legislation ruling the
Conservation Units, given that some decrees allow cattle raising
raisi
activities in
protected areas, for example.
After structuring this data base, the digitized maps of the farms suppliers of raw
material, or the pair of geographical coordinates of the shipment point (shipment
loading pen) plus the 10 km radius of that point
point (in case there is not map),
map)
provided by JBS, are added. Details on the origin of the data base used for the
monitoring are in Attachment IV.
The results of the monitoring processes are recorded in the Amazon Biome
Monitoring System (SMBA), kept by APOIO Consultoria, with the following
classification:
IRREGULAR: properties
roperties whose perimeter (digitized map) superimposes a
deforested area (PRODES/DETER),
RODES/DETER), Conservation Unit or Indigenous Land, or
whose pair of geographical coordinates of the shipment point (shipment loading
pen) plus a 10 km radius of that point are within any of these restriction areas;
ELIGIBLE: only properties monitored through digitized maps that do not have
within their perimeters any deforested areas, Conservation Unit or Indigenous
Land. It may occur cases of properties included in PRODES/DETER lists but
classified as ELIGIBLE,
ELIGIBLE when analyses show that the deforestation was not
intentional or effective, such as fire in neighboring properties, natural fires,
exposed rocks and dry river beds, as long as that can be proved through analyses
of experts from the monitoring company;
14
ALERT: properties (with no digitized maps) whose pair of geographical
coordinates of the shipment point (shipment loading pen) plus a 10 km radius of
that point are out of deforested areas, Conservation Unit or Indigenous Land, or
which have inconsistent coordinates.
coordina
APOIO Consultoria, which performs the monitoring, issues a digital certificate of
each monitored property on a website exclusively developed to that end, recording
the data of the farm and cattle farmer, the name of the technician responsible for
the monitoring, the result of the monitoring and its justification, as well as a
history of the monitoring processes already performed in the property under
analysis.
The result of APOIO Consultoria’s monitoring, along with the classification of the
suppliers as “IRREGULAR”, “ELIGIBLE” and “ALERT”, is then sent to the
Sustainability Team of JBS, which classifies the “ELIGIBLE” or “ALERT” monitored
properties in the ERP system as allowed for cattle purchase, and the “IRREGULAR”
properties as blocked for cattle purchase.
p
The properties classified as “IRREGULAR” are not actually excluded from the list of
suppliers, but cattle purchase from those properties is immediately suspended and
they remain blocked in the registry of JBS' suppliers for an indefinite time. The
release or unblocking of suppliers happens only when APOIO Consultoria classifies
the property as “ELIGIBLE” or “ALERT”,
“ALERT”, in case the supplier provides documents
supporting the environmental regularization, or when they are no longer included
in the official
al lists of embargoed areas (IBAMA) or slave-like
like work involvement
(MTE), monitored by the Sustainability Team of JBS.
JBS is working to obtain the georeferenced map of all farms supplying the company
in the Amazon Biome, by requesting to the cattle farmers,
farmers, before negotiation,
specific documentation on the property (CCIR, LAR, CAR, or descriptive
memorandum) to digitize the maps. The only state in which JBS has all the maps is
Pará, given that in that state the CAR is mandatory and the document contains the
th
georeferenced map of the property.
Although
hough JBS has at least a pair of geographical coordinates of the shipment point
(shipment loading pen) plus a 10 km radius of all its suppliers in the Amazon Biome
which do not have the digitized map, it is not possible
possible to monitor those suppliers
with the proper severity,
severity given that it is impossible
possible to accurately guarantee that
the whole area of the property is not involved in deforestation or invasion of
Indigenous Land and/or Protected Areas.
15
Specifically in regard to the CAR, the exams of the samples showed that 100% of
the suppliers in Pará (Marabá, Tucumã and Redenção) have the document, 30% in
Mato Grosso (Alta Floresta and Matupá), and none in the remaining units (Vilhena,
Pimenta Bueno and Rio Branco), as follows (identified CAR/number
number of suppliers in
the sample):
Vilhena – RO (0/25);
Pimenta Bueno – RO (0/25);
Rio Branco – AC (0/25);
Alta Floresta – MT (5/25);
Matupá – MT (10/25);
Marabá – PA (25/25);
Tucumã – PA (25/25);
Redenção – PA (25/25).
25/25).
In the states in which the CAR is mandatory, only in the unit of Tucumã – PA, there
were 3 (three) cases in which the meat-packing
meat packing plant provided the printed
document. However, by checking SEMA’s website, the register of those documents
was not found. As the professional who prepares the CAR and makes the upload of
the document in SEMA's system also has access to exclude the document, the data
base of JBS is likely to be outdated, given that the documents may be recorded in
the Company’s ERP, but with no validity in the environmental agency.
Also, we point out that the in the samples analyzed, we found cases of divergences
in the CAR numbers recorded in JBS system and showed on SEMA's website,
probably due to the reason referred to above. On 10/30/2012, JBS had 4,491 (four
thousand, four hundred ninety-one)
ninety one) CARs recorded in its system of suppliers.
As for the LAR/LAU/LAPR, the exam showed that only 1% of the suppliers
s
of the
sample had the documents, as follows (identified LAR, LAU or LAPR/number of
suppliers in the sample):
Redenção – PA (0/25);
(0/25
Vilhena – RO (1/25).
On 10/30/2012, it was possible to verify that JBS had 278 (two hundred seventyseventy
eight) LAR/LAU/LAPR recorded in its system of suppliers, in addition to 390 (three
hundred ninety) protocols.
16
Accordingly, there are actually few suppliers with the document, due to the
slowness of the process analysis by the state environmental bodies. However, the
suppliers which have and present to JBS the request protocol of LAR/LAU/LAPR waiting analysis of the documentation and
and final issue of the LAR/LAU/LAPR by the
environmental body – have the register number of its documents included in the
supplier’s list.
As for the CCIR, the exams of the samples showed that 2.5% of the suppliers had
the document (in the units of Pimenta Bueno – RO and Marabá – PA), and none in
the remaining units,, as follows (identified CCIR/number
/number of suppliers in the sample):
(
The difficulties for the regularization of rural properties are evident (ownership
(
of
rural properties), and for this reason the Brazilian government, by means of
Federal Decree No. 7.620/11, has extended the period for regularization in up to
20 years. Therefore, JBS has difficulties to demand from its suppliers of raw
material proof of the legality of their title deeds.
As for the totality of licenses and certificates (CAR, LAR/LAU/LAPR
LAR/LAU/LAPR and CCIR), the
exam of the samples shows their lack in all but 1 (one) of the 8 (eight) units
visited, which is in Rio Branco - AC.
It is important to mention that the maintenance of those licenses and certificates
is not mandatory in most Brazilian states. Pursuant to current legislation, only in
the state of Pará the CAR is mandatory. In the state of Mato Grosso, for example,
the deadline for regularization is 11/13/2012.
It is also important to highlight that the licenses and certificates of the properties
pr
are manually input into the system, which allows that divergences in the records
occur.
A work intended to request and question the cattle farmers about updates on the
documentation is already being performed. Additionally, certain units also search
sear
websites in order to check changes and updates in the documentation.
17
In both situations, in the units that have such control, if a change in the number of
the document is verified,
verified the document is digitally and physically filed in the unit
and the change entered into the register of the supplier. An action related to this
control is being developed in partnership with state environmental bodies and with
INCRA, aiming the periodical disclosure of environmental and rural property
regularization documents, allowing them to be crosschecked against the data base
of the Company’s suppliers.
JBS also has an internal rule that describes the procedures for the purchase of
cattle and procedures for importing the official lists of embargoed areas (IBAMA)
and slave-like
like work involvement (MTE) to block and unblock suppliers in JBS’
JBS ERP
system.
meat
Additionally,, in the first negotiation between the supplier farm and JBS’ meatpacking plant, a declaration is printed and must be signed by the owner or
o legal
representative of the cattle supplier property, in which the person responsible for
the property ensures that he/she is not party to any civil and/or criminal legal
action resulting in a sentence of conviction in a lower court,
court related to the
following issues:
Illegal deforestation;
Illegal occupation of government or indigenous land;
land
Land conflicts;
Slave-like
like work conditions, discrimination because of race or gender and child
labor.
When the negotiation is conducted at the unit, or when the supplier
suppli accompanies
the slaughter of the animals, the document is signed in the same day and filed.
When there is no personal contact, the suppliers send the signed documents by
mail or email.
The meat-packing
packing plant establishes a control over the declarations using
u
physical
folders and, in some cases, using spreadsheets, so that if the cattle farmer has not
signed the document yet, in a next purchase the document is printed again and the
supplier required signing it.
This declaration is the only guarantee that JBS has in regard to the involvement of
its suppliers in land fraud and land conflicts,
conflicts, given that INCRA does not make
available any official list of areas involved in this sort of situation,
situation that could be
used as basis for the blockade by the Company.
18
Through
hrough the exam of the sample, we found that only 33 (thirty-three)
(thirty
suppliers
referring to the 200 (two hundred) purchases in the period did not provide the
declaration so far, which totals 83.50% of signed declarations, as follows (cattle
breeder’s declaration/number
number of suppliers in the sample):
The declaration is issued along with the conclusion of the negotiation, as well as
the Instructions Guide to the Cattle Farmer (which provides information on the
deadlines for environmental and rural property regularizations), automatically
printed in all purchases (through the ERP system), which guarantees that the
documents and information on current legislation and the socio-environmental
socio
criteria adopted by JBS are known by 100% of its direct suppliers.
As for indirect suppliers, no control was found, given that traceability
traceabi
systems are
not applied on large scale in Brazil to allow the identification of the cattle origin,
before its destination to the direct supplier.
supplier Also, traceability in Brazil is focused
on sanitary purposes and socio-environmental
environmental traceability is not part of government
programs. We found that 100% of the purchases are accompanied by the Animal
Transit Form (GTA), which guarantees the traceability of direct suppliers.
Additionally, JBS has specific clients and programs that guarantee the origin of the
animals, from birth to slaughter. However, these are small-scale
small scale and not quite
representative programs in comparison with the slaughter volume of the Company.
During the audit procedures, we found that JBS has at least a pair of geographical
coordinates of the shipment point (shipment loading pen) plus a 10 km radius of
100% of the supplier properties, as stated in the purchase report used as test basis.
Without at least a pair of geographical coordinates of the shipment loading pen,
the slaughter does not happen.
In certain situations, if there are no other restrictions indicated by the Monitoring
and Traceability System of JBS (deforestation, invasion of Indigenous Land or
Protected Areas) and by the official lists of IBAMA and MTE, the pair of
geographicall coordinates of the shipment point (shipment loading pen) is collected
at the moment the animals are shipped, by means of JBS’ tracked trucks which
automatically obtain those points, or through manual GPS devices, so that in the
moment the animals are slaughtered
sla
at the meat-packing
packing plant the situation is
already regularized.
19
Specifically in regard to the official lists of MTE and IBAMA, in addition to the
automatic blockade of irregular suppliers, JBS adopts the procedure of checking
the file downloaded from the MTE website,
website with the list of Employers found
exploiting workers in slave-like
slave like work conditions, and the website of IBAMA, with
the official list of embargoed areas, in 3 (three) different moments: when the
cattle purchase order is input into
in the system, upon the shipment of the cattle,
and before the slaughter of the animals at the meat-packing
meat packing units.
