The Cattle Realm
Transcrição
The Cattle Realm
The Cattle Realm A new phase in the livestock colonization of Brazilian Amazonia Highlights in English The Cattle Realm - A new phase in the livestock colonization of Brazilian Amazonia Original Title in Portuguese: O Reino do Gado - Uma nova fase na pecuarização da Amazônia Brasileira All rights reserved Amigos da Terra - Amazônia Brasileira - São Paulo, 2008 The full report in Portuguese is available on the web at http://www.amazonia.org.br/arquivos/259381.pdf Authors: Roberto Smeraldi, Peter H. May Review: Judson Ferreira Valentim Collaboration: Mario Menezes, Luciane Simões, Alessandra Caires Front page picture: Amigos da Terra/Amauri Moreira We acknowledge the kind contribution to research provided by prof. Samuel Giordano from the University of São Paulo and Alcides Torres from Scot Consultoria. Research and surveys related to this document were financially supported by: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of Amigos da Terra - Amazônia Brasileira - and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. Amigos da Terra Amazônia Brasileira Rua Bento de Andrade, 85 04503-010 São Paulo SP Tel 11 3887-9369 Fax 11 3884-2795 Web www.amigosdaterra.org.br The Cattle Realm highlights Sugarcane expansion, resurgence of soybean prices and the corn explosion were among the most controversial themes last year in Brazil, reflecting domestic and external trends. The advance of the agricultural frontier into forests, particularly in the Amazon, stimulated international discussion, especially in the light of climate change negotiations. But in reality, whatever other factors may be involved in the transformation and displacement of agricultural activities, land use change in the Amazon is first and foremost a product of ranching. It is on the hooves of cattle, out on the forest fringe, where the repercussions of investments and alterations in food or energy consumption are felt. The principal indirect impacts around large infrastructure investments are also generally associated with cattle expansion. Ranching in the Amazon spread at an unprecedented rate over the past five years, and now requires additional and undivided attention on the part of government authorities, the market chain, financial institutions, scientists and civil society organizations. Today, Brazil still underestimates or is simply unaware of the dimension and dynamics of this phenomenon. _1.1 In 2007, for the first time, the Legal Amazon[1] _1.2 The cattle herd in the Legal Amazon passed the historical threshold of 10 million head of cattle slaughtered, with an increase of 46% over the figure in 2004. Slaughterhouses in the Amazon accounted for 41% of all head of cattle processed in Brazil in 2007, compared with 34% in 2004. In 2006, the offtake (% of the total herd slaughtered each year) grew to the point that it exceeded the natural growth of the herd, a rate of growth itself considered relatively high due to the good productivity of areas used for ranching in the Amazon. This occurred due to an expressive growth in slaughter of females. Growth in production in the Amazon was decisive for Brazil to become, since 2004, the second largest global producer of beef, even when the European Union is treated as a single country. reached approximately 74 million head, or 3.3 head per inhabitant, triple the national average. In Mato Grosso, this ratio attained 9.3 head per inhabitant; in Rondônia, 7.7. For every four additional head of cattle in Brazil in the last five years, three were added in the Amazon. [1] The Legal Amazon includes the states of Mato Grosso, Rondônia, Acre, Amazonas, Roraima, Amapá, Pará, Tocantins and Maranhão _1.3 Between December 2003 and the same month in 2006 (most recent data regarding the herd size), there was hardly any growth outside of the Legal Amazon; 96% of all growth registered in this period in the country (equivalent to approximately 10 million head) is from the Amazon. _1.4 The growth in beef production in the Amazon (estimated in approximately 1.5 million tons carcass equivalent during the last five years) outpaced the increase in exports registered over the same period (approximately 1.4 million tons carcass equiv.). It was therefore the increase in Amazon production that permitted Brazil to take the lead as of 2004 in beef exports, well out in front of its competitors. In 2007, Brazil exported more beef than the second and third place countries taken together. _1.5 One third of Brazilian fresh beef exports in 2007 came from direct exports from the Amazon, notably from the states of Mato Grosso, Pará, Rondônia and Tocantins. Since 2004, Pará increased its direct exports (by weight) by 7,800%, Rondônia by 1,350%, Tocantins by 150% and Mato Grosso by 360%. These data do not include exports of live cattle by Pará that exceeded 200,000 head in 2007. Mato Grosso mainly