For example Evolution: Science learning through - AECC-BIO
Transcrição
For example Evolution: Science learning through - AECC-BIO
For example Evolution: Science learning through participatory research in life science projects Franz Radits, Austrian Educational Competence Center Biology (University of Vienna) Franz Rauch, Institute of Instructional and School Development (University of Klagenfurt) Barbara Strametz, Austrian Educational Competence Center Biology (University of Vienna) Problem: In many European countries the science system attempts, via its ministries and public and private funds, to improve its relationship to the public sector through “collaborations” with educational partners. Occasionally it is also only concerned with encouraging young talent by socialization, primarily, into natural science laboratories. Goals and concepts of these collaborations differ: This paper focuses on initiatives promoting students’ participation in real professional research projects on very specific topics such as the evolution of sexually deceptive orchids and hymenopterans. The question as to how the research concept changes with children’s participation in academic research projects needs to be clarified, as well as the nature of the students’ specific learning processes during participation (EDELSON, D.C. 1998; DUSCHL & GRANDY 2008). The search for appropriate structures for cross-institutional collaboration between two contrary social systems such as school and university has to be considered when collaboration should be more than a single event. (LOIBL, M. C. 2005, RADITS 2005; GERLOFF-GASSER, JANN 2007) Rational: This paper presents and discusses the working model of the project “Kids Participation in Educational Research” (KiP), which is currently being tested at the Faculty of Life Sciences at the University of Vienna and developed and researched by the Austrian Educational Competence Center (AECC-Biology, University of Vienna). KiP is being funded by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research as part of the program “Sparkling Science“. Scientists from the Faculty of Life Sciences invite science classes to take part in one of the research projects in the fields of neurobiology, environmental research, marine biology, forensic botany and evolutional biology. Using biological research projects as learning environments and research fields the teachers and students develop their own questions in collaboration with the scientists and investigate their learning processes according to the paradigm of participative action research (WHYTE et al. 1989). This means that solutions for the problems of researching together beyond the cultural borders of school and university are not developed by experts outside of the collaboration and then transferred over into practice. Solutions are developed by all partners interactively in action and reflection rounds. This action and awareness pattern follows a reflexive rationality— the term was coined by Donald Schön (1983) and has its roots in the works of John Dewey (1933) and Lawrence Stenhouse (1975). Encouraging research findings on this model are available in literature (see WISEMAN & KNIGHT 2003; ALTRICHTER & POSCH 1992) and should be expected from the project reported. In the course of the conference, the current state of the model development will be reported on. Moreover, the first results from the accompanying research according to participative action research will be introduced and discussed. Focus of Research: The main goals of the project are the evidence based development of a model describing the research educational cooperation and the investigation of learning processes of students, teachers and scientists. The working model of KiP is based on an empirically well-founded boundel of hypothesis (s. NOVOTNY 1999, RADITS & KATTMANN 2005; LOIBL 2005; GERLOFF-GASSER, JANN 2007). Successful collaboration (learning and research) is possible in case scientists remember their key competence being the experts in scientific scientists open their research practice for reflection granting a glimpse into their “epistemic secrets“, scientists and teachers agree that reconstruction of knowledge is more important than top down transfer of knowledge, students are encouraged to bring in their own knowledge when they are developing their research questions and hypotheses, the collaboration retreat to a problem area that is meaningful for both partners. In respect to the focus of the conference, this presentation deals mainly with rather descriptive results of students’ participation in research area dealing with sexually deceptive orchids and hymenopterans conducted by the Department of Evolutionary Biology. How do scientists, teachers and students design joint research? What happens with the concept of evolution during participatory negotiations about joint research questions? First results will be presented. They will show how the subject matter “Evolution” is vanishing… EVO-KiP Educational Reconstruction (Kattmann 1997) Participatory Action Research (Whyte et al. 1989, Kyburz-Graber 2008) Students, teacher and scientist discussing RESEARCH – DEVELOPING - LEARNING WORKING MODEL KiP Successful Installation of nest boxes for mason bees Research area 1: Signal evolution of orchids and hymentopterans Research area 2: Breeding biology of Osmia rufa (mason bee) Contact EVO-KiP School Elisabeth Inschlag, [email protected] Contact EVO-KiP University Johannes Spaethe, [email protected] University of Vienna, Dept. of Evolutionary Biology, www.univie.ac.at/evolutionsbiologie Ref.: ALTRICHTER, H. und POSCH, P. (1992). Lehrer erforschen ihren Unterricht. Eine Einführung in die Methoden der Aktionsforschung. Julius Klinkhardt. Bad Heilbrunn. DEWEY, J. (1933). How We Think. Boston: D. C. Heath. DUSCHL, R. A. & GRANDY, R. E. (2008): Reconsidering the Character and Role of Inquiry in School Science: Framing the Debates. In: R.A. Duschl & R. E. Grandy (Hrsg.): Teaching Scientific Inquiry. Recommendation for Research and Implementation. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, S. 1-37. EDELSON, D.C. (1998): Realising authentic science learning through the adaptation of science practice. In: B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.); International handbook of science education. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, S. 317-331. GERLOFF-GASSER, C., JANN, P. (2007): Report on Research and Cooperations in Europe. Zürich: University of Zurich. LOIBL, M. C. (2005) Spannungen in Forschungsteams – Hintergründe und Methoden zum konstruktiven Abbau von Konflikten in inter- und transdisziplinären Projekten. Heidelberg: Verlag für Systemische Forschung (VSF) im Carl-Auer Verlag. NOVOTNY, H. (1999). The Place of People in Our Knowledge. In: European Review 7 (2), S. 247-262. RADITS, F. (2005). Unsicheres Wissen und problemorientiertes Forschen aus der Perspektive der Wissensvermittlung - Fallbeispiel Kulturlandschaftsforschung. In: Radits, F., Rauch, F. & Kattmann, U. (Hrsg.) (2005): Gemeinsam Forschen – Gemeinsam Lernen. Innsbruck, Wien, Bozen: Studienverlag. SCHÖN, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London: Temple Smith. STENHOUSE, L. (1975). An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. Heinemann: London. WHYTE, W. F., GREENWOOD, D. J. und LAZES, P. (1989). Participatory Action Research. Through Practice to Science in Social Research.American Behavioral Scientist 32(5): 513-551. t .a WISEMAN, L.D. und KNIGHT, St.L. (2003). Linking School-University Collaboration and K-12 Student Outcomes. ac . r e AACTE Publications: New York. lt e s t iv i t a a t un c. gis .at hh .a t .a rc r@ a ac e olo .ac u . i i . t z e c e D B e iv c et alt .a er c. a yt i vi s o f i vi .a m un .a hh rd de k lu ch elz un ra it s e r iv i e as ive un e c x.a @ l a t t i i r u o. d z z gl öll P v t e B S t t t S n @ m u a i d n a o n @ n r c r n H n a e u g a u d e s R n a t e y e rd ffi ze un ah Pa d z R Le @ ar de m W r th en as an d l @ fre ud rd nz tio h@ ga ct o tel j a u a n @y e c h e z l@ rb Stu .stra rti uan oel a n c t it s ün res er.p ra lua auc an St d.ba s n a a l p n I d F Irm oje rd.s G Fr oje .rad A ra _g B D ra p h M D re a e a r M rad nah Te e.w Ev n z . Pr ga Re e nt Pr n z G pa P h rba P h anf G arti a m u a s il fr ir g fr an ba m m t .a Contact: Franz Radits, [email protected], 0043-664-60277 71000 University of Vienna, AECC Biology – Austrian Educational Competence Centre for Biology http://aeccbio.univie.ac.at/