The purchase of cattle is also blocked using the CPF/CNPJ of the cattle farmer, in a
way that if one of the properties is embargoed, other farms of the same owner are
also blocked. In case of embargo by IBAMA, for some of the properties to be
authorized for purchases again, a formal request has to be sent to the
Sustainability Team of JBS, showing the regularity of the property, despite the
existence
xistence of other property registered under the same CPF/CNPJ. When found that
the property is no longer embargoed by IBAMA, the blockade is removed and the
farm temporarily returns to the list of suppliers.
In case the cattle farmer is included in the list
list of MTE of involvement in slave-like
slave
work, the blockade reaches all properties registered under the same CPF/CNPJ,
and this supplier cannot be unblocked.
If irregularities from the cattle farmer are found in any of those phases, the
purchase transaction iss cancelled. As JBS has an automatic system for blocking
irregular suppliers, block and unblock actions can be proved by means of records
with date and time of data import.
As a result of the analyses made, it
it is possible to guarantee that the ERP system of
JBS has parameters that ensure the traceability of the block and/or unblock
actions, as well as of cattle purchase.
During the audit work, it was possible to identify that the log tool, on the cattle
purchase
hase screen, is enabled and that the block of the properties that fail to meet
JBS’ criteria is automatic.
We point out that the data bank of IBAMA and MTE is daily downloaded and
manually imported into the system. This situation may compromise the integrity
integr
of
the data, given that the volume of information to be downloaded is significant and
may lead to errors, intentional or not, during the downloads.
There are discussions between the Company and IBAMA and MTE (with which
negotiations are nearly concluded)
conclude to turn this phase of data importing automatic,
as data are updated by the agency. However, this process requires changes in the
websites of IBAMA and MTE, in order to make the information compatible.
compatib
As we were informed by the Sustainability Team of JBS, in regard to the criteria
that involve official bodies for checking the regularity of the direct suppliers or
their managers, periodical meetings are conducted with those bodies, such as MTE,
IBAMA, FUNAI, INCRA, ICMBio and MMA,
MMA and the main discussions
ns and achievements
are the following:
20
IBAMA – Discussions
i. Requesting a computer-based
computer
tool to integrate the systems of IBAMA and JBS for
the search of properties included in the list of embargoed areas;
ii. Making available a field named “IBGE City Code” for properties included in the
list of embargoed areas, in order to automatically identify the municipality of
the embargo.
iii. Standardizing the description of the violations – from IBAMA’s field inspector to
the website of embargoed areas;
iv. Solution for the constant failures of the server hosting the data bank and
website of embargoed areas;
v. Making available the perimeters identified as embargoed within the assessed
properties;
vi. Creating the field “Date of entry in the list” in website of embargoed areas;
vii. Creating procedures that can be monitored, audited and reported in the
website of the embargoed areas.
IBAMA – Achievements
i. Creation of the field “Date of entry in the list”;
ii. Availability of the computer-based
computer
tool WebService for the exchange of
information (in process to become functional);
iii. Reduction in the number of failures of the server that hosts the embargoed
areas website;
iv. Beginning the standardization of the completion of the notices of violation.
MTE – Discussions
i. Creating a public list of child labor;
ii. Creating the field “Last
Last update”
update” in the black list of employers involved in slaveslave
like work;
iii. Computer-based
based searching tool to identify suppliers included in that list through
CPF/CNPJ;
iv. Creating a tool for previous warning of updating in the black list of employers
involved in slave-like
like work;
v. Creating procedures that can be monitored, audited and reported in the
website of the black list of employers involved in slave-like
slave like work.
MTE – Achievements
i. Negotiations
egotiations on the creation of a public list of child labor already started;
started
ii. Creation of the field “Last update” in the black list of employers involved in
slave-like work.
21
FUNAI – Discussions
i. Making available a public list of properties (per perimeter of properties or
CPF/CNPJ) included in the boundaries of indigenous lands;
ii. Making available, updating, and informing the date when the perimeters of the
indigenous areas in the Brazilian territory were updated.
iii. Creating procedures
rocedures that can be monitored, audited and reported in the
website that hosts the indigenous land perimeters.
FUNAI – Achievements
i. Availability of the Brazilian indigenous land perimeters in a way that can be
monitored, audited and reported.
ICMBio – Discussions
i. Making available the perimeters of federal environment protection areas on a
website, in a way that can be monitored, audited and reported.
ICMBio – Achievements
i. Availability of the perimeters of federal environment protection areas on a
website, in a way that can be monitored, audited and reported.
INCRA – Discussions
i. Making available a more simple and quick way to check the CIR and CCIR;
ii. Creating a public list of properties involved in land conflicts, land fraud and
trespassing;
iii. Creating procedures that can be monitored, audited and reported for the
availability of those lists.
MMA – Discussions
i. Making available the perimeters of state and municipal environment protection
areas on a public website, in a way that can be monitored, audited and
reported;
ii. Making available lists of regular and irregular properties included in the
perimeters of state and municipal environment protection areas.
In general, it is possible to verify the efforts that JBS has been making to turn
tu the
procedures of its System for Monitoring and Tracking
racking the origin of raw material in
the Amazon Biome more effective. Nevertheless, we understand that the
cooperation of the competent bodies in providing periodical information,
particularly about the irregular properties,
properties is required in order to facilitate the
monitoring process of the supplier farms.
22
Attachments
23
Attachment I – Conducted tests - Alta Floresta - MT
1.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Name or company name
FAZ.MANTRINCHA
FAZ. SITIO NOSSA APARECIDA
FAZ.ESTANCIA RENASCER
FAZ.RANCHARIA
FAZ.ROSA BRANCA
FAZ. SITIO LAGOA DA MATA
FAZ.SAO SEBASTIAO
FAZ.PURI SANTOS
FAZ.SITIO ROSIMEIRE
FAZ.ESTANCIA UIRAPURU
FAZ.ESTANCIA RENASCER
FAZENDA CORRENTAO II
FAZ.SITIO BERTIN
Cattle breeder
PEDRO TEODORO ARANTES
AMAURI FERMINO FERREIRA
MIGUEL ANTONIO MENDES
ALEXANDRE LAVEZO NETO
ODENIR DOMINGOS ARALDI
ROSANI DE OLIVEIRA PEREIRA BARBOSA
VICENTE GESUALDO
JERSON NONATO DOS SANTOS
ROSEMILDO ADRIANO GENZ
ANTONIO CHIUCHI NETO
MIGUEL ANTONIO MENDES
DAVID VENTURA
ANTONIO SERGIO BERTIM
CPF / CNPJ
048.120.771-68
814.091.091-00
513.434.879-00
025.622.661-02
257.666.781-34
616.540.862-15
108.479.109-97
369.625.119-49
934.547.241-04
039.424.301-34
513.434.879-00
150.515.446-49
469.022.011-53
Date
2012-05-14 00:00:00.000
2012-04-30 00:00:00.000
2012-05-09 00:00:00.000
2011-12-15 00:00:00.000
2012-04-19 00:00:00.000
2011-12-21 00:00:00.000
2012-05-04 00:00:00.000
2011-12-22 00:00:00.000
2012-03-09 00:00:00.000
2012-01-20 00:00:00.000
2012-04-13 00:00:00.000
2012-03-19 00:00:00.000
2012-01-10 00:00:00.000
Municipality
APIACAS
ALTA FLORESTA
CARLINDA
PARANAITA
PARANAITA
CARLINDA
ALTA FLORESTA
ALTA FLORESTA
PARANAITA
ALTA FLORESTA
CARLINDA
TERRA NOVA DO NORTE
ALTA FLORESTA
UF
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
Property's
Georeferenced Point
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
ESTANCIA CONQUISTA
FAZ.SITIO NOSSA SENHORA AUXILIADORA
SITIO RIBEIRO
SITIO 3 IRMAOS
FAZ.SITIO ALTO JARDIM
FAZENDA BRAGATTI III
FAZ.SANTA CECILIA
FAZ.SANTA MARIA
FAZ.TSUYU
FAZ.SANTA CRUZ
FAZ.SANTO ANTONIO
SITIO DOLEYS
JOSE APARECIDA ZANQUETA
MARIA INEZ WERNKE GESSER
PAULO PEDRO RIBEIRO DE SOUZA
MARCIO SANTOS DE AQUINO
ANTONIO FELISBINO DA SILVA
WAGNER XAVIER RIBEIRO
SEBASTIAO AGUIAR DA SILVA
CELIO ROBERTO AGUIAR
SERGIO MITSUO KUME
CARLOS CRUZ
ANA LUCIA DE OLIVEIRA
SANTO RECH DOLEYS
010.810.571-73
581.331.601-97
452.268.141-00
695.796.527-91
569.884.601-44
939.216.169-72
021.909.153-68
004.861.086-00
570.583.429-20
069.475.069-72
554.251.431-68
016.157.131-07
2012-02-24
2012-01-19
2012-04-19
2012-04-12
2012-04-19
2012-05-07
2012-04-30
2012-04-11
2012-01-25
2011-12-15
2012-04-17
2011-12-08
NOVA BANDEIRANTES
PARANAITA
PARANAITA
PARANAITA
CARLINDA
PARANAITA
ALTA FLORESTA
NOVA MONTE VERDE
ALTA FLORESTA
PARANAITA
ALTA FLORESTA
CARLINDA
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(l)
(m)
(o)
(p)
(q)
(s)
ok
N/A
00:00:00.000
00:00:00.000
00:00:00.000
00:00:00.000
00:00:00.000
00:00:00.000
00:00:00.000
00:00:00.000
00:00:00.000
00:00:00.000
00:00:00.000
00:00:00.000
LAR/LAU/
LAPR
CCIR
(d)
(c)
(d)
(c)
(d)
(c)
(d)
(c)
(d)
(c)
(d)
(c)
(d)
(c)
(d)
(c)
(d)
(c)
(d)
(c)
(d)
(c)
(d)
(c)
(d)
(c)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
CAR
(b)
ok
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
ok
(b)
ok
(b)
(b)
(b)
a)
(p)
(p)
ok
(q)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
ok
(p)
(p)
b)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
c)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
a)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
a)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
a)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
a)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
b)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
c)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
d)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
a)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
Cattle
breeder’s
declaration
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
(l)
(l)
ok
(l)
ok
ok
ok
ok
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
ok
ok
(b)
(b)
(b)
ok
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
ok
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
(l)
(l)
ok
(l)
(l)
ok
(l)
Last monitoring
before purchase
5/14/12
4/18/12
4/18/12
none
4/11/12
12/19/11
5/4/12
12/19/11
3/7/12
1/20/12
4/5/12
3/17/12
1/9/12
2/20/12
1/17/12
4/16/12
3/13/12
4/18/12
4/18/12
4/18/12
3/19/12
1/23/12
12/12/12
4/16/12
12/6/11
Monitoring result
ALERT
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ALERT
Reason
inconsistent coordinates
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
Period between
monitoring and
purchase
Note
0 days
12 days
21 days
(s)
8 days
2 days
0 days
3 days
2 days
0 days
8 days
2 days
1 day
4 days
2 days
3 days
30 days
1 day
19 days
12 days
23 days
2 days
3 days
1 day
2 days
-
To the indirect supplier this kind of control does not exist, given that there is no traceability program.
