teoria das relações internacionais

Centro Sócio-Econômico
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Relações Internacionais
Campus Universitário Reitor João David Ferreira Lima – Trindade
CEP 88040-900 - Florianópolis - Santa Catarina - Brasil | www.ppgri.ufsc.br |[email protected]
+ 55 (48) 3721-6789 Fax: + 55 (48) 3721-6771
MESTRADO EM RELAÇÕES INTERNACIONAIS
REI410002 - TEORIA DAS RELAÇÕES INTERNACIONAIS
Semestre 2011-1, 4ª feiras, 14.00 às 18.00 hs
Profa. Dra. Mónica Salomón
[email protected]
4 créditos
OBJETIVOS
-Familiarizar aos estudantes com as principais correntes teóricas atuais das Relações
Internacionais desde uma perspectiva crítica e contrária a qualquer dogmatismo.
-Estimular a reflexão sobre o que significa teorizar em relações internacionais e em
ciências sociais em geral.
EMENTA
Correntes principais da teoria das Relações Internacionais: realismo e liberalismo. A
Escola Inglesa.
Reformulação atual das correntes principais: neo-realismo e
neoliberalismo institucional. A teoria liberal atual. Construtivismo. Teoria crítica neogramsciana. Teoria crítica normativa. Pós-modernismos e feminismos. A contribuição
da Sociologia Histórica.
AVALIAÇÃO
25 % da nota: participação nas discussões e apresentação de leituras
25 %: elaboração de cinco resenhas durante o curso. Cada resenha tratará das leituras
obrigatórias estabelecidas para a aula e, opcionalmente, das assinaladas para
apresentações individuais. Tamanho: de quatro a cinco páginas de 30 linhas. As
resenhas deverão ser apresentadas ao começo da aula em que serão discutidos os textos.
25 %: prova presencial sobre os conteúdos da primeira parte do curso.
25 %: prova não presencial sobre os conteúdos da segunda parte do curso.
ORGANIZAÇÃO DO CURSO
Na primeira parte de cada aula serão discutidas por toda a turma as leituras obrigatórias
que figuram no programa. Cada aluno (independentemente de estar ou não apresentando
uma resenha nessa aula) deverá trazer uma lista dos pontos considerados como mais
relevantes em cada leitura e estar preparado para fazer uma breve apresentação dos
textos. Na segunda parte da aula, um aluno previamente designado apresentará
criticamente uma leitura complementar, indicada no programa com um asterisco, e
levantará questões para discutir entre todos.
30/3
Apresentação. As teorias das Relações Internacionais: instruções de uso.
6/4
Os debates teóricos na trajetória disciplinar das RI. A interação entre teoria e
prática política.
Schmidt, Brian. “Lessons from the Past: Reassessing the Interdisciplinary History of
International Relations”, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 42, pp. 433-459, 1998.
Guzzini, Francesco. “Realism – the USAmerican paradigm”, in: Guzzini, F. “The
Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. Realism in International Relations/International
Political Economy”, EUI Working Papers in Political and Social Sciences No. 92/20,
Florence: European University Institute, 1992, pp. 25-33 e 140-146.
Waever, Ole. “The Sociology of a not so International Discipline: American and
European Developments in International Relations”. International Organization, vol.
52, no. 4, 1998, pp. 687-727.
Brown, Chris “The Future of the Discipline?” International Relations, vol. 21, no. 3,
2007/2008, pp. 347-350.
* Nye, Joseph S. “International Relations: the Relevance of Theory to Practice”, in:
Reus Smith, Christian e Snidal, Duncan. The Oxford Handbook of International
Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 648-660.
13/4
O realismos na atualidade
Waltz, Kenneth N. “Structural Realism after the Cold War”. International Security, vol.
25, nº 1, 2000, pp. 5-41.
Brooks, Stephen. “Dueling Realisms", International Organization, vol. 51, no. 3, 1997,
pp. 445-477.
Rose, Gideon “Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy”. World Politics, vol.
51, no. 1, oct. 1998 pp. 144-172.
* Mearsheimer, John J. “Back to the Future. Instability in Europe After the Cold War”.
International Security, vol. 15, no. 1, 1990, pp. 5-56.
20/4
A contribuição e a recuperação da Escola Inglesa
Little, Richard. “The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International
Relations”. European Journal of International Relations, vol. 6, no. 3, 2000, pp. 395422.
Buzan, Barry. From international to World society? English school theory and the
social structure of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 2762.
Finnemore, Martha. “Exporting the English School”, Review of International Studies,
vol. 27 no 3, 2001, pp. 509-513.
* Yongjin Zhang, “The English School in China: a travelogue of ideas and their
diffusion”, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 9, no 1, 2003, pp. 87-114.
27/4
Da interdependência ao institucionalismo
Keohane, Robert O. e Nye, Joseph S. “Afterword”, in: Keohane, R. O. y Nye, J. S.
Power and Interdependence, 3a ed. New York: Longman, 2001, pp. 267-287.
Keohane, Robert O. e Nye, Joseph S. “Power, Interdependence, and Globalism”, in:
Keohane, R. O. y Nye, J. S. Power and Interdependence, 3a ed. New York: Longman,
2001, pp. 228-263.
Keohane, Robert e Martin, Lisa. “The promise of Institutionalist Theory”. International
Security, vol. 20, nº 1, 1995, pp. 39-51.
Martin, Lisa L. e Simmons, Beth A. “Theories and Empirical Studies of International
Institutions”, International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4, 1998, pp. 729-757.
* Richardson, James L. “The Ethics of Neoliberal Institutionalism”, in: Reus Smith,
Christian e Snidal, Duncan. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 222-233.