exported to Russia, Egypt, China (via Hong Kong), United Kingdom, Italy, Germany and the United States. Rondônia's principal importers included Russia, Egypt, China and the United Kingdom. Pará, whose exports boomed since mid-2007, has Israel, Egypt, China, Saudi Arabia, Ivory Coast, Lebanon and Angola as main importers. _1.6 The removal of restrictions against the Amazon region for control of hoof-and-mouth disease not only placed it in the same phytosanitary category as other regions of the country, but made it a zone of preference for some importers. The new phenomenon is that the south and southeast regions were once again threatened by this disease, owing to their greater contact and integration with infected areas. The substitution of ranching by other, more profitable uses of land (grain, sugarcane, urbanization, etc.) in the south and southeast regions, and the facility of land access in the Amazon, may have contributed to a progressive transference of the herd to the North. Ranchers who transferred their herds to the Amazon now participate, with lesser restrictions, in the growing export market. In this sense, recent commercial restrictions imposed by the European Union and other countries may actually be contributing to the pace of ranch expansion in the Amazon. _1.7 The growth in industrial capacity, with the proliferation of new slaughterhouses and the arrival in the region of the five largest exporters contributed, at least in some poles, to the expansion of ranching during the last few years. The majority of the nearly 200 slaughterhouses in operation in the region should be considered illegal, including the industrial segment. Those that held a Federal Inspection Service (SIF) registry grew from 27 in 2004 to 87 by the end of 2007. Even these, however, are supplied by largely illegal ranchers from the point of view of land tenure, labor and environmental legislation. For example, as of January 2007, 62% of enterprises that are on the “dirty list” of slave labor by the Labor Ministry were Amazon ranches. Slaughterhouses responsible for more than 73% of Brazilian exports acquired their products from ranches that operated with slave labor between 2006 and 2007. _1.8 There coexist today in the Amazon a range of productivity patterns, in accordance with the profile of ranchers and different regions. The stocking rate varies from 0.4 head to 3.8 head per hectare, varying with soil fertility, previous land use and pasture management, as well as genetic material and management of the herd itself. The average regional rate is 1.4 head per hectare. Pastures recently converted from forests possess greatest fertility, a factor that stimulates expansion of the ranching frontier. _1.9 The explosion of ranching in the Amazon over the last decade was responsible for a volume of emissions of greenhouse gases of between 9 and 12 billion tons of CO2-equivalent (including land use change and enteric fermentation of the herd, but without taking processing and transport into account), that is, an order of magnitude comparable in volume to two years of emissions by the United States, the highest emitting country in the world. _1.10 Lack of organization and profound asymmetries in the beef supply chain offer the opportunity for actions to improve control, security, transparency and organization in a business undergoing rapid transformation and which is growing at an unprecedented and unpredictable rate. Lack of investment in the recuperation of degraded pastures and the lack of a focus on small production impede the dissemination of sustainable practices. _1.11 The establishment of criteria and standards, whether specific to the productive unit or of wider coverage and related to regional land use, can contribute to the transparency and structuring of the chain, but its implementation tends to depend on the effective establishment of a reference system for verification and certification over the entire agricultural and livestock sector. Figure 1 World Beef Production Figure 2 World Beef Exports Figure 3 Slaughterhouses with Federal Registry in the Legal Amazon - December 2007 RR AP Ananindeua Castanhal Manaus Mãe do Rio Altamira Santarém Igarapé do Meio São Luís AM PA Açailândia Marabá Imperatriz Tucumã Eldorado Carajás Xinguara Àgua Azul do Norte Rio Maria Redenção Araguaína Nova Olinda AC Boca do Acre Colinas do Tocantins Santana do Araguaia Ariquemes Porto Velho Rio Branco Senador Guiomard Alta Floresta Jaru RO Vila Rica Nova Canaã do Norte Cacoal MT Chupinguaia Gurupi Araguaçú Sinop Vilhena Sorriso Paranatinga Canarana Água Boa Tangará da Serra Mirassol d´Oeste Nova Xavantina Pontes e Lacerda Araputanga Cuiabá Barra do Garça Várzea Grande S. José dos Quatro Marcos Cáceres Source: Amigos da Terra - Amazônia Brasileira, 2008 based on Ministry of Agriculture data Paraíso do Tocantins Colíder Juína Rolim de Moura TO Matupá