Lack of Rural Environmental Record (CAR).
Lack of Rural Environmental License (LAR)
Lack of Certificate of Registration of Rural Property (CCIR).
The supplier is blocked, but not excluded. They are unblocked only after proving the reparation to the environmental damage.
Funai does not make data regularly available for consultation. There were no cases of slave-like or degrading work.
The supplier is blocked, but not excluded. Purchases are restarted after the supplier is unblocked.
The National Institute of Colonization and Agrarian Reform (INCRA) has no official list, therefore, it is difficult to comply with this item.
In the state of Mato Grosso, CAR and LAR are not yet mandatory. However, some properties already have the CAR.
There is no control and proof of cattle’s growing and development. Accordingly, traceability will be limited for these analyses.
Lack of Cattle Breeder’s Declaration.
There is no control and monitoring of indirect suppliers, therefore the audit’s analysis is limited.
The meetings of the Commission with representatives of the industry, NGOs, customers, the financial system and Government are not held monthly.
The result of the property's monitoring was ALERT, which allows the purchase, but there is no reliability.
According to the Monitoring Certificate presented, there was no monitoring before the purchase.
There was no monitoring previous to the purchase date, however, according to the certificate issued by APOIO Consultoria on 04/18/2012, a monitoring was conducted after the purchase and the property was then classified as “ALERT”.
According to the performed work stage test.
Not applicable.
24
Attachment I – Conducted tests – Marabá - PA
1.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
(a)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(m)
(o)
(p)
(r)
ok
N/A
FAZENDA SANTA BARBARA
FAZENDA PARAGON
FAZENDA NELORE
SITIO RAINHA DA PAZ
FAZENDA BOA UNIAO
FAZ LUA NOVA
FAZENDA J J R
FAZENDA SAO JOSE
FAZENDA BOM JARDIM I
FAZENDA ESPERANCA
FAZENDA ROCHA I
FAZENDA RIO GRANDE
FAZENDA VALE DO ACAI
FAZENDA SAO SEBASTIAO
FAZENDA ELDORADO
FAZENDA SERRA BONITA
FAZENDA SAO RAIMUNDO
FAZENDA TOCANTINS
FAZENDA ORIZONA
FAZENDA ESTRELA DO NORTE
FAZENDA SULCAVAO
FAZENDA RIO MARIA
FAZENDA CACHOEIRA
FAZENDA BOA ESPERANCA
FAZENDA BAMBU
Cattle breeder
JURANDIR DE SOUZA BOA MORTE
MILTON COSTA FILHO
WANDERLEI SANTOS VIANA
JUNIOR CERSA DE MELO
PEDRO MIRANDA DE OLIVEIRA JUNIOR
RICARDO ALESSANDRO PEREIRA LEMOS
EDIR NEPOMUCENO DA SILVA
MAGNON COELHO DE CARVALHO
JOAO ROBERTO BARBOSA
EDVAL FERNANDES DE MOURA
CARIVALDO RIBEIRO
HUMBERTO EUSTAQUIO DE QUEIROZ
JOSE MUNIZ OLIVEIRA ARAUJO
ROQUE QUAGLIATO
CLAUDIO ROBERTO FELICE PAJARO
JOAQUIM MIRANDA CRUZ
JOAO BATISTA MELGACO CHAVES
HOLZETTES BERTOLINI DA COSTA
MARCOS VAZ DE MORAES
PEDRO MIRANDA DE OLIVEIRA JUNIOR
LUCAS JOSE DO NASCIMENTO
EDUARDO KROEFF CORBETTA
MARINO JANUARIO BRAZ
SEBASTIAO RODRIGUES PEREIRA
JOSE ELVECIO VILARINO
CPF / CNPJ
033.976.107-53
248.353.902-53
159.720.896-53
011.485.032-18
117.921.752-72
852.981.661-72
140.498.216-72
160.224.086-87
051.638.201-25
382.417.141-49
032.467.952-15
078.243.006-68
226.350.921-68
013.402.128-20
526.331.876-68
117.677.071-34
328.993.192-72
774.955.277-49
071.049.361-49
117.921.752-72
809.806.946-04
108.003.280-00
211.190.581-04
037.284.471-53
091.128.471-00
Date
2012-04-16 00:00:00.000
2012-03-13 00:00:00.000
2012-04-16 00:00:00.000
2012-03-03 00:00:00.000
2012-01-07 00:00:00.000
2011-12-15 00:00:00.000
2012-05-03 00:00:00.000
2012-01-20 00:00:00.000
2012-03-05 00:00:00.000
2012-02-23 00:00:00.000
2012-03-29 00:00:00.000
2012-03-02 00:00:00.000
2012-05-08 00:00:00.000
2012-02-04 00:00:00.000
2012-01-18 00:00:00.000
2012-02-15 00:00:00.000
2012-02-08 00:00:00.000
2012-04-13 00:00:00.000
2011-12-16 00:00:00.000
2012-04-12 00:00:00.000
2012-01-06 00:00:00.000
2012-02-22 00:00:00.000
2012-01-10 00:00:00.000
2012-05-16 00:00:00.000
2012-04-16 00:00:00.000
Municipality
ITUPIRANGA
ITUPIRANGA
ITUPIRANGA
ITUPIRANGA
MARABA
ANAPU
MARABA
MARABA
SAO GERALDO DO ARAGUAIA
ITUPIRANGA
ITUPIRANGA
ITUPIRANGA
MARABA
XINGUARA
SAO GERALDO DO ARAGUAIA
MARABA
MARABA
ITUPIRANGA
BREJO GRANDE DO ARAGUAIA
MARABA
MARABA
RIO MARIA
NOVO REPARTIMENTO
PICARRA
ITUPIRANGA
State
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
Property's
Georeferenced Point
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
CCIR
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
ok
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
LAR/LAU/
LAPR
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
ok
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
CAR
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
a)
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
(p)
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
(r)
(p)
(p)
(r)
ok
ok
ok
ok
b)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
2.
c)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
a)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
3.
a)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
4.
a)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
5.
a)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
b)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
6.
c)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
d)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
a)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
Cattle
breeder’s
declaration
Last monitoring
before purchase
Monitoring result
Reason
Period between
monitoring and
purchase
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
4/10/12
3/7/12
4/11/12
2/8/12
1/5/12
12/13/11
4/18/12
1/19/12
2/28/12
2/15/12
3/21/12
2/24/12
5/3/12
1/26/12
1/18/12
2/9/12
2/1/12
3/7/12
12/12/11
3/1/12
12/1/11
2/13/12
1/9/12
5/10/12
3/23/12
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
6 days
6 days
5 days
24 days
2 days
2 days
15 days
1 day
6 days
8 days
8 days
7 days
5 days
9 days
0 days
6 days
7 days
37 days
4 days
42 days
36 days
9 days
1 day
6 days
24 days
Note
-
To the indirect suppliers this kind of control does not exist, given that there is no traceability program.
Lack of Rural Environmental License (LAR).
Lack of Certificate of Registration Rural Property (CCIR).
In the state of Pará, only CAR is mandatory. However, some properties already have the LAR.
According to the Monitoring Certificate presented, the period between monitoring and purchase is more than 31 days.
Not applicable.
25
Attachment I – Conducted tests – Matupá - MT
1.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(l)
(m)
(o)
(p)
(q)
(s)
ok
N/A
FAZENDA DOIS IRMAOS
FAZENDA QUERENCIA NOVA
FAZENDA PORTO ALEGRE
FAZENDA DEZIM
FAZENDA AMANHECER ALEGRE
AGROPECUARIA SAO MIGUEL
FAZENDA SAO LUIZ
FAZ.POLIZEL
CHACARA 03 IRMAOS
FAZENDA NOSSASENHORA DO MEDIANEIRA
FZ: MEIA LUA
FAZENDA CAPELA 1
FAZENDA RINCAO
ESTANCIA TOTH
FAZENDA BOA ESPERANÇA
FAZENDA EL DOURADO DO XINGU
FAZ. TATIANE
FAZENDA LAGOA AZUL
SITIO SANTA RITA
SITIO SAO FRANCISCO DE ASSIS
FAZENDA BANG BANG
FAZENDA BOA ESPERANÇA
FAZENDA CENTENARIO
SITIO MAIA
FZ: MEIA LUA
Cattle breeder
RODRIGO NAVES AGUIAR
FAZENDA QUERENCIA NOVA
RODRIGO NAVES AGUIAR
CLAUDIO APARECIDO CARNEIRO FERREIRA
FABIO PEREIRA NOGUEIRA
AGROPECUARIA SASTRE LTDA
ANDRE DE MORAES ZUCATO
PAULO PRUDENTE POLIZEL
WILLIAN SILVA SOUZA
AGUINALDO RAMOS DE OLIVEIRA
JOSE MOACIR DE ANDRADE LAJES
FLAVIO EDUARDO PARO
EDSON MIGUEL PIOVESAN
WAGNER JOSE URGNIANI
HUMBERTO MARTINS COSTA
AGENOR VIEIRA ANDRADE NETO
RENATO LIMA DOS SANTOS
FLAVIO MORONA
ELMO DIEDRICH DA COSTA
CLEUSA STRADIOTTO
LUIZ CARLOS NUNES CASTELO
MARCOLINO ALDO DE SOUZA DILL
BERNAR TEIXEIRA CRUVINEL
DORLI MAIA
JOSE MOACIR DE ANDRADE LAJES
CPF / CNPJ
621.203.601-20
894.514.491-91
621.203.601-20
002.452.386-03
884.266.371-91
09.015.888/0001-00
695.916.791-49
218.954.538-28
150.313.492-04
326.610.292-49
466.718.706-91
141.545.768-95
139.332.219-00
022.503.021-70
987.063.732-91
902.679.316-20
896.367.671-49
559.079.380-72
162.481.630-49
458.913.891-34
534.469.258-72
296.221.909-87
022.877.961-85
570.054.191-20
466.718.706-91
Date
2012-05-04 00:00:00.000
2012-02-11 00:00:00.000
2012-03-16 00:00:00.000
2011-12-16 00:00:00.000
2012-01-12 00:00:00.000
2012-02-06 00:00:00.000
2012-01-23 00:00:00.000
2012-04-11 00:00:00.000
2012-01-27 00:00:00.000
2011-12-02 00:00:00.000
2012-01-09 00:00:00.000
2012-02-17 00:00:00.000
2012-03-14 00:00:00.000
2012-02-29 00:00:00.000
2011-12-01 00:00:00.000
2012-03-03 00:00:00.000
2012-01-27 00:00:00.000
2012-03-21 00:00:00.000
2012-02-22 00:00:00.000
2011-12-01 00:00:00.000
2012-03-27 00:00:00.000
2011-12-06 00:00:00.000
2012-04-16 00:00:00.000
2012-03-09 00:00:00.000
2012-03-08 00:00:00.000
Municipality
NOVO PROGRESSO
NOVA GUARITA
TERRA NOVA DO NORTE
NOVO PROGRESSO
CONFRESA
TERRA NOVA DO NORTE
PARANAITA
NOVO MUNDO
PEIXOTO DE AZEVEDO
NOVO PROGRESSO
NOVO MUNDO
NOVO PROGRESSO
NOVO PROGRESSO
NOVA SANTA HELENA
ITAITUBA
MARCELANDIA
TERRA NOVA DO NORTE
ALTAMIRA
PEIXOTO DE AZEVEDO
PEIXOTO DE AZEVEDO
SAO JOSE DO XINGU
NOVA GUARITA
ITAITUBA
MATUPA
NOVO MUNDO
Property's
LAR/LAU/
LAPR
State Georeferenced Point CCIR
PA
ok
(d)
(c)
MT
ok
(d)
(c)
MT
ok
(d)
(c)
PA
ok
(d)
(c)
MT
ok
(d)
(c)
MT
ok
(d)
(c)
MT
ok
(d)
(c)
MT
ok
(d)
(c)
MT
ok
(d)
(c)
PA
ok
(d)
(c)
MT
ok
(d)
(c)
PA
ok
(d)
(c)
PA
ok
(d)
(c)
MT
ok
(d)
(c)
PA
ok
(d)
(c)
MT
ok
(d)
(c)
MT
ok
(d)
(c)
PA
ok
(d)
(c)
MT
ok
(d)
(c)
MT
ok
(d)
(c)
MT
ok
(d)
(c)
MT
ok
(d)
(c)
PA
ok
(d)
(c)
MT
ok
(d)
(c)
MT
ok
(d)
(c)
CAR
ok
(b)
(b)
ok
(b)
ok
(b)
(b)
(b)
ok
(b)
ok
ok
(b)
ok
(b)
(b)
ok
(b)
(b)
ok
(b)
ok
(b)
(b)
a)
(p)
(p)
(p)
ok
(p)
(p)
(p)
ok
(p)
(p)
(p)
ok
(p)
ok
(q)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
b)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
2.