4/5
Outras contribuições liberais
Rosenau, James N. “Governance, order, and change in world politics”. Rosenau, James
e Czempiel, Ernst-Otto (eds.). Governance without Government: Order and Change in
World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 1-29.
Dingwerth, Klaus e Pattberg, Philipp. “Global Governance as a Perspective on World
Politics”. Global Governance, vol. 12, nº 2, 2006, pp. 185-203.
Moravcsik, Andrew, “The New Liberalism”, in: Reus Smith, Christian e Snidal,
Duncan. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 2008, pp. 235-254.
* Slaughter, Anne Marie. A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press,
2008, pp. 8-35.
11/5
Prova
18/5
Construtivismo
Hurd, Ian.”Constructivism”, in: Reus Smith, Christian e Snidal, Duncan. The Oxford
Handbook of International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Finnemore, M. e Sikking, K., “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,
International Organization, vol. 52, no 4, 1998, pp. 887-917.
Lutz, Ellen e Sikkink, Katherine “The Justice Cascade: The Evolution and Impact of
Foreign Human Rights Trials in Latin America”, Chicago Journal of International Law,
no. 2: 1, 2001, pp. 1-33.
Onuf, Nicholas e Klink, Frank F. "Anarchy, Authority, Rule", International Studies
Quarterly, vol. 33, 1989, pp. 149-174.
* Fearon, James e Wendt, Alexander. “Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical
View”. In: Handbook of International Relations, editado por Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas
Risse y Beth A. Simmons. Londres: Sage, 2002, pp. 52-72.
25/5
Teoría crítica neo-gramsciana
Germain, Randall D. e Kenny, Michael. “Engaging Gramsci: international relations
theory and the new Gramscians”, Review of International Studies, vol. 24, 1998, pp. 321.
Cox, Robert. “Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: an Essay in method”,
in: Gill, Stephen (ed.), Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 49-66.
Holman, Otto. “Internationalisation and democratization: Southern Europe, Latin
America and the world economic crisis”, in: Gill, Stephen (ed.), Gramsci, Historical
Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1993, pp. 213-236.
* Murphy, Craig “The promise of critical IR, partially kept”, Review of International
Studies, vol. 33, 2007, pp. 117-133.
1/6
Teoría crítica normativa, outras teorías normativas
Linklater, A. The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the posWesphalian era. Columbia: University of South Carolina, 1998, pp. 14-66.
Nardin, Terry. “International ethics”, in: Reus Smith, Christian e Snidal, Duncan. The
Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008,
pp. 594-611.
Devetak, Richard e Higgott, Richard. “Justice unbound? Globalization, states and the
transformation of the social bond”. International Affairs, vol. 75, no 3, 1999, pp. 483498.
* Pogge, Thomas, “World Poverty and Human Rights”, Ethics & International Affairs,
vol. 19, no. 1, 2005, pp. 1-7.
8/6
Pós-modernismos
Ashley, Richard K. e Walker, R. B. J. “Introduction. Speaking the Language of Exile:
Dissidence in International Studies”, Special Issue of International Studies Quarterly
vol. 34, no. 3, 1990, pp. 259-268.
Ashley, Richard K. e Walker, R.B.J. “Conclusion: Reading Dissidence/Writing the
Discipline: Crisis and the Question of Sovereignty in International Studies”, Special
Issue of International Studies Quarterly vol. 34, no. 3, 1990, pp. 367-416.
Doty, Roxanne Lynn. “Foreign Policy as Social Construction: a Post-Positivist Analysis
of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines”, International Studies Quarterly,
vol. 37, 1993, pp. 297-320.
15/6
Género e Relações Internacionais
Hudson, Valerie e.a. “The Heart of the Matter: The Security of Women and the Security
of States”, International Security, vol. 33,no.3, 2008/2009, pp. 7-45,
Simmons, Beth. “Women and International Institutions: the Effect of the Women’s
Convention on Female Education”, in: Non-State Actors and World Politics, in: Power,
Interdependence and Non-State Actors in World Politics. Princeton: Princeton
University Press, 2009, pp. 108-125.
Sylvester, Christine. Feminist theory and international relations in a postmodern era.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 1-29 e 209-226.
* Steans, Jill, “Debating women’s human rights as a universal feminist project:
defending women’s human rights as a political tool”, Review of International Studies,
vol. 33, 2007, pp. 11-27.
22/6
Sociologia histórica e Relações Internacionais
Tilly, Charles. “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime”, in: Evans, Peter,
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich e Skocpol, Theda, Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1985, PP. 169-187.
Tilly, Charles. Coerção, capital e estados europeus. São Paulo, Edusp, 1996, PP. 273316.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. “The inter-state structure of the modern world-system”, in:
Smith, Steve, :Booth, Ken e Zalewski, Marysia (eds.), International theory: positivism
and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 87-107.
* Halliday, Fred. “For an International Sociology”, in: Hobden, Stephen e Hobsen, John
M. Historical Sociology of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 2002 pp. 244-264.
29/6
A teoria das Relações Internacionais e os desafios do futuro
Waever, Olé. “Still a Discipline After All These Debates?” in: Dunne, Tim, Kurki,
Milja e Smith, Steve (eds.). International Relations Theories. Discipline and Diversity.
2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 297-318.
Keohane, Robert O. “Big Questions in the study of World Politics”, in: Reus Smith,
Christian e Snidal, Duncan. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 708-716.
Smith, Steve. “Six Wishes for a More Relevant Discipline of International Relations”,
in: Reus Smith, Christian e Snidal, Duncan. The Oxford Handbook of International
Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 725-732.