Juara Ji-Paraná Pimenta Bueno Colméia Rondonópolis Pedra Preta Alavorada Bacabal MA Timon Table 1 Principal Importers of Brazilian Beef (Jan-Nov 2007) Country Russia The Netherlands Egypt USA Italy United Kingdom China incl. Hong Kong Germany Iran Weight in Value in tons US$ (000) 428,877 907,484 59,846 331,826 176,571 331,234 62,353 306,054 59,414 275,391 80,496 261,963 86,846 171,964 22,472 135,387 56,841 132,733 Source: Amigos da Terra - Amazônia Brasileira, 2008 based on Ministry of Development data Table 2 Cattle Herd Size in the Legal Amazon and in Brazil (1994-2006) Brazil and States Brazil Rondônia Acre Amazonas Roraima Pará Amapá Tocantins Maranhão Mato Grosso Amazônia Legal Brazil and States Brazil Rondônia Acre Amazonas Roraima Pará Amapá Tocantins Maranhão Mato Grosso 1994 1995 158,243,229 161,227,938 3,469,519 3,928,027 464,523 471,434 746,638 805,804 285,596 282,049 7,539,452 8,058,029 86,221 93,349 5,374,168 5,544,400 4,101,939 4,162,059 12,653,943 14,153,541 34,721,999 37,498,692 2001 2002 176,388,726 185,348,838 6,605,034 8,039,890 1,672,598 1,817,467 863,736 894,856 438,000 423,000 11,046,992 12,190,597 87,197 83,901 6,570,653 6,979,102 4,483,209 4,776,278 19,921,615 22,183,695 1996 1997 1998 1999 158,288,540 161,416,157 163,154,357 164,621,038 3,937,291 4,330,932 5,104,233 5,441,734 853,264 862,534 906,881 929,999 733,910 770,805 809,302 826,025 400,334 377,546 424,700 480,500 6,751,480 7,539,154 8,337,181 8,862,649 63,648 65,953 74,508 76,734 5,242,655 5,350,885 5,441,860 5,813,170 3,935,754 3,905,311 3,936,949 3,966,430 15,573,094 16,337,986 16,751,508 17,242,935 37,491,430 39,541,106 41,787,122 43,640,176 2003 195,551,576 9,392,354 1,874,804 1,121,009 423,400 13,376,606 81,674 7,659,743 5,514,167 24,613,718 2004 2005 2006 204,512,737 10,671,440 2,062,690 1,156,723 459,000 17,430,496 82,243 7,924,546 5,928,131 25,918,998 207,156,696 11,349,000 2,313,185 1,197,171 507,000 18,063,669 96,599 7,961,926 6,448,948 26,651,500 205,886,244 11,484,162 2,452,915 1,243,358 508,600 17,501,678 109,081 7,760,590 6,613,270 26,064,332 Source: Amigos da Terra - Amazônia Brasileira, 2008 based on Brazillian Institute of Geografy and Statistics data Table 3 Change in Cattle Slaughter in the Legal Amazon (in units) 2004 State Acre Amapá* Amazonas Maranhão Mato Grosso Pará Rondônia Roraima Tocantins Amazônia Legal Brazil Nº Head Slaughtered 2005 % of National Slaughter 121,768 7,380 0 369,577 3,340,452 1,388,827 1,123,470 21,799 659,557 0.6 0.04 1.8 16.3 6.8 5.5 0.1 3.2 7,032,830 20,508,448 34 100 Nº Head Slaughtered 126,498 8,730 30,315 349,341 3,992,697 1,503,696 1,272,068 41,473 815,392 0.6 0.04 0.1 1.5 17.6 6.6 5.6 0.2 3.6 8,140,210 22,623,602 36 100 2006 State Acre Amapá* Amazonas Maranhão Mato Grosso Pará Rondônia Roraima Tocantins Amazônia Legal Brazil Nº Head Slaughtered % of National Slaughter 2007 % of National Slaughter Nº Head Slaughtered (through Sept.) ** nº Head Slaughtered (projection 2007) % of National Slaughter (projection 2007) 150,672 9,810 57,877 522,450 4,597,675 1,702,274 1,648,987 45,676 1,061,732 0.6 0.04 0.2 2.1 18.6 6.9 6.7 0.2 4.3 203,105 0 14,476 328,929 3,448,666 1,458,708 1,464,353 29,353 831,814 270,807 9,810 19,301 438,572 4,598,221 1,944,944 1,952,471 39,137 1,109,085 1.1 0.04 0.1 1.7 18.2 7.7 7.7 0.2 4.4 9,797,153 24,669,907 40 100 7,779,404 18,938,869 10,382,349 25,251,825 41 100 * Estimate based on projection of 9% over the herd size, due to insufficient SIPA/DFA-AP data. ** Projection through December 2007 based on average of period Jan-Sept. 2007. Source: Amigos da Terra - Amazônia Brasileira, 2008 Based on data from Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock Management and Supply; SIPA (Inspection Service for Products of Animal Origin); DFA (Federal Agricultural Delegation) Table 4 Exports of Fresh Beef from the Legal Amazon 2004 State Value US$ Net Weight FOB (tons) Mato Grosso 132,599,558 Pará 248,837 Rondônia 12,362,022 Tocantins 10,210,584 TOTAL State 2005 Value US$ FOB 92,068.396 249,135,250 189.055 963,295 8,172.085 36,793,979 6,893.626 12,697,170 146,093.456 565.133 20,707.376 8,272.277 155,421,001 107,323.162 299,589,694 175,638.242 2006 2007 (Jan-Oct) 2007 (Projection Jan-Dec)* Value US$ Net Weight Value US$ Net Weight Value US$ Net Weight FOB (tons) FOB (tons) FOB (tons) Mato Grosso 587,347,673 260,732.232 592,723,721 265,825.913 Pará 21,008,148 9,739.170 23,668,157 11,750.224 Rondônia 124,894,227 50,982.921 165,745,288 80,209.939 Tocantins 53,521,918 24,348.791 23,958,004 12,604.108 TOTAL Net Weight (tons) 790,298,295 354,434.551 31,557,543 15,666.965 220,993,717 106,946.585 31,944,005 16,805.477 786,771,966 345,803.114 806,095,170 370,390.184 1,074,793,560 493,853.579 Source: Amigos da Terra- Amazônia Brasileira, 2008 b ased on Ministry of Development data *projection until Decemb er, 2007 b ased on average of the period b etween January and Octob er, 2007