c)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
a)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
3.
a)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
4.
a)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
5.
a)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
b)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
6.
c)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
d)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
a)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
Cattle
breeder’s
declaration
Last monitoring
before purchase
Monitoring
result
ok
(l)
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
4/19/12
1/16/12
3/12/12
12/12/12
1/10/12
2/6/12
1/2/12
4/11/12
12/30/11
12/2/11
1/4/12
2/3/12
3/6/12
2/10/12
none
2/21/12
1/16/12
3/9/12
2/21/12
11/28/11
3/26/12
12/5/11
4/16/12
2/27/12
3/5/12
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
Reason
Period between
monitoring and
purchase
Note
coordenadas inconsistentes
CAR
matching perimeter
CAR
matching perimeter
15 days
26 days
4 days
4 days
2 days
0 days
21 days
0 days
28 days
0 days
5 days
14 days
8 days
19 days
11 days
11 days
12 days
1 day
3 days
1 day
1 day
0 days
11 days
3 days
(s)
-
In the state of Mato Grosso, there is no obligation to CAR and LAR, but some properties already have CAR.
There was no monitoring before the purchase, however, according to the certificate issued by APOIO Consultoria on December 28, 2011 a monitoring was conducted after the purchase and the property was then classified as “ALERT”.
Not applicable.
26
Attachment – Conducted tests – Pimenta Bueno - RO
1.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(l)
(m)
(o)
(p)
(q)
(r)
(s)
(t)
ok
N/A
FAZENDA PARANA
FAZENDA SANTA ADELIA GUAPORE VI
SITIO NOVA ESPERANCA
SITIO COLINA
SITIO 3 IRMÃOS
FAZENDA MELGACINHO
FAZENDA AREAL
FAZENDA ASA BRANCA
FAZENDA TRES MOCAS
FAZENDA FURNAS
SITIO AGUAS DE LINDOIA
FAZENDA VANAIRA
FAZENDA SANTA ANA
FAZENDA PEROBAL
FAZENDA IMBAUBA
SITIO BOA SORTE
SITIO XORORO
SÍTIO VISTA ALEGRE
SITIO NOVO HORIZONTE
SITIO BOA VISTA
SITIO AREIA BRANCA
SITIO BOBECK
SITIO MALHEIRO
FAZENDA ROSILDA HENKE CORA
SITIO BOA ESPERANCA
Cattle breeder
PEDRO JOSE BESCOROVAINE
TALIS ROBERTO SIMONATO
JOUBERT ANTONIO DE OLIVEIRA
ENIO PERINI
FABIANO SILVA DE OLIVEIRA
ROBERTA MARIA DE QUEIROZ FIGUEREDO
WALTER EUGENIO DOS SANTOS
PAULO SERGIO LAGASSI
OSMAR POLIZEL
JOAQUIM DE SOUZA GOMES
GENALDO MARTINS DE ALMEIDA
DAVID BINOW
ALVARO ABREU RIBEIRO E OUTRO
DANIEL ANDRADE VILELA
ERIVELTO SANTOS DE HOLANDA
GELIS JOSE DIAS
NILTON FRANCISCO DE ASSUNCAO
HILARINDO APARICIO INACIO
DANIEL MILLER
ROBERSON GOMES
ELIAS FERREIRA INERIO
PEDRO BOBECK
JOVECI BEVENUTO SOUZA
ROSILDA HENKE CORA
ETEVALDO TOZETTI BRAGA
CPF / CNPJ
248.793.202-34
826.710.012-15
478.929.782-91
816.806.787-87
683.654.972-04
569.368.694-91
602.260.139-87
400.278.992-68
803.976.468-87
070.748.321-20
349.185.669-87
139.476.726-91
061.685.738-10
686.191.708-72
645.167.502-44
478.798.312-15
172.257.601-49
359.954.169-87
639.369.412-20
594.639.452-53
636.798.172-15
010.521.799-91
325.287.791-00
419.004.052-53
315.413.132-91
Date
2012-04-11 00:00:00.000
2012-01-20 00:00:00.000
2012-05-11 00:00:00.000
2012-04-17 00:00:00.000
2012-05-31 00:00:00.000
2012-01-04 00:00:00.000
2012-03-09 00:00:00.000
2012-02-11 00:00:00.000
2012-03-14 00:00:00.000
2012-02-20 00:00:00.000
2012-01-20 00:00:00.000
2012-05-15 00:00:00.000
2011-12-01 00:00:00.000
2012-04-09 00:00:00.000
2011-12-15 00:00:00.000
2012-03-08 00:00:00.000
2012-03-09 00:00:00.000
2011-12-08 00:00:00.000
2012-02-09 00:00:00.000
2012-01-20 00:00:00.000
2012-01-10 00:00:00.000
2012-05-15 00:00:00.000
2012-04-19 00:00:00.000
2012-05-25 00:00:00.000
2012-04-14 00:00:00.000
Property's
Municipality
State Georeferenced Point
PARECIS
RO
ok
COSTA MARQUES
RO
ok
MINISTRO ANDREAZA
RO
ok
MACHADINHO D OESTE
RO
ok
PRIMAVERA DE RONDONIA
RO
ok
PIMENTA BUENO
RO
ok
MACHADINHO D OESTE
RO
ok
CACOAL
RO
ok
CACOAL
RO
ok
CAMPO NOVO DE RONDONIA
RO
ok
CACOAL
RO
ok
ESPIGAO D OESTE
RO
ok
CORUMBIARA
RO
ok
CORUMBIARA
RO
ok
PORTO VELHO
RO
ok
CACOAL
RO
ok
ESPIGAO D OESTE
RO
ok
PRESIDENTE MEDICI
RO
ok
ESPIGAO D OESTE
RO
ok
CACOAL
RO
ok
PARECIS
RO
ok
ROLIM DE MOURA
RO
ok
ESPIGAO D OESTE
RO
ok
CACOAL
RO
ok
ESPIGAO D OESTE
RO
ok
CCIR
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
ok
(d)
(d)
(d)
ok
ok
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
ok
(d)
LAR/LAU/
LAPR
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
CAR
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
a)
ok
(p)
ok
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
ok
(p)
ok
(r)
ok
ok
ok
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(q)
(p)
ok
(p)
b)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
2.
c)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
a)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
3.
a)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
4.
a)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
5.
a)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
b)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
6.
c)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
d)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
a)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
Cattle
breeder’s
declaration
Last monitoring
before purchase
Monitoring result
Reason
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
(l)
ok
ok
ok
ok
(l)
(l)
(l)
(l)
(l)
(l)
(l)
(l)
(l)
ok
(l)
(l)
(l)
ok
4/2/12
1/11/12
5/8/12
4/16/12
5/30/12
12/2/11
3/6/12
2/8/12
3/12/12
11/20/10
12/12/11
5/2/12
11/24/11
4/4/12
12/15/11
3/2/12
3/7/12
12/8/11
2/9/12
1/5/12
1/5/12
none
4/16/12
5/18/12
4/14/12
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
Period between
monitoring and
purchase
Note
9 days
9 days
3 days
1 day
1 day
33 days
3 days
3 days
2 days
457 days
(t)
39 days
13 days
7 days
5 days
0 days
6 days
2 days
0 days
0 days
15 days
5 days
(s)
3 days
7 days
0 days
-
In the state of Rondônia, CAR and LAR are not yet mandatory.
There was no monitoring before the purchase date, however, according to the certificate issued by APOIO Consultoria on 05/16/2012, a monitoring was conducted after the purchase and the property was then classified as “ALERT”.
The monitoring occurred 457 days before the purchase date, however, according to the certificate issued by APOIO Consultoria on April 17, 2012, a monitoring was conducted after the purchase and the property was then classified as “ALERT”.
Not applicable.
27
Attachment I – Conducted tests– Redenção - PA
1.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
(a)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(m)
(o)
(p)
(q)
(r)
ok
N/A
FAZENDA NUVEM BRANCA II
FAZENDA IMARU
FAZENDA AGUA BOA
FAZENDA BORONESA
FAZENDA BOA ESPERANCA
FAZENDA BOA SORTE
CHACARA AGUAS CLARAS
CHACARA NOSSA SRA APARECIDA
FAZENDA FOFOCA
FAZENDA GRADAUS
FAZENDA SANT ELENA
FAZ SANTA HELOIZA
SITIO ARAGUAIA
FAZENDA ALO BRASIL
FAZENDA SANTA FE
FAZENDA BERANTI
FAZENDA BACURI
FAZENDA OURO PRETO
FAZENDA REUNIDAS MACEDONIA
FAZENDA SAO RAFAEL
FAZENDA NOSSA SENHORA APARECIDA
FAZENDA SANTA DELIA
FAZENDA 3 J
FAZENDA IMARU
MARIO PEDRO SEBER JUNIOR
Cattle breeder
CPF / CNPJ
ANTONIO LUCENA BARROS
066.374.852-68
DIMAS GOMES SANTANA
088.848.111-04
VILMAR VIEIRA
723.549.412-34
FLAVIA SILVEIRA DE FREITAS
649.517.231-15
ADOLFO MARTINS DOS ANJOS
218.595.662-00
JUNIA LUCIA DUCA COSTA
029.385.866-71
VERCINO COELHO DA SILVA
076.968.091-72
FRANCISCO RODRIGUES SOARES
179.295.042-04
WILDER SANTANA SAMPAIO
097.498.292-04
ANDRE LUIZ BORGES STEFAN
198.011.571-00
ALEXANDRE ROSA VILELA
549.783.868-53
JOSE ALBERTO DE SOUSA BRANCO
075.597.043-87
GASPAR VIEIRA DE CARVALHO
332.928.091-34
MARCORELIO NOVAIS SANTANA
207.535.512-68
WELINGTON BRASIL ZUCATO
713.835.498-34
IBIS ALVES DE RESENDE
262.633.511-87
DANIEL DE PAIVA ABREU
452.361.006-15
ELOI ZATTA
177.129.989-49
PEDRO ANDRADE SILVA
031.114.666-04
ADINEI CAMPOS RODRIGUES
059.086.551-04
WASHINGTON SEBASTIAO DE CARVALHO
322.667.316-53
713.835.498-34
FELLIPE CUNHA BORGES
961.136.932-87
DIMAS GOMES SANTANA
088.848.111-04
MARIO PEDRO SEBER JUNIOR
091.176.418-61
Date
2012-01-07 00:00:00.000
2012-03-08 00:00:00.000
2012-04-03 00:00:00.000
2012-03-26 00:00:00.000
2012-04-09 00:00:00.000
2012-01-31 00:00:00.000
2012-04-03 00:00:00.000
2011-12-13 00:00:00.000
2012-05-02 00:00:00.000
2012-03-07 00:00:00.000
2012-03-12 00:00:00.000
2012-01-16 00:00:00.000
2012-05-16 00:00:00.000
2012-02-08 00:00:00.000
2012-04-23 00:00:00.000
2012-01-11 00:00:00.000
2012-03-20 00:00:00.000
2012-02-11 00:00:00.000
2012-01-28 00:00:00.000
2011-12-06 00:00:00.000
2012-02-14 00:00:00.000
2012-02-24 00:00:00.000
2012-05-09 00:00:00.000
2012-01-31 00:00:00.000
2012-03-21 00:00:00.000
Municipality
CUMARU DO NORTE
SANTA MARIA DAS BARREIRAS
SANTANA DO ARAGUAIA
CUMARU DO NORTE
SANTANA DO ARAGUAIA
CUMARU DO NORTE
PAU D ARCO
REDENCAO
SANTANA DO ARAGUAIA
CUMARU DO NORTE
CUMARU DO NORTE
BANNACH
BANNACH
CUMARU DO NORTE
SANTANA DO ARAGUAIA
UF
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
Property's
Georeferenced Point
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
CCIR
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
LAR/LAU/
LAPR
CAR
a)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
(r)
ok
ok
(p)
ok
ok
(q)
ok
(r)
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
b)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
2.
c)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
a)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
3.
a)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
4.
a)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
5.
a)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
b)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
6.
c)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
d)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
a)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
Cattle
breeder’s
declaration
Last monitoring
before purchase
Monitoring result
Reason
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
1/7/12
3/2/12
3/6/12
3/14/12
3/28/12
12/8/11
3/20/12
12/7/11
4/26/12
2/29/12
3/5/12
1/16/12
5/10/12
1/16/12
4/19/12
12/12/11
3/16/12
2/7/12
1/25/12
11/29/11
2/7/12
2/20/12
4/19/12
1/18/12
3/6/12
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
Period between
monitoring and
purchase
Note
0 days
6 days
28 days
12 days
12 days
54 days
14 days
6 days
6 days
7 days
7 days
0 days
6 days
23 days
4 days
30 days
4 days
4 days
3 days
7 days
7 days
4 days
20 days
13 days
15 days
-
In the state of Pará, there is the obligation only for CAR. There are no records for LAR.
Not applicable.
28
Attachment I – Conducted tests – Rio Branco - AC
1.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(l)
(m)
(o)
(p)
ok
N/A
SITIO PLANALTO
FAZENDA JOAO PESSOA
FAZENDA UIRAPURU
FAZENDA BURITI
COLINA JV
FAZENDA VALE DO IQUIRI
COLONIA SAO CRISTOVAO
FAZENDA PORTO RICO
COLONIA RETIRO
FAZENDA PERSEVERANCA
COLONIA LUAR DE AGOSTO
FAZENDA U
COLONIA SOL NASCENTE
FAZENDA SANTA MÔNICA
FAZENDA ESPERANÇA
COLONIA PODEROSO
FAZENDA AQUARIUS
FAZENDA CAMPO VERDE
FAZENDA SANTA RITA
FAZENDA OURO BRANCO
FAZENDA JARAGUÁ
COLONIA CAMPO VERDE
FAZENDA NOVO HORIZONTE
COLONIA JARDIN 1
FAZENDA ALVORADA
Cattle breeder
JOAO PESSOA DE BRITO
JOAO PESSOA DE BRITO
EDSON ROBERTO VIANA
AGROPECUARIA BURITI S/A
JOSE VANILDO PESSOA
JOSE RIBAMAR BRITO
MARIO PAULINO DE LIMA
SEBASTIÃO ISRAEL TAVARES
VALDIRO DOMINGOS DE OLIVEIRA
EDUARDO PRANDINI
LUIZ CEZARIO GOMES
EDSON GOMES BATISTA
JORGE MONTEIRO DA SILVA
ESMERALDINO SATURNINO DA SILVA
LEANDRO TAVARES VERONEZ
ARTEMILTON ALVES DA SILVA
ELIMAR BARBOSA TEIXEIRA
FERNANDO OLIVEIRA JUNIOR
ROQUE REIS BARREIROS
EDWIN MACOWSKI
SERGIO SEBASTIÃO DE BARROS
SAYDE MESQUITA DE SOUSA
FERNANDO DE ASSIS FERREIRA MELO
LUIZ CARLOS JARDIM
SERGIO VASQUES ARANTES
CPF / CNPJ
216.276.222-68
216.276.222-68
424.798.609-06
02.266.524/0001-54
321.868.432-34
215.970.653-15
052.275.772-34
019.301.501-30
435.466.762-20
039.579.249-52
177.132.341-87
350.126.842-49
696.786.002-00
020.106.312-34
673.407.332-72
650.516.532-00
719.167.766-04
227.213.043-72
035.736.728-68
022.465.629-53
357.476.768-49
002.909.072-50
947.481.286-15
893.967.668-87
474.450.338-15
Date
2011-12-09 00:00:00.000
2012-05-16 00:00:00.000
2012-03-13 00:00:00.000
2011-12-28 00:00:00.000
2012-04-14 00:00:00.000
2012-04-24 00:00:00.000
2012-04-11 00:00:00.000
2012-03-30 00:00:00.000
2012-04-20 00:00:00.000
2012-02-10 00:00:00.000
2012-04-13 00:00:00.000
2012-03-07 00:00:00.000
2012-01-21 00:00:00.000
2011-12-21 00:00:00.000
2011-12-17 00:00:00.000
2011-12-09 00:00:00.000
2012-01-13 00:00:00.000
2012-04-14 00:00:00.000
2012-05-15 00:00:00.000
2012-03-23 00:00:00.000
2011-12-05 00:00:00.000
2011-12-08 00:00:00.000
2012-02-13 00:00:00.000
2012-02-04 00:00:00.000
2011-12-08 00:00:00.000
Municipality
PORTO VELHO
RIO BRANCO
BRASILEIA
CAPIXABA
BRASILEIA
SENADOR GUIOMARD
BUJARI
EPITACIOLANDIA
SENA MADUREIRA
CAPIXABA
BRASILEIA
BUJARI
RIO BRANCO
RIO BRANCO
CAPIXABA
SENA MADUREIRA
PLACIDO DE CASTRO
ACRELANDIA
BRASILEIA
XAPURI
BUJARI
RIO BRANCO
RIO BRANCO
PLACIDO DE CASTRO
SENADOR GUIOMARD
Property's
RO
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
AC
ok
(d)
LAR/LAU/
LAPR
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
CAR
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
a)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
ok
ok
(p)
(p)
ok
(p)
(p)
ok
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
b)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
2.
c)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
a)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
3.
a)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
4.
a)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
6.
5.
a)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
b)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
c)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
d)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
a)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
Cattle
breeder’s
declaration
Last monitoring
before purchase
Monitoring result
Reason
ok
ok
ok
ok
(l)
(l)
(l)
(l)
(l)
ok
(l)
ok
ok
ok
(l)
ok
ok
(l)
ok
(l)
(l)
ok
ok
ok
ok
12/6/11
4/16/12
3/12/12
12/5/11
4/2/12
4/4/12
4/16/12
3/27/12
4/20/12
2/6/12
4/10/12
3/5/12
12/8/11
12/1/11
12/15/11
12/7/11
1/10/12
4/13/12
4/17/12
3/19/12
12/1/11
12/1/11
2/10/12
2/2/12
12/6/11
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
Period between
monitoring and
purchase
Note
3 days
30 days
1 day
23 days
12 days
20 days
5 days
3 days
0 day
4 days
3 days
2 days
44 days
20 days
2 days
2 days
3 days
1 day
28 days
4 days
4 days
7 days
3 days
2 days
2 days
-
In the state of Acre, CAR and LAR are not yet mandatory.
Not applicable.
29
Attachment I – Conducted tests – Tucumã - PA
1.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
(a)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(m)
(n)
(o)
(p)
(r)
(t)
ok
N/A
FAZENDA ARCO VERDE
FAZENDA VIDA NOVA
FAZENDA CAJAZEIRA
FAZENDA JUSSARA
FAZENDA NOVO HORIZONTE
FAZENDA RANCHO DO VALE
FAZENDA SANTA CLARA
FAZENDA TIANGUA
FAZENDA PAU BRASIL
FAZENDA SANTA DELIA
FAZENDA MARCO PERDIDO
FAZENDA CAJAZEIRA
FAZENDA SANTA ROSA
FAZENDA ESPIRITO SANTO
FAZENDA SANTA RITA
FAZ BOQUEIRAO DA SERRA I
FAZENDA MATAO
FAZENDA JUSARA
FAZENDA 2 IRMAOS
FAZENDA VALE DO MUTUM
FAZENDA MOCA BONITA
FAZENDA VALE DO BOI
FAZENDA RODEIO II
FAZ MORADA DO SOL
FAZENDA FORTALEZA
Cattle breeder
AMALIA NEVES DOS SANTOS
CORACY MACHADO KERN
GABRIEL AUGUSTO CAMARGO
MANOEL JOSE CARDOSO
ACIR JOSE COELHO
ZACARIAS AZEVEDO JUNIOR
ARLINDO LAURIANO ROSA
AVERCINO MOTA DOS REIS
PAULO GASPARETTO
CLAUDIONEI ZAMPIVA
GABRIEL AUGUSTO CAMARGO
KLEVESON RAIMUNDO SILVA
AGROPECUARIA SANTA BARBARA XINGUARA S/A
MARIA RITA VIEIRA E SILVA
PEDRO DA SILVA NETO
MAYRA TRINDADE GOMES FERREIRA
JOSE ALVES BOMFIM
JOAO APARECIDO PESCONI
MOACIR PEREIRA SALGADO
PAULO ROCHA DA SILVA
JOAO BARBOSA SANTOS
JOSE PAULO CARREIRA
FERNANDO CAVALCANTI CALIXTO DIAS TANNUS
GASPAR GONCALVES BONTEMPO
CPF / CNPJ
007.272.541-97
084.221.251-53
178.405.116-00
122.099.535-53
125.194.481-72
247.354.691-68
135.211.601-49
280.430.141-91
231.693.200-25
713.835.498-34
248.073.382-34
178.405.116-00
299.133.492-49
07.336.695/0003-98
111.089.756-15
332.773.701-00
462.536.372-15
013.735.011-20
363.780.898-68
231.143.551-53
112.444.376-20
225.990.291-04
748.467.958-53
038.547.826-75
122.584.401-06
Date
2012-04-20 00:00:00.000
2012-04-14 00:00:00.000
2012-03-16 00:00:00.000
2012-05-17 00:00:00.000
2012-01-27 00:00:00.000
2012-01-18 00:00:00.000
2012-04-27 00:00:00.000
2012-05-11 00:00:00.000
2012-01-30 00:00:00.000
2012-02-22 00:00:00.000
2012-05-02 00:00:00.000
2012-02-07 00:00:00.000
2012-02-11 00:00:00.000
2012-01-20 00:00:00.000
2012-01-16 00:00:00.000
2012-02-03 00:00:00.000
2012-05-05 00:00:00.000
2012-01-03 00:00:00.000
2012-04-25 00:00:00.000
2011-12-16 00:00:00.000
2012-04-25 00:00:00.000
2011-12-16 00:00:00.000
2012-03-10 00:00:00.000
2012-03-21 00:00:00.000
2012-03-15 00:00:00.000
Municipality
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
OURILANDIA DO NORTE
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
CUMARU DO NORTE
TUCUMA
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
XINGUARA
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
OURILANDIA DO NORTE
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
SAO FELIX DO XINGU
Property's
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
PA
ok
(d)
LAR/LAU/
LAPR
CAR
a)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
(n)
ok
(n)
ok
ok
(n)
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
(r)
ok
ok
(r)
ok
ok
ok
ok
(p)
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
(p)
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
(p)
ok
b)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
2.
c)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
a)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
3.
a)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
4.
a)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
5.
a)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
b)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
6.
c)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
d)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
a)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
Cattle
breeder’s
declaration
Last monitoring
before purchase
Monitoring result
Reason
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
4/18/12
4/10/12
2/9/12
5/17/12
1/4/12
12/13/11
4/16/12
5/8/12
1/6/12
2/20/12
4/17/12
2/3/12
2/2/12
1/16/12
1/9/12
1/6/12
2/24/12
1/2/12
4/25/12
12/8/11
4/23/12
12/9/11
2/23/12
3/9/12
2/27/12
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
Period between
monitoring and
purchase
Note
2 days
4 days
36 days
0 day
23 days
36 days
11 days
3 days
24 days
2 days
15 days
4 days
9 days
4 days
7 days
28 days
71 days
(t)
1 day
0 day
8 days
2 days
7 days
16 days
12 days
17 days
-
In the state of Pará, only CAR is mandatory. There are no records for LAR.
Failure to identify the CAR on the website of the Environment Department, however, the physical document was provided.
The monitoring occurred 71 days before the purchase date, however, according to the certificate issued by APOIO Consultoria on August 30, 2012, a monitoring was conducted after the purchase and the property was then classified as "ELIGIBLE".
Not applicable.
30
Attachment I – Conducted tests– Vilhena - RO
1.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(l)
(m)
(n)
(o)
(p)
(r)
(t)
ok
N/A
FAZENDA SERRA DOURADA
SITIO NOSSA S APARECIDA
FAZENDA SANTA RITA DE CASSIA
FAZENDA SIRIO I
SITIO CANELA
FAZENDA CAJUEIRO
ESTANCIA NEVES
ESTANCIA DHULLY
SÍTIO PARANÁ
SITIO RN
SITIO SAO JOSE
SITIO BOA SORTE
SITIO 2 NESTOR
FAZENDA MAGALHAES
SITIO IPIRANGA
SITIO VILELA
FAZENDA SÃO PEDRO
SITIO NASCIMENTO
FAZENDA TOCA DA ONCA
FAZENDA NOVA PARA
FAZENDA RANCHO ALEGRE 2
SITIO BOA ESPERANCA
FAZENDA MODELO
FAZENDA FERRARI
SITIO SAGRADO CORACAO DE JESUS
Cattle breeder
ROBSON REINOSO DE PAULA
CARLOS MONTEIRO E LIMA
RUDINEI FLORES MELLO
PAULO SERGIO MARTINS DA SILVA
LUIZ NICCHIO
WILLIAN TANAKA OTA
ADALTO FERREIRA NEVES
JOAO MARIA CORDEIRO DA SILVA
JAIR CONSTANTE DOS SANTOS
ROGERIO LUIZ NICOLA
JOSE FRANCISCO DE ANDRADE
NARCELIO CRISOSTOMO DO NASCIMENTO
NESTOR RODRIGUES DE SOUZA
WILSON JOSE CAHULLA
ARMANDO GENTIL
CARIVALDO VILELA DA COSTA
PEDRO NOGUEIRA
OTILIO NASCIMENTO
FABIO OLTRAMARES
NORBERTO RIBEIRO DE MENDONCA NETO
JEOVA EVANGELISTA SOUZA
ELZELINDA MARIA DA CONCEICAO MIRANDA
ANGELITA ALECCHANDRA RIBEIRO DE ASSIS
DEJAIR FERRARI
ODAIR DA SILVA
CPF / CNPJ
302.413.402-68
551.071.686-04
348.925.592-53
783.445.069-72
528.952.469-04
658.712.002-49
059.381.328-60
305.556.392-15
283.174.919-00
385.495.142-68
369.453.401-63
768.329.962-68
086.208.069-04
710.231.519-87
012.735.749-15
113.528.762-72
077.702.431-49
252.004.456-04
514.403.182-04
020.059.548-29
116.497.809-82
171.161.391-68
592.383.562-20
328.042.297-34
424.445.439-04
Date
2012-03-09 00:00:00.000
2012-03-24 00:00:00.000
2011-12-22 00:00:00.000
2011-12-09 00:00:00.000
2012-02-29 00:00:00.000
2011-12-21 00:00:00.000
2012-04-28 00:00:00.000
2012-04-24 00:00:00.000
2012-04-27 00:00:00.000
2011-12-08 00:00:00.000
2012-01-12 00:00:00.000
2012-04-25 00:00:00.000
2012-03-29 00:00:00.000
2012-04-16 00:00:00.000
2012-04-23 00:00:00.000
2012-01-27 00:00:00.000
2012-02-17 00:00:00.000
2012-03-09 00:00:00.000
2012-05-24 00:00:00.000
2012-02-16 00:00:00.000
2012-01-25 00:00:00.000
2012-01-09 00:00:00.000
2012-04-13 00:00:00.000
2012-01-20 00:00:00.000
2012-05-15 00:00:00.000
Municipality
ESPIGAO D OESTE
CORUMBIARA
ALTO ALEGRE DOS PARICIS
ALTA FLORESTA D OESTE
COLORADO DO OESTE
PIMENTEIRAS DO OESTE
SANTA LUZIA D OESTE
COLORADO DO OESTE
ROLIM DE MOURA
COLORADO DO OESTE
CORUMBIARA
CORUMBIARA
CABIXI
PIMENTA BUENO
CABIXI
CABIXI
CHUPINGUAIA
COLORADO DO OESTE
ALTO ALEGRE DOS PARICIS
CHUPINGUAIA
CASTANHEIRAS
CEREJEIRAS
PRESIDENTE MEDICI
ESPIGAO D OESTE
VILHENA
Property's
State Georeferenced Point
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
RO
ok
CCIR
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(n)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
LAR/LAU/
LAPR
ok
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
CAR
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
a)
(p)
ok
(p)
(r)
ok
(p)
ok
ok
(p)
(p)
ok
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
ok
(p)
(p)
(r)
ok
(p)
ok
(p)
(p)
ok
b)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
2.
c)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
a)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
3.
a)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
4.
a)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
(h)
5.
a)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
b)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
(i)
6.
c)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
d)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
(j)
a)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
(o)
Cattle
breeder’s
declaration
Last monitoring
before purchase
Monitoring result
Reason
Period between
monitoring and
sale
ok
(l)
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
2/20/12
3/13/12
12/2/11
7/30/11
2/13/12
12/19/11
4/26/12
4/18/12
4/17/12
12/1/11
12/28/11
4/16/12
3/29/12
4/16/12
4/16/12
1/24/12
1/9/12
2/16/12
4/18/12
2/10/12
1/9/12
12/30/11
4/11/12
1/16/12
4/18/12
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
matching perimeter
18 days
11 days
20 days
132 days
16 days
2 days
2 days
6 days
10 days
7 days
15 days
9 days
0 days
0 days
7 days
3 days
39 days
22 days
36 days
6 days
16 days
10 days
2 days
4 days
27 days
Note
(t)
-
In the state of Rondônia, CAR and LAR are not yet mandatory.
There is no control and proof of cattle’s growing and development. Accordingly, traceability will be limited to the analyses.
There is no control and monitoring to indirect suppliers, therefore the audit’s analysis is limited.
There are divergent information in the CCIR, given that the data of the property stated in the document differ from the data input in the ERP system. Only the holder’s data match.
The monitoring occurred 132 days before the purchase date, however, according to the certificate issued by APOIO Consultoria on November 12, 2012, a monitoring was conducted after the purchase and the property was then classified as "ELIGIBLE".
Not applicable.
31
Attachment II – Monitoring test for purchase
Unit code
Unit
Farm
Code
Farm
State Registration
CNPJ/CEI (Corporate Tax ID)
Cattle breeder
Issue date
Reason
Period between
monitoring and purchase
187
187
GDP
PIB
277714
119680
SITIO BELA VISTA
FAZENDA FURNAS
0000000152951-0
1214624
733.984.202-06
070.748.321-20
ADEMIR LOURENCO COELHO
JOAQUIM DE SOUZA GOMES
56
VHA
324559
FAZ. BOI GORDO II
2867508
348.925.592-53
RUDINEI FLORES MELLO
2012-03-23 00:00:00.000
1/14/11
56
159
159
181
181
329
329
60
VHA
AFT
AFT
MRB
MRB
MTP
MTP
RBO
121817
575622
1569480
639043
1015625
435969
660773
1658523
SITIO SANTA ROSA
FAZ.RANCHARIA
ESTANCIA ALVORADA
FAZENDA SAO FRANCISCO
FAZENDA FABISA
SITIO SAO JOAO
FAZENDA VENANCIO
FAZ FONTE AZUL
1335961
13.382.026-2
NULL
NULL
15.116.849-0
13.351.707-1
13.298.197-1
NULL
385.520.352-00
025.622.661-02
949.554.411-49
127.138.994-00
05.814.264/0002-83
467.991.259-68
042.736.676-30
611.486.522-72
JORCELINO RODRIGUES DA SILVA
ALEXANDRE LAVEZO NETO
GILSON ALVES MARTINS
FRANCISCO ADAILTON DIAS DE SA
FAZENDAS BOPIL KING RANCHO LTDA
JOAO ALVES MALAQUIAS
HELIO VENANCIO DE OLIVEIRA
ROSA CRISTINA SAMPAIO
2012-01-27 00:00:00.000
2012-04-19 00:00:00.000
2012-01-09 00:00:00.000
2011-12-23 00:00:00.000
2012-01-24 00:00:00.000
2012-02-06 00:00:00.000
2012-01-25 00:00:00.000
2012-03-27 00:00:00.000
11/17/11
4/18/12
None
11/25/10
1/20/12
None
None
None
60
185
185
RBO
RED
RED
369885
595456
592468
COLONIA SANTA LUCIA
FAZENDA NOSSA SENHORA DO CARMO
FAZENDA JAGUARI
NULL
15.115347-7
15.269.919-8
580.593.182-68
011.260.401-34
29.362.985/0002-68
ELADIO SANTIAGO DA SILVA
DIVINO DA SILVA MARQUEZ
SOCIEDADE AGROPECUARIA IMACULADA CONCEICAO LTDA
2012-01-16 00:00:00.000
2011-12-21 00:00:00.000
2012-02-23 00:00:00.000
11/20/10
12/6/12
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
2/20/12
ELIGIBLE
186
186
TCM
TCM
652927
1072689
FAZENDA MATAO
FAZENDA BAIXADAO
462.536.372-15
104.212.543-00
MAYRA TRINDADE GOMES FERREIRA
ONOFRE LOURENCO DA CUNHA
2012-05-05 00:00:00.000
2012-02-08 00:00:00.000
5/5/12
ELIGIBLE
2/7/12
ELIGIBLE
CAR
NULL
NULL
2012-04-03 00:00:00.000
2012-01-24 00:00:00.000
Last monitoring before
purchase
Classification
Note
12/6/11
ELIGIBLE
matching perimeter
119 days
(a)
11/20/10
ELIGIBLE
-
430 days
(b)
ELIGIBLE
matching perimeter
434 days
(c)
ELIGIBLE
ALERT
ELIGIBLE
ELIGIBLE
-
matching perimeter
CAR
CAR
-
71 days
1 day
393 days
4 days
-
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
matching perimeter
CAR
422 days
15 days
(j)
-
CAR
3 days
-
matching perimeter
0 days
-
43 days
-
(a) The monitoring occurred 119 days before purchase, however, according to the certificate issued by APOIO Consultoria on April 18, 2012 a monitoring was conducted after the purchase and the property was then classified as “ELIGIBLE”.
(b) The monitoring occurred 430 days before purchase, however, according to the certificate issued by APOIO Consultoria on November 8, 2012 a monitoring was conducted after the purchase and the property was then classified as “ALERT”.
(c) The monitoring occurred 434 days before purchase, however, according to the certificate issued by APOIO Consultoria on November 12, 2012 a monitoring was conducted after the purchase and the property was then classified as “ELIGIBLE”.
(d) The monitoring occurred 71 days before purchase, however, according to the certificate issued by APOIO Consultoria on April 18, 2012 a monitoring was conducted after the purchase and the property was then classified as “ELIGIBLE”.
(e) There was no monitoring previous to the purchase date, however, as the certificated issue by Consulting APOIO on April 16, 2012 was made the monitoring subsequent sale and the property, so it was classified by “ALERT”.
(f) The monitoring occurred 393 days before purchase, however, according to the certificate issued by APOIO Consultoria on January 25, 2012 a monitoring was conducted after the purchase and the property was then classified as “ELIGIBLE”.
(g) There was no monitoring previous to the purchase date, however, as the certificated issue by Consulting APOIO on April 18, 2012 was made the monitoring subsequent sale and the property, so it was classified by “ALERT”.
(h) There was no monitoring previous to the purchase date, however, as the certificated issue by Consulting APOIO on April 18, 2012 was made the monitoring subsequent sale and the property, so it was classified by “ALERT”.
(i) There was no monitoring previous to the purchase date, however, as the certificated issue by Consulting APOIO on April 16, 2012 was made the monitoring subsequent sale and the property, so it was classified by “ALERT”.
(j) The monitoring occurred 422 days before purchase, however, according to the certificate issued by APOIO Consultoria on April 17, 2012 a monitoring was conducted after the purchase and the property was then classified as “ALERT”.
32
Attachment III - Test to check IBAMA embargos - Suppliers of Rio Branco, Alta Floresta, Matupá, Marabá, Tucumã and Redenção
Ibama No.
1853
1854
493
504
577
627
877
979
980
921
922
1054
TAD No.
Area (hectare)
7497 432
555513 21,7
556328
9667 49
153434 40
6969 88
376476 422
7496 68
391830 967,69
362165 19,546
362152 2829,5
183207 68,134
Al No.
569629
628144
629210
568893
525812
569251
525452
569631
23898
585051
687840
388837
Cattle breeder's name
MARCOS CARVALHO COSTA JUNIOR
FRANCISCO FLORENCIO MAIA
FRANCISCO MÁRCIO SOARES
GILMAR BONFIM GOMES
IZIDIO REIS
JULIO CEZAR MORAIS NANTES
ONOFRE LOURENÇO DA CUNHA
CPF or CNPJ
310.387.601-78
310.387.601-78
644.000.502-20
796.736.781-20
060.780.218-93
140.075.411-91
Property location
FAZENDA NAÍMECOORD. S 09°34'54" W 65°43'17"
BR 364, KM 3, LINHA 1, KM 07.COORD. S 09°35`50,6¿ W
65°41`52,7¿
PA PLVIR COL CAMPO VERDE
AC 40, KM 58, RAMAL KM 13,FAZENDA IZIDORO.\nCOORD. S
10°26`01` W 67°26`04¿/S 10°25`13¿ W 67°25`34¿
COLONIA SÃO ROQUE-XAPURI-AC
FAZ. URICURIZAL.\nCOORD. S 10°57`15¿ W 69°09`49
181.558.041-00
310.387.601-78
310.387.601-78
RO
RO
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
COORD. S 09°26'57' W 65°45'01"
BR 364 - KM 42 - RAMAL DO JEQUITIBÁ.
310.387.601-78
FAZENDA MARMELO-LABREA/AM S-09º27´49,7 E W65º46´18,4.
310.387.601-78
FAZENDA MARMELO-VISTA ALEGRE DO ABUNÃ-PORTO
VELHO/RO.S-09º30´43,7 E W- 65º44´43,7.
104.212.543-00
State
FAZENDA LAGOA
AC
AC
AM
AM
TO
Municipality
PORTO VELHO
PORTO VELHO
EPITACIOLANDIA
PLACIDO DE CASTRO
XAPURI
BRASILEIA
XAPURI
RIO BRANCO
RIO BRANCO
MANICORE
LABREA
COLINAS DO TOCANTINS
Others Units Biome
Is it the property that
supplied for JBS?
Violation
Data of inclusion in the list
It was not possible to
check the judgment
date of the Notice of
violation
Deforesting or destructing other forms of vegetation,
without the authorization of Ibama, in areas in which
deforestation is allowed, that is: 20% in the forest and 65%
in the Brazilian savanna (Region of Legal Amazon).
10/16/08
310.387.601-78
No
Not judged
Destroying, deforesting, damaging forests or any other kind
of native vegetation or native species planted, object of
special preservation, in area of legal reserve, conservation
easement, public or private domain, not liable to
authorization
08/08/09
310.387.601-78
No
Not judged
authorization
07/17/12
644.000.502-20
No
Not judged
Destroying or damaging forests or any other kind of native
vegetation, in special preservation areas according to
Article 225 of Brazilian Constitution/1988, (Legal Amazon
Region) Article 50 of Law No. 9.605/98 and article 37 of
Decree No. 3.179/99.
02/28/08
796.736.781-20
No
Not judged
Deforesting or destroying other kinds of vegetation, in
disagreement with the authorization provided by Ibama.
11/08/2007
060.780.218-93
No
Not judged
03/27/08
140.075.411-91
No
Not judged
03/19/08
181.558.041-00
No
Not judged
02/27/09
Flora violation not classified.
02/08/2010
04/25/07
310.387.601-78
310.387.601-78
No
No
Not judged
Destroying or damaging forests, cutting down trees or other
kinds of natural vegetation, in area of permanent
preservation or whose species is specially protected,
without the authorization of the competent body or in
disagreement with the authorization obtained.
07/07/11
310.387.601-78
No
Not judged
Preventing or difficulting the natural regeneration of forests
or other kinds of native vegetation.
04/14/11
310.387.601-78
No
Destroying (damaging, deforesting) vegetation located in
legal reserve areas (when referring to areas of Brazilian
savanna in the Legal Amazon).
08/30/06
104.212.543-00
No
Judgment
07/23/12
33
Attachment III - Test to check IBAMA embargos - Suppliers of Pimenta Bueno
Ibama No.
1171
1172
1173
TAD No.
Area (hectare)
440462 2,5
564532 160
440898
Al No.
553667
465139
555415
IVO NARCISO CASSOL
IVO NARCISO CASSOL
IVO NARCISO CASSOL
CPF or CNPJ
304.766.409-97
Property location
COORD. 13º2`36.3¿S 62º14`7.6¿W
supplied for JBS?
Pimenta embargo
Destroying (damaging, deforesting) forests or other forms
of vegetation considered of permanent preservation (areas
11/12/2007 of article 2 of Law 4.771/65)
04/26/07
304.766.409-97
No
03/03/09
304.766.409-97
No
PORTO VELHO
Not judged
304.766.409-97
RO
ALTA FLORESTA D'OESTE
04/14/09
02/01/2008
304.766.409-97
No
RO
PORTO VELHO
Not judged
06/12/2009
304.766.409-97
No
RO
COSTA MARQUES
Not judged
08/025/08
140.507.491-49
No
Not judged
Destroying (deforesting, damaging) forest cover consisting
of forest phytophysiognomy (Legal Amazon)
08/25/08
140.507.491-49
No
03/19/12
600.209.709-00
Block on the date of the
slaughter
676172
IVO NARCISO CASSOL
304.766.409-97
1208
564619 149
556365
JAIR ROBERTO SIMONATO
140.507.491-49
COORD. GEOG. LAT. 12º04`24,3¿ S LONG. 64º10`59,1¿\n
12º04`10,6¿ S LONG. 64º08`40,3¿
Violation
RO
471005 352
250655
Judgment
LAT: 13°01`35,8¿ E LONG:062°12`24,6¿\nLAT: 13°01`37,9¿
E LONG:062º12`18,1¿
304.766.409-97
1174
564618
RO
Municipality
authorization
ROLIM DE MOURA DO GUAPORÉ, ALTA FLORESTA DO
OESTE/RO.
1209
State
140.507.491-49
12° 04` 38,0¿S - 064° 09` 11,0¿ W
RO
COSTA MARQUES
1848
618017
702135
MARCOS ALEXANDRE TEODORO DE OLIVEIRA E
OUTROS
600.209.709-00
MARGEM DIREITA DO RIO MEQUENS COORD. 13 05 10 S 62 22
18 W
RO
CACOAL
Not judged
Building, renovating, expanding, installing or operateing
businesses, potentially polluting or users of natural
resources works or services, without license or
authorization from the competent environmental bodies, at
odds with the license obtained
2081
618506 130
701162
020.059.548-29
FAZENDA UNIÃO, COORD EM ANEXO
RO
CHUPINGUAIA
Not judged
Preventing or difficulting the natural regeneration of
forests or other kinds of native vegetation.
04/25/11
020.059.548-29
No
Not judged
Destroying (deforesting, damaging) forests located in legal
reserve areas (forests) (Legal Amazon)
20/11/08
025.062.461-34
No
2128
468151 27,5
555744
OSSUALDO GONÇALVES BARBOSA
025.062.461-34
LINHA 50, KM 05 FAZENDA TECHAGAÚ - SÃO FELIPE/RO.
RO
SAO FELIPE D'OESTE
34
Attachment III - Test to check IBAMA embargos - Suppliers of Vilhena
Ibama No.
360
361
409
410
840
1042
1043
1171
1172
1173
TAD No.Area (hectare) Al No.
471001
619069 257,96
443159 239,492
443162 441,457
470735 7,17
470705 284
290129 7,5
440462 2,5
564532 160
440898
555396
708197
499346
499349
677186
677165
464453
553667
465139
555415
ARMANDO FERNANDO MATOS
ARMANDO FERNANDO MATOS
BRAULINO BASILIO MAIA FILHO
BRAULINO BASILIO MAIA FILHO
FABIO ANTONIO DE FARIA
GUSTAVO CARVALHO
GUSTAVO CARVALHO
IVO NARCISO CASSOL
IVO NARCISO CASSOL
IVO NARCISO CASSOL
CPF or CNPJ
013.423.558-49
013.423.558-49
013.162.738-49
Property location
LOTES 138/A E 138/B, GLEBA CORUMBIARA,
CHUPINGUAIA/RO.
FAZENDA PRIMAVERA, LT 99, SETOR 06, E LT 09 SETOR 10,
GLRBA CORUMBIARA, CHUPINGUAIA
FAZENDA IVYPORÃ E FAZENDA IUYPITÃ.
013.162.738-49
LINHA 14 - ALTO ALEGRE DOS PARECIS.
Facilities 13º2`36.3¿S 62º14`7.6¿W
304.766.409-97
2682
603
440748 69
391403 74,726
554096
27805
ZÉLIO JOSÉ ROSO
IZAIAS DA ROSA DUTRA
No
Not judged
06/14/06
013.162.738-49
No
Not judged
06/14/06
013.162.738-49
No
Not judged
Destroying, deforesting, damaging forests or any other forms
authorization
12/31/09
211.849.766-00
No
Not judged
Destroying or damaging forests or any other kind of
vegetation, in special preservation areas according to Article
225 of Brazilian Constitution/1988, (Legal Amazon Region)
Article 50 of Law No. 9.605/98 and article 37 of Decree No.
3.179/99.
11/19/08
073.919.279-53
No
Not judged
Making use of fire in agropastoral areas without the
authorization of the competent body or in disagreement with
the authorization obtained
11/20/08
073.919.279-53
No
12/11/07
Destroying (damaging, deforesting) forests or other forms of
vegetation considered of permanent preservation (areas of
article 2 of Law 4.771/65)
04/26/07
304.766.409-97
No
authorization
03/03/09
304.766.409-97
No
304.766.409-97
No
RO
RO
RO
PORTO VELHO
CORUMBIARA
CORUMBIARA
Not judged
Not judged
Not judged
06/12/2009
01/19/11
01/19/11
304.766.409-97
087.220.647-53
087.220.647-53
No
No
No
RO
COSTA MARQUES
Not judged
08/25/08
140.507.491-49
No
Not judged
Destroying (deforesting, damaging) forest cover consisting of
forest phytophysiognomy (Legal Amazon)
08/25/08
140.507.491-49
No
Not judged
Preventing or difficulting the natural regeneration of forests
or other kinds of native vegetation.
04/25/11
020.059.548-29
No
Not judged
11/20/08
025.062.461-34
No
Making use of fire in any kind of vegetation (except woods
and forests) without the authorization and/or noncompliance with the precautions recommended in controlled
burning (agropastoral areas).
02/01/2007
07/28/08
213.005.939-20
513.429.879-34
No
No
Facilities GEOG. LAT: 12º04`24,3¿ S LONG. 64º10`59,1¿\n
12º04`10,6¿ S LONG. 64º08`40,3¿
OSSUALDO GONÇALVES BARBOSA
013.423.558-49
02/01/2008
140.507.491-49
555744
09/16/11
468151 27,5
SAO FELIPE D'OESTE
Not judged
04/14/09
556365
2128
SAO FELIPE D'OESTE
No
564619 149
VILHENA
013.423.558-49
RO
1208
701162
PIMENTEIRAS DO OESTE
06/01/2009
authorization
304.766.409-97
304.766.409-97
087.220.647-53
087.220.647-53
618506 130
CEREJEIRAS
Not judged
Destroying or damaging forests, cutting trees or any other
forms of natural vegetation, in areas of permanent
preservation or whose species is specially protected, without
authorization from the competent body or at odds with the
license obtained
Vilhena embargo
Not judged
IVO NARCISO CASSOL
JAIR CORREIA
JAIR CORREIA
2081
VILHENA
PORTO VELHO
676172
250089
249715
RO
CHUPINGUAIA
supplied for JBS?
Violation
Judgment
RO
471005 352
75883
174364
250655
RO
Municipality
LAT: 13°01`35,8¿ E LONG:062°12`24,6¿\nLAT: 13°01`37,9¿
E LONG:062º12`18,1¿
1174
1201
1202
564618
RO
RO
ROLIM DE MOURA DO GUAPORÉ, ALTA FLORESTA DO
OESTE/RO.
FAZENDA 3 IRMAOS - SETOR 11 - GL CORUMBIARA
FAZENDA 3 IRMAOS PARTE LOTE 4 - GLEBA CORUMBIARA
1209
RO
RO
073.919.279-53
304.766.409-97
RO
RO
211.849.766-00
073.919.279-53
State
140.507.491-49
020.059.548-29
025.062.461-34
213.005.939-20
513.429.879-34
12° 04` 38,0¿S - 064° 09` 11,0¿ W
FAZENDA UNIÃO, COORD EM ANEXO
LINHA 50, KM 05 FAZENDA TECHAGAÚ - SÃO FELIPE/RO.
LINHAS 95 A 100 - ZONA RURAL, PARECIS/RO.
BR 230, RAMAL MARAVILHA,KM 19
RO
RO
RO
RO
AM
COSTA MARQUES
CHUPINGUAIA
SAO FELIPE D'OESTE
VILHENA
MANICORE
04/14/08
08/13/10
35
Attachment III – Test to check property owners listed in the Registry of Employers' disclosed by MTE – Suppliers of Rio Branco
Leão José Albuquerque Ferreira
CPF or CNPJ
Property location
State
Inclusion in MTE Employers’ Registry
Date of JBS last purchase
890.332.055-72
Fazenda Pica-Pau - Rodovia BR-364, Ramal Aspoty, Linha 01, km 35, Vista
Alegre do Abunã, Porto Velho
RO
jul/12
04/28/2012
36
Attachment IV – Origin of the information that composes the monitoring data
bank
Official data
Shapefile of Brazilian territory, Geopolitical State Divisions
Source: IBGE - www.ibge.gov.br
Shapefile of Amazon Biome
Source: MMA - www.mma.gov.br
Shapefile of Conservation Unit
Source: MMA - www.mma.gov.br
Shapefile of Brazilian Indigenous Lands
Source: FUNAI - www.funai.gov.br
Satellite images
Source: INPE - www.inpe.br
Shapefile PRODES/INPE
Shapefile DETER/INPE
Shapefile of CAR-PA
Source: Sema-PA / SimLam - www.sema.pa.gov.br
Shapefile of LAR
Source: Sema-PA / SimLam - www.sema.pa.gov.br
Shapefile of the CAR-MT
Source: Sema-MT / SimLam - www.sema.mt.gov.br
Shapefile of LAU -MT
Source: Sema-MT / SimLam - www.sema.mt.gov.br
37
Shapefile of agrarian lots, Rondônia (Land Use Legislation and Regularization,
decades of 70 and 80)
Source: SEDAM-RO - www.sedam.ro.gov.br
Non-official data
Coordinates (decimal degrees) of the shipment loading pens of JBS suppliers
Source: JBS – S.A.
Perimeters of properties belonging to JBS suppliers for digitalization
(enrollment, deeds, topographic surveys, description memoranda, and other)
Source: JBS – S.A.
Non-official data are received at APOIO Consultoria, for treatment and analysis
through the following e-mails:
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Glossary
SHAPEFILE – The Esri Shapefile or simply shapefile is a popular file format
containing geospatial data in vector format used by Geographic Information
Systems, also known as SIG. Spatial Shapefiles describe geometries: points,
lines and polygons. Among other things, these geometries can represent
wells, rivers, lakes, roads etc. Each item may have attributes that describe
it, for example: Name, temperature, depth, area or the attributes that
better describe the user’s need.
IBGE (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics);
MMA (Ministry of Environment);
FUNAI (Brazilian Indian Foundation);
INPE (National Institute for Space Research);
PRODES (Legal Amazon Deforestation Monitoring Project);
DETER (Real-Time Deforestation Detection in Amazon);
CAR-PA (Rural Environmental Register) (State of Para);
LAR (Rural Environmental License) (State of Pará);
CAR-MT (Rural Environmental Register) (State of Mato Grosso);
LAU – (Single Environmental License) (State of Mato Grosso);
SEMA – (State Department of the Environment);
SIMLAM (Integrated Environmental Monitoring and Licensing System);
SEDAM (State Secretariat for Environmental Development);
38
Declaration
Name: ________________________________________________________
ID No.: __________________________ Issuing agency: ________________
Individual Tax ID No.:___________________________
Property: __________________________________________________
Municipality: ______________________________________ State: _________
Individual/Corporate Tax ID No.: _____________________________________
State Registration Number: _________________________________________
I hereby declare for all intents and purposes of the law that I am not and was not a
party to any civil and/or criminal legal actions resulting in a sentence of conviction in a
lower court, related to the areas of:
(i) Illegal deforestation;
(ii) Illegal occupation of government or indigenous lands;
(iii) Land conflicts (Area whose ownership or possession is disputed through violent
means)
(iv) Slave-like work conditions, discrimination because of race or gender and child
labor.
I also declare that if any of the situations listed above develop after the present date, I
promise to immediately inform JBS S.A.
Place and date
Name of the owner or legal representative

(2852i-12 Relatório_JBS_Bioma_v18 TX1)

Transcrição

Documentos relacionados

Conteúdo Programático

2015 Cup of Excellence – Pulped Naturals – 9th Place

Birds, Montane forest, State of Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil

JULY 4 – D2 arr BELEM - Pacific Bonanza Society

Livro de AtividAdes Activities Book

ISO 14001:2004

Guarantee Agreement

Magda Chambriard_BRATECC2016

A comparison of three cattle temperament assessment

A new species of Phasmahyla Cruz, 1990 (Anura: Hylidae) from the

Wind energy in Vietnam